PINGS survey [@Rosales-Ortega2010] and the CALIFA survey [@Sanchez2012]. Based on the SDSS-IV MaNGA survey [@Bundy2015; @Yan2015; @Yan2016; @Blanton2017], [@Barrera-Ballesteros2016a] and [@Zhu2017] presented a tight local stellar mass surface density versus metallicity relation, suggestive of the fact that local properties play a key role in determining the metallicity in typical disk galaxies. These authors also reproduced the global MZR using the local relation, concluding that the global relation is a scale-up, integrated effect of the local relation. In addition, a series of studies with IFS data explored whether there is a secondary dependent parameter in the global MZR or the stellar mass surface density – metallicity relation. Using the data in CALIFA survey, [@Sanchez2013a] and [@Sanchez2017a] presented the local mass surface density – metallicity relation and global MZR, and confirmed the nonexistence of such these relations with (s)SFR. [@Barrera-Ballesteros2017] also demonstrated that the MZR is independent on the (s)SFR with more than 1700 galaxies in MaNGA survey.

It is well known that the global stellar mass dominates the metallicity in the center of galaxies [@Tremonti2004; @Mannucci2010a]. However, it remains unclear whether the global stellar mass has an nonnegligible effect on shaping the distribution of local metallicity. Intuitively, higher global stellar mass 