BACKGROUND: In preoxygenated patients, time until oxygen saturation drops can be extended by insufflating oxygen into their airways, thus oxygenating them apneically.OBJECTIVES: To compare different methods of apneic oxygenation.METHODS: A noncommercial dual-use laryngoscope with an internal lumen in its blade was used to provide oxygen insufflation into a simulated laryngeal space during intubation. In this experimental study, oxygen insufflation via the dual-use laryngoscope was compared with no oxygen insufflation, with nasal oxygen insufflation, and with direct intratracheal oxygen insufflation. In a preoxygenated test lung of a manikin, oxygen percentage decrease was measured over a 20-min observation period for each method of oxygen application.RESULTS: Oxygen percentage in the test lung dropped from 97% to 37 ± 1% in the control group (p < 0.001 compared to all other groups) and to 68 ± 1% in the nasal insufflation group (p < 0.001 compared to all other groups). Oxygen percentage remained over 90% in both the direct intratracheal insufflation group (96 ± 0%) and the laryngoscope blade insufflation group (94 ± 1%) (p < 0.01 between the latter two groups).CONCLUSIONS: Simulating apneic oxygenation in a preoxygenated manikin, deep laryngeal oxygen insufflation via the dual-use laryngoscope kept oxygen percentage in the test lung above 90%, and was more effective than oxygen insufflation via nasal prongs.
Apnea Humans