should improve as $Q^2$ increases and the use of quasifree kinematics should minimize distortion of $\rho(p_m)$ due to variation of current operator off shell. It would then be of interest to test the reaction mechanism by comparison with data for parallel kinematics with large $T_p$. Ideally such tests should have sufficient resolution in $E_m$ to isolate discrete states without the complications of incoherent mixtures. Unfortunately, no high-resolution $(e,e^\prime p)$ data for parallel kinematics with $T_p > 200$ MeV and sufficient coverage in $p_m$ are available.

![EMA-noSV calculations for $^{12}$C$(e,e^\prime p)$ are compared with data from from NIKHEF using parallel kinematics for $T_p = 70$ MeV/$c$. []{data-label="fig:NIKHEF-para"}](emanosv_nikhef.ps){width="3.0in"}

![EMA-noSV calculations for $^{12}$C$(e,e^\prime p)$ are compared with data from from Saclay using parallel kinematics for $T_p = 99$ MeV. Solid, dashed, and dash-dotted curves are based upon NLSH, HS, and NIKHEF wave functions, respectively. []{data-label="fig:Saclay-para"}](emanosv_saclay_para.ps){width="3.0in"}

![(Color online) NR2 calculations for $^{12}$C$(e,e^\prime p)$ are compared with data from from NIKHEF using parallel kinematics for $T_p = 70$ MeV/$c$. WS refers to the NIKHEF Woods-Saxon wave function and $\eta>0$ shows the effect of enhancing transverse components of the current opertor. []{data-label="fig:NR2-para"}](nr2_nikhef.ps){width="3.0in"}

RDWIA analysis {#sec:RDWIA}
==============

Normalization factors {#sec:norm}
---------------------

### JLab {#sec:norm-JLab}

Full RDWIA fits 