We have 125 years of history of this Court making sure that the limits, both express and implied, in the Copyright Clause, have some meaning. The Feist opinion very clearly sets out the implied limits, a per se limit for originality, for the reasons Justice Breyer was trying to get me to say.

Based on that paragraph can we conclude that this sentence is true?
For 125 years, this Court has taken into account what Justice Breyer was leading up to in regard to a limit for originality.