INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive techniques (MIT), including sialendoscopy, extracorporeal lithotripsy and intraoral approach, have to be preferred in parotid stones removal. In case of MIT failure, a combined intra- and extra-oral approach can be achieved. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and the complications of these combined approaches.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study has been conducted on patients treated between 2006 and 2015. All adult patients presenting with one or more parotid stones and in whom TMI failed have been included. Age and sex of the patients, number, size and location of the stones, result of the procedure, occurrence of pain, swelling, or infection have been recorded.RESULTS: Nine patients were included (mean age: 56). Mean follow-up was 48 months. Eighty-eight percent of patients had an unique stone. Nine stones were extracted by combined approach. Mean diameter of the stones was 8.5mm and 33% of them were located at the junction between middle and posterior third of parotid duct. All the patients suffered preoperatively from daily retention symptoms, such as pain (55%) and swelling (100%). Two patients had an infectious complication (duct and/or gland infection). Seventy-five percent (9/12) of stones were removed. Complications consisted of 1 fistula, 1 facial paresis, 3 recurrences. Seven of 9 patients (77%) had a total relieve after surgery.DISCUSSION: Surgical combined approaches for parotid stones removals are indicated after failure of MIT when symptoms affect quality of life.
Aged Combined Modality Therapy