\bar{N} A_0$         0.98                0.80                0.91                0.79              11-12
                                                                                                             
   ${\tilde S} \bar{N} A_1$         -4.1                -6.8                -7.7                -7.7               6-4
   $\sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}}$         0.94                0.75                0.72                0.72               11-5
   $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}}$         0.66                0.59                0.58                0.58               10-5
                                                                                                             
   ${\tilde S} \bar{N} A_2$         -0.51               -0.11               -0.15              -0.021         0.17-0.19 [^2]
                                                                                                             
         $\chi^2$/DoF         $\frac{380}{315}$   $\frac{315}{315}$   $\frac{314}{315}$   $\frac{329}{315}$  

  : \[TableI\] Parameters and fitting errors (only) for model fits \[Eq. (\[Eq3\])\] to joint autocorrelation data in Fig. \[Figure2\] for centrality bins (a) - (d) (central - peripheral). Total systematic error for tracking efficiency-corrected amplitudes is 11% [@extrap].

Discussion
==========

This analysis demonstrates for the first time that charge-dependent angular correlations for central Au-Au collisions differ dramatically from those for p-p collisions. CD angular correlations for p-p collisions are dominated by a 1D negative gaussian peak on $\eta_{\Delta}$ with $\sigma_{\eta_\Delta} \simeq 1$ [@isrpp; @jeffpp], conventionally associated with longitudinal charge ordering on $z$ during string fragmentation [@lund], plus a 2D gaussian peak associated with quantum correlations. For the most peripheral Au-Au centrality (d) in this analysis we observe CD correlation structure intermediate between p-p and central Au-Au collisions, consistent with the fact that collision events in centrality class (d) for these 130 GeV data are not very peripheral: they contain about 100 particles in the STAR acceptance (see 