T T \^u\_2 H\^\_[5]{} + TT \^u\_2 \^u\_2 H\^\_[5]{}\
\[LOdown\] &&+ F T\_3 \^d\_3 H\_ + (F \^d\_3)\_[**[1]{}**]{} ( T \^d\_2 )\_[**[1]{}**]{} H\_ + (F \^d\_2 \^d\_2)\_[**[3]{}**]{} ( T \^d\_3 )\_[**[3]{}**]{} H\_\
\[LOnu\] &&+ y\_D F N H\^\_[5]{} + N N \^\_1 + N N \^\_2 + N N \^\_[3’]{} , where $M$ is the generic messenger mass which is of the order of the scale of grand unification. Note that we have to assume specific contractions, ${\bf 1}$ and ${\bf 3}$, to dominate in the case of the second and third operators in Eq.(\[LOdown\]), as has been discussed in detail in [@HKL10]. A viable UV completion leading to the scenario in which these operators are dominant is briefly recapitulated in section \[messengers\]. The following vacuum alignment, achieved through $F$-terms of suitable driving fields [@HKL10], \[VEVup\] && \^u\_2   =   \^u\_2

0\
1

, \^u\_2  =  \^u\_2

0\
1

,\
\[VEVdown\] && \^d\_3   =   \^d\_3

0\
1\
0

, \^d\_3   =  \^d\_3

0\
-1\
1

, \^d\_2  =  \^d\_2

1\
0

,\
\[VEVnu\] && \^\_[3’]{}  =  \^\_[3’]{}

1\
1\
1

, \^\_2 =  \^\_2

1\
1

, \^\_1  =  \^\_1 , leads to a diagonal up quark mass matrix $M_u$, a 