have been predicted by Braaten [*et al.*]{}[@Braaten:2009ey]. The measured position of the resonance at 685 G [@Lompe:2010; @Nakajima:2010], which is well within the universal region, is larger than the prediction by about 30%. This is consistent with an error of order 10% error due to effective range corrections. However, the value $\eta_*=0.016$ extracted from the three-body recombination data is not able to describe the atom-dimer relaxation data which require the larger value $\eta_*=0.34$ [@Lompe:2010]. The reason for the larger value of $\eta_*$ in dimer relaxation compared to the value from recombination data is not understood. However, we note that a similar discrepancy between the values of $\eta_*$ from atom-dimer relaxation and three-body recombination occurs in the bosonic systems of $^{133}$Cs atoms [@Knoop:2008; @Helfrich:2009uy].

Using the value $\eta_*=0.34$, our zero temperature calculation is able to describe the data qualitatively. In the vicinity of this resonance, we have also performed an approximate finite temperature calculation and find sizable temperature effects that can suppress the relaxation rate by an order of magnitude if $\eta_*=0.016$. For the larger value $\eta_*=0.34$, however, these effects lead to a moderate suppression of about 25%, such that zero temperature results are useful as a first approximation.

In Ref. 