how these pathways play out depends on intrahousehold gender dynamics which are in turn are affected by local gender regimes and socioeconomic inequalities within a setting or beneficiary population likewise programs that generate smaller shifts in relationship power appear more easily accepted by men than those catalysing larger disruptions wasilkowska slate and mphale maldonado for example buller and colleagues note that increased cash and inkind transfers to women was accepted by colombian and ecuadorian men in part because it was intended for children s nutrition a domain already within the domestic r esponsibilities of women indeed how a program is framed and the meaning imbued to cash by a program s stated intent eg for women s entrepreneurship versus child health may influence the transfer s impact on gender dynamics and ipv as much as any other program feature