coincidence data. We have therefore considered $T_f$ to be constant in the GLO model. We have chosen $T_f = 0.30$ MeV, to give a reasonable global agreement with experimental data of $^{93-98}$Mo for $E_{\gamma} \gtrsim 3$ MeV, as illustrated in Fig. \[fig02\]; this first adaptation of the GLO model is in the following referred to as GLO-lo.

For the GEDR parameters we take experimental values from [@RIPL; @iaea00] when available (for $^{98}$Mo a new improved determination has been performed), and interpolated values from the even-even $^{92,94,96,98}$Mo for the missing odd isotopes $^{93,95,97}$Mo. For the heavier Mo nuclei ($A>98$), we used the systematics recommended in Ref. [@RIPL]. The final GEDR parameters for $^{93-98}$Mo are summarized in Table \[tab:parameters\].

  ----------- ---------- --------------- ---------------
  Nucleus      $E_{E1}$   $\sigma_{E1}$   $\Gamma_{E1}$
                (MeV)         (mb)            (MeV)
  $^{93}$Mo     16.59         173.5           4.82
  $^{94}$Mo     16.36        $185.0$          5.50
  $^{95}$Mo     16.28        $185.0$          5.76
  $^{96}$Mo     16.20        $185.0$          6.01
  $^{97}$Mo     16.00        $187.0$          5.98
  $^{98}$Mo     16.50       $ 220.0$          8.00
  ----------- ---------- --------------- ---------------

  : Parameters used for the GEDR strength of $^{93-98}$Mo.

\
\[tab:parameters\]

We have chosen two ways to model the upbend:

-   [introducing a low-lying resonance of the form of a standard Lorentzian (SLO).]{}

-   [modifying the energy-dependent width of the GLO model.]{}

It 