In the first one, the petitioners call upon the government to put the surplus accumulated in the employment insurance account back into the pockets of the unemployed by revoking the current eligibility rules for new entrants and using surpluses for training for the unemployed, thereby promoting direct employment.
Can we infer the following?
In the first 2, the petitioners call upon the government to put the surplus accumulated in the employment insurance account back into the pockets of the unemployed

Select from the following.
[I] Yes.
[II] It's impossible to say.
[III] No.
The answer is: