Dusky v. United States
{'<entity_0>': 'Supreme Court of the United States', '<entity_1>': 'Dusky v. United States', '<entity_2>': 'United States of America', '<entity_3>': 'decision'}
[['Dusky v. United States', 'significant event', 'decision'], ['Dusky v. United States', 'country', 'United States of America'], ['Dusky v. United States', 'court', 'Supreme Court of the United States'], ['Dusky v. United States', 'applies to jurisdiction', 'United States of America']]
<entity_1>, 362 U.S. 402 (1960), was a landmark <entity_0> case in which the Court affirmed a defendant's right to have a competency evaluation before proceeding to trial. Although the statutes addressing competency vary from state to state in the <entity_2>, the two elements outlined in the <entity_3> are held in common: Subsequently, in Godinez v. Moran (1993), the Supreme Court held that the competency standard for pleading guilty or waiving the right to counsel is the same as the competency standard for standing trial established in Dusky.
['legal case', 'United States Supreme Court decision']