\[Model\] details the proposed model. The validation experiments are described in Section \[sec:modelValidation\], while the on-line prediction method is experimented with in Section \[sec:Online\]. Section \[conclusion\] summarizes the paper and gives some hints for further research in the area of trajectory prediction.

Related Work {#sec:relatedWork}
============

Research on TP includes a set of methodologies for its specification, implementation and evaluation. First, the Eurocontrol Specification for Trajectory Prediction gives the requirements for an operational TP and a validation methodology useful for the Air Navigation Service Providers in their choice of a new ATM system compatible with SESAR. This document covers many functionalities like flight plan and clearance processing, airspace constraints and real-time monitoring. Unfortunately, it does not specify the accuracy requirements. Besides, [@Musialek2010] provides an important literature survey of trajectory prediction technology with 282 reviewed documents and 20 selected for further studies. From the selected set, many implement the point-mass model where the rotational moments are not modeled. This is an acceptable assumption for airline aircraft. Also, [@Coppenbarger1999] and [@Swierstra2003] enumerate the principal difficulties inherent to TP, i.e. the uncertainty on the input data, the controller and pilot intents, and quantify the errors accordingly. The input data mainly refers to aircraft 