I don't believe there is a definite answer, and I feel that many of the arguments made both for and against the war are inaccurate.  First, the argument that we are there for oil.  If this were the case, you would have seen American oil companies moving in, special trade agreements, and lower oil and gas prices.  This has not happened, so I doubt this is the case.  Second, that Bush was lying.  Bush didn't lie about the wmd's because he didn't make up the intelligence.  He believed the information given to him by people who also believed in it, and just because it was incorrect does not mean he lied.  \nHowever, I believe wholeheartedly that we should still be there, and continue to be there until things have stabilized.  We made a promise to those people, and we must keep it.  I guarantee you, if this works out, thirty years down the road when this is in the history books, we will be the good guys.  In fact, the majority of the Iraqi people love what we are doing.  So, in conclusion, while me may not have been "right" to invade, we are doing the people of Iraq a great service by actually giving them a chance to be free.