Problem: How to clean cork floors<br>Sweep regularly. Use a soft-bristled broom, a dust mop, or a vacuum cleaner with a soft brush attachment. Depending on how heavily you use the area, repeat 2-7 times a week, or whenever you notice it getting dusty.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "never sweep cork floors"?

A: No


Problem: Maybe we should ask. So if you're asking me if I feel it's enough or if it's -- I'm not sure what it is you're asking me about that. I feel, actually, that there are topics that probably could be explored in more detail, but I understand that there are limitations within any textbook that you have to hit on core concepts. I believe that core concepts are covered, but I think that, in my opinion, what I've looked at, it's historical context.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "textbook has been made by somebody named jackson"?

A: It's impossible to say


Problem: This looks artificial when you're dealing with a fact witness, but these are fact witnesses who are also reporters, and I am straining to try to find a fair way to do this. I believe that to the extent -- and I've said this now several times -- that the reporters' testimony is necessary in order to invoke the residual hearsay exception under Rule 807, that the defendants have to have an opportunity to examine the reporters on the same topics and subjects that I would allow the plaintiffs to question them on during their case-in-chief, nothing more and nothing less.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The fact witnesses are only witnesses"?

A: