by dimensional reduction together with modified minimal subtraction. It has been shown in the meeting [@Stockinger:2005gx] that the inconsistencies of the original scheme [@Siegel:1980qs] can be overcome and that the ${{\overline{DR}}}$ scheme can be formulated in a mathematically consistent way. To make use of the highly developed infrastructure for proton colliders, which is based on the ${{\overline{MS}}}$ factorisation scheme (which requires [*[ad-hoc]{}*]{} counter terms to restore supersymmetry), a finite shift from the commonly used ${{\overline{MS}}}$ parton density functions to the ${{\overline{DR}}}$ density functions has to be carried out [@37a]. Moreover, for massive final state particles spurious density functions for the 4-D gluon components have to be introduced to comply with the factorization theorem. Formulating an efficient combination of the most attractive elements of both schemes in describing hadronic processes is therefore an important task of the project [@inprog]. The SUSY scale is chosen $\tilde M = 1$ TeV to avoid large threshold corrections in running the mass parameters by renormalization group techniques from the high scale down to the low scale. In the decay widths and production cross sections the physical on-shell masses are introduced such that the phase-space is treated in the observables closest to experimental on-shell kinematics; the 