Borel-summed forms should give identical values to the MB-regularized asymptotic forms. Because the remainder for the Borel-summed asymptotic forms is an infinite sum of exponential integrals, as indicated previously, the Mathematica code calculating both MB-regularized and Borel-summed asymptotic forms was implemented as a batch program to enable many calculations to be performed simultaneously. In addition, the Stokes discontinuity and logarithmic terms require careful treatment. In order to avoid a blow-out in the computation time and a substantial reduction in the accuracy, a relatively large value of $|z|$, viz. 5/2, was chosen. It is found that despite varying both $\theta$ and the truncation parameter, the MB-regularized results agree with each other to the 30 significant figures. The Borel-summed results are also in agreement with the MB-regularized asymptotic forms provided the remainder is very small by choosing the truncation parameter not to be far away from the optimal point of truncation. For $N \!=\! 2$, however, it is found that the Borel-summed and MB-regularized do agree with each other but to much less significant figures (22 as opposed to 30). This is attributed to the fact that the Borel-summed remainder represents an approximation because the upper limit in its sum was set 