Problem: The Titanic sank in 1912 after striking an iceberg on its maiden voyage from Southampton, England, to New York.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The Titanic no longer floats"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: Yes


Q: The VA hospital has trouble keeping good doctors because they can't afford to pay them.
Now, maybe that explains why he hasn't fully funded the VA and the VA hospital is having trouble and veterans are complaining. Maybe that explains why Medicare patients are complaining about being pushed off of Medicare. He doesn't adequately fund it.
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: It's impossible to say


It's one of the reasons I'm a strong believer in what they call health savings accounts. These are accounts that allow somebody to buy a low-premium, high-deductible catastrophic plan and couple it with tax-free savings. Businesses can contribute, employees can contribute on a contractual basis. But this is a way to make sure people are actually involved with the decision-making process on health care.
Health savings accounts do not exist.  OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: No


input hypothesis: Angela received all her instructor certifications without tuition. 
Context: Angela<br>Angela loved diving. Angela decided she wanted to teach diving for a living. Angela took diving instructor classes. Angela received all her instructor certifications. Angela found a job teaching diving in Cozumel.
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
true or false: It's impossible to say


Context:
The Good Mother is a 1988 American drama film and an adaptation of Sue Miller's novel of the same name. Directed by Leonard Nimoy, the film stars Diane Keaton and Liam Neeson in the leading roles. "The Good Mother" explores feelings and beliefs about children's exposure to adult sexuality and challenges society's growing reliance upon courts to settle complex private and ethical matters.
Hypothesis: Diane Keaton is a better actor than Liam Nesson. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
It's impossible to say


Problem: Why wouldn't it? If the equity argument under the Necessary and Proper Clause justifies extension of the copyright for those whose copyright will expire tomorrow if it's not extended, in order to put them on parity with those getting copyrights for new works, why doesn't it apply to the copyright, the holder of the copyright that expired yesterday?

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The equifax argument is under the Necessary and Proper Clause."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: