title: 2013/602/EU: Decision of the European Parliament of 17 April 2013 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the financial year 2011#Resolution of the European Parliament of 17 April 2013 with observations forming an integral part of its Decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the financial year 2011

text:
               16.11.2013

               EN

               Official Journal of the European Union

               L 308/303

         DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
   of 17 April 2013
   on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the financial year 2011
   (2013/602/EU)
   THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

               —

               having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the financial year 2011,

               —

               having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the financial year 2011, together with the Foundation’s replies (1),

               —

               having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 12 February 2013 (05753/2013 – C7-0041/2013),

               —

               having regard to Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

               —

               having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (2), and in particular Article 185 thereof,

               —

               having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (3), and in particular Article 208 thereof,

               —

               having regard to Regulation (EEC) No 1365/75 of the Council of 26 May 1975 on the creation of a European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (4), and in particular Article 16 thereof,

               —

               having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (5), and in particular Article 94 thereof,

               —

               having regard to Rule 77 of, and Annex VI to, its Rules of Procedure,

               —

               having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (A7-0067/2013),

               1.

               Grants the Director of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions discharge in respect of the implementation of the Foundation’s budget for the financial year 2011;

               2.

               Sets out its observations in the resolution below;

               3.

               Instructs its President to forward this Decision and the resolution that forms an integral part of it to the Director of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).

            The President

         Martin SCHULZ

            The Secretary-General

         Klaus WELLE

      (1)  OJ C 388, 15.12.2012, p. 174.

      (2)  OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

      (3)  OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

      (4)  OJ L 139, 30.5.1975, p. 1.

      (5)  OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72.

      RESOLUTION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
      of 17 April 2013
      with observations forming an integral part of its Decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the financial year 2011
      THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

                  —

                  having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the financial year 2011,

                  —

                  having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the financial year 2011, together with the Foundation’s replies (1),

                  —

                  having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 12 February 2013 (05753/2013 – C7-0041/2013),

                  —

                  having regard to Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

                  —

                  having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (2), and in particular Article 185 thereof,

                  —

                  having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (3), and in particular Article 208 thereof,

                  —

                  having regard to Regulation (EEC) No 1365/75 of the Council of 26 May 1975 on the creation of a European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (4), and in particular Article 16 thereof,

                  —

                  having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (5), and in particular Article 94 thereof,

                  —

                  having regard to Rule 77 of, and Annex VI to, its Rules of Procedure,

                  —

                  having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (A7-0067/2013),

                  A.

                  whereas the Court of Auditors stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the annual accounts for the financial year 2011 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular,

                  B.

                  whereas on 10 May 2012, Parliament granted the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (‘the Foundation’) discharge for the implementation of the Foundation’s budget for the financial year 2010 (6), and in its resolution accompanying the discharge, inter alia:

                              —

                              urged the Foundation to register all decisions of the Governing Board on surveys as the efficiency and effectiveness in communicating these decisions may be affected in the absence of proper standards for documenting decisions made;

                              —

                              called on the Foundation to put written procedures in place describing its core activities, which could help the Foundation to use its resources effectively and identify possible weaknesses;

                              —

                              urged the Foundation to properly address the recommendations issued by the Internal Audit Service (IAS) and to inform the discharge authority on the measures taken in this respect;

                  C.

                  whereas the overall budget of the Foundation for the year 2011 was EUR 20 600 000, which is a decrease compared to the 2010 financial year (EUR 20 900 000); whereas for 2011, the initial contribution of the Union to the Foundation’s budget amounted to EUR 20 210 000, compared to EUR 19 067 159 in 2010,

         Budgetary and financial management

                  1.

                  Observes from the annual accounts that EUR 1 166 895 of the commitment appropriations contracted by the end of 2011 but not yet paid were carried forward to 2012; notes, furthermore, that the total of carried forward appropriations cancelled (i.e. carried forward from 2010 and not paid in 2011) in 2011 represents EUR 130 133;

                  2.

                  Is concerned that the Court of Auditors reported that the Foundation carried over 47 % of Title III appropriations (operational expenditure), amounting to EUR 3 400 000, of which EUR 1 600 000 were unplanned (22 % of Title III); expresses concern that this situation indicates delays in the implementation of the Foundation’s activities which are financed by Title III and is at odds with the budgetary principle of annuality;

                  3.

                  Calls on the Foundation to inform the discharge authority of the actions it has taken to address this deficiency and the actions it will take to prevent such a situation in the future; notes, furthermore, that the situation deteriorated, compared to the previous year;

         Follow-up of the discharge 2010 recommendations

                  4.

                  Welcomes the Foundation’s report on measures taken in light of the discharge authority’s recommendations of 2010; in particular, notes that according to the Foundation:

                              —

                              a register of all Board and Bureau decisions is available on the Foundation’s website and that missing signatures and dates were singular mistakes which were remedied;

                              —

                              the comprehensive manual for the survey management process, as recommended by the IAS as part of its audit on survey management, had been established and is now followed by the organisation;

                              —

                              all open recommendations of the IAS at the end of 2010 were closed and details can be found in the Annual Report on Internal Audit Activities 2011 (report according to Article 72.5 of the Financial Regulation);

         Performance

                  5.

                  Invites the Commission, together with the European Training Foundation, the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions and the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, to further explore the synergies that exist between those agencies and to report, before any decisions concerning possible changes to the respective responsibilities and/or working methods of these agencies are considered, to the discharge authority on the possible deeper integration of those four agencies; invites those agencies and the Commission to evaluate whether closer cooperation could lead to economies of scale and optimisation of their performance;

         Recruitment procedures

                  6.

                  Notes that the Court of Auditors identified a need to improve the transparency of recruitment procedures; notes that selection board meetings were not always sufficiently documented and there is no evidence that questions for interviews or written tests were set before interviews or examinations;

                  7.

                  Calls on the Foundation to inform the discharge authority of the actions it has taken to address this deficiency; considers that some of the provisions of the Staff Regulations may present a considerable administrative burden; encourages, therefore, the Commission to allow for a certain degree of simplification under Article 110 of the Staff Regulations in regard to the agencies;

                  8.

                  Refers, in respect of the other observations accompanying its Decision on discharge, which are of a horizontal nature, to its resolution of 17 April 2013 (7) on the performance, financial management and control of the agencies.

         (1)  OJ C 388, 15.12.2012, p. 174.

         (2)  OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

         (3)  OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

         (4)  OJ L 139, 30.5.1975, p. 1.

         (5)  OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72.

         (6)  OJ L 286, 17.10.2012, p. 258.

         (7)  Texts adopted, P7_TA(2013)0134. (See page 374 of this Official Journal).


title: Council Decision 2012/315/CFSP of 19 December 2011 on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand establishing a framework for the participation of New Zealand in European Union crisis management operations#Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand establishing a framework for the participation of New Zealand in European Union crisis management operations

text:
               21.6.2012

               EN

               Official Journal of the European Union

               L 160/1

         COUNCIL DECISION 2012/315/CFSP
   of 19 December 2011
   on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand establishing a framework for the participation of New Zealand in European Union crisis management operations
   THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
   Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, in particular Article 37 thereof, and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in particular Article 218(5) and (6) thereof,
   Having regard to the proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (‘the HR’),
   Whereas:

               (1)

               Conditions regarding the participation of third States in European Union crisis management operations should be laid down in an agreement establishing a framework for such possible future participation, rather than defining those conditions on a case-by-case basis for each operation concerned.

               (2)

               Following the adoption of a Decision by the Council on 26 April 2010 authorising the opening of negotiations, the HR negotiated an Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand establishing a framework for the participation of New Zealand in European Union crisis management operations (‘the Agreement’).

               (3)

               The Agreement should be approved,

         HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
   Article 1
   The Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand establishing a framework for the participation of New Zealand in European Union crisis management operations is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.
   The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.
   Article 2
   The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement in order to bind the Union.
   Article 3
   The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Union, give the notification provided for in Article 16(1) of the Agreement.
   Article 4
   This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

      Done at Brussels, 19 December 2011.

            For the Council

            The President

         M. KOROLEC

      AGREEMENT
      between the European Union and New Zealand establishing a framework for the participation of New Zealand in European Union crisis management operations
      THE EUROPEAN UNION (EU),
      of the one part, and
      NEW ZEALAND
      of the other part,
      hereinafter referred to as the ‘Parties’,
      WHEREAS:

                  (1)

                  The European Union may decide to take action in the field of crisis management.

                  (2)

                  The European Union will decide whether third States will be invited to participate in an EU crisis management operation. New Zealand may accept the invitation by the European Union and offer its contribution. In such case, the European Union will decide on the acceptance of the proposed contribution of New Zealand.

                  (3)

                  Conditions regarding the participation of New Zealand in EU crisis management operations should be laid down in an Agreement establishing a framework for such possible future participation, rather than defining these conditions on a case-by-case basis for each operation concerned.

                  (4)

                  Such an Agreement should be without prejudice to the decision-making autonomy of the European Union, and should not prejudge the case-by-case nature of the decisions of New Zealand to participate in an EU crisis management operation.

                  (5)

                  Such an Agreement should only address EU crisis management operations and should be without prejudice to any existing agreements regulating the participation of New Zealand in an EU crisis management operation that has been already deployed,

            HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
      SECTION I

         GENERAL PROVISIONS

      Article 1
      Decisions relating to the participation
      1.   Following the decision of the European Union to invite New Zealand to participate in an EU crisis management operation, and once New Zealand has decided to participate, New Zealand shall provide information on its proposed contribution to the European Union.
      2.   The European Union shall provide New Zealand with an early indication of the likely contribution to the common costs of the operation as soon as possible with a view to assisting New Zealand in the formulation of its offer.
      3.   The assessment by the European Union of New Zealand’s proposed contribution shall be conducted in consultation with New Zealand.
      4.   The European Union shall communicate the outcome of that assessment to New Zealand by letter in a timely fashion with a view to securing the participation of New Zealand in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.
      Article 2
      Framework
      1.   New Zealand shall associate itself with the Council Decision by which the Council of the European Union decides that the EU will conduct the crisis management operation, and with any other decision by which the Council of the European Union decides to extend the EU crisis management operation, in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement and any required implementing arrangements.
      2.   The participation of New Zealand in an EU crisis management operation shall be without prejudice to the decision-making autonomy of the European Union.
      3.   Paragraph 1 does not affect the right of New Zealand to withdraw from participation in an EU crisis management operation if it does not agree with a Decision referred to in that paragraph.
      Article 3
      Status of personnel and forces
      1.   The status of personnel seconded to an EU civilian crisis management operation and/or of the forces contributed to an EU military crisis management operation by New Zealand shall be governed by the agreement on the status of forces/mission, if available, concluded between the European Union and the State(s) in which the operation is conducted.
      2.   The status of personnel contributed to headquarters or command elements located outside the State(s) in which the EU crisis management operation takes place, shall be governed by arrangements between the headquarters and command elements concerned and New Zealand.
      3.   Without prejudice to the agreement on the status of forces/mission referred to in paragraph 1, and subject to any bilateral or multilateral agreements in force, in cases where the forces of New Zealand operate on board a vessel or aircraft of an EU Member State, the latter State shall exercise jurisdiction in accordance with its internal laws and procedures.
      4.   New Zealand shall be responsible for answering any claims linked to its participation in an EU crisis management operation, from or concerning any of its personnel. New Zealand shall be responsible for bringing any action, in particular legal or disciplinary, against any of its personnel in accordance with its laws and regulations.
      5.   The Parties agree to waive any and all claims (other than contractual claims) against each other for damage to, loss, or destruction of assets owned/operated by either Party, or injury or death to personnel of either Party, arising out of the performance of their official duties in connection with activities under this Agreement, except in the case of gross negligence or wilful misconduct.
      6.   New Zealand undertakes to make a declaration as regards the waiver of claims against any State participating in an EU crisis management operation in which New Zealand participates, and to do so when signing this Agreement.
      7.   The European Union undertakes to ensure that European Union Member States make a declaration as regards the waiver of claims, for any future participation of New Zealand in an EU crisis management operation, and to do so when signing this Agreement.
      Article 4
      Classified information
      1.   New Zealand shall take appropriate measures to ensure that EU classified information is protected in accordance with the European Union Council’s security regulations, contained in Council Decision 2011/292/EU of 31 March 2011 on the security rules for protecting EU classified information (1), and in accordance with further guidance issued by competent authorities, including the EU Operation Commander concerning an EU military crisis management operation or by the EU Head of Mission concerning an EU civilian crisis management operation.
      2.   If the EU receives classified information from New Zealand, that information shall be given protection appropriate to its classification and equivalent to the standards established in the regulations for EU classified information.
      3.   Where the EU and New Zealand have concluded an agreement on security procedures for the exchange of classified information, the provisions of such an agreement shall apply in the context of an EU crisis management operation.
      SECTION II

         PROVISIONS ON PARTICIPATION IN CIVILIAN CRISIS MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS

      Article 5
      Personnel seconded to an EU civilian crisis management operation
      1.   New Zealand shall ensure that its personnel seconded to the EU civilian crisis management operation undertake their mission in accordance with:

                  (a)

                  the Council Decision and subsequent amendments as referred to in Article 2(1);

                  (b)

                  the Operation Plan;

                  (c)

                  implementing measures.

            2.   New Zealand shall inform in due time the Head of Mission of the EU civilian crisis management operation (‘Head of Mission’) and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (‘HR’) of any change to its contribution to the EU civilian crisis management operation.
      3.   Personnel seconded to the EU civilian crisis management operation shall undergo a medical examination, vaccination as may be deemed necessary by the competent New Zealand authorities, and be certified medically fit for duty by a competent authority from New Zealand. Personnel seconded to the EU civilian crisis management operation shall produce a copy of that certification.
      Article 6
      Chain of command
      1.   Personnel seconded by New Zealand shall carry out their duties and conduct themselves solely with the interests of the EU civilian crisis management operation in mind.
      2.   All personnel shall remain under the full command of their national authorities.
      3.   National authorities shall transfer operational control to the European Union.
      4.   The Head of Mission shall assume responsibility and exercise command and control of the EU civilian crisis management operation at theatre level.
      5.   The Head of Mission shall lead the EU civilian crisis management operation and assume its day-to-day management.
      6.   New Zealand shall have the same rights and obligations in terms of day-to-day management of the operation as European Union Member States taking part in the operation, in accordance with the legal instruments referred to in Article 2(1).
      7.   The EU civilian crisis management operation Head of Mission shall be responsible for disciplinary control over EU civilian crisis management operation personnel. Where required, disciplinary action shall be taken by the national authority concerned.
      8.   A National Contingent Point of Contact (NPC) shall be appointed by New Zealand to represent its national contingent in the operation. The NPC shall report to the EU civilian crisis management operation Head of Mission on national matters and shall be responsible for day-to-day discipline of the contingent.
      9.   The decision to end the operation shall be taken by the European Union, following consultation with New Zealand if it is still contributing to the EU civilian crisis management operation at the date of termination of the operation.
      Article 7
      Financial aspects
      1.   New Zealand shall assume all the costs associated with its participation in the operation apart from the running costs, as set out in the operational budget of the operation. This shall be without prejudice to Article 8.
      2.   In case of death, injury, loss or damage to natural or legal persons from the State(s) in which the operation is conducted, issues of possible liability and compensation by New Zealand shall be governed by the conditions foreseen in the applicable status of mission agreement referred to in Article 3(1) or any applicable alternative arrangements.
      Article 8
      Contribution to operational budget
      1.   New Zealand shall contribute to the financing of the budget of the EU civilian crisis management operation.
      2.   The financial contribution of New Zealand to the operational budget shall be calculated on the basis of either of the following formulae, whichever produces the lower amount:

                  (a)

                  the share of the reference amount which is in proportion to the ratio of New Zealand’s GNI to the total GNIs of all States contributing to the operational budget of the operation; or

                  (b)

                  the share of the reference amount for the operational budget which is in proportion to the ratio of the number of personnel from New Zealand participating in the operation to the total number of personnel of all States participating in the operation.

            3.   Notwithstanding paragraphs 1 and 2, New Zealand shall not make any contribution towards the financing of per diem allowances paid to personnel of the European Union Member States.
      4.   Notwithstanding paragraph 1, the European Union shall, in principle, exempt New Zealand from financial contributions to a particular EU civilian crisis management operation when:

                  (a)

                  the European Union decides that New Zealand’s participation in the operation provides a significant contribution which is essential for this operation; or

                  (b)

                  New Zealand has a GNI per capita which does not exceed that of any Member State of the European Union.

            5.   An arrangement on the payment of the contributions of New Zealand to the operational budget of the EU civilian crisis management operation shall be signed between the EU civilian crisis management operation Head of Mission and the relevant administrative services of New Zealand. That arrangement shall, inter alia, include the following provisions:

                  (a)

                  the amount concerned;

                  (b)

                  the arrangements for payment of the financial contribution; and

                  (c)

                  the auditing procedure.

            SECTION III

         PROVISIONS ON PARTICIPATION IN MILITARY CRISIS MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS

      Article 9
      Participation in the EU military crisis management operation
      1.   New Zealand shall ensure that its forces and personnel participating in the EU military crisis management operation undertake their mission in accordance with:

                  (a)

                  the Council Decision and subsequent amendments as referred to in Article 2(1);

                  (b)

                  the Operation Plan; and

                  (c)

                  implementing measures.

            2.   New Zealand shall inform the EU Operation Commander in due time of any change to its participation in the operation.
      Article 10
      Chain of command
      1.   All forces and personnel participating in the EU military crisis management operation shall remain under the full command of their national authorities.
      2.   Personnel seconded by New Zealand shall carry out their duties and conduct themselves solely with the interest of the EU military crisis management operation in mind.
      3.   National authorities shall transfer the Operational and Tactical command and/or control of their forces and personnel to the EU Operation Commander, who is entitled to delegate his authority.
      4.   New Zealand shall have the same rights and obligations in terms of the day-to-day management of the operation as participating European Union Member States.
      5.   The EU Operation Commander may, following consultations with New Zealand, at any time request the withdrawal of New Zealand’s contribution.
      6.   A Senior Military Representative (SMR) shall be appointed by New Zealand to represent its national contingent in the EU military crisis management operation. The SMR shall consult with the EU Force Commander on all matters affecting the operation and shall be responsible for the day-to-day discipline of contingent of New Zealand.
      Article 11
      Financial aspects
      1.   Without prejudice to Article 12 of this agreement, New Zealand shall assume all the costs associated with its participation in the operation unless the costs are subject to common funding as provided for in the legal instruments referred to in Article 2(1) of this Agreement, as well as in Council Decision 2008/975/CFSP (2) establishing a mechanism to administer the financing of the common costs of EU operations having military or defence implications.
      2.   In case of death, injury, loss or damage to natural or legal persons from the State(s) in which the operation is conducted, issues of possible liability and compensation by New Zealand shall be governed by the conditions foreseen in the applicable status of forces agreement referred to in Article 3(1) or any applicable alternative arrangements.
      Article 12
      Contribution to the common costs
      1.   New Zealand shall contribute to the financing of the common costs of the EU military crisis management operation.
      2.   The financial contribution of New Zealand to the common costs shall be calculated on the basis of either of the following two formulae, whichever produces the lower amount:

                  (a)

                  the share of the common costs which is in proportion to the ratio of New Zealand’s GNI to the total GNIs of all States contributing to the common costs of the operation; or

                  (b)

                  the share of the common costs which is in proportion to the ratio of the number of personnel from New Zealand participating in the operation to the total number of personnel of all States participating in the operation.

            Where the formula under point (b) of the first subparagraph is used and New Zealand contributes personnel only to the Operation or Force Headquarters, the ratio used shall be that of its personnel to that of the total number of the respective headquarters personnel. In other cases, the ratio shall be that of all personnel contributed by New Zealand to that of the total personnel of the operation.
      3.   Notwithstanding paragraph 1 above, the European Union shall, in principle, exempt New Zealand from financial contributions to the common costs of a particular EU military crisis management operation when:

                  (a)

                  the European Union decides that New Zealand’s participation in the operation provides a significant contribution to assets and/or capabilities which are essential for the operation; or

                  (b)

                  New Zealand has a GNI per capita which does not exceed that of any Member State of the European Union.

            4.   An arrangement shall be concluded between the Administrator provided for in Decision 2008/975/CFSP establishing a mechanism to administer the financing of the common costs of EU operations having military or defence implications, and the competent administrative authorities of New Zealand. That arrangement shall include inter alia provisions on:

                  (a)

                  the amount concerned;

                  (b)

                  the arrangements for payment of the financial contribution; and

                  (c)

                  the auditing procedure.

            SECTION IV

         FINAL PROVISIONS

      Article 13
      Arrangements to implement the Agreement
      Without prejudice to the provisions of Articles 12(4) and 8(5), any necessary technical and administrative arrangements in pursuance of the implementation of this Agreement shall be concluded between the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, and the appropriate authorities of New Zealand.
      Article 14
      Non-compliance
      Should one of the Parties fail to comply with its obligations under this Agreement, the other Party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by serving notice of one month.
      Article 15
      Dispute settlement
      Disputes concerning the interpretation or application of this Agreement shall be settled by diplomatic means between the Parties.
      Article 16
      Entry into force
      1.   This Agreement shall enter into force on the first day of the first month after the Parties have notified each other of the completion of the internal procedures necessary for this purpose.
      2.   This Agreement shall be reviewed upon the request of either Party.
      3.   This Agreement may be amended on the basis of a mutual written agreement between the Parties.
      4.   This Agreement maybe denounced by either Party by written notice of denunciation given to the other Party. Such denunciation shall take effect six months after receipt of notification by the other Party.

         Done at Brussels, this eighteenth day of April in the year two thousand and twelve.

            For the European Union

            For New Zealand

         (1)  OJ L 141, 27.5.2011, p. 17.

         (2)  OJ L 345, 23.12.2008, p. 96.

         DECLARATION BY THE EU MEMBER STATES
         The EU Member States applying an EU Council Decision of an EU crisis management operation in which New Zealand participates will endeavour, insofar as their internal legal systems so permit, to waive as far as possible claims against New Zealand for injury, death of their personnel, or damage to, or loss of, any assets owned by themselves and used by the EU crisis management operation if such injury, death, damage or loss:

                     —

                     was caused by personnel from New Zealand in the execution of their duties in connection with the EU crisis management operation, except in case of gross negligence or wilful misconduct, or

                     —

                     arose from the use of any assets owned by New Zealand, provided that the assets were used in connection with the operation and except in case of gross negligence or wilful misconduct of EU crisis management operation personnel from New Zealand using those assets.

         DECLARATION BY NEW ZEALAND
         New Zealand, when applying an EU Council Decision of an EU crisis management operation, will endeavour, insofar as its internal legal system so permits, to waive as far as possible claims against any EU Member State participating in the EU crisis management operation for injury, death of its personnel, or damage to, or loss of, any assets owned by itself and used by the EU crisis management operation if such injury, death, damage or loss:

                     (a)

                     was caused by personnel in the execution of their duties in connection with the EU crisis management operation, except in case of gross negligence or wilful misconduct; or

                     (b)

                     arose from the use of any assets owned by States participating in the EU crisis management operation, provided that the assets were used in connection with the operation and except in case of gross negligence or wilful misconduct of EU crisis management operation personnel using those assets.