Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, judge whether or not a specific person is wrong here. Answer 'not answerable' if more information is required and 'answerable' if all the information is sufficient to answer who is wrong in this situation.
One example is below.
Q: So on one hand I don't think it's the best thing but at the same time it's led her to talking about how she cut(s) herself and a kid who told her to shoot herself which she wouldn't have talked about otherwise.
A: not answerable
Rationale: Here there is no information about how severe the situation was or what was her reaction after telling this to the author. We also do not know whether she told this on purpose or not. More information is needed to determine who is at fault here.
Q: I can’t help but think this would be petty, but I’m curious about others’ opinions. 

There’s this girl in my friends’ Discord chat (around 20 people) who will not shut the fuck up about being a “mathematician” (she’s still in the process of completing her degree, by the way). She constantly posts unfunny math memes that no one except her understands and it’s annoying and awkward. One of my previous posts is her if you’re wondering what I mean: [HERE](https://www.reddit.com/r/iamverysmart/comments/au2av9/and_her_profile_photo_has_to_be_pi/?utm_source=share&amp;utm_medium=ios_app)

Would I be an asshole to call her out on it? A lot of the folks in the chat haven’t even attended post secondary, and I can’t help but feel like she’s bragging about how smart she is. I don’t want others in the chat to be alienated. 
A:
not answerable