Photometry (SAP), as well as a corrected time series based on Pre-search Data Conditioning [PDC, @Smith2012; @Stumpe2014] referred to as PDCSAP (as detailed by Tenenbaum and Jenkins 2018[^5]). This work made use of the PDCSAP time series available on the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (MAST[^6]). The TESS photometry is presented in the upper panel in Figure \[fig:tess\_phot\].

A Data Validation Report for L 168-9 was released to the community as part of the MIT TESS Alerts[^7]. The report includes several validation tests to assess the probability that the signal is a false positive: eclipsing-binary discrimination tests, a statistical bootstrap test, a ghost diagnostic test, and difference-image centroid offset tests. These are described by @Twicken2018. All the tests were passed successfully. The formal false-alarm probability of the planet candidate was reported to be 5.85$\times 10^{-37}$.

The TESS time series covers 19 transits of what was originally deemed a planet candidate (L 168-9b or TOI-134.01), and reported on the TESS exoplanet Follow-up Observing Program (TFOP) website[^8]. According to the Data Validation Report the orbital period is P $=1.401461\pm0.000137$ days and the transit depth is $\Delta F/F_0=566\pm38\ ppm$, which translates into a planetary radius of R$_p=1.58\pm0.36$ R$_\oplus$ (Sect. \[subsec:stellarparam\] describes how we 