CASE OF REPUBLICAN PARTY OF RUSSIA v. RUSSIA

Violations of Art. 11;Remainder inadmissible;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed

Anatoly Kovler;Elisabeth Steiner;George Nicolaou;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska

ORG of GPE was created in DATE by consolidation of ORG and its subsequent secession from that party .

On DATE ORG formally registered the public association “ ORG of the NORP Federation ” .

Following changes in domestic legislation , on DATE a general conference of the public association decided on its reorganisation into a political party by the name of “ ORG of GPE ” .

On DATE the applicant was registered as a party by ORG .

Its articles of association list among its aims the nomination of candidates for election to state and municipal bodies and participation in the activities of those bodies , the development of civil society in GPE and the promotion of the unity and territorial integrity of the country and of the peaceful coexistence of its multi - ethnic population .

On DATE an extraordinary general conference of the applicant elected its management bodies . In particular , Mr GPE was elected chairman of ORG and PERSON chairman of ORG . In accordance with the articles of association they became ex officio representatives of the party . The general conference also decided to change the party ’s address and to create several regional branches .

On DATE the applicant asked ORG to amend the information contained in ORG . In particular , it asked that its new address and the names of its ex officio representatives be entered in the ORG .

On DATE ORG refused to make the amendments because the party had not submitted documents showing that the general conference had been held in accordance with the law and with its articles of association .

On DATE the applicant re - submitted its request . It produced the minutes of the conferences of its regional branches at which delegates to the general conference had been nominated , the list of the delegates and the minutes of the general conference .

On DATE ORG refused for the second time to register the amendments . It found that the applicant had not submitted documents confirming the number of its members . Moreover , TIME of the GPE , GPE and GPE regional conferences did not include the lists of participants . TIME NORP regional conferences were flawed because they indicated that those conferences had been convened at the initiative of the GPE regional branch . The PERSON regional conference had not actually been held . Some of the participants at the general conference were not members of the party or had not been elected delegates . Due to those and other omissions it was not possible to establish whether the regional conferences had been quorate and whether the general conference had been legitimate .

The applicant challenged the refusal before a court . It argued that it was not required to submit documents confirming the number of its members . In any event , that information was already in the ORG ’s possession because the party had submitted it in its DATE activity report in DATE . ORG was not empowered to verify whether the general conference and the regional conferences were legitimate . Domestic law required that such verification be conducted only before the registration of a new party or of amendments to the articles of association , which was not the case of the applicant . In any event , the general conference had been convened in accordance with domestic law and the articles of association . It had brought together CARDINAL delegates from CARDINAL regional branches . The delegates had been nominated at regional conferences held in compliance with the party ’s internal rules . The law did not require the TIME of regional conferences to contain the list of participants . TIME had indicated the total number of the members of the regional branches and the number of participants at the conferences . That information had been sufficient to establish that the conferences had been quorate . The applicant conceded that TIME and NORP regional conferences contained typing errors , which , however , did not affect the outcome of the voting . ORG finding that the PERSON regional conference had never been held had been refuted by the documents . The finding that some of the participants at the general conference had not been members of the party or had not been elected delegates was not supported by any documentary evidence . The applicant lastly submitted that officials of the regional departments of ORG who had attended some of the regional conferences had not noted any breaches of the substantive or procedural rules . The applicant claimed that the refusal to amend the ORG violated its freedom of association and hindered its activities . In particular , ORG had refused to register CARDINAL regional branches precisely because the ORG did not contain the names of the applicant ’s ex officio representatives .

The Ministry of Justice maintained that the decision of DATE had been lawful . ORG was not only entitled , but had a legal obligation to verify the information submitted by the applicant . The verification had revealed that the documents produced by the applicant had not met the legal requirements . In particular , the TIME of the regional conferences did not all contain the list of participants . CARDINAL regional conferences had been inquorate . The applicant had never submitted any information about its local branches and it was therefore not clear who had nominated delegates for the regional conferences and whose interests they had represented . TIME NORP regional conferences indicated that the conferences had been convened at the initiative of the GPE regional branch . Due to those omissions it had not been possible to establish whether the delegates to the general conference had been duly nominated . Moreover , the decision to convene the general conference had been taken on DATE , while some of the regional conferences had taken place in DATE . As the general conference had been convened in breach of the procedural rules , it had been illegitimate .

On DATE ORG of GPE upheld the decision of DATE . It held that , under sections CARDINAL , DATE , DATE and DATE of LAW , ORG had been empowered to verify the information and documents submitted by the applicant before registering any amendments to the ORG . ORG had found that the documents submitted did not meet the requirements established by law . The court had no reason to doubt its findings because they were corroborated by the case materials and had not been refuted by the applicant . The court held that the decision of DATE had been lawful and had not violated the applicant ’s rights under LAW .

In its appeal submissions the applicant claimed , in particular , that ORG requirement to submit the same documents as for the initial registration of a party or the registration of amendments to its articles of association had no basis in domestic law . Under LAW amendments concerning a party ’s address or the names of its ex officio representatives were to be registered on the basis of a written notification to the registration authority . The applicant also argued that ORG had no authority to verify the legitimacy of its general conference . It insisted that the general conference had been held in conformity with its articles of association and with domestic law .

On DATE ORG upheld the judgment on appeal . It referred to section QUANTITY of LAW and held as follows :

“ ... A political party requesting to amend the information [ contained in the ORG ] is to produce the same documents as required for registration of a party . The list of those documents is contained in section QUANTITY of LAW .

[ The applicant ’s ] argument that the extraordinary general conference of the party was organised and held in accordance with the law in force and with its articles of association aims at a different assessment of documents produced [ by the applicant ] to [ ORG ] for registration . At the same time , [ ORG ] and the [ ORG had reasons to conclude that the submitted documents contained information which did not meet the legal requirements . The [ ORG agrees with the [ ORG assessment of the evidence . ”

In DATE , in a separate set of proceedings , ORG conducted an inspection of the applicant ’s activities . It issued CARDINAL warnings to the party ’s regional branches . CARDINAL regional branches were dissolved by courts at the ORG ’s request and the activities of the GPE regional branch were suspended . On DATE the Ministry prepared the inspection report mentioning that the applicant had CARDINAL regional branches , of which CARDINAL had CARDINAL members , and that the total number of party members was CARDINAL .

On DATE ORG asked ORG of GPE to dissolve the applicant . It claimed that the party had CARDINAL members and CARDINAL regional branches with CARDINAL members , in breach of LAW .

The applicant submitted that it met the requirements of LAW because it had CARDINAL members and had CARDINAL registered regional branches with CARDINAL members .

On DATE ORG of GPE ordered the dissolution of the applicant . It found that the PERSON , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , and PERSON regional branches had been dissolved by court decisions in DATE , therefore their members could not be taken into account . CARDINAL regional branches had CARDINAL members , in particular :

– despite a warning issued by ORG , the ORG regional branch did not submit documents showing the number of its members . According to the information in ORG possession , the branch had CARDINAL members ;

– the applicant had submitted that the GPE regional branch had CARDINAL members . However , an inspection had revealed that CARDINAL of them had never joined the party , CARDINAL of them were simultaneously members of other regional branches , the names of CARDINAL members appeared twice in the list , and CARDINAL members did not reside at the indicated addresses . Therefore , the branch had in fact CARDINAL members ;

– out of CARDINAL members of the Krasnodar Regional branch CARDINAL had made a written declaration that they had never joined the party . CARDINAL members , while refusing to make a written statement , had made oral statements to that effect ;

– the ORG regional branch had CARDINAL members . However , CARDINAL of them were DATE . Moreover , the party had not produced individual applications for membership in respect of CARDINAL members ;

– CARDINAL members of the PERSON regional branch had been admitted to the party in breach of the articles of association . In particular , CARDINAL members had been admitted by the branch ’s political council elected at an illegitimate general conference . To support its conclusion that the general conference had been illegitimate ORG referred to the judgment of ORG of GPE of DATE ( see paragraph CARDINAL above ) ;

– the GPE regional branch had CARDINAL members . However , the membership of CARDINAL of them had not been confirmed . In particular , the party had not produced individual applications for membership in respect of CARDINAL members , CARDINAL members had no residence registration in LOC , CARDINAL members had left the GPE region , CARDINAL members had been younger than DATE at the time they had joined the party , CARDINAL members had not signed their applications for membership , and CARDINAL had declared that they had never joined the party ;

– the NORP Regional branch had CARDINAL members ;

– the Komi - Permyatskiy regional branch had CARDINAL members .

The court held that it had no reason to doubt the information submitted by ORG . The applicant had never contested before the courts the information contained in the inspection report or the warnings issued by ORG . The court further found that ORG had not submitted any evidence in support of their conclusions that ORG , LOC and GPE regional branches had CARDINAL members , therefore the court accepted the number of members suggested by the applicant . The court also accepted that the party had several unregistered branches . However , their members could not be taken into account for establishing the total number of party members . The court concluded that on DATE the applicant had CARDINAL members , and CARDINAL regional branches with CARDINAL members . Thus , the applicant did not meet the requirements established by law and was subject to dissolution .

The applicant appealed . It submitted that the ORG ’s submissions had not been supported by any documents . Nor had ORG indicated the names of the people who , in its opinion , had been admitted to the party in breach of domestic law and the party ’s articles of association . The first - instance court had refused to admit evidence submitted by the applicant , namely individual applications for membership and other documents confirming the number of party members . The court had not taken into account CARDINAL members living in the regions where the branches were not registered , although they had been admitted to the party at the federal level and were members of the party itself and not members of its unregistered regional branches . ORG had conducted an inspection in DATE ; it had never verified the number of the applicant ’s members as at DATE . Moreover , its CARDINAL regional branches had been dissolved DATE , therefore on DATE they had still been functioning and the applicant had had the required number of regional branches . Lastly , as domestic law did not establish the inspection procedure , the inspections had been arbitrary .

On DATE the Appellate Collegium of ORG upheld the judgment of DATE on appeal . It found that the findings of the first - instance court had been based on sufficient evidence , namely the inspection reports compiled by ORG and its regional departments . The court had taken into account the number of the party ’s members as at DATE . Individual applications submitted by the party after that date could not be taken into account because they could have been written after DATE and backdated . Moreover , the applicant had not challenged the inspection report or the warnings issued by ORG . It was accordingly barred from contesting before ORG the facts mentioned in the report and in the warnings . In any event , even according to the party ’s submissions it had CARDINAL regional branches with CARDINAL members instead of CARDINAL , which was in itself a sufficient ground for dissolution .

The status and activities of political parties are governed by LAW ( Federal Law no . CARDINAL-FZ of DATE ) , ORG ( Federal law No . CARDINAL of DATE ) and ORG ( Federal Law no . CARDINAL of DATE ) .

Membership of a political party shall be voluntary and individual . ORG of GPE who have attained DATE may be members of a political party . Foreign citizens , stateless persons , and NORP nationals who have been declared incapable by a judicial decision may not be members of a political party . Admission to membership of a political party is decided upon on the basis of a written application by the GPE citizen , in accordance with the procedure set out in the articles of association . A GPE citizen may hold membership of CARDINAL political party at once . A member of a political party may be registered only in CARDINAL regional branch in the region of his permanent or predominant residence ( section QUANTITY , CARDINAL , DATE and CARDINAL of LAW ) .

LAW , adopted on DATE , introduced the requirements of minimum membership and regional representation for political parties . Until DATE section QUANTITY of LAW required that a political party should have CARDINAL members and should have regional branches with CARDINAL members in CARDINAL of GPE ’s regions . If those conditions were fulfilled , it was also allowed to have branches in the remaining regions provided that each branch had CARDINAL members .

On DATE a group of deputies of ORG proposed amendments to section CARDINAL § CARDINAL of LAW . In particular , they proposed increasing the minimum membership of a political party to CARDINAL members and the minimum membership of a regional branch to CARDINAL members . An explanatory note appended to the draft law provided the following justification for the amendments :

“ The proposed draft Federal law is a follow - up to the reform of the political system started in DATE and it aims at strengthening the political parties and involving a wider range of citizens in the political life of the society and the ORG . ”

ORG recommended that the amendments be adopted . The recommendation reads as follows :

“ The subject of the proposed Draft law is extremely important and pertinent .

The experience of [ political ] party development in DATE has revealed that the political system in GPE needs perfection . The state and development of the party system have a major influence on the effective functioning of the legislative and executive powers whose mission is to protect ORG rights and create favourable conditions for the development of the country .

This is the rationale of the political reform proposed by the President of GPE , which advocates as one of its main goals the enhancement of the role and prestige of political parties in contemporary GPE .

Acting as the nexus between civil society and the authorities and participating in parliamentary elections , large and authoritative political parties with firm political views , supported by a large number of voters , reinforce the structure and stability of the party system .

This [ Draft ] law proposes increasing the minimum membership of a party from CARDINAL ( under the PERSON now in force ) to CARDINAL members and , for the regional branches , from CARDINAL members . This is mainly justified by the consideration that the parliamentary , and consequently democratic , system can not function without strong parties .

Many small parties , the so - called quasi parties , having virtually no political weight or influence on the voters take part in the elections and enjoy various advantages . During the election campaign they receive financing from the ORG budget , have access to the media and are allocated free airtime on television . And after the election they disappear from the political scene .

It is enough to note that out of CARDINAL parties and political alliances registered at the moment CARDINAL parties and CARDINAL political alliance have seats in ORG . CARDINAL parties have passed the PERCENT threshold , while the others have obtained PERCENT of the votes . This situation places an excessive burden on the budget and is at variance with the principle of efficient and careful spending of public funds provided for in LAW of GPE .

The dispersal of voters between such [ small ] parties results in the instability of the political system which we are witnessing DATE in our country .

On the whole , the ORG law aims at streamlining the existing political system and creating effective , large - scale political parties having stable branches in the regions , expressing the genuine interests of substantial groups of voters and capable of defending them in the present conditions of democratic transformations in GPE .

In view of the above , the ORG considers it necessary to support the proposed Draft law . ”

On DATE section CARDINAL § CARDINAL was amended . The amended section CARDINAL § CARDINAL required that a political party should have CARDINAL members and should have regional branches with CARDINAL members in CARDINAL of GPE ’s regions . It was also allowed to have branches in the remaining regions provided that each branch had CARDINAL members .

The political parties were required to bring the number of their members into compliance with the amended section CARDINAL § CARDINAL by DATE . If a party had not complied with that requirement it had to reorganise itself into a public association within DATE , failing which it would be dissolved ( section QUANTITY of LAW , Federal Law no . CARDINAL-FZ of DATE ) .

On DATE ORG announced that CARDINAL political parties out of CARDINAL registered as at DATE now met the requirements of minimum membership and regional representation . CARDINAL political parties were dissolved by ORG in DATE , CARDINAL political parties reorganised themselves into public associations , while several more political parties merged with bigger parties . CARDINAL political parties remained registered by DATE and were eligible to participate in DATE elections to ORG .

On DATE the President , in his address to ORG , called for the development of democracy , in particular , by decreasing the minimum membership requirement for political parties .

On DATE the President proposed amending section CARDINAL § CARDINAL of LAW by providing for a gradual decrease in the minimum membership requirement . The explanatory note contained the following justification for the proposed amendments :

“ The ORG law aims at giving effect to the President ’s address to ORG of GPE of DATE , concerning the necessity gradually to decrease the minimum membership of political parties required for their registration and further functioning , as well as to introduce the requirement of rotation for [ management bodies ] of political parties . ”

ORG LAW recommended that the proposed amendments be adopted . The relevant part of its recommendation reads as follows :

“ The Draft law proposes a gradual decrease in the [ minimum ] membership of political parties required for their establishment , registration and further functioning . Its aim is to give effect to the measures proposed by the President of GPE in his address to ORG , with a view to increasing the level and quality of people ’s representation in the government . ”

On DATE section CARDINAL § CARDINAL was amended . It now reads as follows :

“ CARDINAL . ... a political party shall :

before DATE have CARDINAL members , and regional branches with CARDINAL members in CARDINAL of NORP regions ... It may also have branches in the remaining regions provided that each branch has CARDINAL members ...

from DATE to CARDINAL DATE - have CARDINAL members , and regional branches with CARDINAL members in CARDINAL of NORP regions ... It may also have branches in the remaining regions provided that each branch has CARDINAL members ...

from DATE - have CARDINAL members , and regional branches with CARDINAL members in CARDINAL of NORP regions ... It may also have branches in the remaining regions provided that each branch has CARDINAL members ... ”

NORP In accordance with ORG , all legal entities , including political parties , must be registered in ORG . ORG must contain , inter alia , the following information about each legal entity : its address and the names of its ex officio representatives . The legal entity must notify the registration authority of any change in that information ( section QUANTITY ) .

Section CARDINAL of ORG contains a list of documents to be submitted for the initial registration of a legal entity . Its section CARDINAL § CARDINAL contains a list of documents to be submitted for the registration of amendments to the legal entity ’s articles of association . Paragraph CARDINAL of that section provides that to register changes in other information on the legal entity ( such as a change of address or ex officio representatives ) , the legal entity must submit a written notification to the registration authority . The notification must contain a declaration confirming that the information submitted is authentic and satisfies the requirements established by law . For that purpose a standard notification form was to be designed by the Government .

The Non - Profit Organisations Act also contains a list of documents to be submitted for the initial registration of a non - profit organisation ( section CARDINAL § CARDINAL ) and the registration of amendments to its articles of association ( section CARDINAL ) . The LAW also provides that a non - profit organisation must notify the registration authority about any change concerning its address or its ex officio representatives and submit confirming documents . The procedures and time - limits are the same as for the initial registration of a non - profit organisation . The list of documents to be submitted is determined by the competent executive authority ( section CARDINAL § CARDINAL , added on DATE and in force from DATE ) . The competent executive authority may refuse registration if the documents submitted do not comply with statutory requirements ( section CARDINAL § CARDINAL ) .

LAW provides that political parties must be registered in ORG in accordance with the special registration procedure established by that LAW ( section CARDINAL § CARDINAL ) . Amendments to the ORG are made pursuant to the decision of a competent executive authority authorising registration of information about the establishment , reorganisation or dissolution of a political party or its regional branches or of other information specified by law ( section CARDINAL § CARDINAL ) . Before registering a political party , the competent registration authority must verify whether the documents submitted for registration satisfy the requirements of LAW . The ORG must be amended within DATE from the date of the authorisation issued by the registration authority ( section DATE ) .

Section CARDINAL § CARDINAL of LAW contains an exhaustive list of documents to be submitted for the registration of a political party established by the founding congress : ( a ) an application for registration ; ( b ) the party ’s articles of association ; ( c ) its political programme ; ( d ) copies of decisions taken by the founding congress , in particular those concerning the establishment of the political party and its regional branches , the adoption of its articles of association and its programme and the election of its management bodies , and containing information about the delegates present and the results of the votes ; ( e ) a document confirming payment of the registration fee ; ( f ) information about the party ’s official address ; ( g ) a copy of the publication announcing the time and place of the founding congress , and ( h ) copies of the TIME of regional conferences held in DATE of GPE ’s regions , mentioning the number of members of each regional branch . LAW of the same section prohibits ORG officials from requiring the submission of any other documents . The documents listed above must be submitted to the registration authority DATE after the founding congress ( section CARDINAL § CARDINAL ) .

The registration authority may refuse registration if the party has not submitted all necessary documents or if the information contained in those documents does not meet the requirements established by law ( section CARDINAL § CARDINAL ) .

A political party must notify the registration authority , within DATE , of any change in the information contained in ORG , including any change in its address or its ex officio representatives . The registration authority amends the ORG within DATE of receipt of the notification ( section QUANTITY )

A political party ’s articles of association must establish , among other things , the procedure for the election of its management bodies ( section CARDINAL § CARDINAL of LAW ) . Management bodies of a political party must be re - elected DATE ( section CARDINAL § CARDINAL ) . Management bodies must be elected by a secrete vote at a general conference assembling delegates from regional branches established in CARDINAL of GPE ’s regions . The election must be conducted in accordance with the procedure established by the party ’s articles of association and the decision must be taken by a majority of those present and voting ( section QUANTITY , CARDINAL and DATE ) .

Until DATE candidates in elections to ORG bodies could be nominated by political parties , electoral blocks or by self - nomination . Since legislative amendments introduced on DATE entered into force on DATE , candidates in elections to ORG bodies may be nominated by political parties only ( section CARDINAL § CARDINAL of LAW as in force from DATE ) .

A political party wishing to participate in elections to ORG must submit its list of candidates to the electoral commission . It must also submit a certain number of signatures of support . Parties who currently have seats in ORG are absolved from the requirement to submit signatures of support . Until DATE a political party had to submit signatures from no fewer that CARDINAL enfranchised citizens domiciled in CARDINAL NORP regions . The legal provision currently in force requires a political party to submit signatures from CARDINAL enfranchised citizens domiciled in CARDINAL of NORP regions . The number of signatures required will be decreased to CARDINAL after the parliamentary elections of DATE ( section CARDINAL of ORG Federal Law no . CARDINAL-FZ of CARDINAL DATE ) ) .

Until DATE the CARDINAL seats in ORG were distributed between those political parties whose electoral lists obtained PERCENT of the votes cast . ORG of DATE increased the electoral threshold to PERCENT ( section CARDINAL § CARDINAL of ORG ) . In accordance with recent amendments to LAW introduced on CARDINAL DATE , a political party whose electoral list wins PERCENT of the votes cast receives CARDINAL seats in ORG , while a party which wins PERCENT of the votes cast receives CARDINAL seat ( section CARDINAL of ORG ) .

Political parties which take part in elections and obtain more that PERCENT of the votes cast are entitled to receive public financing to reimburse their electoral expenses . The amount of public financing received by each party is proportionate to the number of votes obtained by it ( section QUANTITY , CARDINAL and CARDINAL of LAW ) .

Once a year a political party must submit to the competent authorities a report on its activities , indicating , in particular , the number of members of each of its regional branches ( section CARDINAL § CARDINAL ( b ) ) .

The competent authorities monitor compliance by political parties and their regional and other structural branches with NORP laws , as well as the compatibility of political parties’ activities with the regulations , aims and purposes set out in their articles of association . The authorities concerned have the right to study , on an DATE basis , the documents of political parties and their regional branches confirming the existence of regional branches and the number of their members , and to issue warnings to political parties and their regional branches if they pursue activities incompatible with their articles of association . The party or regional branch may challenge such warnings before a court . The authorities have the right to apply to a court for the suspension of the activities or the dissolution of a political party or its regional branch ( section CARDINAL § CARDINAL ) .

A political party may be dissolved by ORG of GPE if it does not comply with the minimum membership requirement or the requirement to have regional branches in DATE of NORP regions ( section CARDINAL § CARDINAL ) .

“ CARDINAL . The LAW of the Russian Federation provides for the multiparty system ( LAW ) and for the right to freedom of association and freedom of activities of public associations ( LAW ) ... It does not , however , specify the territorial level – all - NORP , interregional , regional or local DATE on which political parties may be founded . Similarly , it does not contain an explicit ban on the creation of regional parties . Accordingly , the requirement in section CARDINAL § CARDINAL of [ LAW ] that political parties may be created and operated only on the federal ( all - NORP ) level is a limitation of the constitutional right to freedom of association in political parties . Such limitations are permissible only if they are necessary in order to protect constitutionally guaranteed values ( LAW ) .

... [ LAW ] guarantees the right to freedom of association in political parties ( section CARDINAL ) and provides that political parties are established for the purpose of ensuring participation by NORP citizens in the political life of their society . Their mission is to form and articulate ORG political will , to take part in public and political actions , elections and referenda , as well as to represent ORG interests in ORG and municipal bodies ( section CARDINAL § CARDINAL ) . According to the substance of [ LAW ] , political parties are created to ensure NORP ORG participation in the political life of the entire GPE rather than in CARDINAL of its parts . Their vocation is to form the political will of the multinational NORP people as a whole and to articulate nationwide interests first and foremost . Their aims should not be associated with the interests of certain regions only . At the same time , when carrying out their activities directly in the regions , political parties must combine nationwide and regional interests ...

The federal legislator ... made the acquisition ( and retention ) of the status of a political party conditional , firstly , on a public association expressing the interests of a considerable number of citizens irrespective of their region of residence and , secondly , on its carrying out activities in the entire territory of GPE or most of it . Such structuring of the political scene is aimed at preventing the division of the political forces and the emergence of numerous artificial small parties ( especially during electoral campaigns ) created for a short duration and therefore incapable of fulfilling their mission ... in the country ’s political system .

... In the contemporary conditions where NORP society has not yet acquired solid experience of democratic existence and is faced with serious challenges from separatist , nationalist and terrorist forces , the creation of regional political parties – which would inevitably be interested in vindicating mainly their own purely regional or local interests – might result in a breach of the territorial integrity and unity of the political system and undermine the federative structure of the country .

The legal line between regional political parties and political parties based in fact on ethnic or religious affiliation would be blurred . Such parties ... would inevitably strive to assert mainly the rights of their respective ethnic and religious communities , which at the present stage of historic development would distort the process of forming and articulating the political will of the multinational people which is the bearer of sovereignty and the only source of power in GPE .

Moreover , taking into account the complex [ federal ] structure of GPE , the establishment of regional and local political parties in each region of the Federation might lead to the rise of numerous regional party systems . This might turn the emerging party system ... into a destabilising factor for the developing NORP democracy , popular sovereignty , federalism and the unity of the country , and weaken the constitutional protection of people ’s rights and freedoms , including the right to freedom of association in political parties and the equal right of all citizens to establish a political party and participate in its activities in the entire territory of GPE .

Thus , the requirement contained in [ LAW ] that the status of a political party may be acquired only by nationwide ( all - NORP ) public associations pursues such constitutionally protected aims as the creation of a real multiparty system , the legal institutionalisation of political parties in order to assist the development of the civil society , and ... the formation of large , nationwide political parties . This requirement is also necessary in the contemporary historical conditions of developing democracy and rule of law in GPE for the purpose of protecting constitutional values and , above all , securing the unity of the country . The above limitation is temporary in character and must be abolished as soon as the circumstances justifying it become different .

Although it provides for a multiparty system and guarantees the right to freedom of association in political parties and the freedom of their activities , LAW does not set any requirements concerning the number of parties , or any membership requirements . Nor does it prohibit establishing a minimum membership requirement for political parties . It is the role of the federal lawmaker to establish those requirements in such a way that , on the one hand , the [ required minimum ] membership and territorial scale of activities of political parties are not excessive and do not encroach on the very essence ... of the ORG right to freedom of association and , on the other hand , [ the political parties ] are capable of fulfilling their aims and mission as nationwide ( all - NORP ) political parties . In other words , the lawmaker must be guided by the criteria of reasonable sufficiency ensuing from the principle of proportionality .

When deciding on the minimum membership and the territorial scale of the activities of political parties the lawmaker has a wide discretion , taking into account that this issue is to a considerable degree based on political expediency . This follows from the fact that there exist different solutions to the issue in the legislation of other countries ( the minimum membership requirement for political parties is considerably higher or lower than that contained in section CARDINAL of [ LAW ] ) ...

Defining the minimum - membership requirement for political parties in [ LAW ] , the lawmaker apparently proceeded from the necessity for a political party to have considerable support in society . Such support is required to fulfil the main mission of a political party in a NORP society , namely forming and articulating the political will of the people . The requirements such as contained in section CARDINAL § CARDINAL of [ LAW ] [ as in force until DATE ] are not in themselves incompatible with the LAW of GPE . These quantitative requirements might become incompatible with the LAW if their enforcement results in the practical impossibility for the citizens to exercise their constitutional right to freedom of association in political parties , for example if , in breach of the constitutional principle of the multiparty system , they permit the establishment of CARDINAL party only .

The principle of political pluralism guaranteed by LAW may be implemented not only through a multiparty system and establishment and the activities of political parties with various ideologies . Therefore the forfeiture by interregional , regional and local public associations ... of the right to be called a political party does not mean that such associations are deprived of the right to participate in the political life of society at the regional and local levels . Nor have their members been deprived of the right to freedom of association .

... public associations have the majority of the rights guaranteed to political parties ... The provision of [ LAW ] that a political party is the only kind of public association that may nominate candidates in elections to ORG bodies ( section CARDINAL § CARDINAL ) does not mean that other public associations , including regional and local ones , ... are deprived of the right to nominate candidates for elections to municipal bodies or the right to initiate regional or local referenda ...

It follows from the above that , taking into account the historical conditions of development of GPE as a democratic and federative ORG governed by the rule of law , sections CARDINAL § CARDINAL and QUANTITY of [ LAW ] setting out the requirements for political parties and providing for the forfeiture by interregional , regional and local public associations of the status of political parties ... can not be considered as imposing excessive limitations on the right to freedom of association . The above requirements do not prevent citizens of GPE from exercising their constitutional right to freedom of association by creating all - NORP political parties or joining them , or from defending their interests and achieving their collective goals in the political sphere at the interregional , regional and local levels by creating public associations ... and joining them ... ”

“ CARDINAL ... [ The aim of the minimum membership requirement ] is to promote the consolidation process , to create prerequisites for the establishment of large political parties voicing the real interests of the social strata , and to secure fair and equal competition between political parties during elections to ORG .

LAW of CARDINAL DATE [ ORG ] reformed the electoral system ... In accordance with that law all CARDINAL members of ORG are to be elected from electoral lists submitted by political parties . The seats in ORG are distributed between the political parties which pass the threshold [ of PERCENT ] in terms of the number of votes cast for their respective electoral lists . The introduction of the threshold ... prevents excessive parliamentary fragmentation and thus ensures normal functioning of the parliament and buttresses the stability of the legislature and the constitutional foundations in general ...

[ As a result of the reform ] political parties become the only collective actors of the electoral process ...

The reform of the electoral system requires that the legal basis for the functioning of the multiparty system be adjusted so that the party system is capable of reconciling the interests and needs of society as a whole and of its various social and regional strata and groups , and of representing them adequately in ORG . ORG is an organised form of representation of the will and interests of the multiethnic population of GPE . That will and those interests can be expressed only by large , well - structured political parties .

This is CARDINAL of the reasons for changing the requirements imposed on political parties , including the minimum membership requirement for parties and their regional branches . These requirements are dictated by the characteristics proper to each stage of development of the party political system . They do not create insurmountable obstacles for the establishment and activities of political parties representing various political opinions , are not directed against any ideology and do not prevent discussion of various political programmes . The ORG guarantees equality of political parties before the law irrespective of the ideology , aims and purposes set out in their articles of association .

... when setting out the minimum membership requirements for political parties the federal legislator must take care , on the one hand , that those requirements are not excessive and do not impair the very essence of the right to freedom of association , and must ensure , on the other hand , that the political parties are able to pursue the aims and purposes set out in their articles of association exclusively as national ( all - NORP ) political parties . The national legislature must be guided by the criteria of reasonable sufficiency and proportionality .

... the quantitative requirements will be incompatible with the LAW only if the constitutional right to associate in political parties becomes illusory as a result of their application ...

... the federal legislature is entitled to set out membership requirements for political parties in the light of current historical conditions in GPE . Those requirements can be changed in one way or the other because they are not arbitrary but objectively justified by the ... aims in the sphere of development of the political system and maintenance of its compatibility with the basic constitutional foundations of GPE . They do not abolish , diminish or disproportionately restrict the ORG constitutional right to associate in political parties .

... Political parties are created to ensure the involvement of citizens of GPE in the political life of NORP society by means of forming and expressing their political will , participating in public and political activities , elections and referenda , and representing the ORG interests in ORG and municipal bodies . Therefore , the legislator rightfully determined [ the minimum membership ] by reference to a political party ’s real ability to represent the interests of an important portion of the population and to accomplish its public functions ...

The [ minimum membership ] requirements ... are not discriminatory because they do not prevent the emergence of diverse political programmes , they are applied in an equal measure to all public associations portraying themselves as political parties , irrespective of the ideology , aims and purposes set out in their articles of association , and they do not impair the very essence of the ORG right to freedom of association . Their application in practice shows that the constitutional right to associate in political parties remains real ... ( according to information from [ ORG ] , on DATE CARDINAL political parties out of CARDINAL had confirmed their compliance with the new legal requirements , CARDINAL political parties had decided on a voluntary basis to reorganise themselves into public associations ... ) .

The members of political parties which do not comply with the legal requirements established by LAW have a choice ... between increasing the number of members of their party to reach the required minimum , reorganising their party into a public association ... , founding a new party or joining another [ existing ] political party ... ”

The Guidelines on prohibition and dissolution of political parties and analogous measures ( ORG . ORG - INF(CARDINAL)CARDINAL ) , adopted by ORG ( “ the GPE Commission ” ) on DATE , read as follows :

“ ORG ,

Has adopted the following guidelines :

States should recognise that everyone has the right to associate freely in political parties . This right shall include freedom to hold political opinions and to receive and impart information without interference by a public authority and regardless of frontiers . The requirement to register political parties will not in itself be considered to be in violation of this right .

Prohibition or enforced dissolution of political parties may only be justified in the case of parties which advocate the use of violence or use violence as a political means to overthrow the democratic constitutional order , thereby undermining the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the constitution . The fact alone that a party advocates a peaceful change of the LAW should not be sufficient for its prohibition or dissolution .

The prohibition or dissolution of political parties as a particularly far - reaching measure should be used with utmost restraint . Before asking the competent judicial body to prohibit or dissolve a party , governments or other state organs should assess , having regard to the situation of the country concerned , whether the party really represents a danger to the free and democratic political order or to the rights of individuals and whether other , less radical measures could prevent the said danger .

Legal measures directed to the prohibition or legally enforced dissolution of political parties shall be a consequence of a judicial finding of unconstitutionality and shall be deemed as of an exceptional nature and governed by the principle of proportionality . Any such measure must be based on sufficient evidence that the party itself and not only individual members pursue political objectives using or preparing to use unconstitutional means .

The prohibition or dissolution of a political party should be decided by the LAW court or other appropriate judicial body in a procedure offering all guarantees of due process , openness and a fair trial . ”

ORG made the following recommendations in its Guidelines and explanatory report on legislation on political parties : some specific issues ( ORG . ORG of DATE ) :

B. Registration as a necessary step for recognition of an association as a political party , for a party ’s participation in general elections or for public financing of a party does not per se amount to a violation of rights protected under LAW and CARDINAL of LAW . Any requirements in relation to registration , however , must be such as are ‘ necessary in a democratic society’ and proportionate to the objective sought to be achieved by the measures in question . Countries applying registration procedures to political parties should refrain from imposing excessive requirements for territorial representation of political parties as well as for minimum membership . The democratic or non - democratic character of the party organisation should not in principle be a ground for denying registration of a political party . Registration of political parties should be denied only in cases clearly indicated in the LAW on prohibition of political parties and analogous measures , i.e. when the use of violence is advocated or used as a political means to overthrow the democratic constitutional order , thereby undermining the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the LAW . The fact alone that a peaceful change of the LAW is advocated should not be sufficient for denial of registration .

C. Any activity requirements for political parties , as a prerequisite for maintaining the status as a political party and their control and supervision , have to be assessed by the same yardstick of what is ‘ necessary in a democratic society’ . Public authorities should refrain from any political or other excessive control over activities of political parties , such as membership , number and frequency of party congresses and meetings , operation of territorial branches and subdivisions .

ORG authorities should remain neutral in dealing with the process of establishment , registration ( where applied ) and activities of political parties and refrain from any measures that could privilege some political forces and discriminate others . All political parties should be given equal opportunities to participate in elections .

E. Any interference of public authorities with the activities of political parties , such as , for example , denial of registration , loss of the status of a political party if a given party has not succeeded in obtaining representation in the legislative bodies ( where applied ) , should be motivated , and legislation should provide for an opportunity for the party to challenge such decision or action in a court of law .

F. Although such concern as the unity of the country can be taken into consideration , Member GPE should not impose restrictions which are not “ necessary in a NORP society ” on the establishment and activities of political unions and associations on regional and local levels .

PERSON When national legislation provides that parties lose their status of a political party if they do not succeed to take part in elections or to obtain representation in legislative bodies , they should be allowed to continue their existence and activities under the general law on associations .

a. Registration of political parties

The already mentioned study on the establishment , organisation and activities of political parties conducted in DATE by ORG on ORG has shown that many countries view registration as a necessary step for recognition of an association as a political party , for participation in general elections or for public financing . This practice – as ORG has stated before in its LAW even if it were regarded as a restriction of the right to freedom of association and freedom of expression , would not per se amount to a violation of rights protected under LAW and CARDINAL of LAW . The requirements for registration , however , differ from CARDINAL country to another . Registration may be considered as a measure to inform the authorities about the establishment of the party as well as about its intention to participate in elections and , as a consequence , benefit from advantages given to political parties as a specific type of association . Far - reaching requirements , however , can raise the threshold for registration to an unreasonable level , which may be inconsistent with the Convention . Any provisions in relation to registration must be such as are necessary in a NORP society and proportionate to the object sought to be achieved by the measures in question .

b. Activity requirements for political parties and their control and supervision

Similar caution must be applied when it comes to activity requirements for political parties as a prerequisite for maintaining their status as a political party and their control and supervision . Far - reaching autonomy of political parties is a cornerstone of the freedoms of assembly and association and the freedom of expression as protected by LAW . As ORG has stated , the LAW requires that interference with the exercise of these rights must be assessed by the yardstick of what is ‘ necessary in a democratic FAC . The only type of necessity capable of justifying an interference with any of those rights is , therefore , one which may claim to DATE from ‘ democratic society’ . In particular , control over the statute or charter of a party should be primarily internal , i.e. should be exercised by the members of the party . As regards external control , the members of a party should have access to a court in case they consider that a decision of a party organ violates its statute . In general , judicial control over the parties should be preferred over executive control .

Another important aspect is that of equal treatment of parties by public authorities . In the case of registration procedure ( if it is foreseen by national legislation ) the ORG should proceed carefully in order to avoid any possible discrimination of political forces which might be considered as representing an opposition to the ruling party . In any case , clear and simple procedures should exist to challenge any decision and/or act of any registration authority in a court of law .

d. Political parties and elections

The main objective of political parties is participation in the public life of their country . Elections are essential for the fulfilment of this task ; therefore the principle of equality between parties is of utmost importance . In DATE some new democracies claim that the stability of government and the good functioning of parliament can be achieved through limiting the number of parties participating in elections . This suggestion seems to be in contradiction with NORP standards applicable to electoral process .

In DATE the role of a multitude of political parties as associations expressing the will of many different parts of society is being reconsidered in a positive way .

“ Preventing an excessive number of parties through the electoral system would seem to be the most effective and least objectionable method as far as political rights are concerned . The general trend is to avoid restricting the number of parties by tinkering with the terms and conditions governing registration , because refusal to register a party is often a convenient way for the authorities to get rid of a competitor who is irksome rather than ORG , ch . II.CARDINAL.CARDINAL ] .

In some Member GPE parties can lose their status of “ political party ” if they do not have any candidates elected in national elections . If the provisions of LAW and CARDINAL are to be applied with due regard to what is ‘ necessary in a democratic society’ , they should be allowed to continue their activities under the general law on associations .

e. Parties on local and regional levels

Member states should not restrict the right of association in a political party to the national level . There should be a possibility to create parties on regional and local levels since some groups of citizens might want to associate in groups limiting their action to local and regional levels and to local and regional elections . However , certain new democracies consider such extensive approach to the freedom of association premature in the light of their effort to preserve the unity of the ORG . Such concern can be understood , but before any restrictions are imposed , the principle of proportionality and the yardstick of what is ‘ necessary in a democratic society’ should be considered thoroughly . ”

The Report on the participation of political parties in elections ( ORG . ORG - AD(CARDINAL)CARDINAL , of DATE ) states as follows :

“ CARDINAL . Political parties are , as some Constitutions and ORG have expressly admitted , essential instruments for democratic participation . In fact , the very concept of the political party is based on the aim of participating “ in the management of public affairs by the presentation of candidates to free and democratic elections ” . They are thus a specific kind of association , which in many countries is submitted to registration for participation in elections or for public financing . This requirement of registration has been accepted , considering it as not per se contrary to the freedom of association , provided that conditions for registration are not too burdensome . And requirements for registration are very different from CARDINAL country to another : they may include , for instance , organisational conditions , requirement for minimum political activity , of standing for elections , of reaching a certain threshold of votes . However , some pre - conditions for registration of political parties existing in several ORG requiring a certain territorial representation and a minimal number of members for their registration could be problematic in the light of the principle of free association in political parties . ”

Further , in the report entitled “ Comments on the Draft law on political parties of GPE ” endorsed by ORG at its CARDINALst plenary session ( ORG . ORG , of DATE ) , ORG criticised the requirements contained in the Moldovan Draft Law that a political party have CARDINAL members in CARDINAL of the territorial administrative units , with CARDINAL members domiciled in each of the aforementioned territorial administrative units . It found those requirements to be unusually high as compared to other democracies in LOC and almost impossible to fulfil for any local association . In another report on GPE ORG criticised the statutory requirement that political parties submit membership lists for review DATE . The relevant part of that report , entitled ORG on the electoral law and the electoral administration in GPE of ORG ( Doc . PERSON , of DATE ) read as follows :

“ CARDINAL . GPE has gone too far in registering political opinions , in that the membership lists have to be submitted for review DATE .

It is difficult to find a justification for this . Once a party is registered and has run for elections , the results of the elections could be sufficient evidence of its support . Only the need for renewed registration of such parties , which never gained support during elections , is admissible . Submitting membership lists to the government if a party has won seats in ORG in a number of municipalities or rayons , seems at best unnecessarily bureaucratic , at worst , abusive .

DATE . Moreover , the requirement of support across the country discriminates regionally based parties . ”

ORG has also adopted LAW ( Doc . ORG , of DATE ) . ORG to LAW reads , in so far as relevant , as follows :

“ CARDINAL . Stability of the law is crucial to credibility of the electoral process , which is itself vital to consolidating democracy . Rules which change frequently – and especially rules which are complicated – may confuse voters . Above all , voters may conclude , rightly or wrongly , that electoral law is simply a tool in the hands of the powerful , and that their own votes have little weight in deciding the results of elections .

In practice , however , it is not so much stability of the basic principles which needs protecting ( they are not likely to be seriously challenged ) as stability of some of the more specific rules of electoral law , especially those covering the electoral system per se , the composition of electoral commissions and the drawing of constituency boundaries . These CARDINAL elements are often , rightly or wrongly , regarded as decisive factors in the election results , and care must be taken to avoid not only manipulation to the advantage of the party in power , but even the mere semblance of manipulation .

It is not so much changing voting systems which is a bad thing – they can always be changed for the better – as changing them frequently or just before ( within DATE of ) elections . Even when no manipulation is intended , changes will seem to be dictated by immediate party political interests . ”

The ORG conducted a comparative study of the legislation of CARDINAL - one Member States of ORG . CARDINAL of those GPE impose a minimum membership requirement on political parties . In particular , in order to obtain registration political parties are required to prove that they have a certain number of founding members . The required minimum membership ranges from CARDINAL in GPE and CARDINAL in GPE to CARDINAL in GPE and CARDINAL in GPE . CARDINAL countries ( GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE and GPE ) do not impose any minimum membership requirement on political parties . CARDINAL more countries , while not setting a membership requirement as such , make registration of a political party conditional on producing a certain number of signatures of support ( CARDINAL in GPE and GPE and CARDINAL in GPE ) . In CARDINAL countries is there a statutory requirement that a political party establish regional branches in a certain number of regions ( in CARDINAL of the regions in GPE and in all regions in GPE ) . The legislation of CARDINAL more countries requires political parties to have members domiciled in a certain number of regions ( CARDINAL members in CARDINAL of the regions in GPE and CARDINAL members in CARDINAL regions in GPE ) .

It must also be noted that out of the CARDINAL countries studied by the ORG the legislation of CARDINAL countries ( GPE and GPE ) restricts the right to nominate candidates for elections to political parties or their coalitions . The legislation of all the other countries examined allows the nomination of election candidates by associations of citizens or by self - nomination .

The ORG also studied a report adopted by ORG , on the establishment , organisation and activities of political parties on the basis of the replies to the questionnaire on the establishment , organisation and activities of political parties ( ORG . ORG ( CARDINAL , of DATE ) , which , in so far as relevant , reads as follows :

“ CARDINAL . This report has been prepared from the replies to ORG , which was adopted by ORG on ORG ( GPE , DATE , ORG ) . The questionnaire is a follow - up to a similar document , which was sent out earlier , as part of preparations for the adoption of ORG on ORG ( GPE , DATE , ORG ) .

NORP This time CARDINAL countries responded . They are listed here in alphabetical order :

GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , “ The Former GPE ” , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE and GPE .

CARDINAL Does the law distinguish between political parties on the local , the regional and the national level ?

The majority of responding countries do not distinguish between political parties on different levels of government , no matter whether the governmental system of the country is unitary , federal or other ; GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE and GPE may be mentioned as examples . There are exceptions , however . GPE distinguishes between political parties on the federal and on the provincial level . GPE prohibits explicitly establishment of political parties on the grounds of regional or territorial basis . GPE does not include political activities on the local level as aiming at taking part in the forming of the will in the representation of the people , i.e. the whole of the people ; associations which are politically active on the local level only , therefore , do not fall within the concept of political party in the sense of the LAW and the NORP legislation on political parties .

CARDINAL What are the substantive and procedural requirements to establish a political party ?

A number of countries have a specific legal framework for the activities of political parties and their establishment .

– in general

– concerning its political programme

– concerning founding members or concerning other individuals , who in some way have to support the establishment ( and their number , citizenship , geographical distribution etc . )

Some countries impose on political parties an obligation to go through a registration process . Almost all countries mentioned in the first group in paragraph CARDINAL have to go through a registration process or at least through deposition of their articles of association with the competent authorities of their country . This process is justified by the need of formal recognition of an association as a political party . Some of these additional requirements can differ from CARDINAL country to another :

d ) ORG minimum membership ( GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE and GPE ) ;

i ) signatures attesting certain territorial representation ( GPE , GPE , GPE and GPE ) ;

After these requirements are met , a competent body ( Ministry of Justice , for example ) proceeds with official registration . In the case of such countries as , for example , GPE and GPE , the LAW ( articles of association ) are just submitted to the competent authority in order to be added to a special ORG register .

CARDINAL Is a political party required to maintain national , regional or local branches or offices ?

There are no requirements in law to maintain branches or offices in a particular way in GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE and GPE . GPE requires political parties to maintain a head office , GPE requires headquarters and GPE , a national office in GPE . GPE requires parties to maintain regional branches , and in GPE a party must state whether it intends to operate in GPE as a whole , in part of GPE or at a local level ; however , this is no more than a statement of intention , and the law does not appear to impose a legal obligation on the party to carry out this statement of intention . In GPE , within DATE from the date of registration a political party shall secure the formation and registration of its regional , city and district organisations in most regions of GPE , in the cities of GPE and PERSON and in GPE .

CARDINAL Is it mandatory for political parties , e.g. as a prerequisite for maintaining registration or for access to public financing ,

- to present individual candidates or lists of candidates for general elections on the local , regional or national level ?

- to participate in local , regional or national election campaigns ?

- to get a minimum percentage of votes or a certain number of candidates elected in local , regional and national elections ?

- to conduct other political activities specified by law ?

Regulations on the participation of political parties in the political process of the country are more diverse in the case of GPE where there is a requirement for party registration . However , financing from public sources is subject to detailed legislation in most countries . Such general trends can be observed in countries for party registration and party financing :

( a ) NORP only parties participating in general elections , which attain a certain threshold can receive public funding ( GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , “ the Former GPE ” , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , the GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE , GPE ) ;

( b ) registration is revoked if a party :

( CARDINAL ) does not take part in a certain number of elections ( GPE ) ;

( CARDINAL ) does not receive a minimum number of votes ( GPE ) ; or

( CARDINAL ) fails to prove a minimum membership and/or regional representation ( GPE , GPE , GPE ) ;

( c ) The party is removed from the official list of parties but can continue to exist as an association if it does not take part in a certain number of elections ( GPE ) ... ”


Violation of Art. 6-1;Remainder inadmissible;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - financial award;Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings

The applicant was born in DATE and lives in GPE . He suffers from an occupational disease .

On DATE the applicant sued his former employers , private companies , for compensation for health damage . The ORG of PERSON registered his statement of claim and listed the first preliminary hearing for DATE . Another preliminary hearing was held on DATE .

Of CARDINAL hearings listed DATE and DATE CARDINAL hearings were adjourned because the judge was ill or involved in other proceedings and CARDINAL hearings were postponed for provision of additional evidence and obtaining statements by witnesses .

NORP In DATE and DATE the applicant asked ORG to order expert medical examinations . The examinations were not ordered because the applicant withdrew his requests .

On DATE ORG dismissed the applicant 's action as unsubstantiated .

That judgment was quashed on appeal by ORG on DATE . The case was remitted for a fresh examination to ORG .

It appears that ORG received the case - file on DATE and listed a hearing for DATE . At that hearing the applicant amended his claims and requested ORG not to perform a medical examination .

DATE and DATE ORG listed CARDINAL hearings . All of the hearings were adjourned because the judge was ill or involved in other unrelated proceedings .

On DATE ORG ordered a medical examination of the applicant . The court noted that the defendants should bear the expenses of the examination and stayed the proceedings pending completion . NORP The applicant appealed against that decision , claiming that the examination was not necessary .

ORG upheld the decision of DATE on DATE .

On DATE the ORG sent the case - file and the applicant 's medical records to the GPE - based ORG on occupational diseases ( Федеральный экспертный совет по профзаболеваниям ) .

NORP In DATE the council informed the applicant that the examination had not been carried out because it had not been paid for .

The examination was performed on DATE by ORG of the medical sciences . The expert report was sent to ORG on DATE . DATE ORG received the case - file .

On DATE the case was assigned to another judge and a hearing was fixed for DATE . DATE and DATE ORG fixed CARDINAL hearings which were adjourned because the defendants defaulted and the judge was ill .

On DATE ORG dismissed the applicant 's claims .

That judgment was upheld on DATE by ORG .