of the discrepancy in more detail in § 5.2. However, for two cases, this step caused us to modify the final redshift assessment. One of these final modifications was due to confusing a target and very close ($\sim 1\arcsec$ separation) serendipitous source, while the other modification was due to a genuine error in line identification aggravated by incomplete sky-line subtraction mimicking a corroborating emission line.

Quality Flags 
--------------

The redshift flagging scheme we use is similar to that adopted by the zCOSMOS [@Lilly07], DEEP2 [@Newman13], and VUDS surveys [@LeFevre15]. The quality flags range from 0-4 with 4 indicating the highest confidence redshift and 0 indicating that no redshift could be found. The interpretation of the flags is roughly as follows:

[lcccccc]{} 16A-D01 / UDS-m1n1 & N01-D & 2:17:27.0 & $-$5:15:07 & 90.0 & 2$\times$1800 & 86 / 51 / 5\
16A-D02 / UDS-m3n1 & N01-D & 2:17:27.0 & $-$5:14:07 & 90.0 & 2$\times$1800 & 100 / 66 / 5\
16A-D03 / COSMOS-m3n1 & N01-D & 10:00:22.0 & $+$2:20:00 & 90.0 & 4$\times$1800 & 104 / 72 / 7\
16A-D04 / COSMOS-m4n1 & N01-D & 10:00:22.0 & $+$2:35:00 & 90.0 & 4$\times$1800 & 70 / 60 / 19\
16A-M05 / COSMOS-m1-Y 