In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
One example is below.
Q: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES 
 TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

 (a) Definitions.--In this section:
 (1) Business entity.--The term ``business entity'' means a 
 firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint 
 venture, or other form of enterprise.
 (2) Facility.--The term ``facility'' means any real 
 property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
 (3) Gross negligence.--The term ``gross negligence'' means 
 voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at 
 the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be 
 harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
 (4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ``intentional 
 misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the 
 time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health 
 or well-being of another person.
 (5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ``nonprofit 
 organization'' means--
 (A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3) 
 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from 
 tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
 (B) any not-for-profit organization organized and 
 conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for 
 charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or 
 health purposes.
 (6) State.--The term ``State'' means each of the several 
 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto 
 Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern 
 Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the 
 United States, or any political subdivision of any such State, 
 territory, or possession.
 (b) Limitation on Liability.--
 (1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business 
 entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any 
 injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity 
 in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit 
 organization if--
 (A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business 
 of the business entity;
 (B) such injury or death occurs during a period 
 that such facility is used by the nonprofit 
 organization; and
 (C) the business entity authorized the use of such 
 facility by the nonprofit organization.
 (2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
 (A) with respect to civil liability under Federal 
 and State law; and
 (B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization 
 pays for the use of a facility.
 (c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an 
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business 
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, 
including any misconduct that--
 (1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is 
 defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act 
 of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section 
 2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in 
 any court;
 (2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the 
 Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
 (3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable 
 State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any 
 court; or
 (4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been 
 found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
 (d) Superseding Provision.--
 (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection 
 (e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that 
 such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act 
 shall not preempt any State law that provides additional 
 protection from liability for a business entity for an injury 
 or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs 
 (A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
 (2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to 
 supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
 (e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall 
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business 
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State 
enacts a statute--
 (1) citing the authority of this subsection;
 (2) declaring the election of such State that this Act 
 shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
 (3) containing no other provision.
A: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization. 
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law. 
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law. 
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Rationale: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.
Q: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Comprehensive Comparative Study of 
Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Populations Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds as follows:
            (1) Securing the health of the Nation's children is our 
        most important concern as parents and stewards of the Nation's 
        future.
            (2) The Nation's vaccine program has greatly reduced human 
        suffering from infectious disease by preventing and reducing 
        the outbreak of vaccine-preventable diseases.
            (3) Total health outcomes are the best measure of the 
        success of any public health effort, including security from 
        both chronic and infectious disease.
            (4) Childhood immunizations are an important tool in the 
        pursuit of childhood health.
            (5) The number of immunizations administered to infants, 
        pregnant women, children, teenagers, and adults has grown 
        dramatically over recent years.
            (6) The incidence of chronic, unexplained diseases such as 
        autism, learning disabilities, and other neurological disorders 
        appears to have increased dramatically in recent years.
            (7) Individual vaccines are tested for safety, but little 
        safety testing has been conducted for interaction effects of 
        multiple vaccines.
            (8) The strategy of aggressive, early childhood 
        immunization against a large number of infectious diseases has 
        never been tested in its entirety against alternative 
        strategies, either for safety or for total health outcomes.
            (9) Childhood immunizations are the only health 
        interventions that are required by States of all citizens in 
        order to participate in civic society.
            (10) Public confidence in the management of public health 
        can only be maintained if these State government-mandated, mass 
        vaccination programs--
                    (A) are tested rigorously and in their entirety 
                against all reasonable safety concerns; and
                    (B) are verified in their entirety to produce 
                superior health outcomes.
            (11) There are numerous United States populations in which 
        a practice of no vaccination is followed and which therefore 
        provide a natural comparison group for comparing total health 
        outcomes.
            (12) No comparative study of such health outcomes has ever 
        been conducted.
            (13) Given rising concern over the high rates of childhood 
        neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism, the need for such 
        studies is becoming urgent.

SEC. 3. STUDY ON HEALTH OUTCOMES IN VACCINATED AND UNVACCINATED 
              AMERICAN POPULATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services (in 
this Act referred to as the ``Secretary'') , acting through the 
Director of the National Institutes of Health, shall conduct or support 
a comprehensive study--
            (1) to compare total health outcomes, including risk of 
        autism, in vaccinated populations in the United States with 
        such outcomes in unvaccinated populations in the United States; 
        and
            (2) to determine whether vaccines or vaccine components 
        play a role in the development of autism spectrum or other 
        neurological conditions.
    (b) Qualifications.--With respect to each investigator carrying out 
the study under this section, the Secretary shall ensure that the 
investigator--
            (1) is objective;
            (2) is qualified to carry out such study, as evidenced by 
        training experiences and demonstrated skill;
            (3) is not currently employed by any Federal, State, or 
        local public health agency; and
            (4) is not currently a member of a board, committee, or 
        other entity responsible for formulating immunization policy on 
        behalf of any Federal, State, or local public health agency or 
        any component thereof;
            (5) has no history of a strong position on the thimerosal 
        controversy; and
            (6) is not currently an employee of, or otherwise directly 
        or indirectly receiving funds from, a pharmaceutical company.
    (c) Target Populations.--The Secretary shall seek to include in the 
study under this section populations in the United States that have 
traditionally remained unvaccinated for religious or other reasons, 
such as Old Order Amish, members of clinical practices (such as the 
Homefirst practice in Chicago) who choose alternative medical 
practices, and practitioners of anthroposophic lifestyles.
    (d) Timing.--Not later than 120 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue a request for 
proposals to conduct the study required by this section. Not later than 
120 days after receipt of any such proposal, the Secretary shall 
approve or disapprove the proposal. If the Secretary disapproves the 
proposal, the Secretary shall provide the applicant involved with a 
written explanation of the reasons for the disapproval.
A:
Comprehensive Comparative Study of Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Populations Act of 2006 - Requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Director of the National Institutes of Health, to conduct or support a comprehensive study to: (1) compare total health outcomes, including risk of autism, in vaccinated, U.S. populations with such outcomes in unvaccinated, U.S. populations; and (2) determine whether vaccines or vaccine components play a role in the development of autism spectrum or other neurological conditions.

Requires the Secretary to include in the study U.S. populations that have traditionally remained unvaccinated for religious or other reasons, members of clinical practices who choose alternative medical practices, and practitioners of anthroposophic lifestyles.