the quenching of the RPA at high [$Q^{2}$]{}($\gtrsim 0.5$ GeV$^{2}$). The ratio of non-relativistic to relativistic RPA is shown in Figure \[fig:RPA\_types\_ratio\_NEUT\]. Both RPA models are investigated in this analysis as there is no guidance on which model is more physical. The ‘stray’ points in Figures \[fig:RPA\_ratio\_NEUT\] and \[fig:RPA\_types\_ratio\_NEUT\] are artifacts from the authors of the RPA model, who provided the data used to produce these figures. The cause of these artifacts is unknown, but as these points lie outside the kinematically allowed region of ([$E_{\nu}$]{}, [$Q^{2}$]{}) space, they do not affect the RPA implementation in [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">NEUT</span>]{}as no event outside this region can be generated.

[0.9]{} ![The ratio of the non-relativistic RPA correction to the relativistic RPA correction, shown for both muon neutrino and muon antineutrino interactions on carbon. These [$E_{\nu}$]{}and [$Q^{2}$]{}dependent tables are used to reweight [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">NEUT</span>]{}events from one RPA model to the other. By default, [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">NEUT</span>]{}events are generated with the non-relativistic RPA model.[]{data-label="fig:RPA_types_ratio_NEUT"}](figures/NU_2D-RPA_types_ratio.pdf "fig:"){width="\textwidth"}

[0.9]{} ![The ratio of the non-relativistic RPA correction to the relativistic RPA correction, shown for both muon neutrino and muon antineutrino interactions on carbon. These [$E_{\nu}$]{}and [$Q^{2}$]{}dependent tables are used to reweight [<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">NEUT</span>]{}events from one RPA model to the other. 