Possible $1s$ contributions were neglected. The first set uses the EDAD1 and the second the EDAIC optical potential. \[table:normperp\_EMAnoSV\]

The data for parallel kinematics, on the other hand, present special problems. We omit the Mainz data [@Blomqvist95] because there appear to be significant normalization problems for that experiment [@Lapikas00]. The NIKHEF and Saclay data for parallel kinematics are compared with EMA-noSV calculations for NLSH, HS, and NIKHEF wave functions in Figs. \[fig:NIKHEF-para\] and \[fig:Saclay-para\]. The results for both experiments are similar but none of these calculations reproduce the data for the $1p$ shell. Due to obvious the difficulties for $p_m < 0$, the normalization factors listed in Table \[table:normpara\_EMAnoSV\] were fit to $0 < p_m < 200$ MeV/$c$. These factors are also correlated with the peak values of $\rho(p_m)$ but for the relativistic wave functions are somewhat lower than were obtained using quasiperpendicular kinematics. On the other hand, these fits underestimate the cross sections for $p_m <0$ and larger $Q^2$.

  experiment   $T_p$   NLSH    HS      NIKHEF
  ------------ ------- ------- ------- --------
  NIKHEF       70      0.635   0.616   0.541
  Saclay       99      0.685   0.636   0.505

  : Normalization factors for $^{12}$C$(e,e^\prime p)(1p)^{-1}$ fit to data for parallel kinematics using several overlap functions in the EMAnoSV approximation. 