Q: Generate a context and a hypothesis.

Generated: Context: Rocks.<br>A bunch of waves went over the cliffs. The weathering started to take a toll. Some rocks began to fall. They made a splash in the waves. The rocks fell to the bottom of the ocean.

Hypothesis: The rocks were wet.


Q: Generate a context and a hypothesis.

Generated: Context: BERLIN — German police say they're investigating the explosion of an "apparent pyrotechnical device" in a subway station in the northern port city of Hamburg. Hamburg police said on Twitter there was a "small detonation" on the platform of the Veddel subway station early Sunday evening. They say a pane of glass was damaged, but no injuries were reported. Police say they have information about a suspect and the investigation is continuing.

Hypothesis: German police say they're investigating the explosion of an "apparent pyrotechnical device" in a subway station in the northern port city of Berlin.


Q: Generate a context and a hypothesis.

Generated: Context: Okay, and is your argument that we find and hold against their retrospective because there is some, at least plausible basis should so argument, to say that there can be a causal connection between the retrospective extension and some benefit that can be traced to those particular works through the retrospective extension, like dissemination? Is that your argument?

Hypothesis: The speaker is trying to clarify someone else's position. 


Q: Generate a context and a hypothesis.

Generated: