+ continuum-RPA response functions of $^{208}$Pb with Skyrme interaction MSL0 by varying individually $K_{0}$ (a), $L$ (b), and $m_{s,0}^{\ast }$ (c).[]{data-label="SRPAPb208"}](SRPAPb208.eps)

As for the correlation analysis method in Fig. \[XEaPb208\], we would like to stress that, when the macroscopic quantities (except $E_{0}(\rho _{0})$ and $\rho _{0}$) change individually from their base values in MSL0 within the empirical uncertain ranges considered here, the values of the binding energy or the charge rms radii of finite nuclei will vary by only about $2\%$ at most (See, e.g., Figs. 4 and 5 in Ref. [@Che10]). Therefore, the original agreement of MSL0 with the experimental data of binding energies or charge radii of finite nuclei will essentially still hold with the individual change of the macroscopic quantities. In this way, changing the macroscopic quantities individually in the present correlation analysis approach is equivalent to constructing a number of different Skyrme interaction sets which can give reasonable description on the ground state binding energy and charge rms radii of finite nuclei. The key point and the most important advantage of the present analysis approach is that in the present correlation analysis, one knows exactly what is the difference among different Skyrme interaction sets constructed by 