Whren v. United States
{'<entity_0>': 'United States Supreme Court decision', '<entity_1>': 'Whren v. United States', '<entity_2>': 'Antonin Scalia', '<entity_3>': 'decision'}
[['Whren v. United States', 'significant event', 'decision'], ['Whren v. United States', 'instance of', 'United States Supreme Court decision'], ['Whren v. United States', 'majority opinion by', 'Antonin Scalia']]
<entity_1>, 517 U.S. 806 (1996), was a unanimous <entity_0> that "declared that any traffic offense committed by a driver was a legitimate legal basis for a stop." The court came to a unanimous <entity_3>, written by <entity_2>: The temporary detention of a motorist upon probable cause to believe that he has violated the traffic laws does not violate the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable seizures, even if a reasonable officer would not have stopped the motorist absent some additional law enforcement objective.
['legal case', 'United States Supreme Court decision']