Thompson, B. (Ed.), (2003). Score reliability: Contemporary thinking on reliability issues . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Thompson, B., & Vacha-Haase, T. (2000). Psychometrics is datametrics: The test is not reliable. Educational and Psychological Measurement ,60,
174/C0195.
Velicer, W. F., & Jackson, D. N. (1990). Component analysis versus common factor-analysis: Some further observations. Multivariate Behavioral
Research ,25,9 7/C0114.
Webb, N. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Haertel, E. H. (2006). Reliability coefficients and generalizability theory. In C. R. Rao, & S. Sinharay (Eds.),
Handbook of statistics: Psychometrics (Vol. 26, pp. 81 /C0124). Elsevier.
Weiss, L. G., Saklofske, D. H., Coalson, D., & Raiford, S. E. (Eds.), (2010). WAIS-IV Clinical Use and Interpretation . San Diego: Academic.
Widiger, T. A. (2012). Changes in the conceptualization of personality disorder: The DSM-5 debacle. Clinical Social Work Journal ,41, 163/C0167.
Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li., W. (2005). Cronbach’s alpha, Revelle’s beta, McDonald’s omega: Their relations with each and two
alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika ,70, 123/C0133.
Zoski, K. W., & Jurs, S. (1996). An objective counterpart to the visual scree test for factor analysis: The standard error scree. Educational and
Psychological Measurement ,56, 443/C0451.
Zumbo, B. D., & Rupp, A. A. (2004). Responsible modeling of measurement data for appropriate inferences: Important advances in reli-
ability and validity theory. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 73 /C092).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.15 REFERENCES
I. INTRODUCTION: CORE ISSUES IN ASSESSMENT