for different resolutions](fig6){width="60.00000%"}

Due to the large pressure peak there is also a small residual slip velocity at the contact line, which can be observed in figure \[figure:velocityEquil\]. As was the case with the pressure, this velocity peak gets sharper at higher resolutions. As can be seen in figure \[figure:angleRadiusEquil\] the residual slip velocity does not negatively affect the shape of the drop. However, spurious currents are a well known issue of Volume Of Fluid solvers [@deshpande2012] and, if needed, can be controlled by making the time step sufficiently small.

![Integral of pressure peak at the contact line as a function of resolution.\[figure:resolutionPressure\]](fig7){width="60.00000%"}

![Integral of slip velocity at the contact line as a function of resolution.\[figure:resolutionVelocity\]](fig8){width="60.00000%"}

To investigate to what extent the pressure and velocity peaks affect the solution they are both integrated over the wall for various resolutions. Figure \[figure:resolutionPressure\] shows this integral for the pressure, and figure \[figure:resolutionVelocity\] for the slip velocity. The integration limits in both plots are from $\alpha = 0.01$ to $\alpha = 0.99$. For the integral over the pressure peak this approach makes sure that the integral is not affected by the Laplace pressure inside the droplet, and the velocity integral uses the same 