And as for why it happened, I'm no expert on the Texas procedures, but what my friends there tell me is that the governor opposed a measure put forward by Democrats in the legislature to expand the number of children that would be covered. And instead directed the money toward a tax cut, a significant part of which went to wealthy interests.

Based on that paragraph can we conclude that this sentence is true?
A smaller part of the money went towards procuring a hovercraft for the governor.
It's impossible to say