Generate an appropriate title for the given text. The generated title must be short and include the main topic of the text. The preferred titles are under fifteen words.
--------
Question: Doreen Lawrence told the Daily Mail she believed detectives had run out of lines of inquiry but were worried about her reaction if they close the case. Two people have been convicted over Mr Lawrence's killing in Eltham, south-east London, on 22 April 1993. A Met spokesman said "the investigation remains live". In 2012, Gary Dobson and David Norris were found guilty of murder and jailed for life. However, police believe Mr Lawrence was stabbed to death by a group of up to six white men in an unprovoked racist attack as the 18-year-old waited at a bus stop with a friend. Baroness Lawrence said: "They should be honest - say they've come to an end and stop." "I think they're carrying on pretending everything's fine because they don't want to hear what I'll say if it is stopped," she said. Six years on from the Dobson and Norris' convictions, Baroness Lawrence said she was aware of the cost to the taxpayer of continuing the investigation. "I've been on the go for 25 years. I haven't stopped. I don't think I've even completely grieved for Stephen", she told the newspaper. Mayor of London Sadiq Khan described Baroness Lawrence as a "crusader" whose work had led to laws being changed and two men responsible for her son's death being put behind bars. Speaking about her comments he said it was an "operational matter for the police" but expected detectives to "speak to Doreen and the family before taking any steps going forward." A Scotland Yard spokesman said the investigation into the murder "remains in an active phase" and the force "continues to hold regular meetings to update the family."

Answer: Stephen Lawrence: Mother says Met should be 'honest' about investigation


Question: By Jonathan MorrisBBC News Online South Hams District Council in Devon cited "commercial confidentiality" in keeping the Salcombe plans under wraps, but a watchdog rejected that excuse. Environment group South Hams Society urged "more transparency in planning matters" by the council. The authority said it "did not want the meeting to be sidetracked". Drawings of the homes had formed part of draft plans for the hill-top development off Shadycombe Road in the seaside town. But a council officer told architects in an email on 11 October last year that "at this point" the scale of the four-bed detached houses should be left out of the plans. He said the scale "concerns me" and added: "It would be a mistake to present this detail." In an email response, the architect sent back revised plans with circles instead of drawings of the houses "without being too prescriptive on their size and design". The revised plans were then put before a planning workshop of councillors and local businesses on 17 October. The council initially refused South Hams Society's request to reveal the original plans. However, it appealed and the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) ordered the authority to divulge the omitted details. In a statement, the council said it had "sought legal advice" and "we were of the view that we were entitled to withhold them". "It was clear to us that the plans as they were, would not be recommended for approval by the council. "We felt that the size of the properties on the plan were inappropriate. The workshop had been arranged to talk to key stakeholders about a masterplan for the whole area and we did not want the meeting to be side-tracked by a proposal which we were sure would never come forward in its current state." It added it now "fully respects" the demand to release the full plans. Didi Alayli, chair of the society, said she hoped the ICO ruling "will lead to real change" in how council planners deal with draft plans. "The huge profits to be made by landowners and developers in our beautiful area make it all the more important that our planning system is fit for purpose and we are not there yet," she said. It is understood landowner Jason Smith, who has not yet responded to a BBC request for comment, has not taken the proposals forward.

Answer: Salcombe beauty spot homes plans withheld from councillors


Question: The Health Protection Agency and the Food Standards Agency fear contaminated samples were to blame for the infection that hospitalised four people and caused illness in another three people in late 2011. Hepatitis A virus is carried by human faeces and can be passed on through contact with food or water. Severe cases can lead to liver failure. All of the seven people infected have since made a recovery. One of the strains of hepatitis A identified in two of the patients was identical to a strain that caused a similar outbreak linked with sun-dried tomatoes in the Netherlands in 2010, saysa report. Four of the patients in this latest outbreak in England said they had consumed sun-dried tomatoes. Officials are on the alert for further cases. But they say they do not know which brands of sun-dried tomatoes might be involved. This is because there is no reliable test to find the virus in food. A spokeswoman for the Food Standards Agency said: "Sun-dried tomatoes are being investigated as one possible source of the hepatitis A cases reported last year. "However, no food source has been conclusively identified so far and no other relevant cases have been reported in the UK since November 2011. The investigation by FSA and HPA is ongoing." Hepatitis A is a notifiable condition. This means that when the condition is diagnosed, the doctor making the diagnosis must inform the local authority. In most cases the infection is relatively short-lived and people recover within a couple of months.

Answer:
Sun-dried tomatoes linked to hepatitis A outbreak


