Problem: ZOO<br>Bob took his daughter to the ZOO. She was happy to see all the animals. In the primate house a monkey came to say hi to them. The little girl got scared. They run away from there.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Bob's took his daughter to see monkeys"?

A: Yes


Problem: And let me say again, Detroit is rearing to go on that. We differ on the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, as I have said. We differ on whether or not pollution controls ought to be voluntary. I don't think you can -- I don't think you can get results that way.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Detroit is definitely ready and able to face up to this challenge. Detroit is one city that is actually taking action. Detroit is a city which has experienced great economic hardship but is still standing up and fighting. Detroit is a wonderful city."?

A: It's impossible to say


Problem: That's right. All that I'm suggesting is, here is a plain meaning of the term that gives effect to the constitutional limit in a way that assures that, in fact, the limit is respected, contrary to the Government's argument, which, in effect, permits Congress the power perpetually to extend terms. If I may reserve the remainder of my time.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The Congress wants to reserve the constitutional limit."?

A: