original GLO model, which is easy to understand from the higher absolute value of the GEDR tail when using a variable temperature which is found to be higher than the 0.3 MeV considered in the GLO-lo model (see Fig. \[fig02\] for $^{98}$Mo). However, when approaching the neutron drip line, the rates of the GLO-lo model become comparable and even larger than the ones using the GLO model. This is due to the fact that the neutron separation energy drops rapidly and so does the temperature $T_f$, at least for neutron incident energies of about 100 keV (corresponding to the $T=10^9$ K temperature considered here). The original GLO model when applied to the neutron capture by exotic neutron-rich nuclei can therefore be approximated by the $T_f=0$ case. We see from Fig. \[fig05\] that assuming a constant temperature $T_f=0.3$ MeV (i.e the GLO-lo case) can give an order of magnitude increase in the reaction rates for such exotic nuclei.

Including the upbend structure through the GLO-up1 model may give another significant increase of the rates as shown in Fig. \[fig06\]. In particular, the rates for neutron-rich Cd isotopes gain an additional order of magnitude due to the low-energy RSF contribution that become 