smile for the camera great thank you hello yep cheers right helium one i think there should be a break for and sorry yep it should be this one here but i think maybe that one should be underlined yeah it is hard to know what that is that is this is a bit of h t m l goo yeah i think there should be a break for and helium and they do not know what to do with the h t m l goo m b d a presumably is lambda but this this is not a s yeah and this is not a separate thing so i w i would agree that you underline the you underline the goo in each case but not the and yes course of course it is yeah and the in that case yep right do you reckon this stands for lambda or yeah okay yeah yeah okay yep right what is different just this high excitation emission lines i think high excitation should be in because it is just saying it is talking about the species that the emission lines are coming from yes yeah yeah okay right you do not get that living up in nebulosity eso i do not think is an instrument eso is not an instrument okay you are right we agreed for to keep hubble to not yes to keep hubble yep for this that should be green as well yeah that should be a source type yeah it is yeah do you think that is part of the name yeah well it is the whole name yes i get i do not yeah i have no way of knowing yeah yeah i think it all is yeah i think it is all m one name absorption line systems should not be there yep yep absorption line systems and again yep right needs column densities which is a derived property yeah yeah these are s s species ions again not individual lines but then yep that is fine and lyman alpha cloud should not be in there either nope right no for some reason i seem to have just died on this one i win he got bored you are right there okay i forgot to keep track of the overall score like who wins and who lose it is not a competition yeah i know yes is there a prize at the end bottle of champagne okay i have labeled that wrong and here again yeah and this one that is a spectral feature that is okay it is but is emission line a g n a separate class from a g n ye i do not think it is i think a g n emission line a g n you would not talk about you can get a g n without emission lines but i do not think you would particularly class them as a separate source a separate source class i think in phil is paper he does does not he maybe you would the paper i pointed you to a few weeks ago or last week i did not it i just looked at the plu i did not know what he meant but yes i have seen people talk about them as separate classes but i do not really know what that means and i guess there is a difference between an a g n with emission lines and one without esp especially if it is x ray detected yeah so yeah i am happy with that as long as that is red as well which it is yep 0 no 0 galactic stars i think you are r you are right again there kay yeah that g dwarfs are things are not they g dwarf presumably that is alright yeah never met one but do not know what it is yeah well it is one of them out over here i think actually at the moment right so cause our sun is a is a t dwarf 0 is it there you go i saw it yesterday yeah and cluster you are right absorption there he is by lyman alpha forest and lyman limit systems but it is the same lyman alpha forest systems again so you are right there yeah okay or there maybe there should not be any yeah i think should still be absorption yeah radio loud quasar again you are right emission models definitely not why associated i should definitely now we had a debate about this before and i can not remember why i decided to mark associated what does it mean yeah it means it is associated with some physical thing but it does not have anything to do with the spectral features i do not think does it what is as associated absorption does not say it is associated with what well it is a process though is not it is not it a process i do not know i have got no idea what it means i am happy to say m 2 what not absorption is a spectral feature yeah yeah but associated means it is associated to some physical thing yeah yeah so yeah i would not have that right okay so is that what it means in that c context so that should not be in right and associated again alright yep those are mechanisms mechanisms so they do not count do not think yep i just missed it quasar and that is it and we should have s put emission line features should not we yeah we should do but we are not supposed to mark things we have done differently so yeah we did that the same but it is different from what we have been doing we have just talked about n und underlining features well i think y bu y y you can actually mark it if it is not altering what is in the manual it is only altering earlier rules yeah yeah and it is not in the manual is it that are not allowed it does not say in the manual about features or not but we d when we saw ones previously we marked features yeah then then do i think yeah so let us do that yes extend yeah the only problem it is done if we have both been not marking it there might be other instances in the text where it is not marked yeah y yeah yeah but yeah well w within the sentence that you sort of currently looking at feel free to correct it that way that you will do you know like it is not only about resolution but it is sort of like coming up with a corrected version based on these right okay yeah yeah okay have you do you have seen that there are the other one there the quasar right the right sorry yes we have got quasars yeah and this is exactly the same as last one systems yep i m galaxies it is a kind of a regular galaxy yeah is it okay just a p what are you doing there there sorry hubble deep fields is being marked and absorption should not be marked yep yep is not remote yeah fine yeah i do not think able cluster is different from cluster yeah that is actually marked ex explicitly in here not to have a bar clusters an able cluster is just a a discover ri right yeah so yeah soft excess that definitely gets to go in that is not a component no i i am i am not arguing yep okay we can have soft excess i think i agree yeah yeah we could come to blows over soft excess and yes you are wrong cause that is you are right cause that is extended emission and compton emission okay i think you are right on both of them yeah okay x ray b l x and radio b l x i think are because the b l within should be marked so yeah i agree that is fine do you want this one here no no conti continuum no for continuum no continuum no okay c 0 luminosity i think that is a s species again yeah that is fine 0 it is still too hot i can agree with taking that out intermediate is a region that the so called yeah i do not think it should be should it it should not be highlighted you are right because if if we talk about the broad line region we are not supposed to highlight it cause it is a region yeah yep it is the same it is just it is not very clear before the so called yeah it is badly written infrared galaxies we said not to mark things based solely on so it is just defined only by wave length so we can not include infrared galaxies yeah just galaxies and star bursts star bursts count surely yes they do 0 yes assuming you are talking about star burst galaxies rather than star burst within a galaxy yes yeah they are but they are talking about star burst galaxies and galaxies galaxies continua or continuum flux it is another one of those that does not really make a big difference it does not really matter but what did we decide i would say continuum flux but i do not obviously let us keep flux in because it in most of these cases we have put flux in but i do not care yep okay yeah i think you have and the same as feature no i am happy to take that out broad line i was going to say put it in 0 the lack of broad line polarization broad line polarization is that a spectral feature i think you would want the whole thing in some extent no you can not point to it ts you can not get it just from a spectrum but you can if you have got a spectrum that is split by polarized light yeah yeah yeah well n i think i would actually leave it with only th on those as it is br broad l line in it because i think that is s what you have been doing earlier on polarization is a property yes okay okay yeah yeah yep okay now i d do not know what was marked here have you got the bottom of this page or is it cut off no oops no we are missing weak weak line no i said that weak line was because the modifier should be included which i think it should even though we claim radio galaxies i this should be underlined this should be green okay yeah or actu actually sorry i think the this cut up page continues in the next side 0 right okay okay are we the same on the bottom line yeah characterized by unusually right okay so the question is 0 no it is different 0 no is it yeah no you have got line in there 0 i have got line that is fine the difference only weak line is not it m line comes out and and should come out as well and should come out 0 yeah so there is a right but i think weak line should be in there is a line there as well it is different and an and okay different as well bec i in the same way that if you had broad line it would be in there yeah yep that is okay right galactic black hole candidates they just made that up yes yeah that is yeah exactly and give it an acronym g b h c ooh that is not a source type yeah i do not think that is a source type okay line again but we have got emission line in the ratios that is fine infrared galaxies yep that is right again 0 no is it no it is not right no it is wrong yeah right i will get this line emitting gas i do not like yeah line far infrared galaxies we can not have and that is it that is okay making emission feature which we are including now yeah that is okay damped lyman alpha absorption the same right yep emission feature yeah that can not be in star forming galaxies no we can not yep star forming galaxies should be in yes it should be that is we did earlier anyway yep that should be in yeah so proto galactic lump no they just made that up as well that is not a source type w not going to get away with that one no what were you thinking it is a lump it is something emission feature again yeah dibulae absorption damp lyman that should be because it is not an absorber it is an absorption no but it says it covers a significantly small angular size that is a process though 0 covers yeah it is a physical thing yeah it is a process or a source i am sorry yeah you cross em out get this out of the way features yep this feature a feature again yeah okay is a feature a spectral feature alpha damped lyman alphas again yeah you do not get that do you those are those are regions globs nebulae yeah after and the rest is the same yep now a line should be in yeah x ray b l x ray b l lax yep that is okay intermediate intermediate types it now if we are d we put in type type one9 did we in the end yeah yeah yes i think it should be in 0 right you get it then that does not go in and that is okay 0 gosh this looks complicated right that is okay 0 it is just it is lyman alpha absorption we do not like systems and we do not like that one and we do not like that one yeah that is okay well hang on though but was not there one just a minute ago in which only had a line yes we are taking out line on its own are we so we ha yes but you just okay yep every time keeping lines there yes i think we have to take in general every time there has been line where is there been line so what line are we taking out okay it is line width but it is saint it is still where it says lines line width yeah have we had any just where it says line ratios line ratios we have been taking out line as a word that relates to other words adjective my head is going yeah yes but lines are still lines right okay okay yeah that is okay yes i think you are right okay yeah okay fine right i agree that that can go out cause that is a fitting thing no we want the whole thing in there absorption features in the u v spectra or in the u v i do not think spectrum should be there but if it is a wave length or a wave band we were putting it in okay it is likely one spectrum in the u v which you can see absorption features in yeah yeah right quasars quasars huh yep you are right yeah i am right and here i think i am right again line center you can point to not like line width but you can point to line center in fact the whole thing should be highlighted i think line center you can point to the line wings yeah you would you would say line wings alright you get it that is just a right you win eclipsing i do not think yep no that should not be in there yeah you are right there you are right star burst 0 star burst active star burst like activity that is i do not think that is a class it is a action y yeah but then the a g n like activity yeah but a g but a an a an a g n is a class that has to go as well then surely so both of them have to go a star burst is a class a star burst is a class a star burst is a type of galaxy but it is also something that can happen within a galaxy as is an a g n an a g n it is but an a g n is an object the star burst you can not say here is a star burst but we are counting star bursts as star burst galaxies can not star burst if it means galaxy if this means star burst galaxy like activity then that is fair enough no but a star burst galaxy is only a galaxy which has a star burst in it like an a g an active galaxy is just a galaxy with an a g n in it but star burst refers to wait fr from the linguistic side if you if you mark star burst before and if you feel that star bursts are like objects i can see that then i think it sh it should stay in in this case even though it is modified by activity or it is it is m modifying activity actually yeah okay let us keep it in i think they are the same i i think you are right anyway they either have to both stay or both go and i i think they should stay yeah yeah yes i think it was ma maybe if it was star forming like activity that would be different okay yeah but yeah star formation we were not putting in yes that is right but star burst is different okay we have just got this split up i think there should be w h that you are right it is 2 or was it is a wave length region it is a wave length region but it is tilt but you are saying between that line and that line yeah yeah yeah okay i am right here that is part of a name yeah you are yes that is all part of the name line ratios kay infrared galaxies this time you have it but galaxy should be in but galaxies should be in so we need to write that right hold on 0 what have we done 0 no they are the same sorry i missed that absorption line systems hubble hubble and hubble and galaxy yeah ok i in the galaxy distribution galaxy distribution still the distribution of galaxies yeah yeah okay high ionization lines yeah we did it before yes yeah that is okay 0 yeah okay open that radius button we were not doing spectral shapes were we yes do not include platt is spectrum quasars yeah that counts low ionization but 3 should be in low ionization th they are low bals are not they are they if you say so well low bal is a separate class of source okay yeah that is true i i do not know if high bals are but low bals are that counts they are and it is a big joke okay 0 right yeah high balls yeah yeah next i should not you are right there yeah yeah that does not go in emission line candidates that means objects that are identified and maybe at a particular red shift based on it yes you are right yeah that does not count continuum i think should be in are not they although i was talking about conti yeah continuum luminosity continuum flux it should be in continuum luminosities well you have not been earlier have you i thought we had we would put in i do not remember about luminosities i do not think you were we have been putting in continuum flux have you 0 okay yeah okay yeah we were not doing broad band detections we were doing yeah this is nice tea mine too 0 now what were we doing if radio loud quasar should be in z equals 2 should not it and what were we doing the rule was to leave it in was it i do not know cause you in language speak mark each as a separate entity that is different yeah that is for things marked with and mark sub sections of entities t no that is different does not really say yeah it does not say so we need a rule for that is is goo again or is it really z equals 2 what have we done t z equals 2 z equals 2 is means at a certain distance so that should not be in but radio loud quasars is a thing alright so it is whether to include the z equals 2 in the if it was radio loud quasar then you would mark it as one thing yeah yeah yeah i i think it makes sense to mark the whole thing then as one 0 as one okay i do not know what you feel okay but let us whatever is easiest for you y yes take it out no is not it the spectral components yeah no x ray binaries hubble deep field again no we can not have that emission line objects should not be in either of them yep radio quiet quasar should be go a source type yeah i think that is right now you have done one and not the other 0 and you are right because one is line formation and one is line profile yeah right i g m i have done again this is nice and easy yes yeah components yeah we can rid of that can not we yeah i think so but we want the line still the galaxy or galaxy galaxy with the galaxy given that it is the galaxy it should be the galaxy i guess it should be the galaxy yeah insert proper whatever the word is h v c complexes i do not know what h v c stands for but since they are complexes we can cross it out huh do you know what h v c stands for h v c is it this known to lie in the direction of high velocity clouds no that is where they are high velocity clouds yeah that does not count they should not be in there there that is right yes but they do not explain i c m scuba scuba that is an instrument sometimes anyway when it works you are right there should be this and it probably is that is probably what that means no but no you are right and this should be red as well it should all be 0 i see yeah narrow line a g n are different i missed out that right beta line h beta l width so i do not think that matters very much just keep h beta i think given that we are not putting line width itself okay even line if it is line width you can have flux hurray 0 beta yep h beta should be in no not that line but we want enhanced do we why we we wanted and this is relative we wanted modifiers of modifiers of spectral lines e g weak broad lines but enhanced relative to what i weak w relative to what though it is all relative but it is still a modifier of that line okay and the same so sorry and the the a g n i think that should be one entity right the the w was not it that according to the acronym rule the 1st one y yes that is right mark the la la mark the whole string as one entity one acronym no only when it is embedded but when yeah 0 but the 2nd one 0 it is included beside mark it all as one entity yes yeah yeah that is right 0 i do not think i was doing that yes i do not know how many times i have missed the yeah i have missed that a lot weak emission i think should be in there yeah okay really if we are including it emission if it was are you n 0 yeah extended emission is extended we we have not been including extended emission no no that is true so we should not have done either of those so no yeah but then weak yeah okay nothing at all weak emission levels is just a way of saying yeah i agree nor weak emission then no done star burst contribution that is not a separate source yeah that is true 0 yeah sorry yeah red continuum should be in red continuum okay broad line emission and the rest frame u v should all be one yeah yeah that should be out you are right yeah 0 no it should not we were not doing components no 0 yes sorry you are right so yeah lines yeah this is this a radio transfer thing so they do not mean they mean photons in the lines escape not that that is not something you can point to i do not think that counts yes that is true associated again which means nothing continuum source should not be in and associated should not be in c t i i 0 that should be 0 wait is that s that is an observatory is not it what does it stand for yeah the c t is the c t i 04 meter the name of that telescope that is a separate thing m y ye well i do not know no y yeah and the a a t is an observatory as well is not it yeah but so yes but it is also a telescope and i think he if there is no other way of describing it that telescope the c t i 04 meter telescope is must be what it is called otherwise they would call it a name that is the actually usually yeah but anyway i do not mind but we if we put we are including observatory if it refers if it is part of the proper name of an instrument yeah yeah i gue i guess keep it then but then we have to include 4 meter as well yeah i think so yes up the telescope no just 4 meter no yeah right ion should not be in there yep i agree 0 no it should iron and absorption is it contamination from blended iron and absorption lines no it is not what is that comma doing there yeah no 0 i see i see i see yeah it is no it is not i if the comma was not there it would be in accounting for galactic reddening contamination from blended iron what they mean is blended iron lines blended ion lines yeah so they do mean iron line so so it should be in yes you do mean ion lines yeah yeah and we are keeping line in cause its strengths yeah continuum flux we should have all in continuum fluxes yeah we are doing that yeah no g 0 there are going to be 100s of those least it is quick yeah damped lyman alpha q s 0 i do not think that is a separate class of quasar but then i do not know about quasars i do not know what that means either i think it should p one damped lyman alpha q s 0 s it is not a source type that is definitely true no yeah that is okay so the a w d s white dwarf what is d a and there is w d s it is 25 of d a type and 6 of d b type yeah it is if it has h h hydrogen or h helium in the atmosphere of white dwarfs okay so it is a different class yeah yep okay nope yep yes you are fine with that low bal i would put multiple in there we are not supposed to do components no that is right nope i say neither of them okay that all goes or yeah that is right yeah no absorption lines no luminos that should be highlighted 0 sorry i am i me yeah low luminosity q s 0 s no people talk about them a lot but yeah i do not thin i do not think there was s but well we are doing ultra luminous galaxies yeah so we should do i guess you could keep it then yeah only if it is an astro physically distinct distinct people discuss them as a separate class they are as as much as ultra luminous galaxies are yeah okay no absorption lines should be in and the same here and yep that should be in i did not nice not to do associated for once excellent regions i you are i should not have done that y yes you should not 0 a and b and we w 0 gosh what were we going to to do about a and again no that is the conjunctural i am right here i think yes you are right yeah if yeah strong soft x ray flux yeah you can point to that yeah that is okay and that is associated absorption lines 0 right in the a a l outflow it is a r yeah that does not count but it is a region though is not it and absorption and small clouds is out it does not count ah now this is the conjunct rule again and i have done blue wings of this and this and this and i did not ooh how do you know what is going on here yeah and this is one double line and this yeah and presumably that is red there yeah i do not know what this means it goes over there i think i if the line is too long y you have highlighted all i as one 0 i highlighted all as one right but and i have highlighted it separately it should be separate okay yeah what what is this n thing because that is not marked in the i think if the line is too long it is only ha putting the bottom line because olivia would have marked from blue all the way to the end as one long line ye ye no sorry i mean the so so most the the n should be the n as well yeah yeah yeah yes but i think it probably was and just has not printed because olivia would not have started marking at 1402 right almo 2 lines above yeah but i think it is just m missing out the printing if the line goes over the end yeah 0 i see cause if you look at you look at what olivia is done here olivia would not have just highlighted that line so your n starts yep yep i see what you mean yeah right she would have highlighted the whole thing but yeah so n probably should be highli but it is s so you are mostly settling settling for for the solution where you mark all contacts individually yeah and it is just has not printed that yep but it is marked i think right absorption components do not count continuum source does that count should not be should not be 0 so it is that is right but it is al is that also the name of the source probably yeah yeah so it should be this one plus the pink yep line broadness line broadness and i think that should be in that is a way of saying line width though and we do not mark line width that is true well okay yeah so we have been in here alright my table for now 0 rich iron spectrum rich iron spectrum you are probably right to the feature of the spectrum does that make it a spectral feature something that you can point to right or well kind of it it is d if you had a s sp spectrum yeah you have all the l lines of actually lots of different elements and you have to work out at all the ones sp which are ion lines then after that you look and say ha has a lot of ion in it it is a feature of the whole spectrum rather than you can not say there is a rich iron spectrum you can say this is a rich iron spectrum yeah but b yeah i yep that is the rich iron spectrum 0 i see that is right it is it yeah i agree let us get rid of it so in that sense it is like like a derived property yeah yeah yeah yeah i think so yeah i see huh yes it is not a spectral feature it is feature of the spectrum which is different right that is not should not go in yes and then with the same is that everything yeah okay gosh we are getting through this now yeah yeah we are not going to make it to our 2nd cookie break giant ellipticals or ellipticals i do not mind we were inclu are you not are giant ellipticals separate things i do not know yeah i think so they are separate but are they a separate class i think they probably are in the eta b t g s and things i think so yeah okay yeah line emitting gas does not get in ionized emission if you are doing emission from high yeah yes i think you want ionized in there really really you think well she you can point to ionized emission rather than she was allowed emission from high excitation what not and that is exactly the same emission from high excitation lines yeah that is exactly the same as yeah it it is pointing there and saying look there is a high excitation emission and there is not high excitation okay if you both think so no yeah well i am not certain if high excitation should go in but if high excitation should go in i think ionized means the same thing does not it k yeah okay okay so yeah you are right line ratio what is different there 0 there yes you have got x ray source r 117 narrow line seyfert one should all be one with the red inside it that no that is this is describing the band you do the observations in yeah it is describing the line you are looking for yeah i think so yeah that counts we have included it before when you have said this has been detected alright right okay yeah from i think should be in there s s yeah okay e emission lines yep quasars i missed yep ooh those should not be there should they no damped lyman also is not systems yeah 0 okay okay okay well hang on though but is it just to s scrub your mechanism there it is not a spectral feature such as 0 it is a process ne yes no i think it is a spectral feature you can point to the damped lyman a alpha resorption in in the same way you can point to h beta emission although h beta emission is a process i think this is what we agreed to cross out before is not it or emission from h beta is is a process no the damped lyman alpha absorption systems we crossed out we also crossed out i think it is a process myself i think it is a process too i think especially when they are saying we are y we are choosing low red shift absorption that is not really something you can point to what did we do back you can point to low red shift damped lyman alpha absorption cause you are shifted in the spectrum there i am not too fast i do not think would it be if it was h beta absorption and you just took out the low red shifts quasars with h beta absorption you would put in no i am not sure because it is a spectral feature i think damped lyman alpha absorption it is whether it is a process or a a feature but i can not remember what we have done before i think it is both because we have every feature is produced by a process well if it was if it was absorption and damped lyman alpha clouds you would not mark absorption yes it is depends whether it has t whether it means with low red shift damped lyman alpha cloud absorption if it was damped lyman alpha absorbers that would be different but i think absorption i do think it is a process i think it is a process but it also produces a spectral feature where you can say there is the damped lyman alpha absorption there is the in the same way that the yeah h beta emission is a process yeah well that is true that is true yeah well we have both marked it so let us leave it there yeah i think it should be in there yeah okay okay micro quasars micro quasars they are dubbed micro quasars yeah that means it is new fangled is it going to be a decent source type in the future i have not heard referred to since but yeah but just talk about the micro quasar yeah but they have made up that word yeah i think you are right they have ma on the other hand if we are having hyper luminous galaxies where you know they have just got ultra luminous and 0 even more hyper luminous yeah well someone must have made that up for the 1st time but w do they what defines a micro quasar i think same as a hyper luminous galaxy being very very extreme but i guess keep it probably yeah i reckon a dwarf amorphous nuclei star burst galaxy a dance is a yeah okay no they have made that one up certainly i have never heard of that one before yeah you y there is not been more than one study of dwarf amorphous nuclear star burst galaxies no so that do we say we take that out but what about the acronym because that is has that should be in yep that is it in it so that is okay yep star burst nuclei you are right 0 the object 0 if it was star burst galaxies it would be in there star burst nuclei refers to a region within an object which would not be observed separately yeah that is right oops yeah i would not yeah yep that is fine sorry what what happened now okay so you you f you found that dwarf amorphous blah blah galaxies that that is not a proper name but you still include the acronym or because the acronym has star burst in it galaxies in it in the s and if the acronym includes its 0 okay alright okay then it has to be in there i see continuum flux you can have u v and optical emission line ratios yeah but i think all of that goes then does not it surely we would not have line ratios no so yeah that goes u v and optical emi u v and optical emission should be in there though no it should not cause it it modifies the ratios no i do not think anybody goes yeah no it modifies ratios yeah 0 gosh no emission l okay so i have highlighted this in r red and then the whole thing in green because type 2 seyfart galaxies are one right yep that is fine so i think that is right as long as this is plus red yeah t v gamma ray emission we were not doing broad band detections we were not doing broad band detections yeah no right using the that is definitely an instrument name it is yes very stupid but it is right you are right there f b s objects should not be in there what does it mean i do not know but it has got object yep you are right and the mama scanning machine is an instrument it is not a telescope it is an instrument it is an instrument yeah yeah okay so you can have that right at the other one we stopped after 4 meter so maybe we should do that there as well 0 yes it should be narrow emission lines from high iron yeah yeah we did it this way before absorption features weak continuum yeah you are right that should be separate continuum radiation continuum radiation no neither neither narrow line region emission yep do you th i think that goes out 0 there is emission from the narrow line region yeah yeah we do not narrow line emission should be in yep yep white dwarfs is a source type yeah you are right f v low bal is a source type stupid keckers it is you used to b 0 no keck observatory yes we did decide keck was going in keck is yeah we did not allow iron spectrum so we should not allow h or helium 20 spectrum either yeah that is right at all yep and we should not allow emission yeah iso electronic yeah radio quasars radio quasars are s type yeah 0 no radio loud and radio quiet are but radio quasars means radio loud quasars yeah u v accessors are right is not it it is a spectral feature we were not doing flat spectrum quasars were we no were we ye i think they are a separate class yes we are not putting them in spectral but i think we are putting them in because it is so broad band right but yes they are separate right you are right there line strengths no you can not point to it yeah means equivalent widths yeah i did mis group missed group yep subaru telescope you are right that is it it is under a proper name cause it has got a capital t hey hurray hey wow excellent yeah well very good hurray we are done wonderful under 2 hours excellent amazing well once we have got them identified a lot of them were the same problem going round and round yeah yeah yeah yeah where is the bin in here and more to the point can i get to it without going ah i can carry my little bits in the with me no you can not excuse me camera i need to find the bin and there is not one is there 0 do we each remain wired up are we done i think that is it is not it i th i think so yeah we are done excellent right
great thank you smile for the camera i know right i think there should be a break for and but i think maybe that should be a new i tried to know what that is this is a bit of html goo i think there should be a break for and and i do not know what to do with the h tnr goo mbba but this is lambda yeah and this is not a separate thing so i would agree that you underline the g you underline the goo in each case but not the end yeah do you reckon it stands for lambda yeah okay yeah what is different is this high excitation and mission lines i think high excitation should be in because it is just saying it is talking about the species and the mission lines are coming from yeah okay you do not get that let me enough in nebulosity eso i do not think it is an instrument eso is not an instrument you are around we agreed for to keep hubble to not yes to keep public for this that should be green as well it is is the whole name yeah i do not know i have no way to know yeah i think it is all absorption line systems should not be there absorption and systems and again yeah right these i am talking like column densities which is a derived property yeah these are species of ions again are not they yeah that is fine individual lines i am in lime alpha tahrir i should not be made no for some reason i think you just died i win i got bored to you are right there i forgot to keep track of the overall score like who wins yeah i know it is a surprise at the end battle of champagne i have labeled that wrong okay and here again that is a special feature it is but is a mission line agn a separate class from agm i do not think it is i think agm mission line aegean you would not talk about you can get aegean without mission lines but i do not think you particularly class them as a separate source a separate source class i think in this paper he does does me the paper i pointed you to a few weeks ago last week i did not need it i did not know what he meant but yes i have seen people talk about them as separate classes but i do not really know what that means and i guess there is a difference between an agm with a mission line lines and one without especially for the x ray detected yeah so yeah i am happy with that as long as that is red as well yeah which it is 0 galactic stars i think you are right again there okay g dwarf g dwarf sorry presumably that is a right one yeah yeah i do not know what it is well there is one of them out over here right there is our son is a gdorf there you go i saw it yesterday uncaster you are right yeah absorption by lyman alpha forest but saying lyman alphorist systems again so you are right there yeah okay although maybe there should be any yeah i think i should just take it the option radio loud queso again emission models definitely not why associated now we had a debate about this before and i can not remember why i decided to mark associated what does it mean it means it is associated with some physical thing but it does not have anything to do with the spectral features i do not think is it what is associated with torpion does not say it is associated with what is the process is it in the process i do not know i have got no idea what it means i am happy to say m 2 what not absorption is a spectral feature but associated means it is associated to some physical thing right okay it is how it means in that context and associated again those are mechanisms so they do not count and we should have put emission line features should not we yeah we should do but we are not supposed to mark things we have done differently yeah we did that the same but it is different from what we have been doing we have just talked about underlining features you can actually mark it if it is not altering what is in the manual it is only altering earlier rules yeah and it is not in the manual is it it does not say in the manual about features or not but when we saw ones previously we marked features yeah then do i think yes any problem is then if we have both been not marking it there might be other instances in the text where it is not marked yeah but well within the sentence that you are still currently looking at and feel free to correct it that way that you like it is not only about resolution it is not like coming up with a corrected version right okay yeah okay you have seen the other one there the quayser right yes we have quayser right and this is exactly the same last one and the systems i am galaxies it is a kind of a regular galaxy yeah okay what are you doing there sorry hubble deepfield has been marked and absorption should not be marked yeah fine i do not think able cluster is different from cluster and able clusters just yeah that is actually marked explicitly in hin not to have able clusters yes right so yeah soft excess that definitely gets to go in that is not a component no i am not working we can have soft access i agree hi right you are right because that is extended emission and comp to emission okay i think you are right in both yeah okay x way blax and radio blx i think are because the bl within should be marked yeah i agree that is fine no no continuum no continuum no okay c 0 luminosity i think that is just a species again yeah that is fine i can agree with taking that out intermediate it is a region that is so cold it should not be highlighted you right yeah i do not think it should because if we talk about the board line region we are not supposed to highlight it it is the same it is just not a yeah it is badly written it is so called and for red galaxies we said not to mark things based solely on so it is defined only by wavelength so we can not include them for red galaxy just galaxies and starbursts starbursts yes they do 0 yes assuming it is talking about starburst galaxies rather than starbursts within a galaxy but they are to that starburst galaxies there and galaxies galaxies continue or continue flux it is another one of those that does not really it does not really matter i would take it in a flux but so obviously let us keep flux in in most of these cases we have put flux in yeah okay board line no i am happy to take that out i was going to say put it in 0 the lack of boardline polarization boardline polarization is that a spectable feature i think you would want the whole thing it is something to take  you can not you can not get just from a spectrum but you can if you have got a spectrum that is split by yeah polaroid light yeah yeah well i think i would actually leave it i would only use it on the broad line in it i think that is what you have been doing earlier on yes okay great yeah yeah yeah yep okay i do not know what was marked here have you got the bottom of this page no we are missing week weakline i do not so they are saying weekline radio galaxies are a separate class of radio galaxy no i said that weekline was because it is a modifier should be included which i think you should even though we claim radio galaxies this should be underlined this should be green okay actually sorry i think the this cut up page continues of the next site are we the same on the bottom yeah characterized by anjli okay so the question is no is it 0 no you have got line it is different to any week line that is fine line comes out and and should come out as well and should come out 0 yeah so there is a line there but i think week line should be in and an and okay in the same way if you have broad line it would be in there yeah that is okay right galactic black hole candidates i just made that up and gave it an acronym g d h c yes that is not a source yeah playing again we have got emission line in the ratios red galaxies yeah it is right again 0 no it is not right yeah line emitting gas i do not like line for red galaxies we can not have it is okay a mission feature which we are including now that is okay damp line and alpha of the georgia tries to say right yeah mission feature  star forming galaxies that can not be in no it can not star forming galaxy should be in yes that is what you did earlier anyway yeah protogalactic clump no they just made that up as well that is not a source type not for you thinking it is a lump it is something emission feature again that should be because it is not an absorber it is an absorption no but it says it covers it is definitely small angular size it is a physical thing yeah it is a process yeah features features it is a feature again it is a feature yeah okay it is a feature respectful feature do not climb out of this again yeah you do not get that those are regions blobs nebula and the rest is the same yeah now a line should be in line should be in yeah x rayed be all that it is okay intermediate types now we put in type one8 and type one9 did be in the end yeah yes i think it should be in you get it then that does not go in and that is okay 0 gosh it is complicated right that is okay we do not like systems and we do not like that one and we do not like that one and we do not like that one that is okay well hang on though was not there one minute ago in which i mean had a line yes we are taking out line on its own so we yes but you just every time keeping lines there yes so in general every time there has been line there has been line okay it is line width but it is still was that is lines have we had any just where it says line ratios we have been taking out line as a word that relates to other words adjective my head is going yeah but lines are still lines okay yes that is okay yeah okay bye right i agree that that can go out because that is a thinning i want the whole thing there or in the uv i do not expect you should be there but if it is a wavelength or a waveband we are putting it in okay it is probably one spectrum in the uv which you can see the sort of pictures yeah right there is a picture yeah yeah i might down here i think i am like again line center you can point to not like line width but you can put to line center to line center in fact the whole thing should be i left it i think line center you can point to the line wings you would say line wings all right we get it that is just a eclipsing i do not know yeah no that should not be in there you are right starburst 0 starburst like activity i do not think that is a class it is an action yeah but then the adn like activity yeah that has to go as well an agn is a class a starburst is a class a starbust is a class a starbust is a type of galaxy but it is also something that can happen within a galaxy as is an agm but an agn is an object and starburst you can not say but we are counting starburst starburst galaxies can you starburst if it means galaxy if this means starburst galaxy like activity then that is fair enough no but the starburst is only a galaxy which has a starburst in it like an a eg an active galaxy is just a galaxy with an agm in it but starburst refers to from the linguistics side if you mark starburst before and if you feel that starbursts are like objects then i think it should stay in in this case even though it is modified by activity or it is modifying it to the age okay let us keep it in i think you are right anyway yeah i think they should stay yeah i think it was maybe it was star forming like activity it would be different but yeah star formation we were not putting in yes that is right but starburst is different okay we have just got this split up i think that should be h you are right it is 2 it is a wavelength region but it is still but you are saying between that line and that line yeah right here you are yes let us hope up in the name line ratios but galaxies should be in but galaxies should be in but galaxies should be so we need to write that hold on 0 no the other same sorry i missed that solvement lines systems hubble hubble and hubble and galaxy yeah galaxy distribution it is all the distribution of galaxies yeah okay ionization lines yes before is that radio spectrum yes do not include flat spectrum quasasas yeah that couch low ionization week 3 should be in low ionization they are low bells are not they lowell is a separate class of source yeah that is true i do not know if high bells are but low bells are they are and it is a big joke 0 right yeah next i should not you are right there emission line candidates that means objects that are identified and maybe at a particular redshift they sign that does not count continuum i think it should be in yeah continuum flux should be in what you have not been earlier have you i thought we had i do not remember about luminastases we have been putting in continuum flux have you okay yeah yeah we were not doing broadband detections what we were doing yeah nice teeth mine too now what are we doing if radio lag quasar should be in z equals 2 should not and what are we doing the rule was to leave it in was it i do not know because you would get it in language speak each conduct is a separate entity that is different yeah that is for things marked with and mark subsections of entities no that is different it does not really say yeah it does not say so we need a rule for that is it goo again or is it really z equals 2 z equals 2 means at a certain distance so that should not be in but radio loud quasars is a thing so it is weathered to include the z equals 2 in the if it was really loud quaser then you would mark it as one thing yeah i think it makes sense to mark the whole thing then as one i do not know what you okay that is whatever is easiest for you no yes take it out respectful components no x way binutes  public field again mission line objects should not be in either of them yeah media quasar should be a source of time yeah now you have done one and not the other and you are right because one is line formation and one is line profile profile yeah igm i have done again right this is nice and easy yeah yeah components yeah we can get rid of that can not we yeah yeah but we want the line still the galaxy or galaxy given that it is the galaxy it should be the galaxy yes it should be the galaxy it is proper whatever the word is hpc complexes i do not know what hpc stands for but since they are complexes we can cross it out do you know hpc says that i am going to lie in the direction of high velocity clouds i should be in there that is right yes but it is play icm  scuba scuba that is an instrument sometimes anyone it works you are right there it should be this and it probably is no but you are right and this should be red as well it should all be 0 i see yeah now i know you are different i missed out that hb 2 wip i do not think i do not think i do not think that matters very much just keep hb 2 i think given that we are not putting line width itself okay even line if it is not you can have flux aye hb 2 should be in yep not that line but we want enhanced do it why we wanted unless it is relative we wanted modifiers of modifiers of spectral lines e g weak board lines but enhanced relative to what weak relative to what though it is all relative but it is still a modifier of that line okay and the same sorry the agn i think that should be one entity right the was not it according to the acronym the 1st one  yes that is right mark the whole string is one entity but acronym no only when it is embedded yeah 0 but the 2nd one or it is included beside included beside market all its one entity yeah that is right i do not think i was doing that yes i do not know how many times i have missed that either yeah i have missed that all that we commission i think should be in there yeah okay really including emission are you yeah extended emission we have not been including no that is true so we should not have that on either of us but then weak commission levels is just a way of saying yeah yeah i agree okay nothing at 12 no star burst contribution that is not a separate yeah 0 yeah red continuum should be in board line emission and the rest frame uv should all be one yeah 0 no it should not we were not doing components 0 yes yeah this is a radiative transfer thing so they do not mean they mean photons in the lines escape not that that is not something you can point to yes that is true associated again nothing continuum source should not be in and associated should not be in cti that should be 0 wait what does it stand for that is an observatory is not it yeah is the ctio 4 meter the name of that telescope and the ait is an observatory as well is not it yes but it is also a telescope and i think if there is no other way of describing it that telescope the ctio 4 meter telescope is it must be what it is called otherwise they call it a name it is the blanco actually usually but anyway i do not mind we are including observatory if it refers if it is part of the proper name of an instrument yeah i go but then we have to include 4 meter as well yeah yes up to a telescope no just 4 meter yeah 0 no it should iron and absorption is it contamination from blended iron and absorption lines no it is not what is that comma doing this no it is not if the comma was not there it would be in accounting for galactic reddening contamination from blended iron what they mean is blended iron lines so they do mean iron lines yes it should be in and we are keeping lining because it is strength continuum flux we should have all in no no it is going to be 100s of it is at least it is quick damp lyman alpha qso i do not think that is a separate class of quaza i do not know about quasasas i do not know what that means either one damp lyman alpha qso is it is not a source type of that is definitely true no yeah that is okay dawds what is the white dwarf there is wd is 25 of da 6 of d e yeah it has hydrogen or helium in the atmosphere okay so it is a different class yeah okay nope yes we are talking about that i will put multiple in there we are not supposed to do components no that is right so neither of them that all goes or yeah yeah no absorption lines that should be highlighted 0 sorry yeah low luminosity cuirassos no people talk about them a lot but yeah i do not we are doing ultraluminous galaxies yeah so we should do i guess you should keep it then yeah people discuss them as a separate class they are as much as ultraluminous galaxies huh okay no absorption lines should be in i am the same here i did not mention not to do associated with things i should not have done that yes you should not 0 a and b and we i am i can do about anything no that is the conjunct rule i am right here i think yes you are let us yeah strong soft x ray flux yeah you can put it there that is associated absorption lines 0 right in the aal outflow it is a region though is yeah does not count and absorption in small clouds that does not count now this is the conjunct rule again i did not blue wings of this and this and this yeah and this is one double line and this and presumably that is red there i do not know what i think if the line is too long you piloted a dollar as one i have a letter to all as one right and i piloted it is separate and it should be separate okay what is this end thing because that is not marked in the i think if the line is too long it is only putting the bottom line because olivia would have marked from blue all the way to the end as one long line no sorry i mean the the end should be yeah yeah but i think it probably was not it just has not printed because olivia would not have started marking it 1402 on the 2 lines above yeah but i think it is just missing out the printing if the line goes over the end 0 i see so your end starts if you look at what olivia is done here olivia would not have just highlighted that line right he would have highlighted the whole thing yeah so you are mostly settling for the solution where you mark all contract individually yes and it just has not printed that yeah but it is marked i think right holdenst do not count continuum source is that count should not be i guess but is that right but is that also the name of the source probably yeah so it should be this one plus the pink line broadness i think that should be in that is a way of saying line width though and we do not mark line with that is true well okay yeah we have been in here i am still going to take it 0 rich iron spectrum you probably write to the feature of the spectrum does that make it a spectral feature   something that you can point to right yeah well kind of it is i think you had a suspect you have all the lines of lots of different elements and you have to work out like all the ones to put your iron lines then after that you look and say has a lot of iron in it you can not say there is a rich iron spectrum you just say this is a rich iron spectrum so that is like a derived property yeah i think so yes it is not a spectral feature it is a feature of a back which is different you should not go in yes and then we are the same okay gosh we can not review this now yeah we are going to make it to our 2nd cookie brick giant ellipticals or ellipticals we were including are giant ellipticals separate things yeah i think so they are separate but are they a separate class i think they probably are yeah and things ironized emission if you are doing emission from high yes i think you want ionized in there really really you can point to ionized emission rather than she was allowed emission from high excitation whatnot emission from high excitation lines yeah that is exactly the same as it is pointing there and saying look there is a high excitation emission and there is non high excitation okay if you both think so yeah well i am not certain if high expectation should go in but if high excitation should go in i think ionize means the same thing is not yeah okay line ratio yeah you are right 0 there yeah yeah that is right r 117 narrow line to see that one should all be one with the red inside it what no that is this is describing the band you do the observations in it is describing the line you are looking for yeah yeah that counts i think so we have included it before when you have said this has been detected right okay swamp i think should be in there yeah okay emissioning yeah quasas are missed 0 those should not be there should they templemonibism is not systems yeah 0 okay well hang on though but is it just describe your mechanism there it is not a special feature no i think it is a respectful feature you can point to the damped lime and alpha absorption in the same way you can point to hb to emission although hb to emission is a process i think this is what we agreed to pass out before is not it no damp limelmelf absorption systems we crossed out we also crossed out i think it is a process too i think especially when they are saying we are choosing low red shift absorption that is not really something you can point to you can point to low red shift damp lime alarm because it just shifted in the spectrum there not too fast i do not think would it be if it was hb 2 absorption and you just took out that no redshift quasars with hb to absorption you would put in no i am not sure because it is a spectral feature i think damp climate alpha absorption it is whether it is a process or a feature but i can not remember what we have done before because we have every feature is produced by a process if it was absorption in damp lime and alpha clouds you would not mark absorption yes it depends what it has whether it means with low redshift damp lime and alpha cloud absorption if it was damped lima alpha absorbers that would be different but i think absorption i do think it is a process i think it is a process but it also produces a spectral feature where you can say there is the damp lemon after absorption yeah well that is true in the same way that you know hp to emission is a process well we both marked it yeah i think it should be in there microquazars they are dubbed microquazars yeah that means it is newfangles is it going to be a decent source type in the future i have not heard but referred to since but just talk about the micro quasar yeah but they have made up that word yeah i think you are right they have me on the other hand if we are having hyperluminous galaxies where you know they have just got old luminous and ooh even more hyperluminous yeah well someone must have made that up for the 1st time but do they what defines a microchlazar same as a hyperluminous galaxy being very very extreme i guess keep it probably yeah i reckon a dwarf amorphous nuclear starburst galaxy i have made that one that certainly i have never heard of that one before yeah there is not been more than one study of dwarf amorous nuclear starboard galaxies so that do we say we take that out yeah okay but what about the acronym because that has got it in that should be in okay yeah starburst nuclei you are like 0 the object if it was starburst galaxies it will be in there starburst nuclei refers to a region within an object which would not be observed separately yeah 0 wait yeah yeah that is fine so what happened now so you found that dwarf amorphous blah blah blah galaxies that is not a proper name but you still include the acronym or because the acronym has starbursts in it in the s and if the acronym includes it 0 right okay it has to be in there continuum flux you can have uvo optical emission line ratios but i think all of that goes in is not we would not have line ratios uvn optical emission should be in there though no it should not no it is not no it is modifies ratios 0 gosh no emission okay so i have highlighted this in red and then the whole thing in green because type 2 see if the galaxy is one yes that is fine right as long as this is plus red tv gamma ray emission we were not doing broad band detections using the whipple f that is definitely an instrument it is yes very stupid but it is right you are right there fbs objects should not be in there what does it mean i do not know but it has got objects yeah you are right and the mama scanning machine is an instrument it is not a telescope it is an instrument so you can have that at the other one we stopped after a 4 meter 0 yes it should be now emission lines from high line we did it this way before absorption features weak continuum that should be separate continuum radiation no neither neither neerlein region emission yep 0 that is emissions from the narrow line region yep 0 that is emissions from the narrow line region yeah yeah we do not no aligned emissions should be in yeah white dwarfs is a source type f b lobel is a source type yeah you are right stupid that it may be n kek is 0 no kek observatory yes we did decide kek was going in we did not allow iron spectrum so we should not allow h or a human tool spectrum either yeah that is right at all and we should not allow emission yeah he is so electronic yeah radio quasas radio quasas yeah 0 no radio loud and radio quieter but radio clears i just means radio loud than ourselves it does yeah uvxs is all right that is about the future we were not doing flat spectrum no were we i think there are separate class yes we are not putting them in spectral right but i think we are putting them in because it is so broadband but yes they are separate you are right there mind strengths no you can not point to it yeah you missed group i did miss group subaru telescope you are right that is it yay hey wow excellent it is under a proper name because it has got a capital t all right wonderful under 2 hours excellent once we got them identified a lot of them were the same problem going round and round where is the bin in here and more to the point can i get to it without one i can carry in my little bits and the forehand with me excuse me camera i think it has been and there is not one is there do we need to remain wired up are we done i think that is it is not it i think so yeah we are done excellent melissa nell i do not know i think it is all right i think it is i am not here i am not here thank you