advocated in @Mobasher. If we adopt the hypothesis that JD2 is at $z\sim6.5$ and the 24[$\mu$m]{} emission is dominated by AGN light, we must first subtract the stellar contribution to the mid-infrared flux densities. We find that for the SED fit by @Mobasher, the contribution of stellar photospheric emission to the flux densities at 16, 22 and 24[$\mu$m]{} are 10.7, 6.5 and 6.0 $\mu$Jy respectively. We then attempt to fit the starlight-subtracted mid-infrared photometry with the two mid-infrared AGN templates presented in @Mobasher. The $\chi^{2}$ values are significantly worse than the best fits at $z\sim1.7$ (Table 1 and Figure 5). The Mrk231 template, fairly typical of an obscured AGN, is bluer in its 16[$\mu$m]{}/22[$\mu$m]{} flux ratios at $z=6.5$ than what the observations indicate. NGC1068, which is a Compton-thick AGN with decreasing hot dust continuum at shorter wavelengths due to dust sublimation, would best fit the observed mid-infrared photometry at $z=3.7$. The hot dust emission falls off too rapidly for it to account for the 22[$\mu$m]{} flux density with respect to the 24[$\mu$m]{}flux density if it were at $z=6.5$. One could imagine that varying the AGN template could allow for the mid-infrared photometry here to be fit but given that the 