Ah yeah that is interesting! I didn't know of such a type and actually be googling around it doesn't even seem too well documented!
Thanks a lot for mentioning it! :slightly_smiling_face: You did say not to bother but actually indeed having the set as readonly would make things quite more clear I'd imagine, so please if you would prefer me to revert to the old version and have the set as readonly I really really really really really would not mind!!! Please just say the word and I will get to it! :slightly_smiling_face: I think it would indeed make things clearer... on the other hand, in order not to have to parse the css text one time more than necessary I would indeed need to do a passing and return the tuple as I did before (unless there's a better alternative, but I can't think of one...)
so yeah it's up to you, just please say what you think would be the nicest solution for you and I will gladly be fine with that! :slightly_smiling_face: