Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, judge whether or not a specific person is wrong here. Answer 'not answerable' if more information is required and 'answerable' if all the information is sufficient to answer who is wrong in this situation.
One example is below.
Q: So on one hand I don't think it's the best thing but at the same time it's led her to talking about how she cut(s) herself and a kid who told her to shoot herself which she wouldn't have talked about otherwise.
A: not answerable
Rationale: Here there is no information about how severe the situation was or what was her reaction after telling this to the author. We also do not know whether she told this on purpose or not. More information is needed to determine who is at fault here.
Q: I (19F) drove two hours to see my long distance boyfriend (21M) and he has pretty much spent the whole afternoon playing video games and hanging out with his roommates. I have just kind of silently hung out because I’m very shy and don’t know them very well and all they have been talking about is the video games they play. I have no video game interest or knowledge at all, but try and be supportive because I know he really enjoys them. 

As of right now, I have been awkwardly laying in his bed for two hours while he plays a game on his computer at his desk, only being able to talk to him when he turns around to give me a kiss or tell me he loves me. He plays video games every day after school and I only get to see him once every couple of weeks. I’ve tried to emphasize that I miss him very much and I’m even leaving at an inconvenient time for me tomorrow because I just want to be able to spend a little more time with him, but he seems to think me sitting a couple feet away on my phone for hours is spending time together. 

I know if I told him I didn’t want him to play then he wouldn’t, but am I the asshole for wanting him to WANT to not play, and to spend time with my instead. 
A:
answerable