TABLE 26.1 (Continued )
Model Inventory Publication Reference
Publication
for
InstrumentPublic
DomainSelf-/
Peer-
RatingNumber of
Items (Scales,
Subscales)Response
ScaleNumber of
CulturesReference
SampleLevel of
AnalysisSample
CharacteristicsTranslation
and
AdaptationReliability:
Cronbach’s αEFA Congruence
CoefficientsConfirmatory
Factor
AnalysisDifferential
Item
Functioning
adjustments
in Mexican
version
McCrae
(2002)Costa &
McCrae
(1992)No Self 240 (5 domains,
30 facets)5-point Likert
(agreement)36 US Mixed Students &
adultsTranslated
from
English,
back-
translation;
few items
modified in
several
versionsNot reported;
references to
sources
available; in a
study on 5
cultures
(McCrae
et al.,1999 ):
.80/C0.92 (domain
scales), median
.64/C0.70 (facets
scales)Total sample: .94
(N), .85 (E), .87 (O),
.92 (A), .94 (C)
McCrae et al.
(2005a)Costa &
McCrae
(1992)No Peer 240 (5 domains,
30 facets)5-point Likert
(agreement)50 US Mixed Students Translated
from
English,
back-
translation;
few items
modified in
several
versions.54/C0.94,
Mdn5.90 (N),
.57/C0.95,
Mdn5.90 (E),
.25/C0.93,
Mdn5.88 (O),
.63/C0.95,
Mdn5.92 (A),
.78/C0.96,
Mdn5.94 (C)Individual samples:
.76/C0.98, M5.95 (N),
.66/C0.97, M5.93, (E),
.53/C0.97, M5.90 (O),
.88/C0.97, M5.94 (A),
.65/C0.97, M5.94 (C);
total sample: .98 (N),
.97 (E), .97 (O), .97
(A), .97 (C)
Rolland
(2002)Costa &
McCrae
(1992)No Peer 240 (5 domains,
30 facets)5-point Likert
(agreement)16 French, US Individual Not reported;
cf.McCrae
(2002)Not
reported; cf.
McCrae
(2002)Not reported;
references to
sources available1)c.87/C0.93, M5.90
(N), .80 /C0.96, M5.89,
(E), .86 /C0.97, M5.94
(O), .86 /C0.97, M5.92
(A), .94 /C0.98, M5.96
(C); 2) .89 /C0.97,
M5.95 (N), .80 /C0.98,
M5.91, (E), .83 /C0.97,
M5.93 (O), .81 /C0.98,
M5.93 (A), .94 /C0.98,
M5.96 (C)
ENP1L EPQ Barrett et al.
(1998)Eysenck &
Eysenck
(1975)No Self 90 (3 domains,
Lie scale)Dichotomous 34 UK Individual Students &
adultsTranslated
from
English,
usually with
back-
translationNot reported;
references to
individual
studies reported
inBarrett &
Eysenck (1984) ,
Lynn & Martin
(1995)Males: .78 (P), .92
(E), .90 (N), .87 (L);
females: .74 (P), .92
(E), .92 (N), .86 (L)
Van Hemert
et al. (2002)Eysenck &
Eysenck
(1975)No Self 90 (3 domains,
Lie scale)Dichotomous 24 (31) None Mixed Students &
adultsTranslated
from
English,
usually with
back-
translationAcross 31
countries:
.67/C0.89, M5.82
(E), .74 /C0.90,
M5.83 (N),
.52/C0.91, M5.66
(P), .67 /C0.84,
M5.78 (L)Within and across 24
countries: 1.00 (E),
.96 (N), .54 (P), .93
(L)