in contrast in countries where there is no integrated national climate change action plan or domestic climate change policy framework it has been observed that donors are more likely to finance their own priorities see eg cameron zou and ockenden this is reported to be the case even when national climate change policy reports exist ie namas or nap as have been submitted to the unfccc but it is not clear if this is a case of poor alignment or if systems are not in place to support these plans for example the use of country systems and procedures such as national arrangements and procedures of public financial management accounting auditing procurement monitoring and evaluation is encouraged where appropriate ie busan and manila consensus to improve the effectiveness climate finance through reinforcing the sustainability of results and allowing recipient countries to take greater ownership practitioners recognise aid effectiveness principles and the benefits of using country systems eg ec gcca