Context:
I don't find it beyond the scope of direct. It's appropriate cross-examination. It's overruled on that basis. We're getting argumentative only because I think the witness and counsel are talking over each other. Each of you let the other finish before you start talking.
Hypothesis: The statement was not given by a judge.  OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
No
Context:
In other words you could have -- right now, if Congress decides to have a law, and this law is going to give copyrights in 1) the Bible, 2) Shakespeare, 3) Ben Jonson, and the reason they do it is that they think that that would lead publishers to produce those and distribute them, and they're right, they will, okay? In your view, that's perfectly constitutional?
Hypothesis: congress can't pass laws OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
No
Context:
How to choose an ipa<br>Look for an ipa from a brewery you like. One way to increase your chances of getting an ipa that you will enjoy is to choose one that was made by a brewery you like. If you like the brewery's other beers, then there is a better chance that you will like their ipa.
Hypothesis: The ipa from a brewery you don't like will taste good to you if you haven't tried more that one of their other beers. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
