48
  @2016MNRAS.461..794P          493    158   120   118    2   116    95
  @Preib08–LCC                  121    119    93    89    8    81    61
  @Preib08–UCL                   90      5     2     1    0     1     1
  -------------------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ---- ----- -----

The first column [lists]{} the publications with which we compare [our sample]{}. The second column gives the number of stars in the respective dataset. The third column is the [size of]{} subset of stars from column 2, which are [located]{} in the cone around $(\alpha,\delta) =  (186.5\degr, -60.5\degr$; radius 20 degrees). In the fourth column, we list the number of stars from column 3 which have DR2 measurements and fall into the Crux Cone. The following columns list the cross-matches of the objects from column 4 with our BS (column 5), the ’Old’ sample (column 6), the ’Young’ sample (column 7), and the CMG (column 8).

In their influential paper @1999AJ....117..354D applied a convergent point method to the Hipparcos measurements to find moving groups in 12 nearby OB associations, one of them was found in Lower Centaurus Crux. Their LCC moving group contains 180 members. Table \[others\] shows that all but one star are in our area, but only 129 are in the Crux Cone. This means 