Q: Generate a context and a hypothesis.

Generated: Context: Hurting Eyes<br>I got a new job in an office. I worked on the computer all day. This caused my eyes to hurt badly. My mother bought me shades to wear while at work. Now my eyes would not hurt from the computer screen.

Hypothesis: He worked away from his computer all day. 


Q: Generate a context and a hypothesis.

Generated: Context: I have said it before, and I will say it again-because this cannot be overemphasized-if people have to wait for a week, two weeks or a very long time before an operation, it is not because of the physician or the hospital, but because the hospital is starved of resources and, as a result, the level of services has dropped.

Hypothesis: The speaker has said it before.


Q: Generate a context and a hypothesis.

Generated: Context: No, but that's the Copyright Clause argument, and it seems to me you're saying, okay, we then apply that in First Amendment analysis, which allows us to make a coherent intermediate scrutiny argument. If we don't accept the Copyright Clause retrospectivity argument --

Hypothesis: after the Copyright Clause argumen is paplied, it will allow them make a coherent intermediate scrutiny argument.


Q: Generate a context and a hypothesis.

Generated: