results are not shown in the graph. For reference, the power law $r \propto t^{1/2}$ is also shown. The $r \propto t^{1/2}$ power law describes the late time spreading behavior for low viscosity axisymmetric droplets [@biance2004; @ding2007b]. At a resolution of $256 \times 128$ initially the contact line hardly moves, but then the spreading radius as a function of time becomes proportional to: $r \propto t^{1/2}$. At the larger resolution of $512 \times
256$ it can be seen that the scaling also converges to $r \propto t^{1/2}$.

![\[figure:pressureTanner\] Pressure at the wall for various times at a resolution of $512 \times 256$](fig11){width="60.00000%"}

.

![\[figure:velocityTanner\] Velocity at the wall for various times at a resolution of $512 \times 256$](fig12){width="60.00000%"}

.

Figures \[figure:pressureTanner\] and \[figure:velocityTanner\] show the pressure profile and velocity at the wall for various times. The pressure shows a sharp peak already, but especially at $t=0.5 \si{\milli\s}$ there is quite some noise in both the curves for pressure and velocity. The peaks are expected to become even sharper with increasing resolution [@afkhami2009]. While it is known that for the Navier-slip boundary condition pressure is divergent [@devauchelle2007], whether the reduced Young’s stress provides a cut-off mechanism for the pressure has not 