the UDF catalog of @RIT. As a result, we have not remeasured these values. However, we note that the photometric values in @Mobasher do not include the NICMOS count rate dependent non-linearity correction discussed in @deJong. The effect of this non-linearity correction is to make the photometry brighter by 0.22 mag in the $J_{110}$ band and 0.12 mag in the $H_{160}$ band as shown in Table 2.

We also remeasured the photometry of the source at IRAC wavelengths. We used SExtractor catalogs and measured the photometry in 3$\arcsec$ diameter beams, similar to @Mobasher. To derive aperture corrections and systematic uncertainties, we adopt a different approach. The primary systematic uncertainty in this measurement is the uncertain sky level due to the bright galaxy 7$\arcsec$ to the South-East. We input an artificial point source whose brightness is that of JD2 into the final mosaic. The centroid of the source with respect to the bright galaxy is kept similar to that of JD2, i.e the artificial source has a centroid which is between 7$\arcsec$ and 8$\arcsec$ from the galaxy. The SExtractor routine was run on this fake image and the photometry of the fake source measured. We find a systematic uncertainty whereby the 