Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corporation
{'<entity_0>': 'Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corporation', '<entity_1>': 'Supreme Court of the United States'}
[['Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corporation', 'court', 'Supreme Court of the United States']]
<entity_0>, 547 U.S. 451 (2006), was a <entity_1> case in which the Court, relying on Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation, held that to establish standing under the civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) provision that creates a civil cause of action for any person or entity injured in their business or property by reason of a RICO violation, a plaintiff must demonstrate that he or she was the direct victim of the defendant's RICO violation (e.g., a business may not sue a competitor that may have gained a competitive advantage by not paying taxes).
['legal case', 'United States Supreme Court decision']