line represents our model calculation with flow and dashed line is the result obtained in our stationary thermal model. The dotted line represents the result of the logarithmic fitting function as described in the text. Symbols are the experimental data points [@Sahoo:2014aca; @Adam:2016thv; @Adler:2004zn].](ebj_snn.pdf){height="25em"}

In figure 10, we present the variations of $((dE_T/dy)/0.5N_{part})$ with respect to $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ over a broad energy range from AGS to LHC energies. We compare our model predictions with the experimental data [@Adam:2016thv]. The open symbol in the figure at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV represents the ALICE data while solid symbol is the measurement by the CMS experiment. Here, we take care of conversion of the $dE_T/d\eta$ to $dE_T/dy$ by using the Jacobian factor J($\eta$,y), which is 1.09 at LHC [@Chatrchyan:2012mb]. We notice that our model results agree well with the data upto RHIC energies while it is unsuccessful in explaining the LHC data. Now, we show the results obtained after incorporating the collective flow in our model and find that it explains the ALICE data [@Adam:2016thv] within experimental error but lies below to CMS data [@Chatrchyan:2012mb] at LHC. We also show the results obtained in the EKRT model [@Eskola:1999fc] which is based on the calculation 