IN: This is an email
Rebecca, lets just go forward with HPL on Thursday - Tex Mex, after going  through with the deal team, still has some issues to be resolved. We will  push this into Q1. The HPL deal is anticipated to be signed on Thursday  afternoon or Friday morning. Regards 

What is the subject?

OUT: Board
QUESTION: We have received the faxed copy of the fully executed NDA dated 12/13/00 with  the referenced Counterparty. I will send a copy to David Dupre, Matt Dawson  in London for the UK files, and Kay Young for the Houston files and  database. Thanks to everyone for their help! 
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: NDA-Credit2B.com Inc.
I previously worked for Enron and have found employment elsewhere. I really would like to put my son back into Enron Kids starting Monday, but I cannot afford $800 a month. Do you know if the rates will be lowered? I am a single mother and can only afford $650 - $680 a month. Could you please get back with me as soon as possible? I need to know if I am going to have to put him in another daycare. Thank you for your consideration. 
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Enron Kids
Please attend a meeting at the following time and location to start discussions on gas quality on Northern's system. Day			Thursday 		Date			November 8 		Time			2:00 to 3:30 pm 		Location		Video Conference  ECN 42C2/OMA 696  I would like to start the dialogue in what will be a series of meetings to discuss the impact of non-spec gas on Northern's system and explore solutions to the problems created by the non-spec gas. The following list of issues will be addressed on November 8 and at subsequent meetings. Randy and Danny, will you please select a representative or representatives from your respective regions to be a participants on this project? List of Issues to be explored:  	Identify the contaminants/gas quality problems 	 	What is our tariff specification of each contaminant? System impacts resulting to taking non-spec gas  	Cost to system to accept non-spec gas  	Revenue impact of non-spec gas  	What is the tariff spec of other interconnecting pipelines? Possible solutions by region and contaminant/problem  	Impact of proposed rules which will require Northern to post tariff waivers on gas quality  This list of issues will be expanded and modified as this project moves forward. Please feel free to contact me if you have questions. Feel free to invite others to this meting that I have not included in the notification of this meeting. Penny McCarran 
Answer: Meeting on Gas Quality
Here is an email: I will commit to writing the three items that I had hoped to discuss with you  today. Feel free to get back with me via voice mail (x35926). If you would  prefer to discuss any of these with me, you can reach me at home from  December 20-23 while I am on vacation. My home number is 281-370-8568. I  will be back at work for the week between Christmas and New Years. 1)  January 1:  Do you want me to call you that day after we have tested all  systems to give you a status update? I can leave a voice mail for you at  your Enron number. Or if you prefer, I would be happy to call you if you  will provide me with a number where you will be. Cliff Baxter and several  key commercial personnel have asked that I call them after we have completed  our testing of all systems that support each commodity and product that we  trade in North America. I will make these phone calls myself, and will  naturally treat all phone numbers that I have been given as confidential. Please let me know your preference for notification. 2)  Definition of a global focus for trading operations:  Attached is a draft  memo that Rick Causey proposes to send. This memo describes a coordination  role that I will play on certain operational policies and procedures that  should be coordinated in all trading locations. Please let me and/or Rick  know if you have any comments or suggestions. I had hoped to briefly discuss  this with you in person, as I would want you to understand two points:  (1)  This role will not prevent me from continuing a very strong focus on the  needs of ENA. I have worked very hard to assure a level of accuracy, control  and service in ENA operations. Through that hard work, I believe that I have  your confidence in my ability to deliver results. I  would do nothing to  jeopardize that. (2)  There is a need for this coordination function, and  some one will play that role. If I play that role, I can be in the best  position to influence outcomes with ENA's needs in mind. 3)   Gas Logistics:  I will talk with Whalley about my thoughts on this, but  I had wanted to make you aware that Jeff Shankman believes that he wants  logistics to report to him. His stated reason to me is that he wants it to  "look like power". I had wanted to discuss with you your thoughts on what   the criteria should be on which we make that decision. I will propose to  Greg and Jeff that gas logistics should be located in direct proximity to the  regional traders in order to facilitate the flow of commercially viable  information about the pipes and capacity. ( We have that now for the Central  and West desks, and should be able to make this happen as the 32nd floor is  built out for gas.) I believe, however, that gas logistics should now report  to Brent Price, my business controller over gas for the East, Central and  West regions. Brent would then have operations truly front to back (risk,  confirmations, scheduling and invoicing) and he sits on 31 and works very  closely with Jeff. Also, Brent would be in the best position to ensure that  the logistics team meets requirements for timeliness and accuracy of  volumetric information so that we can achieve our target headcount reduction  in gas operations of 52 by year end 2000. Without a continuing focus in  logistics on the downstream information needs, I will be concerned about our  ability to deliver our projected cost savings. I also believe that Brent  will be in the best position to ensure minimal flash to actual variances. While Greg and Jeff were certainly both with ECT in 1996 when we had an  earnings hit as a result of flash to actual variances, I am not sure that  either one was involved closely enough to appreciate the need for a strong  front to back focus to prevent these problems, and that includes holding  logistics accountable for their part in this. I will let you know the outcome of my conversations with Greg and Jeff on  this issue. 
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Various Discussion Points
QUESTION: On Aug. 18, 2000, New Century Energies, Inc. and Northern States Power Company (NSP) merged and formed Xcel Energy Inc.    As part of the merger, NSP transferred its existing utility operations that were being conducted directly by NSP at the parent company level to a newly formed subsidiary of Xcel Energy named Northern States Power Company. Because of the merger, the record was overlayed in Global Counterparty and all history for Northern States Power Company is now under Xcel Energy. A new Northern States Power Company record has been created in Global. I will be moving all Xcel deals with a July 1, 2001 forward flow date to the newly created record for Northern States Power Company. Xcel Energy will be inactivated in Enpower. Please choose Northern States Power Company (NORTHERNST) for future deals with this counterparty. 
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Xcel Energy Inc. to Northern States Power Company