of LV from reconstructed geometry are compared to their corresponding physiological ranges to show that the reconstruction from echo images is comparable to physiological data. The volume and volumetric flux versus time for both healthy and AMI left ventricles are presented in Fig. \[healthy-AMI-flux\]. The time is non-dimensionalized in this figure so as to have the same time duration for both the healthy and AMI cases. Various parameters including $EF$, the ratio of maximum fluxes during the E-wave and A-wave ($E/A$ Ratio), Deceleration Time ($DT$), Stroke volume ($SV$) and Cardiac Output ($CO$) are calculated based on the curves in Fig. \[healthy-AMI-flux\]. Table \[table-parameters\] shows the comparison between the calculated parameters and their physiological ranges reported in previous in vivo experiments for a porcine LV [@reiter2016early]. As it can be seen in this table, the parameters calculated here for healthy LV lie within the physiological ranges of in-vivo experiments. However, the $E/A$ ratio, $SV$ and $CO$ for the AMI afflicted subject’s LV lie outside the physiological ranges for normal subject’s LV as can be expected.

CFD simulation for the reconstructed LV assembly
------------------------------------------------

It is well known that the blood flow pattern in the LV has a direct impact on the 