LPWAN : the rise of an IoT-specific network
For several years now, the industry has been developing a new kind of medium- and wide-area network for the IoT, called LPWAN (Low-Power Wide-Area Networks),
LPWAN : the rise of an IoT-specific network
For several years now, the industry has been developing a new kind of medium- and wide-area network for the IoT, called LPWAN (Low-Power Wide-Area Networks), which have been created as a pre-emptive solution for the planned phase-out of GPRS networks.
LPWAN uses common technologies such as LoRa, SigFox, LTE-M (Long Term Evolution-M) and NB-IoT (Narrowband Internet of Things) to send messages over a range of 40 km, covering vast areas via relay antennas.
That being said, LPWAN is not suitable for all applications: it is intended for low-power devices with a limited memory capacity and processing power which require a battery life of several years.
Where higher volumes of data and rapid message transmission are required, other technologies such as SIM cards are a better solution.
The expension of low-speed networks
The booming IoT market has led to increased use of LPWAN. These networks fall into two categories:
1. Non-cellular networks like SigFox and LoRa that are specifically designed for the IoT
2. Cellular networks that use existing mobile networks like LTE-M and NB-IoT.
Created in 2009, SigFox is a ground-breaking French IoT company specialising in M2M.
According to the operator’s figures (2), its own eponymous low-speed network currently has over 2,000 antennas across France, and covers 94% of the population.
If users opt for this technology, then emitting/receiving devices must be certified by SigFox. This guarantee compatibility and makes for easy interoperability between covered countries (dodging roaming-related issues in the process).
SigFox’s main competitor is LoRaWan, which specialises in transmitting small data packets of between 0.3 and 50 Kbps (3).
This protocol was designed by the French start-up Cycleo, then acquired by Semtech, the company that set up the LoRa Alliance.
This association is made up of operators and manufacturers who want to promote the development of compatible networks. LoRa is commercialised via operators such as Bouygues and Orange, but remains an open-source network that can be developed and used by any business: the only condition is that they must use LoRa chips.
This means that users can switch from one operator to another and enjoy the benefits of roaming agreements if they use companies who are members of the alliance.
Although the network is still working on solidifying roaming agreements for allowing IoT data to be transmitted internationally, its strengths lies in its GPS-free geolocation, which is much more accurate than SigFox (between 20 and 100 metres depending on antennas versus 10 to under 1 km respectively).
Standardised LPWAN mobile networks
Although LoRa and SigFox technologies form a significant part of LPWAN today, mobile network operators aren’t far behind in rolling out cellular LPWAN for M2M applications.
According to ABI Research, the competition is likely to get even fiercer, particularly in the fields of transport and logistics, power distribution and management, smart cities and smart buildings, industrial automation and smart farming (4).
The mobile technology standardisation organisation 3GPP (3rd Generation Partnership Project) offers IoT standards that use existing mobile networks: LTE-M and NB-IoT.
Its aim is to mitigate compatibility issues in M2M applications and reduce the cost of manufacturing communication modules.
LTE-M, which is used by nine of the world’s largest operators, has been successful recently, with Orange in particular testing the low-speed network alongside LoRa. LTE-M uses the same protocols as 4G and offers sustained data transfer rates, low latency and roaming (5).
Although LoRa and LTE-M are designed for the same applications, they are in fact complementary.
LTE-M offers higher speeds of up to 1 or even 10 Mbps, compared to a few dozen Kbps for LoRa.
This means there are advantages to using LTE-M in terms of transmission speed and latency, but not when it comes