On August 19, 1999, I received a letter from Dr. Chopra in which he states that, "I mentioned that all these actions were the direct consequence of my testimony, which I was requested (required) to give before the Standing Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry for its bovine growth hormone rBST investigations."

Can we draw the following conclusion?
The testimony had many ramifications

Select from:
 *Yes
 *It's impossible to say
 *No