Detailed Instructions: Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, judge whether or not a specific person is wrong here. Answer 'not answerable' if more information is required and 'answerable' if all the information is sufficient to answer who is wrong in this situation.
See one example below:
Problem: So on one hand I don't think it's the best thing but at the same time it's led her to talking about how she cut(s) herself and a kid who told her to shoot herself which she wouldn't have talked about otherwise.
Solution: not answerable
Explanation: Here there is no information about how severe the situation was or what was her reaction after telling this to the author. We also do not know whether she told this on purpose or not. More information is needed to determine who is at fault here.

Problem: I'm not much for the whole giving people shit for fun thing. It irritates me, and I don't care to participate. I expect my friends to understand that and leave me out of it or I walk. I'll volley back once or twice, but if it goes beyond three times, I cut that shit off.

I understand other guys do this, but I don't give af. AITA for expecting others to understand that? I don't think so, but I want to know what others think.
Solution:
not answerable