Problem: No More Freebies<br>Tom moved to a new neighborhood. Tom noticed his new neighbor didn't have a password on his wi-fi. Tom began surfing off his neighbor's wi-fi service for free. One day Tom noticed his neighbor did secure his wi-fi with passwords. Tom then had to call the cable company and begin paying for service.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Tom contains a z"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: No


Q: New work copyright needs to go through the patent office.
Why wouldn't it? If the equity argument under the Necessary and Proper Clause justifies extension of the copyright for those whose copyright will expire tomorrow if it's not extended, in order to put them on parity with those getting copyrights for new works, why doesn't it apply to the copyright, the holder of the copyright that expired yesterday?
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: It's impossible to say


I hope the Minister of Human Resources Development and her officials will really take note of what I said, will follow up on the issue that I raised and will amend the employment insurance program, so as to meet the needs of workers and, above all, eliminate child poverty in this country.
The minister is a female. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: Yes


input hypothesis: Albert V of Saxe-Lauenburg was a happy individual
Context: Albert V of Saxe-Lauenburg (mid 1330s – 1370) was the second son of Duke Albert IV of Saxe-Lauenburg and Beata of Schwerin (*?–before 1341*), daughter of Gunzelin VI, Count of Schwerin. Albert succeeded his elder brother John III in 1356 as Duke of Saxe-Bergedorf-Mölln, a branch duchy of Saxe-Lauenburg. He died without an heir and was succeeded by his younger brother Eric III.
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
true or false: It's impossible to say


Context:
So I'm inclined to accept this language, you know, not word for word, only to the extent where it states, rather generically, "wherein an affidavit is provided," I would take that sentence and simply say that affidavits have been provided, rather than "wherein." It's somewhat artificial or a little strained as it relates to this case.
Hypothesis: "Wherein an affidavit is provided" is not generically worded. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
No


Problem: How to choose an air purifier<br>Deep-clean your living space. If there's dust lurking in your living space, it will make your need for an air purifier seem more dire than it actually is. Vacuum regularly, including furniture, and check your heating vents for lint and dust.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "it will make your want for an air purifier seem more dire than it actually is. Vacuum regularly, including furniture, and check your heating vents for lint and dust"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: