Mundia, L. (2011). Effects of psychological distress on academic achievement in Brunei student teachers: Identification challenges and counsel-
ing implications. Higher Education Studies ,1,5 1/C063.
Ng, H. -S., Cooper, M., & Chandler, P. (1998). The Eysenckian personality structure: A ‘Giant Three’ or ‘Big Five’ model in Hong Kong?
Personality and Individual Differences ,25, 1111/C01131.
Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1998). The effects of social desirability and faking on personality and integrity assessment for personnel selec-
tion. Human Performance ,11, 245/C0269.
Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Reiss, A. D. (1996). Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring.
Journal of Applied Psychology ,81, 660/C0679.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ,46, 598/C0609.
Paulhus, D. L. (1986). Self-deception and impression management in test responses. In A. Angleitner, & J. S. Wiggins (Eds.), Personality assess-
ment via questionnnaire: Current issues in theory and measurement (pp. 143 /C0165). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of person-
ality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17 /C059). San Diego: Academic Press.
Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Paulhus Deception Scales (PDS): The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding /C07. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health
Systems.
Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H. I. Braun, D. N. Jackson, & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The role
of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 49 /C069). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pauls, C. A., & Crost, N. W. (2004). Effects of faking on self-deception and impression management scales. Personality and Individual Differences ,
37, 1137/C01151.
Paunonen, S. V., & LeBel, E. P. (2012). Socially desirable responding and its elusive effect on the validity of personality assessments. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology ,103, 158/C0175.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how
to control it. Annual Review of Psychology ,63, 539/C0570.
Poortinga, Y. H., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & van Hemert, D. A. (2002). Cross-cultural equivalence of the Big Five: A tentative interpretation of
the evidence. In R. R. McCrae, & J. Allik (Eds.), The five-factor model of personality across cultures . New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum.
Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe /C0Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical
Psychology ,38, 119/C0125.
Richman, W. L., Kiesler, S., Weisband, S., & Drasgow, F. (1999). A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-
administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology ,84, 754/C0775.
Robie, C., Brown, D. J., & Beaty, J. C. (2007). Do people fake on personality inventories? A verbal protocol analysis. Journal of Business and
Psychology ,21, 489/C0509.
Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (Eds.), (1991). Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (Vol. 1). San Diego:
Academic Press.
Rogers, R., Bagby, R. M., & Dickens, S. E. (1992). Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) test manual . Odessa, FL: Psychological
Assessment Resources.
Rogers, R. (2008). An introduction to response styles. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed., pp. 3 /C013).
New York, NY: Guilford.
Rogers, R., Gillard, N. D., Berry, D. T. R., & Granacher, R. P. (2011). Effectiveness of the MMPI-2-RF validity scales for feigned mental disor-
ders and cognitive impairment: A known-groups study. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment ,33, 355/C0367.
Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., & Gillard, N. D. (2010). SIRS-2: Structured Interview of reported symptoms professional manual (2nd ed.). Lutz, FL:
Psychological Assessment Resources.
Rosenfeld, P., Booth-Kewley, S., Edwards, J. E., & Thomas, M. D. (1996). Responses on computer surveys: Impression management, social
desirability, and the Big Brother syndrome. Computers in Human Behavior ,12, 263/C0274.
Rost, J. (1991). A mixture distribution model for polychotomous item responses. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology ,44,
75/C092.
Rost, J., Carstensen, C. H., & Von Davier, M. (1997). Applying the mixed Rasch model to personality questionnaires. In J. Rost, & R. E.
Langeheine (Eds.), Applications of latent trait and latent class models in the social sciences . New York, NY: Waxmann.
Russell, M. T., & Karol, D. L. (1994). The 16PF fifth edition administrator’s manual . Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
Sackeim, H. A., & Gur, R. C. (1978). Self-deception, self-confrontation and consciousness. In G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness
and self-regulation: Advances in research (Vol. 2, pp. 139 /C0197). New York: Plenum.
Schinka, J. A., Kinder, B. N., & Kremer, T. (1997). Research validity scales for the NEO-PI-R: Development and initial validation. Journal of
Personality Assessment ,68, 127/C0138.
Schuerger, J. M. (2008). The objective-analytic test battery. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personal-
ity theory and assessment: Vol. 2 /C0Personality measurement and testing . Los Angeles: Sage.
Sellbom, M., & Bagby, R. M. (2008). Validity of the MMPI-2-RF (restructured form) L-r and K-r scales in detecting underreporting in clinical
and nonclinical samples. Psychological Assessment ,20, 370/C0376.
Sellbom, M., & Bagby, R. M. (2010). Detection of overreported psychopathology with the MMPI-2 RF form validity scales. Psychological
Assessment ,22, 757/C0767.
Sellbom, M., Toomey, J. A., Wygant, D. B., Kucharski, L. T., & Duncan, S. (2010). Utility of the MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) validity scales
in detecting malingering in a criminal forensic setting: A known-groups design. Psychological Assessment ,22,2 2/C031.
Seol, H. (2007). A psychometric investigation of the Marlowe /C0Crowne Social Desirability Scale using Rasch measurement. Measurement and
Evaluation in Counseling and Development ,40, 155/C0168.
Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Drasgow, F. (2012). Constructing fake-resistant personality tests using item response theory: High-stakes per-
sonality testing with multidimensional pairwise preferences. In M. Ziegler, C. MacCann, & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), New perspectives on faking
in personality assessment (pp. 214 /C0239). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.42 2. RESPONSE BIAS, MALINGERING, AND IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT
I. INTRODUCTION: CORE ISSUES IN ASSESSMENT