covering group [@FlatCMB]. As has been shown by Inoue [@Inoue], the addition of a cosmological constant term makes the constraints less stringent, whereas the effect of considering the observer out of an axis of rotation is totally unknown. Since the models presented below consider both, a cosmological constant term, and the observer off an axis of rotation, they can not be considered as being ruled out by current observational data.

The models constructed here consider $C_1$ as being the cluster RXJ 1347.5–1145 and $C_2$ the cluster CL 09104+4109. Then for the values $\Omega_{m0} = 0.3$ and $\Omega_{\Lambda 0} = 0.7$, one has $d_1 = 1158h^{-1}
\, Mpc$, $d_2 = 1142h^{-1} \, Mpc$ and $\theta = 87^o$. Other examples can be built by simply reversing these identifications, i.e. by considering $C_1$ as being the cluster CL 09104+4109 and $C_2$ the cluster RXJ 1347.5–1145. As before, let us first examine the classes ${\mathcal{G}_2}-{\mathcal{G}_5}$. One has $|b| =
1142h^{-1} \, Mpc$, and because of the expression $\sqrt{d_1^2\sin^2 \theta -
|a|^2}$ in Table \[Tb:Positions\] one also has the constraint $$\label{|a|-Max}
|a| \leq 1156.4h^{-1} \, Mpc \; .$$ The models within class ${\mathcal{G}_2}$ are special because they have a fixed value of $y$, say $y 