---- --------- ------ -------- --------- -------- -------- ----
     mag    B    15.759  0.208   APASS9   15.7578  15.9591  17.6869 0.01
     mag    H    12.769  0.021    2MASS   12.8287  12.9722  15.0962 2.11
     mag   Ic    13.916   0.03    DENIS   13.9310  14.0947  16.0660 0.42
     mag    J    13.227   0.07    DENIS   13.2451  13.3976  15.4518 0.25
     mag    J    13.283  0.027    2MASS   13.2451  13.3976  15.4518 1.15
     rat  K_p      0.18   0.03 paper-v3    0.1771  14.8825  16.7617 0.10
     sb2  K_p       1.4    0.1 paper-v3    1.3832   5.3211   4.9689 0.17
     mag   Ks    12.602   0.14    DENIS   12.6763  12.8175  14.9610 0.53
     mag   Ks    12.725   0.03    2MASS   12.6763  12.8175  14.9610 1.37
     mag    V    14.881  0.024   APASS9   14.8917  15.0734  16.9224 0.35
     mag    g   15.2956  0.019     SDSS   15.3090  15.5032  17.2736 0.50
     mag    g    15.259   0.11   APASS9   15.3090  15.5032  17.2736 0.45
     mag    i    14.413   0.05   APASS9   14.3643  14.5308  16.4828 0.91
     mag    i   14.3639 0.0192     SDSS   14.3643  14.5308  16.4828 0.02
     mag    r    14.581  0.103   APASS9   14.5961  14.7691  16.6755 0.14
     mag    r   14.6083 0.0133     SDSS   14.5961  14.7691  16.6755 0.53
     Nobs = 17
     Nmag = 14
     Ndf  = 11
     BIC = -68.04

    Completed analysis of EPIC201161715.phot

There will be some systematic error in the T$_{\rm eff}$ estimates for stars in eclipsing binaries cooler than 4900K because we have extrapolated the empirical $S_{\rm V}$ – $(\rm B - \rm 