United States v. Arvizu
{'<entity_0>': 'Supreme Court of the United States', '<entity_1>': 'United States v. Arvizu'}
[['United States v. Arvizu', 'court', 'Supreme Court of the United States']]
<entity_1>, 534 U.S. 266 (2002), is a case in which the <entity_0> unanimously reaffirmed the proposition that the Fourth Amendment required courts to analyze the reasonableness of a traffic stop based on the totality of the circumstances instead of examining the plausibility of each reason an officer gives for stopping a motorist individually.
['legal case', 'United States Supreme Court decision']