the computational performance of the proposed approach and suggest up to $28\%$ last-mile cost savings and $26\%$ capacity savings compared to a static capacity deployment strategy.

Section \[Literature\] summarizes the literature relevant to this type of problem, section \[Probdescription\] describes the problem and proposes a mathematical modeling, section \[SolutionApproach\] presents the proposed solution approach, section \[Results\] provides an experiment setup and discusses results, and section \[Conclusion\] highlights key takeaways and managerial insights, and identifies promising research avenues.

Literature Review {#Literature}
=================

Multi-echelon network for urban distribution have received a lot of attention in the academic literature (e.g. [@BenjellounTrends], [@mancini2013multi], [@janjevic2019integrating]), commonly using urban consolidation centers (UCC) to bundle goods outside the boundaries of urban areas. As reported in [@janjevic_development_2014], several micro-consolidation initiatives have been proposed to downscale the consolidation effort by bundling goods at the neighborhood level using capillary networks of hubs located much closer to pickup and delivery points, defined as access hubs in the conceptual framework proposed by [@montreuil2018IMHRC]. Examples of such initiatives are satellite platforms (e.g. [@BenjellounTrends]), micro-consolidation centers (e.g. [@leonardi2012before]), mobile depots (e.g. [@marujo2018assessing]), and micro-depots [@stodick2019sustainable]. Most of the focus has been on location and vehicle routing aspects (e.g. [@anderluh2017synchronizing] and [@enthoven2020two]) and cost and 