people like John S. Bell showed [@Bell1], such a pragmatic attitude is not always acceptable.

In [@Oko.Sud:14] we argue that the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics is inadequate in cosmological contexts because it crucially depends on the existence of observers external to the studied system (or on an artificial quantum/classical cut). We claim that if the system in question is the whole universe, such observers are nowhere to be found, so we conclude that, in order to legitimately apply quantum mechanics in such contexts, an observer independent interpretation of the theory is required. Nowadays, there are a number of versions of quantum theory, such as Bohmian mechanics [@Gold] and objective collapse models [@GRW], with the needed characteristic. In [@Oko.Sud:14] we focus on the latter to display an array of benefits that such theories offer regarding the resolution of long-standing problems in cosmology and quantum gravity. In particular, we explore applications of objective collapse theories to the origin of seeds of cosmic structure, the problem of time in quantum gravity and the information loss paradox.

In a recent paper entitled “Less Interpretation and More Decoherence in Quantum Gravity and Inflationary Cosmology,” E. M. Crull argues that our focus on conceptual and 