settings. This reduction occurs because the RDWIA calculations for inherently nonrelativistic Woods-Saxon wave functions were made by replacing the Perey factor with the Darwin factor obtained using the spin-orbit potential; this procedure is explained in Ref. [@Kelly05a]. However, because the spin-orbit potential used by van der Steenhoven [[*et al.* ]{}]{}[@vdSteenhoven88a] is stronger than that for NLSH or HS Dirac-Hartree wave functions, the smaller Darwin factor leads to a narrower momentum distribution for RDWIA than for EMA-noSV and, consequently, smaller normalization factors. The fits for the $1p$ bin overshoot the peaks and then fall too rapidly as $p_m$ increases and these problems carry over, in slightly diluted form, to the inclusive bin. Therefore, we reject those parametrizations of the $1p_{3/2}$ and $1s_{1/2}$ overlap functions.

![RDWIA fits to the JLab data for JLab data for $^{12}$C$(e,e^\prime p)$ are compared for NLSH (solid), HS (dashed), and NIKHEF (dash-dot) wave functions. In each panel the top set of curves shows the inclusive $10 \leq E_m \leq 80$ MeV bin scaled by a factor of 20, the middle set shows the $p$-shell bin with $15 \leq E_m \leq 25$ MeV, and the bottom set shows the $s$-shell bin with $30 \leq E_m \leq 50$ MeV 