(Tables \[tab:qresultsone\]+\[tab:qresultstwo\]+\[tab:qresultsthree\]+\[tab:qresultsfour\]). Notice that the softer a self-annihilation channel is, the lower the corresponding acceptance, due to the decrease of the effective area $\rm A_{eff}^{\nu}$ shown in Figure \[aefffig\] towards the low neutrino energies. Also, the channels $\rm WIMP\,WIMP \rightarrow \nu_{\alpha}\bar{\nu}_{\alpha}$ and $\rm WIMP\,WIMP \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ show respectively the largest and smallest acceptance to a WIMP self-annihilation signal. This will respectively induce the best and worse limits for a neutrino flux $\rm \Phi_{\nu_{\mu}+\bar{\nu}_\mu}$, as shown in Equation \[mrfeq\]. The $\rm \bar{A}_{eff}(M_{\rm WIMP}) \times T_{eff}$ distribution of the $W^{+}W^{-}$ channel is kinematically allowed for $M_{\rm WIMP} > M_{W} = 80.4$ GeV [@pdg2012]. However, the low mass region, $\rm 25\,GeV < M_{\rm WIMP} < M_{W}$, is probed by other channels. Moreover, the energy range for which $\rm QFit$ is more efficient than $\rm \Lambda Fit$ will change slightly according to the softness of the self-annihilation channel. As can be seen in Figure \[benchchfig\], most of the contribution of the $b\bar{b}$ channel lies in the range $\rm E_{\nu_{\mu}} < 100$ GeV, for $\rm M_{WIMP} = 360$ GeV, where $\rm QFit$ yields a higher effective area compared to $\rm \Lambda Fit$. Therefore, $\rm QFit$ is preferred over the range of masses $\rm M_{WIMP} < 