we use the median to determine the representative value of all parameters, and we use the percentile values of 16% and 84% to estimate the $1\sigma$ confidence intervals of the parameters, always using the marginalized posterior distribution, shown in the histograms. In Table \[tab:results\], we present the results of this analysis for the first ten entries of the SMUDGes sample. The full table is available online in machine-readable format.

[lccccc]{} SMDG0006543-000029 & $0.07_{-0.05}^{+0.12}$ & $-1.3_{-0.34}^{+0.7}$ & $2.8_{-2.1}^{+7.0}$ & $0.018_{-0.013}^{+0.020}$ & $7.5_{-1.1}^{+0.7}$\
SMDG0016502-002756 & $0.11_{-0.08}^{+0.17}$ & $-1.0_{-0.5}^{+0.8}$ & $7.1_{-4.0}^{+4.5}$ & $0.021_{-0.015}^{+0.020}$ & $8.0_{-1.0}^{+0.6}$\
SMDG0021031+004447 & $0.18_{-0.13}^{+0.28}$ & $-0.4_{-0.8}^{+0.6}$ & $8.0_{-4.5}^{+4.3}$ & $0.022_{-0.015}^{+0.021}$ & $7.9_{-0.9}^{+0.7}$\
SMDG0025396+011515 & $0.10_{-0.07}^{+0.19}$ & $-1.1_{-0.5}^{+0.8}$ & $5.8_{-4.5}^{+5.5}$ & $0.019_{-0.013}^{+0.020}$ & $7.5_{-1.0}^{+0.7}$\
SMDG0035569+010149 & $0.08_{-0.06}^{+0.14}$ & $-1.2_{-0.4}^{+0.6}$ & $3.1_{-2.3}^{+6.9}$ & $0.017_{-0.011}^{+0.021}$ & $7.4_{-1.0}^{+0.7}$\
SMDG0045200-011839 & $0.07_{-0.05}^{+0.12}$ & $-1.3_{-0.4}^{+1.0}$ & $1.5_{-0.9}^{+6.0}$ & $0.018_{-0.013}^{+0.018}$ & $7.4_{-1.2}^{+0.7}$\
SMDG0055526-011739 & $0.14_{-0.10}^{+0.24}$ & $-0.8_{-0.7}^{+0.8}$ & $7.4_{-4.6}^{+4.4}$ & $0.020_{-0.014}^{+0.022}$ & $7.5_{-1.1}^{+0.7}$\
SMDG0058071-010201 & $0.09_{-0.07}^{+0.14}$ & $-1.2_{-0.4}^{+0.8}$ & $4.6_{-3.5}^{+6.1}$ & $0.021_{-0.015}^{+0.021}$ & $8.0_{-1.0}^{+0.6}$\
SMDG0108359-002834 & $0.18_{-0.14}^{+0.28}$ & $-0.5_{-0.8}^{+0.6}$ & $8.0_{-4.4}^{+4.1}$ & $0.022_{-0.015}^{+0.024}$ & $7.9_{-1.1}^{+0.7}$\
SMDG0113101-001223 & $0.10_{-0.07}^{+0.15}$ & $-1.1_{-0.5}^{+0.8}$ & $4.3_{-3.4}^{+6.6}$ & $0.020_{-0.014}^{+0.020}$ & $7.4_{-1.1}^{+0.7}$\

Stellar masses
--------------

We determine the stellar mass of each UDG combining our SED fitting results of the S-PLUS data 