seen in figure \[figure:pressureEquil\], this results in the pressure peak on the surface getting sharper with increasing resolution. The increased pressure inside the drop, left of the pressure peak, is the Laplace pressure.

![Maximum of pressure peak at the contact line as a function of different contact angles.\[figure:anglePresEquil\]](fig5){width="60.00000%"}

The reason there is a pressure peak at the contact line for a stationary droplet in the first place can be seen in figure \[figure:anglePresEquil\]. This figure shows the value of the pressure peak as a function of the Young’s angle. From the figure it is clear that there is a strong dependence of the pressure peak on the Young’s angle. Since the line tension force only acts parallel to the surface, this suggest that the pressure peak is the result of the surface tension force calculated by the @brackbill1992 model. If the vertical component of the reduced Young’s stress also were implemented, an extra term, proportional to $\sigma \sin{\theta_{0}}$, would have been present in the plot as an additional contribution to the pressure peak. Since we are only concerned about solid surfaces, this term was not incorporated in the model.

![\[figure:velocityEquil\] Velocity at the wall at $t = 50 \si{\milli \s}$ 