Because of the high frequency of diseases of heart and circulation a great number of physicians is concerned with experts opinions of them. There were 273 experts opinions from the rural and city district of Leipzig analysed in order to estimate quality and assertions force of experts opinions of invalidity with regard to estimation of diseases of heart and circulation. There was often found that data of anamnesis and documents extracts did not satisfy. But the parts about findings and estimates of experts opinions were in most cases well. Often complaints of patients and possibilities of therapy and rehabilitation were considered too less. The code of diagnosis did not always correspond to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Death Causes. There was often no sufficient evidence of diagnosis and degree of heaviness in the text of the experts opinions. But clinical findings with function checks were very well documented in many experts opinions.
Coronary Disease Disability Evaluation