Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

-- I really think this is an important question and, as Justice O'Connor points out, if we have to ask what's the most plausible explanation for this rule, to reward existing vested interest or to stimulate former new works, it seems to me that it's probably the former.

Select from:
1). Yes.
2). It's impossible to say.
3). No.
Hypothesis: The rule exists to stimulate former new works 


