Context:
And I was surprised at the extent of it. And I think we've now got so many examples around the country that we really have to find ways to end this. Imagine what it -- what it is like for someone to be singled out unfairly, unjustly, and feel the unfair force of law simply because of race or ethnicity.
Hypothesis: The person wasn't surprised OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
No


Input: OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

How to get your dog to pee on command<br>Choose a trigger word or phrase to use. When teaching a dog a command you need to come up with a verbal trigger. This should be a word or sound that indicates to the dog what you would like it to do.

Sentence: Dogs can pee when told to.

Output: Yes


Problem:
Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

The GVB ("Golfvaardigheidsbewijs" in Dutch, "Brevet d´aptitude" in French) or golf ability license is a standardised test and licensing process which players of the game of golf must go through in order to be allowed to play on many golf courses in Belgium or the Netherlands.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Hypothesis: The GVB is translated in Dutch, French, and German.
****
Answer:
It's impossible to say


[Q]: Hit on the head<br>Sonia felt the ball hit her temple before she fell down. Everyone one the baseball field run to her aid. She had trouble distinguishing one face from the next. She tried to stand up but couldn't move. She had to leave the field in an ambulance as people cried for her. Sonia was disoriented. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
[A]: Yes


Problem: Hunting season<br>Jimbo loved to go hunting. He usually saw pheasant and pigeons when hunting. Once, Jimbo saw a deer. He eventually scared it off. This was a huge disappointment for Jimbo.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Once, Jimbo saw a deer name Bambi."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: It's impossible to say


Context:
That's certainly true, and we also believe that, for the reasons averted to by amicus AOL in this case and the reasons you've just suggested, the disruption in that context under the retrospectivity cases Ryder and Reynoldsville Casket Company would be sufficient to fit it within the, quote, "severe disruption exception" to the retrospectivity.
Hypothesis: There is a "severe disruption exception" to this retrospectivity. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
