agree well with the second and fourth resonances reported in Ref. [@lhcbexp], $\Omega_c(3050)$ and $\Omega_c(3090)$. It is interesting to note that cutoff values of this order are used in Ref. [@ramoskaon] for $\bar{K}N$ or in Ref. [@uchino] for $DN$. Fitting one resonance is partly merit of fine tuning the cutoff, but then the second resonance and the widths are genuine predictions of the theory. Note that the widths are respectively $0.88$ MeV and $10.24$ MeV which agree remarkably well with the experiment, $0.8\pm 0.2\pm 0.1$ MeV and $8.7\pm 1.0 \pm 0.8$ MeV, respectively. It is instructive to see the origin of the widths. For this we look at Table \[res1\] for the couplings to the different channels. We can see that for the lower state at $3054$ MeV only the $\Xi_c\bar{K}$ state is open for decay, precisely the channel where it has been observed, and the coupling of the state to this channel is very small. However, for the state at $3091$ MeV the $\Xi^{\prime}_c\bar{K}$ channel is also open, and the coupling to this channel is considerable. Furthermore, the coupling to $\Xi_c\bar{K}$ is bigger than before and there is more phase space for decay.

   ${\bf 3054.05+i0.44}$   $\Xi_c\bar{K}$   $\Xi^{\prime}_c\bar{K}$        $\Xi D$         