a plausible origin for AGC 226067 if it were a tidal remnant. We find this scenario less likely than an M86 subgroup origin, because of the greater projected distance to NGC 4299+NGC 4294 ($\sim$600 kpc), the larger velocity discrepancy between this pair and AGC 226067, and because the HI tidal tail morphology of that pair is pointed to the Southwest, nearly in the opposite direction of AGC 226067 [@Chung09], which is almost due North.

[lcccccccccc]{}\
AGC 226067 Main Body\
RA (h:m:s) & 12:21:54.04\
DEC (d:m:s) & +13:27:35.7\
Radial Size (arcsec) & 13.7\
Radial Size (kpc) &1.1\
$M_{V}$ & $-$11.3$\pm$0.3\
$M_{stars}$ (10$^4$ $M_{\odot}$) & 5.4$\pm$1.3\
$M_{HI}$ (10$^7$ $M_{\odot}$) & 1.5\
$M_{HI}$/$M_{stars}$ & $\approx$280\
AGC 226067 Secondary Body\
RA (h:m:s) & 12:21:55.97\
DEC (d:m:s) & +13:28:53.6\
Radial Size (arcsec) & 13.0\
Radial Size (kpc) & 1.1\
$M_{stars}$ (10$^3$ $M_{\odot}$) & 5.5$\pm$4.2\
Dw J122147+132853\
RA (h:m:s) & 12:21:47.87\
DEC (d:m:s) & +13:28:54.7\
Radial Size (arcsec) & 10.0\
Radial Size (kpc) & 0.8\
$M_{V}$ & $-$11.4$\pm$0.2\
NGVS-1+2 J122624+142327\
RA (h:m:s) & 12:21:24\
DEC (d:m:s) & +14:23:27\
$g$ & 20.1$\pm$0.6\
$NUV$ & 19.5$\pm$0.3\
NGVS-1+3 J122631+151026\
RA (h:m:s) & 12:26:31\
DEC (d:m:s) & +15:10:26\
$g$ & 20.7$\pm$0.5\
$NUV$ & 20.8$\pm$0.7

Conclusions {#sec:conclude}
===========

We have presented 