Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -1,32 +1,74 @@
|
|
1 |
-
---
|
2 |
-
license: apache-2.0
|
3 |
-
configs:
|
4 |
-
- config_name: default
|
5 |
-
data_files:
|
6 |
-
- split: train
|
7 |
-
path: data/train-*
|
8 |
-
dataset_info:
|
9 |
-
features:
|
10 |
-
- name: subject
|
11 |
-
dtype: string
|
12 |
-
- name: question
|
13 |
-
dtype: string
|
14 |
-
- name: A
|
15 |
-
dtype: string
|
16 |
-
- name: B
|
17 |
-
dtype: string
|
18 |
-
- name: C
|
19 |
-
dtype: string
|
20 |
-
- name: D
|
21 |
-
dtype: string
|
22 |
-
- name: answer
|
23 |
-
dtype: string
|
24 |
-
- name: task
|
25 |
-
dtype: string
|
26 |
-
splits:
|
27 |
-
- name: train
|
28 |
-
num_bytes: 52881
|
29 |
-
num_examples: 131
|
30 |
-
download_size: 36977
|
31 |
-
dataset_size: 52881
|
32 |
-
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
---
|
2 |
+
license: apache-2.0
|
3 |
+
configs:
|
4 |
+
- config_name: default
|
5 |
+
data_files:
|
6 |
+
- split: train
|
7 |
+
path: data/train-*
|
8 |
+
dataset_info:
|
9 |
+
features:
|
10 |
+
- name: subject
|
11 |
+
dtype: string
|
12 |
+
- name: question
|
13 |
+
dtype: string
|
14 |
+
- name: A
|
15 |
+
dtype: string
|
16 |
+
- name: B
|
17 |
+
dtype: string
|
18 |
+
- name: C
|
19 |
+
dtype: string
|
20 |
+
- name: D
|
21 |
+
dtype: string
|
22 |
+
- name: answer
|
23 |
+
dtype: string
|
24 |
+
- name: task
|
25 |
+
dtype: string
|
26 |
+
splits:
|
27 |
+
- name: train
|
28 |
+
num_bytes: 52881
|
29 |
+
num_examples: 131
|
30 |
+
download_size: 36977
|
31 |
+
dataset_size: 52881
|
32 |
+
---
|
33 |
+
|
34 |
+
# Finance Fundamentals: Domain Knowledge
|
35 |
+
|
36 |
+
This dataset contains 131 multiple choice questions designed to test a models domain knowledge in business and finance. For more information, see the [BizBench paper.](https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-long.452.pdf)
|
37 |
+
|
38 |
+
|
39 |
+
## Example
|
40 |
+
|
41 |
+
```
|
42 |
+
A fixed-rate system is characterized by:
|
43 |
+
|
44 |
+
A. explicit legislative commitment to maintain a specified parity.
|
45 |
+
B. monetary independence being subject to the maintenance of an exchange rate peg.
|
46 |
+
C. target foreign exchange reserves bearing a direct relationship to domestic monetary aggregates.
|
47 |
+
```
|
48 |
+
|
49 |
+
## Citation
|
50 |
+
|
51 |
+
If you find this data useful, please cite:
|
52 |
+
```
|
53 |
+
@inproceedings{krumdick-etal-2024-bizbench,
|
54 |
+
title = "{B}iz{B}ench: A Quantitative Reasoning Benchmark for Business and Finance",
|
55 |
+
author = "Krumdick, Michael and
|
56 |
+
Koncel-Kedziorski, Rik and
|
57 |
+
Lai, Viet Dac and
|
58 |
+
Reddy, Varshini and
|
59 |
+
Lovering, Charles and
|
60 |
+
Tanner, Chris",
|
61 |
+
editor = "Ku, Lun-Wei and
|
62 |
+
Martins, Andre and
|
63 |
+
Srikumar, Vivek",
|
64 |
+
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
|
65 |
+
month = aug,
|
66 |
+
year = "2024",
|
67 |
+
address = "Bangkok, Thailand",
|
68 |
+
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
|
69 |
+
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-long.452/",
|
70 |
+
doi = "10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.452",
|
71 |
+
pages = "8309--8332",
|
72 |
+
abstract = "Answering questions within business and finance requires reasoning, precision, and a wide-breadth of technical knowledge. Together, these requirements make this domain difficult for large language models (LLMs). We introduce BizBench, a benchmark for evaluating models' ability to reason about realistic financial problems. BizBench comprises eight quantitative reasoning tasks, focusing on question-answering (QA) over financial data via program synthesis. We include three financially-themed code-generation tasks from newly collected and augmented QA data. Additionally, we isolate the reasoning capabilities required for financial QA: reading comprehension of financial text and tables for extracting intermediate values, and understanding financial concepts and formulas needed to calculate complex solutions. Collectively, these tasks evaluate a model{'}s financial background knowledge, ability to parse financial documents, and capacity to solve problems with code. We conduct an in-depth evaluation of open-source and commercial LLMs, comparing and contrasting the behavior of code-focused and language-focused models. We demonstrate that the current bottleneck in performance is due to LLMs' limited business and financial understanding, highlighting the value of a challenging benchmark for quantitative reasoning within this domain."
|
73 |
+
}
|
74 |
+
```
|