= 0.74$ with the cooler white dwarf portion ( T$_{eff} = 24,000$K) giving 57% of the flux and the hotter belt (T$_{belt} = 33,000$K) providing 43% (figure 6).

In general, for a distance d = 150 pc, the model fits to UU Aql’s [*[FUSE]{}*]{} spectrum are worse than for 350 pc. Applying single temperature white dwarf fits, we obtained T$_{eff} = 17,000$K, $R_{wd}/R_{\sun} = 1.06 
\times 10^{-2}$ and a $\chi^{2} = 1.13$. An accretion disk alone yielded a best fit with $\chi^{2} = 1.23$, an accretion rate of $1.3 \times 10^{-11} 
M_{\sun}$/yr and inclination $i = 41$ degrees and M$_{wd} = 0.8 M_{\sun}$. A combination white dwarf plus accretion disk yielded a modest improvement with $\chi^{2} = 1.13$, $\dot{M} = 1.6\times10^{-11} M_{\sun}$/yr, $i = 
41$ degrees and $M_{wd} = 0.8 M_{\sun}$. A two temperature white dwarf (WD + belt) gives a best-fit with a $\chi^{2} = 1.02$, with a 17,000K white dwarf providing 77% of the FUV flux and the belt giving 23% of the flux. In view of the much better agreement of the models with the observations of UU Aql for our assumed distance of 350 pc than for a distance of 150 pc, the closer distance can 