the imputation model, Rubin’s rules provide estimates of standard errors and confidence intervals that correctly reflect the uncertainty introduced by missing data.

The standard implementation of MI in widely available software packages provides valid inference under the assumption that missing values are missing completely at random (MCAR) or missing at random (MAR). However, in many applied settings, it is possible that the unseen data are missing not at random (MNAR). For example, in primary care, individuals with more frequent blood pressure readings may, on average, have higher blood pressure compared to the rest of the primary care population. Although MI can be used when data are MNAR, imputation becomes more difficult because a model for the missing data mechanism needs to be specified, which describes how missingness depends on both observed and unobserved quantities. This implies that in practice, it is necessary to define a model for either the association between the probability of observing a variable and its unseen values (selection models) [@Little-Rubin2002]; or the difference in the distribution of subjects with and without missing data (pattern-mixture models).[@Little1993; @Little1994] Due to the potential complexity of modelling the missingness mechanism under MNAR, analyses assuming MNAR are relatively infrequently performed and 