find that these factors are correlated well with the peak value of the $\rho(p_m)$, such that the NIKHEF wave functions produce the smallest and the NLSH wave functions the largest normalization factors. Over a wide range of $Q^2$, including both early data at low $Q^2$ and recent data for $Q^2 \sim 1$ (GeV/$c$)$^2$, the relativistic wave functions fit the $p_m$ distributions relatively well while the NIKHEF wave functions are systematically narrower than the data. Thus, the data for quasiperpendicular kinematics consistently prefer the broader $p_m$ distributions and larger normalization factors obtained with Dirac-Hartree wave functions.

  ------------ --------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- ------- --------
               $Q^2$           $E_m$                                            
  experiment   (GeV/$c$)$^2$   MeV     NLSH    HS      NIKHEF   NLSH    HS      NIKHEF
  Saclay       0.16            15-22   0.637   0.599   0.483    0.572   0.542   0.444
  Saclay       0.18            15-22   0.757   0.705   0.554    0.684   0.640   0.510
  JLab         0.6             15-25   0.934   0.878   0.697    0.909   0.856   0.682
  SLAC         1.1             15-25   0.852   0.791   0.613    0.887   0.822   0.633
  JLab         1.2             15-25   0.904   0.849   0.671    0.950   0.890   0.699
  JLab         1.8             15-25   0.901   0.854   0.689    0.886   0.841   0.679
  ------------ --------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- ------- --------

  : Normalization factors for $^{12}$C$(e,e^\prime p)(1p)^{-1}$ fit to quasiperpendicular data for the $1p$ bin using several overlap functions in the EMAnoSV approximation. 