Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, judge whether or not a specific person is wrong here. Answer 'not answerable' if more information is required and 'answerable' if all the information is sufficient to answer who is wrong in this situation.
Example: So on one hand I don't think it's the best thing but at the same time it's led her to talking about how she cut(s) herself and a kid who told her to shoot herself which she wouldn't have talked about otherwise.
Output: not answerable
Here there is no information about how severe the situation was or what was her reaction after telling this to the author. We also do not know whether she told this on purpose or not. More information is needed to determine who is at fault here.

New input case for you: Leading up to this I knew that it was being planned, although I didn't have plans on going. It's not that I didn't particulary wanted to (Its complicated I'll skip this part). I was planning on going abroad to work and she is didn't even bother asking whats up with that. She didn't even ask twice or be like, uspet I guess? about me not coming. I know this sounds really boring but on top of that we've had problems lately with trust and all that and shes gonna be with mutual friends. Her rommate is gonna be a guy I know too. Not worried about that though. (i know the guy hes cool). I texted her about this saying it doesnt feel nice and she started this huge argument aaand yeah..
Output:
not answerable