for any residual differences between the jet energy scale in data and simulation are extracted and applied based on comparison of data and simulated samples in relevant control regions [@Khachatryan:2016kdb]. The jet energy resolution typically amounts to 15–20% at 30, about 10% at 100, and 5% at 1 [@Khachatryan:2016kdb]. Corrections extracted from data control regions are applied to account for the difference between the jet energy resolution in data and simulation. Additional selection criteria are applied to each jet to remove those that are potentially dominated by instrumental or reconstruction failures [@CMS-PAS-JME-16-003].

Two collections of jets reconstructed with the anti-algorithm are used in the search. The first consists of jets clustered with $R=0.4$, and will be referred to as “[small-$R$]{} jets”. The charged hadron subtraction algorithm [@CMS-PAS-JME-14-001] is used to eliminate PF candidates from the jet constituents associated with vertices from pileup interactions. The neutral component of the energy arising from pileup interactions is estimated with the effective area method [@CMS-PAS-JME-16-003]. The [small-$R$]{} jets are required to have $\pt > 20$and to be within the tracker acceptance, $\abs{\eta} < 2.4$. Any [small-$R$]{} jets that overlap with preselected electrons and muons, as defined by $\Delta R(\text{j},\ell)<0.4$, are discarded.

The second jet 