Salsman, J. M., & Carlson, C. R. (2005). Religious orientation, mature faith, and psychological distress: Elements of positive and negative asso-
ciations. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion ,44(2), 201 /C0209.
Storch, E. A., Roberti, J. W., Heidgerken, A. D., Storch, J. B., Lewin, A. B., Killiany, E. M., et al. (2004b). The Duke Religion Index: A psycho-
metric investigation. Pastoral Psychology ,53(2), 175 /C0181.
Storch, E. A., Strawser, M. S., & Storch, J. B. (2004a). Two-week test /C0retest reliability of the Duke Religion Index. Psychological Reports ,94(3, Pt
1), 993/C0994.
Tarakeshwar, N., Pargament, K. I., & Mahoney, A. (2003). Initial development of a measure of religious coping among Hindus. Journal of
Community Psychology ,31(6), 607 /C0628.
Tori, C. D. (2004). Self-representation in a selfless society: Reliability and validity of the Tennessee Self-Concept Scale in Thailand. In S. P.
Shohov (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (Vol. 30, pp. 35 /C056). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Underwood, L. G. (2006). Ordinary spiritual experience: Qualitative research, interpretive guidelines, and population distribution for the dail y
spiritual experience scale. Archive for the Psychology of Religion ,28, 181/C0218.
Underwood, L. G. (2011). The daily spiritual experience scale: Overview and results. Religions ,2(1), 29/C050. Available from http://dx.doi.org/
doi:10.3390/rel2010029 .
Underwood, L. G., & Teresi, J. A. (2002). The daily spiritual experience scale: Development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory fa c-
tor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. Annals of Behavioral Medicine ,24(1), 22/C033.
Wang, J., Sun, Y. L., Rong, Y., Zhang, Y. H., & Wang, Z. Z. (2013). The reliability of Chinese version DUREL scale. Journal of Ningxia Medical
University ,35(5), 550 /C0552.561 REFERENCES
V. VICES AND VIRTUES