An interlaboratory comparison of immunoassays using antisera elicited against benzo[a]pyrene-diol-epoxide-modified DNA (BPDE-I-DNA) was carried out resulting in standardization of antisera, competitors and assay conditions. The assays used included competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) with color and fluorescence endpoint detection and an ultrasensitive enzyme radioimmunoassay (USERIA) with a radioactive endpoint. Three different antisera were compared, two of which were obtained from different rabbits immunized with the same BPDE-I-DNA and a third from an animal immunized with another BPDE-I-DNA sample. Samples of standardized BPDE-I-DNA with high (36 pmol adduct/microgram DNA; 1.2 adducts/10(2) nucleotides) and low (4.5 fmol/microgram DNA; 1.5 adducts/10(6) nucleotides) modification levels were prepared and used in each laboratory. The antisera were all elicited against DNAs modified to a high extent, and it was therefore not surprising that they detected adducts in a slightly modified DNA sample with lower efficiency than those in highly modified DNA samples. The discrepancy of antibody recognition between the highly and slightly modified samples varied between 1.4- and 11.2-fold depending on the antiserum and assay. To ascertain the quantitative capability of the immunoassays, the modification level of DNA isolated from mouse keratinocytes treated with [3H]benzo[a]pyrene was determined by radioactivity and immunoassay. These results indicated that when a biological sample is assayed against a BPDE-I-DNA standard modified in the same range as the biological samples (4.5 fmol/microgram), quantitative recovery of adducts is achieved by immunoassay. These studies resulted in the realization that interlaboratory differences in immunoassay procedure can have significant consequences for data comparison and that where possible it is preferable for laboratories to use the same antisera and modified DNA standards.
7,8-Dihydro-7,8-dihydroxybenzo(a)pyrene 9,10-oxide Animals