carried out detailed fits for both values. For a distance of 350 pc, the best-fit WD model to the [*[FUSE]{}*]{} spectrum gave T$_{eff} = 27,000$K, R$_{wd}$/R$_{\sun} = 1.13 \times 
10^{-2}$ and a $\chi^{2} = 0.963$. This best-fitting model is shown in figure 4. The continuum of the model gives a fair representation of the observed continuum down to about 1060Å but there is a shortfall of model flux relative to the data at wavelengths shorter than 1030Å. For the same distance, an accretion disk alone yielded a best fit with $\chi^{2} = 
1.14$, an accretion rate of $5\times 10^{-11} M_{\sun}$/yr and inclination $i = 41$ degrees, M$_{wd} = 0.8 M_{\sun}$. This disk fit is shown in figure 5. The model disk continuum, unlike the WD, fails to match the flux level of the data between about 1090Å and 1180Å and the solar abundance accretion disk model fails to provide a sharp absorption features.

A combination white dwarf plus accretion disk yielded a modest improvement with $\chi^{2} = 0.71$, $\dot{M} = 1.6 \times 10^{-11} M_{\sun}$/yr, $i = 
41$ degrees and $M_{wd} = 0.8 M_{\sun}$. Finally we tried two temperature (WD + belt) fits. The best fit two temperature WD yields $\chi^{2} 