challenge. In many studies, the valve’s leaflets are either ignored or simplified using an on-off approach where the switch between the on and off configuration occurs instantaneously without any intermediate positions [@song2015role; @watanabe2008looped; @zheng2012computational; @domenichini2005three]. Dimasi et al. [@dimasi2012influence] reconstructed the MV and AV from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images. Their study was limited to systole (MV always closed). Seo eta al. [@seo2014effect] created a prescribed kinematic model for MV motion based on the location of the tip of the valve leaflets from echo images for a cardiac cycle. However, mitral annulus was assumed to be a perfect circle with a fixed dimension in their study. Chnafa et al. [@chnafa2014image] modeled the MV based on a projection of mitral annulus geometric with the assumption of elliptical MV orifice, and the aortic valve (AV) was approximated by a simple plane. A reduced degree of freedom model for leaflet motion coupled the left ventricle geometry was introduced by Domenichini et al. [@domenichini2015asymptotic]. However, the mitral annulus was assumed to be a rigid circular orifice in their study. Su et al. [@su2016cardiac] reconstructed MV using a mathematical model based on only one cross section from CMR. Here, we reconstruct mitral and aortic valves 