Context:
How to measure your shirt size<br>Keep your body relaxed while taking your measurements. Do not puff out your chest, suck in your belly, or flex your muscles. If you do any of these, the measurements will not be accurate and the shirt will not fit.
Hypothesis: Posing as Popeye will lead to inaccurate results. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
It's impossible to say


Input: OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

The Cheap Flight<br>Tony was trying to travel to his brother's wedding. He couldn't afford most tickets so he booked something cheap. He arrived for his flight bracing himself for the worst. The flight was long, dirty and uncomfortable. Still in the end at least he managed to travel safely to his destinati.

Sentence: Tony was traveling for a wedding.

Output: Yes


Problem:
Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

Well, that vote wasn't exactly -- a lot of the supporters of the Kyoto Treaty actually ended up voting for that because the way it was worded. But there's no doubt there's a lot of opposition to it in the Senate. I'm not for command and control techniques either.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Hypothesis: I'm for command and control techniques.
****
Answer:
No


[Q]: Going to the Beach<br>Channel woke up in the morning, and decided to go the beach. She put on her bathing suit, packed a cooler, and grabbed a towel. She got in her car and drove a distance. Parking, and then walking to the beach. She placed her towel on the beach and enjoyed the wonderful day. she didn't wear her seatbelt OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
[A]: It's impossible to say


Problem: Cup<br>She wasn't very hungry at lunch time. She went out to pick up burgers. She ordered herself a kids meal. The toy was a plastic cup. She thought it was rather boring.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "She got a large portion of food for herself because she wasn't very hungry. "? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: No


Context:
So how do I make it better? Well, we provided an affidavit, and that affidavit indicated that we, if called upon to testify, would validate the authenticity of the articles that were written. We did that, in effect, to offer to both sides so that we wouldn't otherwise have to testify. Accepted by the plaintiffs, not accepted by the defendants. Defendants wanted to have the right of cross-examination.
Hypothesis: The affadavit was handed in person OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
