referring to the mixed state in which there is a mixed dominance. he states that there is plenty of evidence in the literature which showcase the importance of these mixed states, and so should not be ignored. including these mixed states actually causes quite a lot of complications and so the model generated by manousakis ignores them, treating the two binocular rivalry states as two quantum states. paraan continues to argue that the quantum states in manousakis’ model are purely symbolic and only represents the perception but are not similar in any way. as a result, it would not be a problem adding a third state to represent the mixed state, as long as corresponding experimental data can be obtained. the exclusion of the mixed state in manousakis’ model may be due to the assumption that the mixed state is transitional, bridging two dominance states. paraan et al. believe that the mixed state actually can be the dominant state, albeit dominating in a random fashion, however as mentioned previously, should be represented as a separate state. considering indeterminate perception conte and colleagues similarly modelled mental states following quantum mechanics while participants were asked to observe ambiguous figures. although similar to manousakis’ model, they consider the indeterminate perception (a patient isn’t sure about the shape) which resembles the mixed state. although it is included in the model, it is represented as a wave-function, not as a third state as paraan et al. suggested for the manousakis model. therefore, they argue that this is an inaccurate representation of indeterminate perception as it would mean the two states are superimposed onto each other; in actuality it is another activation of neural correlates of consciousness that is corresponding to the indeterminate position state and should be treated as such. really it must be mentioned that the first approach to discuss consciousness and quantum interference is due to c.h. woo. this author discussed such team in a celebrated paper in 1981 and published on foundations of physics vol.11, nos11/12,1981. he considered the wave function superimposed in a two states as in paper of conte et al. a general criticism for using quantum mechanics to explain brain functions like binocular rivalry is the disconnect from the ‘machinery’ available. where and how quantum mechanical phenomena would interact within the brain to create consciousness or other functions is not yet precisely defined and as a result not yet testable. applications the paper by andrew j. marlow illustrates a potential quantum approach to anorexia nervosa. there are many theories that contribute to possibilities in which a quantum explanation may contribute to this mental illness. theories such as the orch or theory, the thermofield brain dynamics theory and more which further incorporate other theories work to formulate possible applications to anorexia nervosa. this article makes a proposition based on a perceptive view. when asking the question "am i fat?" the answer is either yes or no, in terms of bits relative to quantum bits, respectively. when perceived in relation to quantum bits the answer can be both yes and no, taking into consideration the multitude of corresponding amplitudes. traditionally, when one looks at a mirror and they see their reflection, and they are fat, the answer to that above question, will be yes. however, in the unconscious quantum logic, the answer is both yes and no, where the answers are superposed. the unconscious object relation of anorexia nervosa affect the probability amplitudes of the logical proposition "i am fat" . there is essentially a disruption to the perception. the orch or theory proposes that the human consciousness can be explained through "object reduction" which is a function by which the brain uses "microtubules" in the neurons to computate and regulate neural operations. tubulins, existing as a subunit of microtubules, are related by quantum superposition and perform functions like that of a quantum computer. upon disruption or poor development of these formulations, the normal perception is lost. which leads to one of the coinciding theories where there is a "failure to develop" as a child, learning to recognize self from others and their own body parts. the pre-anorexic child is unable to develop a normal sense of self that is appropriately linked with their psychic experience, thereby introjecting a "false self". with this disconnect having occurred, the child will now derive their self-perception from the wants and desires of others around them. due to this assimilation of an identity not their own, there has been the term coined "the selflessness of anorexia". obedience and desire to please others is why the pre-anorexic child is often described as "the good child that always listens". due to this development that when the child grows up to be independent and not knowing how to have and satisfy their own needs, they resort to self-starvation.