$ \alpha $ in the amount of efficiency is depicted in Fig. \[kesh2\]. What apparently seems from these two, Fig. \[pilot1\] and Fig. \[kesh2\], is that the contribution of the defender itself in its efficiency is more important than the contribution of the interpreter. To be more clear, in the following, we focus on the maximum blocking efficiency (asymptotic efficiency) containing both Gamma factors ($ \gamma_{D}$ and $\gamma_{I} $).

Figure \[3d\_alpha\_1\_0\_5\] shows that, while the blocking efficiency in the plane of $ \gamma_{D} = constant $ alters drastically with changing $\alpha$, the plane of $ \gamma_{I} = constant $ has a few changes, respecting $ \alpha $ alterations, in its amounts. It is because the reduction of the observability $ \alpha $ means an increase in the contribution of the interpreter and thus its dissipation factor $ \gamma_{I} $ becomes more important. Thereby and as it might be expected, we can see that while in $ \alpha =1 $ (Fig. \[3d\_alpha\_1\]) the interpreter’s forgetting factor has no rule in the amount of maximum efficiency due to the fact that the environment is fully observable in this case, it will be as influential as the defender’s gamma factor in $ \alpha 