Fig. \[fig04\] that the increase in the predicted cross section using our description of the upbend structure for this specific stable Mo isotope can reach about 20% if we adopt the GLO-up1 parameterization with respect to the GLO-lo one, and roughly 50% if we adopt the GLO-up2 model. Similar results are obtained for the other Mo isotopes. In general, the upbend structure improves the agreement with experimental data, although there is clearly some strength missing, partially due to a possible extra contribution lying in the 8-10 MeV region of $^{98}$Mo that is not properly described by the present parameterizations (see Fig. \[fig02\]). Note, however, that no effort is done here to reproduce experimental data perfectly, for example by modifying the NLD model or the RSF parameterization. When considering the original GLO model, the estimated cross section is slightly higher due to the high temperatures $T_f$ encountered in the compound system in comparison with the constant values adopted.

On the basis of the input models described above, we now perform calculations on the Maxwellian-averaged neutron capture rates of astrophysical interest for the full isotopic chains of Mo, as well as Fe and Cd up to the neutron drip line. The GLO-up1, 