non-standard parity violation in the dataset as a whole, and then shows the asymmetries seen in CMS Open Data; Section \[sec:Correction\] unfolds the preceding results for detector effects. The paper concludes in Section \[Sec:Conclusion\].

\[Sec:ParityViolation\]Jet-based Signatures for Non-Standard Parity Violation
=============================================================================

One of the evident disadvantages of searching for the breaking of a particular symmetry without a particular model in mind, is that there the number of potential signatures is almost unbounded. If testing for genuine parity violation, any parity-odd variable which is invariant under the action of relevant non-parity symmetries[^4] has the capacity (assuming a parity-even event selection) to be sensitive to *some* parity-violating model, albeit not necessarily one with a strong theoretical motivation.

Lacking clear guidance from any well motivated non LLIQFT models, we make no claims of generality or optimality concerning our choice to concentrate on a signal region containing three jets. We argue only that the investigation is interesting for the reasons already given in the introduction.

A simple way of constructing a parity-odd variable from jets which is insensitive to rotations is to use a pseudoscalar. This simplest of these is arguably the scalar triple product $[{{\vec p^{{j_1}}}},{{\vec p^{{j_2}}}},{{\vec p^{{j_3}}}}] \equiv ({{\vec p^{{j_1}}}}\times {{\vec p^{{j_2}}}}) 