Detrick, P., Chibnall, J. T., & Call, C. (2010). Demand effects on positive response distortion by police officer applicants on the Revised NEO
Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment ,92, 410/C0415.
Dwight, S. A., & Feigelson, M. E. (2000). A quantitative review of the effect of computerized testing on the measurement of social desirability.
Educational and Psychological Measurement ,60, 340/C0360.
Edwards, A. L. (1953). The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed. Journal of
Applied Psychology ,37,9 0/C093.
Edwards, A. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality measurement and research . New York, NY: Dryden Press.
Ellingson, J. E. (2012). People fake only when they need to fake. In M. Ziegler, C. MacCann, & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), New perspectives on faking
in personality assessment (pp. 19 /C033). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Ellingson, J. E., & McFarland, L. A. (2011). Understanding faking behavior through the lens of motivation: An application of VIE Theory.
Human Performance ,24, 322/C0337.
Eysenck, H. J. (1962). The manual of the maudsley personality inventory . San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1968). Manual for the eysenck personality inventory . San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Eysenck personality questionnaire manual . San Diego, CA: Educational & Industrial Testing Service.
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1991). Eysenck personality questionnaire-revised . London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Fekken, G. C., & Holden, R. R. (1989). Psychometric evaluation of the microcomputerized personality research form. Educational and
Psychological Measurement ,49, 875/C0882.
Ferrando, P. J., & Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2009). The interpretation of the EPQ Lie sscale scores under honest and faking instructions:
A multiple-group IRT-based analysis. Personality and Individual Differences ,46, 552/C0556.
Ferrando, P. J., & Chico, E. (2001). Detecting dissimulation in personality test scores: A comparison between person-fit indices and detection
scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement ,61, 997/C01012.
Fischer, D. G., & Fick, C. (1993). Measuring social desirability: Short forms of the Marlowe /C0Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Educational and
Psychological Measurement ,53, 417/C0424.
Fox, S., & Schwartz, D. (2002). Social desirability and controllability in computerized and paper-and-pencil personality questionnaires.
Computers in Human Behavior ,18, 389/C0410.
Francis, L. J., Philipchalk, R., & Brown, L. B. (1991). The comparability of the short form EPQR with the EPQ among students in England, the
U.S.A., Canada and Australia. Personality and Individual Differences ,12, 1129/C01132.
Furnham, A., Eysenck, S. B. G., & Saklofske, D. H. (2008). The Eysenck personality measures: Fifty years of scale development. In G. J. Boyle,
G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), Sage handbook of personality theory and assessment, Vol. 2: Personality measurement and testing
(pp. 199 /C0218). Los Angeles: Sage.
Gaines, M. V., Giles, C. L., & Morgan, R. D. (2013). The detection of feigning using multiple PAI scale elevations: A new index. Assessment ,20,
437/C0447.
Greene, R. L. (2008). Malingering and defensiveness on the MMPI-2. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed.,
pp. 159 /C0181). New York, NY: Guilford.
Greiffenstein, M. F., Baker, W. J., Axelrod, B., Peck, E. A., & Gervais, R. (2004). The Fake Bad Scale and MMPI-2 F-family in detection of
implausible psychological trauma claims. Clinical Neuropsychologist ,18, 573/C0590.
Greiffenstein, M. F., Baker, W. J., Gola, T., Donders, J., & Miller, L. (2002). The Fake Bad Scale in a typical and severe closed head injury liti-
gants. Journal of Clinical Psychology ,58, 1591/C01600.
Greve, K. W., & Bianchini, K. J. (2004). Response to Butcher et al., The construct validity of the Lees-Haley Fake-Bad Scale. Archives of Clinical
Neuropsychology ,19, 337/C0339.
Grieve, R., & de Groot, H. T. (2011). Does online psychological test administration facilitate faking? Computers in Human Behavior ,27, 2391.
Griffith, R. L., Chmielowski, T., & Yoshita, Y. (2007). Do applicants fake? An examination of the frequency of applicant faking behavior.
Personnel Review ,36(3), 341 /C0357.
Griffith, R. L., & Converse, P. D. (2012). The rules of evidence and the prevalence of applicant faking. In M. Ziegler, C. MacCann, & R. D.
Roberts (Eds.), New perspectives on faking in personality assessment (pp. 34 /C052). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Hall, R. C. W., & Hall, R. C. W. (2012). Plaintiffs who malinger: Impact of litigation on fake testimony. In M. Ziegler, C. MacCann, & R.
Roberts (Eds.), New perspectives on faking in personality assessment (pp. 255 /C0281). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Harp, J. P., Jasinski, L. J., Shandera-Ochsner, A. L., Mason, L. H., & Berry, D. T. R. (2011). Detection of malingered ADHD using the MMPI-2-
RF.Psychological Injury and Law ,4,3 2/C043.
Heggestad, E. D., Morrison, M., Reeve, C. L., & McCloy, R. A. (2006). Forced-choice assessments of personality for selection: Evaluating issues
of normative assessment and faking resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology ,91,9/C024.
Helmes, E. (2000). The role of social desirability in the assessment of personality constructs. In R. D. Goffin, & E. Helmes (Eds.), Problems and
solutions in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy (pp. 21 /C040). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
Helmes, E., & Campbell, A. (2009). Differential sensitivity to administration format of measures of attitudes toward older adults. The
Gerontologist ,50,6 0/C065.
Helmes, E., & Holden, R. R. (2003). The construct of social desirability: One or two dimensions? Personality and Individual Differences ,34,
1015/C01023.
Helmes, E., & Reddon, J. R. (1993). A perspective on developments in assessing psychopathology: A critical review of the MMPI and MMPI-2.
Psychological Bulletin ,113, 453/C0471.
Holden, R. R. (2007). Socially desirable responding does moderate personality scale validity both in experimental and in nonexperimental con-
texts. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science ,39, 184/C0201.
Holden, R. R., & Book, A. S. (2012). Faking does distort self-report personality assessment. In M. Ziegler, C. MacCann, & R. D. Roberts (Eds.),
New perspectives on faking in personality assessmen (pp. 71 /C084). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holden, R. R., Book, A. S., Edwards, M. J., Wasylkiw, L., & Starzyk, K. B. (2003). Experimental faking in self-reported psychopathology:
Unidimensional or multidimensional?. Personality and Individual Differences ,35, 1107/C01117.40 2. RESPONSE BIAS, MALINGERING, AND IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT
I. INTRODUCTION: CORE ISSUES IN ASSESSMENT