9.72           0.857
  T-CNN                         6.07           0.906           9.6            0.859
  SP (bce)                      5.63           0.918           9.53           0.860
  SP                            5.52           0.928           9.43           0.861
  AT                            5.02           0.940           9.51           0.857
  Our full model            [**4.05**]{}   [**0.957**]{}   [**7.58**]{}   [**0.898**]{}
  ------------------------ -------------- --------------- -------------- ---------------

  : Results of ablation study[]{data-label="table:ablation"}

![Visualization of predicted gaze maps from our model. Each group contains two images from two consecutive fixations, where a happens before b. We show the output heatmap from the saliency prediction module (**SP**) and the attention transition module (**AT**) as well as our full model. The ground truth gaze map (the rightmost column) is obtained by convolving an isotropic Gaussian on the measured gaze point.[]{data-label="fig:gaze_quality"}](gaze_quali.pdf){width="\linewidth"}

### Visualization.

Figure \[fig:gaze\_quality\] shows qualitative results of our model. Group (1a, 1b) shows a typical gaze shift: the camera wearer shifts his attention to the pan after turning on the oven. SP fails to find the correct gaze position in (1b) only from visual features of the current frame. Since AT exploits the high-level temporal context of gaze fixations, it successfully predicts the region to be on the pan. Group (2a, 2b) demonstrates a “put" action: the camera wearer first looks at the target location, then puts the can to that location. It is 