Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, judge whether or not a specific person is wrong here. Answer 'not answerable' if more information is required and 'answerable' if all the information is sufficient to answer who is wrong in this situation.

Example input: So on one hand I don't think it's the best thing but at the same time it's led her to talking about how she cut(s) herself and a kid who told her to shoot herself which she wouldn't have talked about otherwise.
Example output: not answerable
Example explanation: Here there is no information about how severe the situation was or what was her reaction after telling this to the author. We also do not know whether she told this on purpose or not. More information is needed to determine who is at fault here.
Q: So this is a real long and stupid story, get ready. 

&amp;#x200B;

Basically I met this girl on tinder a while ago, she was visiting her family and she actually lives in another state, so i thought that was the end of it, i still talked to her though. Turns out shes moving back here in 3 months, so we kept talking, realized we both really like each other. We've been talking for 10 days now or so, and we are already planning to start dating once she moves out her.

&amp;#x200B;

When we first started talking she mentioned this other guy \[phillipe\] (whom lives in the town she lives in now) and that she was kinda talking with him. Today i jokingly asked "hows \[phillipe\]" and she told me that shes still kinda talking to him and that he was gonna call her tonight, we were in a call (ft) at the time.

&amp;#x200B;

So I just got upset really, and I told her this, her explanation is that she goes days without talking to him, while we talk pretty much all day every day. She said its not like their dating, but we both know he likes her, and hes most likely flirting with her. So it just hurt me to know that shes still talking to this guy after we've been so serious and kinda intimate.

&amp;#x200B;

AITA
A:
answerable