There are several reasons that explain the growth in the use of crime labs in the past 40 years. Supreme Court decisions in 1960 have compelled police officers to place greater outlook on securing scientifically evaluated evidence. Coinciding with these judicial requirements
There are several reasons that explain the growth in the use of crime labs in the past 40 years. Supreme Court decisions in 1960 have compelled police officers to place greater outlook on securing scientifically evaluated evidence. Coinciding with these judicial requirements is the rapid growth in crime-rates in the past forty years, more importantly drug related arrests, and because all seizures must be sent to the forensic lab for chemical analysis before the case can be adjudicated. DNA profiling caused the major growth within the crime labs. DNA technology crime labs had to expand their staff and modernize their physical plants.
2. Describe the criteria for admissibility of scientific evidence as laid out in Frye v. United States.
During the Frye v. United States case the lie detector test was determined as judicial admissibility of scientific examinations. Scientific test presented collections of experts who testified the scientific issues. The court generally accepted by relevant members of the scientific community.
3. What document offers an alternative to the Frye standard that some courts believe espouses a more flexible standard for admitting scientific evidence?
The document offered an alternative to the Frye standard is the Daubert standard. This says that the trail judges ultimately assume responsibility as “gatekeeper” in judging admissibility and reliability of scientific evidence in their courts.
4. In its decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., who did the U.S. Supreme Court charge with ensuring that an expert's testimony rests on a reliable foundation and is relevant to the case?
The U.S Supreme Court charge the judge of ensuring that the expert’s testimony was relevant to the case to the trial judge, because of the Federal Rules of Evidence rule 702.
5. What is the main difference... [continues]
Cite This Essay
(2012, 10). Week 2 Individual Work. StudyMode.com. Retrieved 10, 2012, from http://www.studymode.com/essays/Week-2-Individual-Work-1122008.html
"Week 2 Individual Work" StudyMode.com. 10 2012. 2012. 10 2012 <http://www.studymode.com/essays/Week-2-Individual-Work-1122008.html>.
- MLA 7
"Week 2 Individual Work." StudyMode.com. StudyMode.com, 10 2012. Web. 10 2012. <http://www.studymode.com/essays/Week-2-Individual-Work-1122008.html>.
"Week 2 Individual Work." StudyMode.com. 10, 2012. Accessed 10, 2012. http://www.studymode.com/essays/Week-2-Individual-Work-1122008.html.