mid-IR criteria had a yield of only 7%, again with low number statistics. Not surprisingly, combining all three selection methods was the most efficient with a yield of 65% (22 new AGNs).

Figure \[fig:cumul\] shows the cumulative distribution of our targets and then their division into quasars, stars, and unclassified objects. We also show the cumulative distribution of $z>0.5$ quasars in AGES (@2011arXiv1110.4371K). These quasars are primarily mid-IR and X-ray selected, like much of the present sample, but with a much deeper optical spectroscopic limit. We have adjusted the AGES magnitudes for the $\Delta E(B-V)\simeq 0.14$ mag extinction difference between AGES and a typical LMC site line (@1999AcA....49..201U), although this may underestimate the correction necessary for a true background population. The completeness of our present sample relative to AGES is roughly 50% (30%) at 18.6 mag (19.3 mag). Figure \[fig:cumul\] also shows the cumulative distribution of the SDSS quasars with $0.3 < z < 2.2$ from [@2006AJ....131.2766R]. Given the change in bandpass (the $(i-I) \simeq 0.5$ mag color term varies significantly with redshift, see Figure \[fig:AGNcolor\]) and the additional line width and luminosity selection criteria in [@2006AJ....131.2766R] it is harder to make a direct comparison, but after matching as best 