for which the $q$-scaled temperature $\theta \equiv T/q^2$ was very low ($\theta\leq 2.5\times10^{4}$ K), a further modification to the coefficients $A(N)$ for $N\le 5$ is necessary in that the values in Table \[TableXX\] should be multiplied by a factor of two.

[rcc]{} H-like & 1 & 16\
He-like & 2 & 18\
Li-like & 3 & 66\
Be-like & 4 & 66\
B-like & 5 & 52\
\

The above final formulation, which consists of the use of Eq. \[eqsuppression2\], with $\mu=0$, $w=5.64548$, and a rather complicated activation density given by Eqs. \[eqxanew\], \[t0\], \[q0\], \[AN\], and \[N1N2\], with $x_{a}^{0}=10.1821$, has been found to model the entire database of ions, temperatures, and densities considered in the @summersRAL data fairly well. To illustrate the general level of agreement over a large range of ions and environments, we compare our parameterized model formulation to the actual suppression data from that report [@summersRAL] for a few selected cases in Fig. \[figsurvey\].

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  ![ A comparison between the present parameterized suppression factor and the collisional radiative results of @summersRAL for a sample of ions and temperatures, as a function of density. \[figsurvey\] ](Fig2a.eps "fig:"){width="3.2in"}   ![ A comparison between the present parameterized suppression factor 