& 242 & 0.72 & 2.17 & 0.91 & 0.33\
SN 2002ap (Ic) & 274 & 0.63 & 2.01 & 0.66 & 0.31\
SN 2002ap (Ic) & 336 & 1.00 & 2.29 & 0.45 & 0.43\
SN 2002ap (Ic) & 386 & 0.87 & 2.19 & 0.46 & 0.40\
SN 1998bw (Ic) & 215 & 0.23 & 1.47 & 0.41 & 0.15\
SN 1994I (Ic) & 146 & 0.26 & 0.97 & 0.84 & 0.26\
SN 1985F (Ib/c) & [$\sim\!\!$ ]{}240 & 0.26 & 3.15 & 0.56 & 0.08\

Although it has been pointed out that this method of line-strength measurement is somewhat inaccurate [@Foley03], it does seem to indicate that the \] line of [SN 2001ig]{} grows with time with respect to the \[\] $\lambda\lambda$7291, 7324 doublet and the \[\] doublet. Relative to the \[\] feature, the \] emission from [SN 2001ig]{} is somewhat weaker than that of SN 2002ap at similar epochs. The other SNe that also appeared in @Foley03 [Table 6] all have about the same \] strength, which is lower that that of either SNe 2001ig or 2002ap. However, we also perform this measurement on a few SNe from the literature (see Table \[t:lines\]) and find 