Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, identify who is wrong here. Classify each post into the following categories : AUTHOR (if the author of the post is wrong in the situation), OTHER (if any of the others mentioned in the paragraph is wrong), EVERYBODY (if everyone mentioned is wrong) and NOBODY (if no one is wrong in the situation).

Example input: Pretty much was hanging out with two friends. I was watching the Lakers game. They won at the very last minute and I immediately hopped up and celebrated. Before I could even finish celebrating one friend started going on about how the Lakers suck. It just pissed me off so much I screamed at her to get out my room until she left. 


She knows I'm a huge fan and she likes them too. She was only saying it to antagonize me. Am I the dick here?
Example output: AUTHOR
Example explanation: It is very rude to shout at someone and ask her to leave the room even if her comments may have antagonized the author. Hence author is at fault here.
Q: Bf is trying to cut down on smoking.  He buys a set amount and gives them to me.  After his dinner cig he doesn’t want me to give him any until the next morning. 

Last night he had a really bad nightmare.  He jerked awake so hard that it woke me up too.  He was really shaken up.  

He wanted me to give him a cigarette to calm down.  The agreement we made was that no matter how much he asked I wouldn’t give him a cigarette after he had his dinner one.   So I refused.  He got really mad and said he needed one and if I didn’t give him one he was still going to have one, that he would just have to drive to the store to get it. 

I still didn’t.  He was so mad.  He stormed out.   I don’t know when he came back.  He slept on the couch for the rest of the night.  He did end up going to the store so maybe I should have just given him one.  He really didn’t have to drive all the way to the store. 
A:
OTHER