the dashed curves show the $1p$ contributions to the inclusive and $p$-shell bins, and the dash-dotted curves show the $1s$ contributions to the inclusive and $s$-shell bins. In addition, scale-factor fits for the IPSM are shown as dotted curves for the inclusive bin but are practically indistinguishable from the solid curves. All calculations use NLSH wave functions and EDAD1 optical potentials in full RDWIA.[]{data-label="fig:Dutta_nlsh"}](Dutta_nlsh.ps){width="5in"}

RDWIA fits to the JLab data using NLSH, HS, or NIKHEF wave functions are compared in Fig. \[fig:Dutta\_fits\]. The two Dirac-Hartree wave functions provide very similar fits with a slight preference for NLSH. Mixing between $1p$ and $1s$ contributions improves fits to the $1s$ bin using NIKHEF wave functions by flattening the small $p_m$ and lifting the large $p_m$ regions. However, two-component fits using NIKHEF wave functions were impossible for the $1p$ bin because the $1s$ normalizations were negative; hence, the $1p$ NIKHEF fits shown here simplify scale RDWIA calculations for $1p_{3/2}$. Furthermore, the $1p$ NIKHEF fits are even worse and their normalization factors are even smaller in RDWIA than in EMA-noSV: with EDAD1 those normalization factors are 0.66, 0.63, and 0.66 for RDWIA compared with 0.70, 0.67, and 0.69 for EMA-noSV at the three $Q^2$ 