 39. Ecological Sampling Methods  823
of everyday life events: Origins, types, and uses. 
Journal of Personality, 59, 339–354.
Wilson, R. E., Thompson, R. J., & Vazire, S. (2017). 
Are fluctuations in personality states more than 
just fluctuations in affect? Journal of Research 
on Personality, 69, 110–123.
Wirtz, D., Kruger, J., Scollon, C. N., & Diener, E. 
(2003). What to do on spring break?: The role 
of predicted, on-line, and remembered experi -
ence in future choice. Psychological Science, 14, 
520–524.
Wright, A. G., & Zimmermann, J. (2019). Applied 
ambulatory assessment: Integrating idiographic 
and nomothetic principles of measurement. Psy -
chological Assessment, 31,  1467–1480.
Wrzus, C., & Mehl, M. R. (2015). Lab and/or field?: 
Measuring personality processes and their social 
consequences. European Journal of Personality, 
29, 250–271.
Wrzus, C., & Mehl, M. R. (2017). Ecological sam -
pling methods for studying everyday situations. In D. Funder, J. Rauthmann, & R. A. Sherman 
(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of psychological 
situations . New York: Oxford University Press.
Wrzus, C., & Roberts, B. W. (2017). Processes of 
personality development in adulthood: The TES -
SERA framework. Personality and Social Psy -
chology Review, 21, 253 –277.
Wrzus, C., Wagner, G. G., & Riediger, M. (2014). 
Feeling good when sleeping in?: Day-to-day as -
sociations between sleep duration and affective 
well-being differ from youth to old age. Emo -
tion, 14,  624–628.
Wrzus, C., Wagner, G. G., & Riediger, M. (2016). 
Personality–  situation transactions from adoles -
cence to old age. Journal of Personality and So -
cial Psychology, 110, 782–799.
Youyou, W., Kosinski, M., & Stillwell, D. (2015). 
Computer-  based personality judgments are more 
accurate than those made by humans. Proceed -
ings of the National Academy of Sciences of the 
USA, 112,  1036–1040.