Escrow deposit

[Table of Contents](#i40ca88ef65884b508d3f9e19d0380e84_7)consecutive annual equal installments commencing on September 30, 2029 pursuant to the escrow account replenishment terms as set forth in the MOU. As of September 30, 2021, the initial escrow deposit was completed by all parties in accordance with the MOU. At June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, DuPont's $50 million deposit into the escrow account is reflected in "Restricted cash and cash equivalents" on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.   
Under the Agreements, Divested Operations and Businesses ("DDOB") liabilities of EID not allocated to or retained by Corteva or the Company are categorized as relating to either (i) PFAS Stray Liabilities, if they arise out of actions related to or resulting from the development, testing, manufacture or sale of PFAS; or (ii) Non-PFAS Stray Liabilities, (and together with PFAS Stray Liabilities, the “EID Stray Liabilities”).   
The Agreements provide that the Company and Corteva will each bear specified amounts plus an additional $200 million of Indemnifiable Losses, described below, in relation to certain EID Stray Liabilities. The Agreements further provide that the Company and Corteva will each bear 50 percent, $150 million each, of the first $300 million of total Indemnifiable Losses related to PFAS Stray Liabilities. When the companies meet their respective $150 million threshold, Indemnifiable Losses related to PFAS Stray Liabilities will be borne 71 percent by DuPont and 29 percent by Corteva. Indemnifiable Losses up to $150 million incurred for PFAS Stray Liabilities are credited against each company’s $200 million threshold.  
Whenever Corteva or DuPont meets its $200 million threshold, the other would generally bear all Non-PFAS Stray Liabilities until meeting its $200 million threshold. Thereafter, DuPont will bear 71 percent and Corteva will bear 29 percent of Indemnifiable Losses related to Non-PFAS Stray Liabilities.  
Indemnifiable Losses, as defined in the DWDP Separation and Distribution Agreement, include, among other things, attorneys’, accountants’, consultants’ and other professionals’ fees and expenses incurred in the investigation or defense of EID Stray Liabilities.  
In connection with the MOU and the Agreements, the Company has recognized the following indemnification liabilities related to eligible PFAS costs:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Indemnified Liabilities Related to the MOU  |
| In millions | Jun 30, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Balance Sheet Classification  |
| Current indemnified liabilities | $ | 62  |  | $ | 37  |  | Accrued and other current liabilities |
| Long-term indemnified liabilities | $ | 124  |  | $ | 89  |  | Other noncurrent obligations |
| Total indemnified liabilities accrued under the MOU 1, 2 | $ | 186  |  | $ | 126  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |

1.As of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, total indemnified liabilities accrued include $171 million and $112 million, respectively, related to Chemours environmental remediation activities at their site in Fayetteville, North Carolina under the Consent Order between Chemours and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (the "NC DEQ").2.In addition to the above, as of December 31, 2021, the Company had recognized a liability of $12.5 million related to the settlement agreement between Chemours, Corteva and DuPont and Delaware's Attorney General, discussed below.   
Future charges associated with the MOU would be recognized over the term of the agreement as a component of income from discontinued operations to the extent liabilities become probable and estimable.  
In 2004, EID settled a West Virginia state court class action, Leach v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, which alleged that PFOA from EID’s former Washington Works facility had contaminated area drinking water supplies and affected the health of area residents. Members of the Leach class have standing to pursue personal injury claims for just six health conditions that an expert panel appointed under the Leach settlement reported in 2012 had a “probable link” (as defined in the settlement) with PFOA: pregnancy-induced hypertension, including preeclampsia; kidney cancer; testicular cancer; thyroid disease; ulcerative colitis; and diagnosed high cholesterol. In 2017, Chemours and EID each paid $335 million to settle the multi-district litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (“Ohio MDL”), thereby resolving claims of about 3,550 plaintiffs alleging injury from exposure to PFOA in drinking water. The 2017 settlement did not resolve claims of Leach class members who did not have claims in the Ohio MDL or whose claims are based on diseases first diagnosed after February 11, 2017. Since the 2017 settlement about 100 additional cases alleging personal injury, including kidney and testicular cancer claims, were filed or noticed and pending in the Ohio MDL.  
30  

