In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
--------
Question: Comment: And the oil fundamentalists cannot fathom concerns for clean, water, land and air and keep hammering jobs, jobs, jobs.

But the latter have the power and think they can just push pipelines through.  

And without a doubt when the money dries up, so do the jobs and all taxpayers get to play for clean up.

Answer: Disagree


Question: Comment: "Trump names China hawk to head new trade team".

And north of the border, Canada elects China shill to head country...

Answer: Disagree


Question: Comment: "When you start running out of ideas to change the present, you start messing with the past, history, past figures and Canadian traditions."
Unbelievable!!!
Did you even read the article? The author has ideas to change the present. The whole premise of this piece is about dealing with "present" issues.
You, and others, as he suggests, are just not listening, or do not want to listen.
He lists a few legitimate "present" concerns: 
"slow implementation of recommendations made by the inquiry investigating the death of seven First Nations youth in Thunder Bay; and we’ve seen the grieving family of Barbara Kentner, the First Nations victim in a racially motivated killing, forced to flee their homes because of threats made against their children at school."
Your complete inability, or desire, to understand what he is saying suggests you come to the discussion with a mind already made up.
That is the problem.

Answer:
Disagree


