0.003 & 0.09$^{+ 0.08}_{- 0.05}$ & 0.23 $\pm$ 0.06 & 0.0030$^{+ 0.0008}_{- 0.0008}$ & 0.08$^{+ 0.08}_{- 0.04}$ & 0.09 $\pm$ 0.02 & 0.06 $\pm$ 0.02 & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.1\

### NGC 1386

NGC 1386 hosts a water maser source [@1997AAS...19110402B], although it is not clear whether the maser spots trace a rotating thin disk or align in front of an underlying continuum (i.e. are jet masers). This makes the central black hole mass estimate challenging and we adopt the one reported by @2013ApJ...764..184M[^3], which is 1.2$^{+ 1.1}_{- 0.6}$ $\times$ 10$^6$ M$_\odot$. A default `MYTorus` model fails ($\chi^2$/$\nu$ = 131/27), and two statistically indistinguishable sets of parameters are possible: one with a Compton-thin obscuration ($N_{\rm H}$ $\sim$ 6 $\times$ 10$^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$) and $\Gamma$ $\sim$ 1.4, and one with a severely obscured AGN ($N_{\rm H}$ $\sim$ 10$^{25}$ cm$^{-2}$) and $\Gamma \sim$ 2.6. A decoupled `MYTorus` model points toward a back-scattered radiation dominated spectrum, with the same parameters of the coupled case ($\chi^2$/$\nu$ = 65/25). The unacceptable fit ($\chi^2$/$\nu$ = 57/27) of the `Torus` model arises from an underestimation of the line contribution, and provides the best $\chi^2$ among the physical models. Following @2015ApJ...805...41B, we add a line component to the fit at 