durations and energy injection regions to capture a broad phase space of conditions in the supernova explosion. Although this allows for a range of explosion properties, it can not capture all the effects of multi-dimensional models. Complete details of the explosion parameterization may be found in @Fryer_2018.

With these calculations, we have produced an extensive set of yields for 3 stellar models and a range of explosion properties (23 15M$_\odot$ explosion scenarios, 31 20M$_\odot$ explosions, and 26 25M$_\odot$ explosions). Table 1 of @Fryer_2018 summarizes the simulations used in this study, showing the range of power, injection regions, and engine duration. This provides some insight to the range of possible yields and their sensitivities to these explosion parameters. However, this study is spherically symmetric and in multi-dimensional explosions material continues to fall onto the neutron star after the launch of the explosion [@2014arXiv1401.3032W]. Thus, the chemical evolution of the outflows can not be fully captured by these 1-dimensional approximations. Instead we use this range of models to test some of the trends in the supernova yields as determined by these fundamental parameters.

Nucleosynthesis
---------------

The nucleosynthesis yields presented in this work are the same as in @jones2019a. We summarize the methodology 