in the analysis. Figures (\[conti\_no\_abs1\]-\[conti\_no\_abs2\]) show: the simulated $\pm 1$ MEG spectrum, (points with error bars); how [wabs1]{} and [wabs2]{} (solid red line) modify the Spectral Energy Distribution (SED)[^2] [pow]{}.

  [Component]{}         [Value]{}   [Units]{}
  --------------------- ----------- ----------------------------------------------
  $\Gamma_{\rm x}$      2           –
  $N^{\rm a}$           $0.010$     photons keV$^{-1}$cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$ at 1 keV
  $z_{\rm pow}$         $0.00976$   –
  $\log \xi(1) $        2.08        erg cm ${\rm s}^{-1}$
  $N_{\rm H}(1)$        $10^{22}$   cm$^{-2}$
  $z_{\rm out-wabs1}$   $0.00876$   –
  $\log \xi(2) $        1.15        erg cm ${\rm s}^{-1}$
  $N_{\rm H}(2)$        $10^{21}$   cm$^{-2}$
  $z_{\rm out-wabs2}$   $0.00836$   –

\

  [Component]{}         [Value]{}              [Units]{}
  --------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------------------------------
  [ism]{}               $9.91\times 10^{20}$   cm$^{-2}$
  $\Gamma_{\rm x}$      2                      –
  $N^{\rm a}$           $0.010$                photons keV$^{-1}$cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$ at 1 keV
  $z_{\rm pow}$         $0.00976$              –
  $\log \xi(1) $        2.08                   erg cm ${\rm s}^{-1}$
  $N_{\rm H}(1)$        $10^{22}$              cm$^{-2}$
  $z_{\rm out-wabs1}$   $0.00876$              –
  $\log \xi(2) $        1.15                   erg cm ${\rm s}^{-1}$
  $N_{\rm H}(2)$        $10^{21}$              cm$^{-2}$
  $z_{\rm out-wabs2}$   $0.00836$              –

\

In order to analyze an X-ray spectrum more similar to a real observation ([@ramirez2013b]), we introduce an outflow velocity to each absorber, $z_{\rm out-wabs1}=0.00876$ (300 ) for wabs1, and $z_{\rm out-wabs2}=0.00836$ (420 ) to wabs2.

Finally, one additional complication is introduced in model B. We add absorption due to interstellar medium (ism), [ism\*(pow)\*wabs1\*wabs2]{}, so we can 