The additional time to complete a three-period two-treatment (3P2T) cross-over trial may cause a greater number of patient dropouts than with a two-period trial. This paper develops maximum likelihood (ML), single imputation and multiple imputation missing data analysis methods for the 3P2T cross-over designs. We use a simulation study to compare and contrast these methods with one another and with the benchmark method of missing data analysis for cross-over trials, the complete case (CC) method. Data patterns examined include those where the missingness differs between the drug types and depends on the unobserved data. Depending on the missing data mechanism and the rate of missingness of the data, one can realize substantial improvements in information recovery by using data from the partially completed patients. We recommend these approaches for the 3P2T cross-over designs.
Analysis of Variance Bias