couple ($\rm \Lambda > -5.7$; $\rm \beta < 0.5^{\circ}$) have been used, respectively. These values of quality parameters are extracted from the optimisation step detailed in Section \[optimisation\]. $\rm QFit$ and $\rm \Lambda Fit$ present different efficiencies of reconstruction, characterised by the effective areas for muon neutrinos, $\rm A_{eff}^{\nu}$ ($\rm m^2$), which are shown in Figure \[aefffig\] as a function of the energy of the primary neutrinos $\rm E_{\nu}$ (GeV). An effective area, $\rm A_{eff}^{\nu}$, at a given energy is defined as the ratio between the neutrino event rate ($\rm s^{-1}$) in a detector and the neutrino flux ($\rm m^{-2} \cdot s^{-1}$) at that energy. As one can see, the $\rm QFit$ reconstruction strategy has a larger efficiency in the low energy regime with $\rm A_{eff}^{\nu}$ higher than the one obtained with $\rm \Lambda Fit$ for $\rm E_{\nu} < 100$ GeV.

Beside the effective area, $\rm QFit$ and $\rm \Lambda Fit$ yield different median angular resolutions, $\rm \tilde{\alpha} = med[\mid\arccos(\vec{d}_{rec}\cdot\vec{d}_{nu})\mid]$ ($^{\circ}$) between the reconstructed muons, $\rm \vec{d}_{rec}$, and the corresponding primary neutrinos, $\rm \vec{d}_{nu}$, as shown in Figure \[angresfig\]. For $\rm QFit$, since in single-line events only the zenith angle, $\rm \theta$, is reconstructed, $\rm \tilde{\alpha}$ is defined as the 