(WF) & $ 546$ & $+0.019$ & $+0.012$ & $+0.029$\
TCM & $1509$ & $+0.018$ & $-0.009$ & $+0.030$\
TCM (North)& $1611$ & $+0.015$ & $-0.006$ & $-0.006$\
TCM (South)& $1421$ & $+0.013$ & $-0.009$ & ${\bf+0.057}$\
\
WMAP W & $2031$ & $+0.015$ & $-0.022$ & $+0.025$\
WMAP W (North)& $2107$ & $+0.020$ & $-0.027$ & $+0.007$\
WMAP W (South)& $1960$ & $+0.011$ & $-0.015$ & ${\bf+0.045}$\
TCM & $1523$ & $+0.013$ & $-0.016$ & $+0.020$\
TCM (North)& $1587$ & $+0.008$ & $-0.015$ & $+0.005$\
TCM (South)& $1464$ & $+0.019$ & $-0.013$ & ${\bf+0.047}$\
\
WMAP W & $1982$ & $+0.015$ & $-0.022$ & $+0.018$\
WMAP W (North)& $2038$ & $+0.014$ & $-0.023$ & $+0.005$\
WMAP W (South)& $1944$ & $+0.016$ & $-0.020$ & $+0.033$\
TCM & $1486$ & $+0.017$ & $-0.027$ & $+0.016$\
TCM (North)& $1536$ & $+0.008$ & $-0.022$ & $+0.002$\
TCM (South)& $1456$ & $+0.026$ & $-0.024$ & $+0.033$\

As shown in Figure 1$a$, the genus measured from the foreground-subtracted Q, V, and W band maps appear to have shapes consistent with Gaussian random phase field. Compared to the Gaussian fitting curves, there is not any noticeable shift and asymmetry in the genus curves at all 