is merely due to limited sensitivity and follow-up time, and that all FRBs have a common origin [@Scholz]. FRB 010724 is an exception to this however: its extreme brightness ($\sim 30$ Jy) far outweighs the lower gain of Parkes relative to Arecibo, so that one cannot infer its lack of repeat bursts is due to limited sensitivity. Recently, [@RaviSci] have reported the detection of FRB 150708, which is of comparable brightness ($\sim 12$ Jy) to FRB 010724, and exhibits 100 percent polarisation and suggests weak turbulence in the ionised IGM. [@DeLaunay] have associated a $\gamma$-ray transient with the FRB 131104 discovered by [@Ravi]. However [@Ravi2016] in contrast, report on the discovery of a variable source (consistent with an AGN) temporally and spatially coincident with the FRB 131104 but not spatially coincident with the $\gamma$-ray burst, and rule out the association of the $\gamma$-ray burst with the FRB using probabilistic reasoning.

![Frequency vs time behaviour of FRBs 160317, 160410 and 160608 detected at UTMOST at the centre frequency of 834.765 MHz. The top panel in each case shows the frequency-averaged pulse profile. The bottom panel shows that narrow-band RFI has been excised and the effects of inter-channel dispersion have been removed 