zero width for the lowest state. As we can see, the mass is smaller than all the thresholds in Table \[tab2\], hence it does not decay into them. To decay into $\Xi_c\bar{K}$, where it has been observed, we would need the exchange of vector mesons in $p$-wave, which give rise to a small width. We can clearly associate the state found with the $\Omega_c(3119)$ observed experimentally, which has a width of $1.1\pm0.8\pm0.4$ MeV. The agreement is also remarkable.

   $q_{max}$         600               650               700               750               800                 
  ----------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- -- -- -- --
                  $3134.39$      ${\bf 3124.84}$      $3112.83$         $3099.2$          $3084.52$              
               $3316.48+i0.14$   $3290.31+i0.03$   $3260.42+i0.08$   $3227.34+i0.15$   $3191.13+i0.22$           

  : Poles in $J^P={3/2}^-$ sector from pseudoscalar-baryon($3/2^+$) interaction. (Units: MeV).

\[res3\]

In Table \[res4\] we show the couplings of the states to the coupled channels of Table \[tab2\]. We can see that the state at $3125$ MeV couples strongly to $\Xi_c^*\,\bar{K}$ and $\Omega_c^*\,\eta$, more strongly to $\Xi_c^*\,\bar{K}$. The upper state couples very strongly to $\Xi^*\,D$.

   ${\bf 3124.84}$   $\Xi^*_c \bar{K}$       $\Omega^*_c \eta$       $\Xi D^*$       $\Xi_c \bar{K}^*$         $\Xi^* D$          $\Xi^{\prime}_c \bar{K}^*$
  ----------------- --------------------- ----------------------- --------------- ----------------------- -------------------- ------------------------------
        $g_i$            $\bf 1.95$               $1.98$                $0$                 $0$                 $-0.65$                     $0$
   $g_i\,G^{II}_i$      $\bf -35.65$             $-16.83$               $0$                 $0$                  $1.93$                     $0$
   $3290.31+i0.03$   $\Xi^*_c \bar{K}$       