on all stars with available error estimates. We do not take into account the small mean offset (0.128 dex) in our total error calculations. The quoted total errors of the SSPP [\[C/Fe\]]{} in Table \[tab:hiressam\] are calculated from Equations (\[eqn:sys\]) and (\[eqn:tot\]) above, and are mostly less than 0.3 dex.

We also compare the atmospheric parameters ([$T_{\rm eff}$]{}, [$\log~g$]{}, and [\[Fe/H\]]{}) from the high-resolution analyses with those obtained from the SSPP; Figure \[fig:hipar\] exhibits the results of the comparisons. Note that the temperature and gravity come directly from the SSPP, while the metallicity is estimated during the $\chi^{2}$ minimization. We notice a small offset in [$T_{\rm eff}$]{}, of 52 K, with $\sigma = 93$ K,

There appears to be a large systematic offset, of about 0.7 dex, in the gravity estimate. There could be several reasons for this. One is that the gravity estimates by Aoki et al. (2008, 2013) in Table \[tab:hiressam\] are based on snapshot high-resolution spectra, which have generally S/N less than 50 per resolution element. Some of these stars, those warmer than 5500 K, were assumed by Aoki et al. to have [$\log~g$]{} = 4.0 (as they are turnoff stars) because of their very weak Fe[ii]{} 