Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, judge whether or not a specific person is wrong here. Answer 'not answerable' if more information is required and 'answerable' if all the information is sufficient to answer who is wrong in this situation.
One example is below.
Q: So on one hand I don't think it's the best thing but at the same time it's led her to talking about how she cut(s) herself and a kid who told her to shoot herself which she wouldn't have talked about otherwise.
A: not answerable
Rationale: Here there is no information about how severe the situation was or what was her reaction after telling this to the author. We also do not know whether she told this on purpose or not. More information is needed to determine who is at fault here.
Q: It sounds horrible but it wasn't that bad. I didn't necessarily call her an attention whore, I told her to stop acting like one. She has some friends that are extremely into politics. I just find them stupid and ignorant. Politics is all about making one group of people seem worse than your group of people. It's so annoying, she always tries to be someone else while with them. I know her well enough to know she is apolitical like me so seeing her try to act like she's into it and going to protest is so insufferable.

Her friends came over and she started trying to make this "rant" about college bias'. I just couldn't handle it and I cut her off midway to tell her to stop being like her stupid friends and that I know she isn't like that so she needs to stop acting like an attention whore. 
A:
answerable