Mo RSF, as seen in Fig. \[fig02\]. Note that the $T_f$ value is obviously different from the value extracted wihtin the GLO-lo model because of the new functional (\[eq:glowidthmod\]) considered for the energy-dependent width. This modified width allows us to use for the RSF a closed form identical to Eq. (\[eq:GLo\]) that makes it possible to describe the RSF at all energies and also to reproduce the upbend structure phenomenologically without calling for the presence of an extra low-lying resonance. We call this model GLO-up2. Since most of the reaction calculations are performed with the original version of the GLO model [@ko90], we also consider the corresponding model with a variable temperature $T_f$, estimated from the well-known expression [@RIPL] $$T_f = \sqrt{(E^* -\Delta - E_\gamma)/a},
\label{eq:temp}$$ where $E^*$ is the initial excited state in the compound nucleus (for neutron capture at incoming neutron energy $E_n$, $E^*=E_n+S_n$), $\Delta$ is a pairing correction, and $a$ is the level density parameter at $S_n$.

For all $E1$ strength functions considered here, we have also added an $M1$ strength described by a Lorentzian shape: $$f_{M1}(E_\gamma)=\frac{1}{3\pi^2\hbar^2c^2} 
    \frac{\sigma_{M1}E_\gamma\Gamma_{M1}^2} {(E_\gamma^2-E_{M1}^2)^2+E_\gamma^2\Gamma_{M1}^2}.
\label{eq:M1}$$ Here, $\sigma_{M1}$, $\Gamma_{M1}$, and $E_{M1}$ are the peak cross section, width, and centroid energy, respectively, of the 