818 vIII. EMERGING  ISSuES AND  NEW  DIRECTIONS
Biel, J.-I., & Gatica-  Perez, D. (2014). Mining 
crowdsourced first impressions in online social 
video. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 16 (7), 
2062–2074.
Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary 
methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Re -
view of Psychology, 54, 579–616.
Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2013). Intensive 
longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary 
and experience sampling research . New York: 
Guilford Press.
Bolger, N., & Schilling, E. A. (1991). Personality 
and the problems of everyday life: The role of 
neuroticism in exposure and reactivity to daily 
stressors. Journal of Personality, 59, 355–386.
Bollich, K. L., Doris, J. M., Vazire, S., Raison, C. 
L., Jackson, J. J., & Mehl, M. R. (2016). Eaves -
dropping on character: Assessing everyday moral 
behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 
61, 15–21.
Brewer, M. B. (2000). Research design and issues of 
validity. In H. Reis & C. Judd (Eds.), Handbook 
of research methods in social and personality 
psychology  (pp. 3–16). Cambridge, UK: Cam -
bridge University Press.
Brown, N. A., Blake, A. B., & Sherman, R. A. 
(2017). A snapshot of the life as lived: Wearable 
cameras in social and personality psychological 
science. Social Psychological and Personality 
Science, 8, 592–600.
Brown, N. A., & Rauthmann, J. F. (2016). Situation 
characteristics are age graded: Mean-level pat -
terns of the situational eight DIAMONDS across 
the life span. Social Psychological and Personal -
ity Science, 7, 667–679.
Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the repre -
sentative design of psychological experiments. 
Berkeley: University of California Press.
Carpenter, R. W., Wycoff, A. M., & Trull, T. J. 
(2016). Ambulatory assessment: New adventures 
in characterizing dynamic processes. Assess -
ment, 23, 414–424.
Chittaranjan, G., Blom, J., & Gatica-  Perez, D. 
(2013). Mining large-scale smartphone data for 
personality studies. Personal and Ubiquitous 
Computing, 17 (3), 433–450.
Cialdini, R. B. (2009). We have to break up. Per -
spectives on Psychological Science, 4, 5–6.
Conner, T. S., & Barrett, L. F. (2012). Trends in 
ambulatory self-  report: The role of momentary 
experience in psychosomatic medicine. Psycho -
somatic Medicine, 74,  327–337.
Craik, K. H. (1993). Accentuated, revealed, and 
quotidian personalities. Psychological Inquiry, 
4, 278–280.
Craik, K. H. (2000). The lived day of an individ -
ual: A person-  environment perspective. In W. 
B. Walsh, K. H. Craik, & R. H. Price (Eds.), Person–  environment psychology: New direc -
tions and perspectives (pp. 233–266). Mahwah, 
NJ: Erlbaum.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R., & Prescott, S. 
(1977). The ecology of adolescent activity and 
experience. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 
6, 281–294.
de Montjoye, Y. A., Gambs, S., Blondel, V., Can -
right, G., De Cordes, N., Deletaille, S., et al. 
(2018). On the privacy-  conscientious use of 
mobile phone data. Scientific Data, 5,  Article 
180286.
de Montjoye, Y.-A., Quoidbach, J., Robic, F., & 
Pentland, A. S. (2013). Predicting personality 
using novel mobile phone-based metrics. In N. 
Agarwal, K. Xu, & N. Osgood (Eds.), Social 
computing, behavioral–  cultural modeling and 
prediction  (pp. 48–55). Cham, Switzerland: 
Springer.
Dickerson, S. S., & Kemeny, M. E. (2004). Acute 
stressors and cortisol responses: A theoretical 
integration and synthesis of laboratory research. 
Psychological Bulletin, 130, 355–391.
Do, T. M. T., & Gatica-  Perez, D. (2014). The places 
of our lives: Visiting patterns and automatic la -
beling from longitudinal smartphone data. IEEE 
Transactions on Mobile Computing, 18 (1), 223–
238.
Doherty, A. R., Hodges, S. E., King, A. C.,  Smeaton, 
A. F., Berry, E., Moulin, C. J. A., et al. (2013). 
Wearable cameras in health: The state of the art 
and future possibilities. American Journal of 
Preventive Medicine, 44,  320–323.
Finnigan, K., M., & Vazire, S. (2018). The incre -
mental validity of average state self-  reports over 
global self-  reports of personality. Journal of Per -
sonality and Social Psychology, 115, 321–337.
Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure- and 
process-  integrated view of personality: Traits as 
density distributions of states. Journal of Person -
ality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027.
Fleeson, W. (2007). Studying personality process -
es. In R. W. Robins, C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger 
(Eds.), Handbook of research methods in per -
sonality psychology (pp. 523–542). New York: 
Guilford Press.
Fleeson, W., & Gallagher, P. (2009). The impli -
cations of Big Five standing for the distribu -
tion of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen 
experience-  sampling studies and a meta-  analysis. 
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 
97, 1097–1114.
Fleeson, W., & Law, M. K. (2015). Trait enactments 
as density distributions: The role of actors, situ -
ations, and observers in explaining stability and 
variability. Journal of Personality and Social 
Psychology, 109, 1090–1104.
Funder, D. C. (2009). Naive and obvious ques -