The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
Example: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Example solution: No
Example explanation: This is correct. The participant does not create a specific need for anybody.

Problem: Context: 'I could make that work 🙂 I'm sorry if I came off mean, I'm just trying to make sure I'll be ok. I don't camp often, so I'm not sure how to prepare.' 'I understand. What are you using the extra food for?' 'I brought some pre-packed snacks, and a few sandwiches. I'm hoping there are no hungry animals around. What about you?'
Utterance: 'I was hoping to get some extra food for some picky eaters, but if they are hungry they will eat!'

Solution: Yes