Problem: Trump’s lawyer accused Comey of committing a felony, but the lawyer got the facts he based this accusation on wrong. “Although Mr. Comey testified he only leaked the memos in response to a tweet, the public record reveals that the New York Times was quoting from these memos the day before the referenced tweet, which belies Mr. Comey’s excuse for this unauthorized disclosure of privileged information and appears to entirely retaliatory,” Marc Kasowitz, President Trump’s personal lawyer said in rebuttal to Comey’s stunning testimony.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The unauthorized disclosure of privileged information was found to not be a retaliation."?

A: It's impossible to say


Problem: New fish place<br>On the beach we saw a great fish place. It served great fish and chips. I was so eager to try it. Luckily I was able to grab a seat. I was amazed at how great it was.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The fish place had the greatest fish and chips of all the beach"?

A: It's impossible to say


Problem: Mr. Speaker, I am rising today to speak to Bill C-54, the personal information protection and electronic documents act the purpose of which is to promote electronic commerce by providing Canadians with a right to privacy of personal information that is collected, used or disclosed in an increasingly information based economy and world.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Canadians would have a right to privacy of public information under the principles of Bill C-54."?

A: