College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board
{'<entity_0>': 'College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board', '<entity_1>': 'Supreme Court of the United States', '<entity_2>': 'Antonin Scalia', '<entity_3>': 'decision'}
[['College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board', 'court', 'Supreme Court of the United States'], ['College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board', 'majority opinion by', 'Antonin Scalia'], ['College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board', 'significant event', 'decision']]
<entity_0>, 527 U.S. 666 (1999), was a <entity_3> by the <entity_1> relating to the doctrine of sovereign immunity. A companion case to the similarly named (but not to be confused) Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank, the court held – in a <entity_3> authored by Justice <entity_2> – that sovereign immunity precluded a private action brought under the Lanham Act.
['legal case', 'United States Supreme Court decision']