Agreement between the suppression curve of Eq. \[eqxanew\] and the @summersRAL data for all iron ions Fe$^{q+}$, $q=9-19$. The upper panel shows the detailed level of agreement of the two end cases, Fe$^{9+}$ and Fe$^{19+}$. The lower panel shows the $2-\sigma$ (95.4%) confidence level as a function of charge state; this means that 95.4% of all density data points in the @summersRAL data, for the given charge and temperature, are within that percentage of the prediction from Eq. \[eqsuppression2\]. The symbols denote different values of the scaled temperature $\theta=T/q^2$. ](Fig3a.eps "fig:"){width="70.00000%"} ![\[figiron\] Agreement between the suppression curve of Eq. \[eqxanew\] and the @summersRAL data for all iron ions Fe$^{q+}$, $q=9-19$. The upper panel shows the detailed level of agreement of the two end cases, Fe$^{9+}$ and Fe$^{19+}$. The lower panel shows the $2-\sigma$ (95.4%) confidence level as a function of charge state; this means that 95.4% of all density data points in the @summersRAL data, for the given charge and temperature, are within that percentage of the prediction from Eq. \[eqsuppression2\]. The symbols denote different values of the scaled temperature $\theta=T/q^2$. ](Fig3b.eps "fig:"){width="70.00000%"}

It is seen that our model fits that data to within 21% for all densities, temperatures, and 