682 vI. SELF‑ AND S OCIAL P ROCESSES
ogy (Vol. 1, pp. 377–397). Thousand Oaks, CA: 
SAGE.
Denissen, J. J. A., & Penke, L. (2008). Individual 
reaction norms underlying the Five Factor Model 
of personality: First steps towards a theory-  based 
conceptual framework. Journal of Research in 
Personality, 42,  1285–1302.
De Young, C. G., & Weisberg, Y. J. (2019). Cyber -
netic approaches to personality and social be -
havior. In M. Snyder & K. Deaux (Eds.), Oxford 
handbook of personality and social psychology 
(2nd ed., pp. 387–414). New York: Oxford Uni -
versity Press.
Donnellan, M. B., Lucas, R. E., & Fleeson, W. 
(2009). Introduction to personality and assess -
ment at age 40: Reflections on the legacy of 
the person–  situation debate and the future of 
person–  situation integration. Journal of Re -
search in Personality, 43, 117–119.
Doris, J. (2002). Lack of character . Cambridge, 
UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Im -
plicit theories and their role in judgments and 
reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psy -
chological Inquiry, 6, 267–285.
Emmons, R. A. (1986). Personal strivings: An ap -
proach to personality and subjective well-being. 
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 
51, 1058–1068.
Fleeson, W. (2001). Towards a structure- and 
process-  integrated view of personality: Traits as 
density distributions of states. Journal of Person -
ality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027.
Fleeson, W. (2004). Moving personality beyond the 
person–  situation debate: The challenge and op -
portunity of within-  person variability. Current 
Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 83 –87.
Fleeson, W. (2007). Situation-  based contingencies 
underlying trait-  content manifestation in behav -
ior. Journal of Personality, 75, 825–861.
Fleeson, W., & Furr, R. M. (2016). Do broad 
character traits exist?: Repeated assessments of 
individuals, not group summaries from classic 
experiments, provide the relevant evidence. In 
I. Fileva (Ed.), Questions of character (pp. 231–
248). New York: Oxford University Press.
Fleeson, W., & Jayawickreme, E. (2015). Whole 
trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 
56, 82–92.
Fleeson, W., & Law, M. K. (2015). Trait enactments 
as density distributions: The role of actors, situ -
ations, and observers in explaining stability and 
variability. Journal of Personality and Social 
Psychology, 109, 1090–1104.
Funder, D. C. (2001). Personality. Annual Review 
of Psychology, 52, 197–221.
Funder, D. C. (2006). Towards a resolution of the 
personality triad: Persons, situations and be -haviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 
21–34.
Funder, D. C. (2016). Taking situations seriously: 
The situation construal model and the Riverside 
Situational Q-sort. Current Directions in Psy -
chological Science, 25 (3), 203–208.
Funder, D. C., & Colvin, C. R. (1991). Explorations 
in behavioral consistency: Properties of persons, 
situations, and behaviors. Journal of Personality 
and Social Psychology, 52, 773–794.
Funder, D. C., Furr, R. M., & Colvin, C. R. (2000). 
The Riverside Behavioral Q-Sort: A tool for the 
description of social behavior. Journal of Person -
ality, 68,  450–489.
Furr, R. M. (2009). Profile analysis in person– 
situation integration. Journal of Research in Per -
sonality, 43,  196–207.
Furr, R. M. (in press). Variability and consistency in 
the analysis of behavior. In J. Rauthmann (Ed.), 
The handbook of personality dynamics and pro -
cesses.  Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
Furr, R. M., & Funder, D. C. (2004). Situational 
similarity and behavioral consistency: Subjective, 
objective, variable-  centered, and person-  centered 
approaches. Journal of Research in Personality, 
38, 421– 447.
Gilbert, D. T. (1998). Ordinary personology. In 
D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), 
Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 89–
150). New York: McGraw-  Hill.
Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The cor -
respondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 
21–38.
Gottman, J. M., & Bakeman, R. (1986). Observing 
interaction: An introduction to sequential analy -
sis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Harman, G. (1999). Moral philosophy meets social 
psychology: Virtue ethics and the fundamental 
attribution error. Proceedings of the Aristotelian 
Society, 99,  315–331.
Harman, G. (2009). Skepticism about character 
traits. Journal of Ethics, 13, 235–242.
Heller, D., Perunovic, W. Q. E., & Reichman, D. 
(2009). The future of person–  situation integra -
tion in the interface between traits and goals: A 
bottom-  up framework. Journal of Research in 
Personality, 43,  171–178.
Helzer, E. G., Barranti, M., Meindl, P. M., Flee -
son, W., & Furr, R. M. (2017). Once a utilitar -
ian, consistently a utilitarian?: Examining prin -
cipledness in moral judgment via the robustness 
of individual differences. Journal of Personality, 
85, 505–517.
Helzer, E. G., Furr, R. M., Hawkins, A., Barran -
ti, M., Blackie, L. E. R., & Fleeson, W. (2014). 
Agreement on the perception of moral character. 
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 
1398–1710.