The nation’s aging water infrastructure is not a new concern, but funds to make repairs and plan for a sustainable future remain elusive for many water agencies. Part of the challenge is getting the public to understand the value and importance of a healthy water supply
The nation’s aging water infrastructure is not a new concern, but funds to make repairs and plan for a sustainable future remain elusive for many water agencies. Part of the challenge is getting the public to understand the value and importance of a healthy water supply and delivery system, and to view it less as a burdensome expense and more as a worthwhile investment.
In Santa Clara County — the heart of Silicon Valley — it might not be surprising that the region known for successful startups “gets” the idea of investing in important projects. But support for water infrastructure in the region has its roots in agriculture and has been embraced by the tech industry.
The Santa Clara Valley Water Conservation District was formed in 1929 by valley farmers to preserve the region’s groundwater supply. The district, which later became Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD), built a system of reservoirs to store water and recharge aquifers to secure future crops. Residents and businesses have valued the connection between a sustainable water supply and a sustainable economy ever since, even though computers and technology have taken over from farming and ranching.
“The county has a strong tradition of supporting the value of water infrastructure that goes back to our founding in 1929,” said Jim Fiedler, the SCVWD’s chief operating officer. “Our communities understand the importance of investing in that infrastructure to ensure a reliable water supply for the future.”
In 2000 and again in 2012 the district successfully placed ballot measures before the voters and obtained the required two-thirds voter approval. The 2000 ballot measure helped fund clean safe creek and natural flood protection measures. In 2012, the vote was to extend the parcel tax for the safe clean water and natural flood protection program to fund water quality and reliability projects for the next 15 years. The measure required a two-thirds “super majority,” and could have been a tough se