of quantum theory, however, the general Born rule probabilities yield *multiple* chances for each possible outcome in $\mathbf{1}$, each at the same time(in the laboratory frame): $Ch_{p}(e_{A})={\frac12}$, but $Ch_{q}(e_{A})=1$ (assuming the outcome in $\mathbf{2}$ is of type $V_{B}$). When (LC) speaks of *the* probabilities attached to \[$e_{A},\bar{e}_{A}$\] in a space-time region $\mathbf{1}$ being unaltered by specification of \[$V_{B}$\] in a space-like separated region $\mathbf{2}$ (my italics), which probabilities are these?

Since the connection to (IP)’s motivating talk of ‘cause’ and ‘effect’ is provided by the thought that a cause alters the chance of its effect, (LC) is motivated only if applied to the *chances* of $e_{A},\bar{e}_{A}$ in region $\mathbf{1}$. But $Ch_{p}(e_{A})$ is *not* altered by specification of $V_{B}$ in space-like separated region $\mathbf{2}$: its value depends only on what happens in the backward light cone of $\mathbf{1}$, in conformity to its role in prescribing $Cr_{p}(e_{A})$.$\ $Of course $Ch_{q}(e_{A})$ does depend on the outcome in $\mathbf{2}$. If it did not, it could not fulfill its constitutive role of prescribing $Cr_{q}(e_{A}/I_{q})$ no matter what information $I_{q}$ provides about the contents of $q$’s past light cone. It follows that $Ch_{q}(e_{A})$ is not altered but *specified* by specification of the result in $\mathbf{2}$.

Only 