Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, judge whether or not a specific person is wrong here. Answer 'not answerable' if more information is required and 'answerable' if all the information is sufficient to answer who is wrong in this situation.
Example: So on one hand I don't think it's the best thing but at the same time it's led her to talking about how she cut(s) herself and a kid who told her to shoot herself which she wouldn't have talked about otherwise.
Example solution: not answerable
Example explanation: Here there is no information about how severe the situation was or what was her reaction after telling this to the author. We also do not know whether she told this on purpose or not. More information is needed to determine who is at fault here.

Problem: There was this house party coming up and my friend wasn't invited to it for very fair reasons but he was still determined to go to the party despite not being wanted there so he arranged to meet up with me before hand. 

Me and another friend decided to arrange to meet up before hand and walk there without him because we didn't want to be responsible for him and felt like we were just being used as a key to the house so he could get in to the party. However, we happened across the friend that wasn't invited just before we got to the house and he started trying to walk with us. We initially told him politely we did not wish to walk with him yet he still persisted so we became more stern and basically told him to go away. This is when he started calling us snakes for not sticking by him and went as far as saying he would have done it for us before getting pissed off and leaving. 

He hasn't spoke to me since and it is a few days after the actual party despite the fact he turned up without us later and got into the house anyway.  I'm starting to think I should have just gone with him.

Solution: answerable