is in underestimates to experimental values, $(12.2\pm 0.7)\times 10^4$ [@aetal-prl15], $(14.4\pm 2.8)\times 10^4$ [@oetal-prc12], $(11\pm 1)\times 10^4$ [@betal-prl99], $(34.5\pm 0.5)\times 10^4$ [@betal-npa07], (12.2-18.2)$\times 10^4$ [@ab-plb11]. Other experimental estimates evaluated earlier, which basically agree with the experimental values mentioned above, can be found in Table VI in Ref. [@dd-prc08]. On the other hand, our result is in good agreement with theoretical estimates, $(2.41\pm 0.38)\times 10^4$ and $2.106\times 10^4$, from the effective range analysis up to the $r_2$ term by Konig [*et al.*]{} [@klh-jpg13] and up to the $P_2$ term by Orlov [*et al.*]{} [@oin-prc16], respectively, and in underestimates for the other theoretical estimates, $(14.45\pm 0.85)\times 10^4$ from the supersymmetric potential model by Sparenberg [@s-prc04] and ($12.6\pm 0.5)\times 10^4$ from the $R$ matrix analysis with a microscopic cluster model by Dufour and Descouvemont [@dd-prc08] and $5.050\times 10^4$ from the new method of the parameterization by Orlov [*et al.*]{} [@oin-17].

For the ANCs, $|C_b|$, for the $0_2^+$ and $3_1^-$ states, our result, $|C_b| = (6.4$-$7.4)\times 10^2$ (fm$^{-1/2}$) for the $0_2^+$ state is in underestimate to an experimental value, $(15.6\pm 1.0) \times  10^2$ [@aetal-prl15] and in overestimate to a theoretical value, $4.057\times 10^2$ [@oin-17]. Meanwhile, our result, $|C_b|=(1.2$-$1.5)\times 10^2$ (fm$^{-1/2}$) for the $3_1^-$ state 