Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, identify who is wrong here. Classify each post into the following categories : AUTHOR (if the author of the post is wrong in the situation), OTHER (if any of the others mentioned in the paragraph is wrong), EVERYBODY (if everyone mentioned is wrong) and NOBODY (if no one is wrong in the situation).

Example input: Pretty much was hanging out with two friends. I was watching the Lakers game. They won at the very last minute and I immediately hopped up and celebrated. Before I could even finish celebrating one friend started going on about how the Lakers suck. It just pissed me off so much I screamed at her to get out my room until she left. 


She knows I'm a huge fan and she likes them too. She was only saying it to antagonize me. Am I the dick here?
Example output: AUTHOR
Example explanation: It is very rude to shout at someone and ask her to leave the room even if her comments may have antagonized the author. Hence author is at fault here.
Q: This was a while ago while I was a senior in high school when I had friends over for July 4th. (about 15 people) the plan was to grill and play some drinking games. So I bought around 40 dollars worth of food (mostly hamburgers and chips) beforehand by myself and afterwards I asked everyone to pitch in a few bucks each to help cover the cost.

To be fair I didn't tell them I was going to expect them to pitch in but it was a set precedent for previous times when my friends and I would grill brats so I figured this would be no different.

Only like 5 people ended up paying me so I was out 30 bucks and everyone seemed mad at me for asking.
A:
AUTHOR