Rate Structure Design
- Implementation Timeline
- Administration and Staffing
- Container Options
- Consensus Building (Gaining Public and Political Support)
- Education and Outreach
- Goal Setting
- Illegal Diversion (Dumping, Burning)

Rate Structure Design
- Implementation Timeline
- Administration and Staffing
- Container Options
- Consensus Building (Gaining Public and Political Support)
- Education and Outreach
- Goal Setting
- Illegal Diversion (Dumping, Burning)
- Legal Issues (Ordinances)
- Monitoring and Evaluation
- Apartment/Multi-Family Housing
- Pilot Programs
- Pricing Systems
- Rate Structure Design
- Recycling and Other Complementary Programs
- Scheduling Issues
- Special Populations
- Volume- vs. Weight-Based Programs
The goal of rate structure design is to determine the price that solid waste planners will charge residents for each container of garbage they set out for collection. Communities usually focus on setting a price that will allow the new program to pay for itself-or at least cover a certain level of their solid waste management costs.
Throughout the pay-as-you-throw (PAYT) planning process, solid waste planners make choices on a wide range of program options. Every program decision, from selecting complementary programs to dealing with residents of apartments/multi-family housing, will affect a community's rate structure. To account for program costs and the level of revenues needed to pay for them, most communities embark on a thorough rate structure design process.
When beginning to design a rate structure, communities often refer back to their program goals. A rate structure can be used to support such key goals as:
- Waste prevention. Many communities are interested in increasing
the amount of material recycled and reducing trash generation rates.
(PAYT often results in households discarding
between 14 and 17 percent less waste, on average. Recycling amounts
increase by between 32 and 59 percent, on average.)
- Greater equity. One of the strongest selling points of PAYT
is the greater level of fairness it offers. Residents pay only for the
trash they set out for collection.
- Extended landfill capacity. By reducing disposal amounts, communities
are able to prolong the life of existing landfills and postpone the
need to locate new disposal facilities.
- Revenue stability. For many communities, creating a rate structure
that generates a predictable level of revenues is an important objective.
To arrive at a price per container that will help them meet their goals, planners typically use one of three approaches (or a combination of these approaches): checking with neighboring communities, estimating a price based on program costs, and performing an advanced rate setting analysis.
Neighboring communities approach
Communities that have launched PAYT programs are an important source of information on rates. One approach to setting a unit price is to examine programs in nearby cities or towns, particularly those with similar demographics. Planners sometimes choose to find communities with comparable disposal costs and tipping fees, complementary programs, and pickup frequency. After learning what size containers are used and the price for each, planners can adjust this rate to fit their community's goals. Others use neighboring rates as a starting point for more extensive calculations.
Estimating the per-container price
A second approach communities use is to review data on program costs and the estimated amount of waste collected each year to calculate a price per container. Planners usually focus on the annual costs of their program and where shifts in program costs could occur. Categories of program expenses could include:
- Administration costs. These include public outreach, enforcement,
and billing and customer service.
- Collection costs. These costs include collecting trash and
recyclables, as well as labor and equipment costs and contract payments.
- Disposal and material handling costs. These include fees for
landfill disposal or waste combustion and costs for materials recovery
Depending on a community's goals and overall approach to rate structure design, costs for a solid waste program with PAYT may increase, decrease, or stay approximately the same. Communities often emphasize that PAYT need not cost more than the existing solid waste program. It is just a different way of structuring the delivery of services.
The next step is to estimate the annual number of containers residents will use once the program is implemented, based on the total annual tonnage of waste collected. (Tonnage can be calculated by checking data on the weight of residential materials disposed of each year.) First, planners often determine the average weight of each container size they will provide. Then, the estimated annual tonnage under the new program is divided by the average weight per container to arrive at the number of containers residents will set out each year.
Once costs have been estimated, planners can divide this figure by the annual number of containers they expect residents to use. This results in the approximate per-container fee that will enable a community to cover the costs of PAYT and other solid waste programs. Because residents have an incentive to reduce and recycle, certain program costs (including labor, equipment, and tipping fees) might be reduced. Other budget areas might need to be increased, such as recycling and other complementary programs.
The cost and revenue calculations planners use with this approach can be simple or complex, de