I think, than other encoders that are out there. I actually just filled out the survey that just came for the feedback one. I did the webinar for that. I would recommend it over some other ones. There's one negative to it versus another one that's out there is we can't run commercial edits against it like another larger one. But that would be the only drawback that I've seen so far, but at least helps you with your federal payers. Okay. And so as a coding professional, you know, there are all these tools. But I primarily when you come into the industry, you just see these code books, which are huge and weigh a ton and the thought of lugging those around is daunting. Does does your encoder to tool codify, does that replace books? It depends on the coder. I'm personally one that I have to have books and my encoder. Codify has the electronic version on stuff. But if you walked into my office right now, you would see seven books already opened and spread out across my desk. So I've got that in addition to my encoder on my other screen just because sometimes it's easier just to flip open a book. Okay. All right. So what's the mentality? Jessica, is it efficiency? I guess for your staff, is it just trying to code as many records as possible? How do you guys operate at your facility? So it depends. I'm in regards to codified, it's definitely so it goes out clean. You don't want to have to go back and pay someone to a word production coding. So the least