not consider it in this paper.

Further discussion on cLFV is possible only when there is an explicit flavor model providing the neutrino Dirac Yukawa and charged lepton Yukawa matrices. As a simple and illustrative example of the explicit model, we consider $S_4$ flavor symmetry in Sec. \[sec:FlavorModel\]. It will be shown that various types of See-Saw Yukawa $Y_\nu$ would predict different sizes of effects on cLFV. Before moving onto the flavor discussion, let us consider the implication on the Higgs mass first.

Higgs mass and superparticle spectrum {#sec:higgs}
-------------------------------------

![Higgs mass with respect to $X_t$ for $\tan\beta=10$, stop mass $M_{\tilde{t}} \sim 2 {\,\textrm{TeV}}$. []{data-label="fig:xHiggs"}](Xthiggsmass.eps){width="45.00000%"}

Minimal gauge mediation does not generate $A_t$ at one loop and the weak scale $A_t$ is radiatively generated by the gluino loop. However, the same gluino contribution appears in stop soft scalar mass and the relative ratio of $|A_t|$ and $m_{\tilde{t}}$ can not be large. On the other hand, the physical light CP even Higgs mass in the MSSM is affected by $\hat{X_t} \equiv (A_t -\mu /\tan \beta)/m_{\tilde{t}}$ and $\hat{X_t} \sim 2$ (or $\sqrt{6}$ more precisely) gives the maximum finite threshold correction as shown in Fig. \[fig:xHiggs\].

One way to make $|\hat{X_t}| > 1$ at 