and thus some enhanced activity may be quite consistent with its past behavior.

Nearly simultaneous X–ray light curve observed by *Swift*-XRT for six days of monitoring of the source is depicted in Figure 2(c). From the figure, we observe that the soft X–ray emission from the source is consistent with the average flux level (5.01$\pm$0.34)$\times10^{-11}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, except for some enhanced activity on March 15, 2013 (MJD 56366). During the enhanced activity on March 15 in X-rays, the HE activity is also observed to be slightly higher with respect to the average flux. We have also looked into the archival X–ray data in the energy bands 2-20 keV and 15-50 keV from *MAXI*[^6] and *Swift*-BAT[^7] instruments respectively and these data do not show any detection above 3$\sigma$. This indicates that during the period of $TACTIC$ observations, the source was not active in hard X-ray regime. The simultaneous UV (W1,M2,W2 filters) and optical(V,B,U filters) light curves of the source for six days of observations are presented in Figure 2(d) and 2(e) respectively. The UVOT flux points included in the light curve have not been de-reddened. No unusual activity is observed in the source with *Swift*-UVOT instrument during the period of 