the spectrum of the model. Here, $X,Y$ represent the massive GUT gauge supermultiplets, $\Sigma$ uneaten components of the $\Sigma({\bf 24})$ superfield, and $H_C$ and $\bar{H}_C$ the colored Higgs supermultiplets; the other symbols denote particles in the SSM in the self-explanatory notation (with $\tilde{G}$ being the gravitino). We have depicted the wino, $\tilde{W}$, at a TeV scale, although it may be at the intermediate scale $\tilde{m}$ if the reheating temperature after inflation is sufficiently low or $R$-parity is broken; see discussions in Section \[subsec:wino\]. The scale $\tilde{m}$ can lead to neutrino masses, inflation, and axions, as indicated on the right.[]{data-label="fig:spectrum"}](out.pdf "fig:")]{}

There are several virtues in the model presented here, with the last two terms in Eq. (\[eq:W\_eff\]) arising from the Kähler potential, compared to the model in Ref. [@Hall:2013eko], in which these terms exist in the superpotential before supersymmetry breaking with $m_H \sim 
O(\langle \Sigma \rangle)$ and $\lambda_H \sim O(1)$. First, since the supersymmetric masses of $\Sigma_3$ and $\Sigma_1$ are comparable to $\tilde{m}$, the interaction $\lambda_H H \Sigma \bar{H}$ in the superpotential gives a non-decoupling contribution to the Higgs quartic coupling: $\delta \lambda \sim \lambda_H^2 \sin^2 2\beta$. In order to preserve the identification of $\tilde{m}$ to be at a scale 