In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
One example: Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests?  Is it a lack of empathy?  Or a more general lack of basic human decency?  I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Solution is here: Disagree
Explanation: This comment expresses strong disagreement with right-wing politics, is disrespectful (accusing right-wingers "lack of basic human decency"), and comes with personal attack (to the user pBurns9). Thus, this comment is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement from others.

Now, solve this: Comment: People are getting run over due to the dismal deficit in road infracture in road improvements. Guess what? People arent going to stop driving cars. Guess what? Its cold in Canada, so people aren't going to stop driving cars. Guess what? Public transportation is for the poor and people arent going to stop driving cars. 

Improve the roads, give drivers a chance at having the right of way (ie pedestrain crossing with no turn light no cars), and spend money on roads and intersections instead of building the little empires of public transpo.
Solution:
Disagree