Problem: That's certainly true, and we also believe that, for the reasons averted to by amicus AOL in this case and the reasons you've just suggested, the disruption in that context under the retrospectivity cases Ryder and Reynoldsville Casket Company would be sufficient to fit it within the, quote, "severe disruption exception" to the retrospectivity.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Ryder and Reynoldsville Casket Company has great yelp reviews"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: It's impossible to say


Problem: 1 of 5 Courtesy of Clarkson Potter Salads for every taste Sure, we all know salad is the ultimate diet dish. But chef Jean-Georges Vongerichten shows us how super-easy, unexpected mixes of seasonal vegetables can make this stay-slim staple taste like a treat. Toss produce in no-fuss homemade dressing, and you have a side salad that can double as a light lunch. With heart-healthy olive oil and fiber-rich veggies, these dishes will fill you upand their amazing flavors will make you feel like you've just splurged on a four-star meal.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Chicken is a common ingredient in Clarkson Potter Salads. "? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: It's impossible to say


Problem: Whereas if you don't accept the Copyright Clause claim, then, in order to make the First Amendment analysis we've simply got to say, well, gee, is the promotion of useful art and so on more important than the public domain, and can we say that that allows a distinction between 50 years and 70 years?

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The speaker knows the constitution better than others"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: