emission: RP203 with a signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio of about 2, and RP268 with a S/N ratio of about 4. Given the dispersion in the surface brightness relation and in the other assumptions, it is easily possible that the emission from RP203 and RP268 is extended, but with an emissivity that lies just below the detection threshold. For RP505 the extremely weak confirmation spectrum lead @RP06b to classify it as only a “Possible" PN that is not resolved in their images. It may be that this object is a faint, diffuse nebula like RP683.

Discussion and Summary
======================

Our search of the [*HST*]{} archive for serendipitous observations of new LMC PN candidates in the RP emission-line survey has resulted in the independent confirmation of 8 extended emission objects, 6 of which can be confirmed as genuine PNe including one that was independently confirmed as a PN by @Shaw_etal06. There is also one source, RP1375, where @RP06b classified it as a “possible" PN and the morphology from the [*HST*]{} image is uncertain. Finally, RP683 is a region of diffuse emission that may be an region; but which was only classed as a possible VLE PN by @RP06b. The central stars can be 