impact of the covid-19 pandemic on the telehealth industry impact of the covid-19 pandemic on the telehealth industry telehealth is the practice of providing healthcare via communication between the healthcare practitioner and the patient through electronic (virtual) methods such as telephones, smartphones, tablets, and computers. telehealth permits patients to communicate with professionals via telephone, secure email, video chat, and in some instances secure messaging. physicians may also utilize the telehealth systems for remote monitoring of patients at home. when the telehealth industry was founded, it was primarily used to provide services to underserved and rural area patients, enabled people to connect to specialists not located nearby. telehealth was initially used predominantly for specialties such as cardiology, neurology, mental health, and dermatology. telehealth has expanded to include many new applications such as physical therapy through digital monitoring tools and surgery done remotely using robots. the first major telehealth company, teladoc, was founded in 2002 and since then the industry has grown to include companies such as amwell, memd, and icliniq. consultation by a doctor through telehealth part of a series on thecovid-19 pandemicscientifically accurate atomic model of the external structure of sars-cov-2. each "ball" is an atom. covid-19 (disease) sars-cov-2 (virus) cases deaths timeline 2019 2020 january responses february responses march responses april responses may responses june responses july responses august responses september responses october responses november responses december responses 2021 january responses february responses march responses april responses may responses june responses july responses august responses september responses october responses november responses december responses 2022 january responses february responses march responses april responses may responses june responses july responses august responses september responses october responses november december 2023 january february march april may locations by country and territory africa antarctica asia europe north america oceania south america by conveyance cruise ships naval ships international response endemic phase evacuations face masks international aid investigations into origin lockdowns by country misinformation by governments fake treatments social distancing software travel united nations world health organization wto ip waiver undercounting of deaths covid-19 apps zero-covid national responses africa china european union germany ghana india ireland netherlands new zealand nigeria philippines russia sweden uk government us federal government vietnam medical response disease testing breathalyzer development drug development drug repurposing public health mitigation vaccines history research vitt deployment authorizations operation warp speed misinformation and hesitancy us vaccine card vaccine passports current vaccines coronavac covaxin convidecia janssen medigen moderna novavax oxford–astrazeneca pfizer–biontech sinopharm bibp sputnik v variants variants of concern alpha beta gamma delta omicron other variants epsilon zeta eta theta iota kappa lambda mu cluster 5 lineage b.1.617 economic impact and recession arts and culture aviation cannabis cinema films disney fashion financial markets food industry food security journalism music performing arts retail shipping television us sportscasting programs tourism video games by country canada india ireland malaysia new zealand russia uk us by sport association football baseball basketball combat sports cricket disc golf gaelic games gridiron football ice hockey motorsport rugby league impacts animals black people crime death rates by country disability domestic violence emergency evacuations education female environment hospitals language lgbt community long-term care media coverage mental health symptoms migration military notable deaths other health issues politics diplomacy popular culture protests pregnancy prisons religion catholic church hajj science and technology social media strikes suicides telehealth xenophobia and racism society ireland malaysia new zealand russia uk us covid-19 portal covid-19's impact on telehealth early stages of the pandemic before the covid pandemic, telehealth use was growing slowly. many patients preferred seeing a doctor in person and were concerned about privacy issues over a video call. when covid-19 began to spread in early 2020, many healthcare professionals curtailed or stopped in-person visits because of concern about possible covid exposure. telehealth offered a solution to this problem; its use increased by 5,000% from february to march 2020 and remains in widespread use. growth in the industry telehealth companies since the start of the pandemic have seen growth in their business in terms of both the number of patients and their overall financial health. between february and march 2020, the number of telehealth claims at the blue cross blue shield of massachusetts grew by 3,500%. the nyu langone health's telehealth platform added over 1,300 new healthcare providers during the pandemic, demonstrating the rapid explosion in the growth of the telehealth industry. the covid-19 pandemic has allowed telehealth companies to reach millions of patients more easily than it would have if not for the environment the pandemic created in healthcare. the sheer number of new customers has allowed companies such as teladoc to reap the rewards of this new high growth potential market. in 2020, teladoc saw its stock valuation increase year to date by 168%, and telehealth's second-largest company, amwell went public on september 17th, 2020. the top 60 virtual health companies have seen their total revenue grow from $3 billion in 2019–2020 to $5.5 billion in 2020–2021 which is an 83% increase. the telehealth industry overall has seen keen interest from venture capitalists and other investors that are trying to get in on the expansion the telehealth industry is experiencing due to the pandemic. in the first quarter of 2020, venture capital raised $788 million for telehealth companies. that amount was over three times more than that was raised in the first quarter of 2019. telehealth startups also saw a year-over-year increase of 1,818% of funding in 2020. logo of the second largest telehealth firm, amwell growth in usage rate in 2020, over 50% of all outpatient care was being delivered completely virtually at its peak during the pandemic. the number of patients using telehealth has grown from 11% in 2019 to around 46% in 2021. analysts believe that this growth will be somewhat sustained due to the pandemic allowing telehealth to overcome its biggest obstacle which was its lack of awareness among patients and providers. millions of patients and providers have now used telehealth to fulfill part of their healthcare needs, and some evidence suggests telehealth contributes to similar outcomes and patient satisfaction. not only has telehealth become known among the public, but providers have also had extremely positive interactions with these services. 57% of providers view telehealth more favorably than before the pandemic and 64% of providers are more comfortable with using telehealth platforms. patients from various demographic locations have given positive reviews on telehealth services due to which telehealth/ telemedicine appears to paint a bright future for the industry. potential barriers to growth lower usage rate the weekly average of daily telehealth visits has been declining since april 2020. in april, the visits were peaking at around two thousand per week and they have dropped to around five hundred a week in june 2020. experts believe that the high peaks of telehealth usage during the pandemic will come down even more and that it is unrealistic to believe that this peak in usage will become the new norm. cross-state practice most states require that the healthcare professional, that is using telehealth, have a form of license to practice in that state regardless of whether they are located in the state. cross-state practice issues can inhibit the growth of the telehealth market due to it affecting the staff composition at these companies. these companies will have to make sure that they have professionals that are licensed in the states that the patients are from in order to service the patients. this could inhibit the growth of the industry since these companies have to allocate a certain amount of workers to be in each region instead of just having certain types of healthcare professionals. coverage and reimbursement issues medicare, medicaid, and commercial payers all have a unique set of rules and criteria for coverage and reimbursements for telehealth services. lawyers believe that these rules and criteria can be inconsistent at times and can be not fully comprehensive. these unique rules and inconsistencies could potentially add another layer of complexity for providers to have to go through in order to get paid for their services. it and security issues experts believe that telehealth services hinge upon the success of their it services. these services include software security, software compliance, and data interoperability. constructing and maintaining these it services can be expensive and can be hard to fund due to competition. with the growing number of potential patients, these startup companies could require funding to expand their it services. without this expansion, these companies could have lower service quality and put at risk the data and privacy of their consumers. provider-patient relationships states require that patients and healthcare professionals to establish a relationship. this relationship was normally established when the patient met the provider in-person. this requirement has evolved in some states to focus more on the existence of several factors such as the patient's medical history or the provider's affirmative acts. remote prescribing some states require that an in-person examination happen before allowing for the remote prescribing of drugs. other states allow remote prescribing without an in-person visit, however there needs to be an interaction via a face-to-face video call. all states do not allow for remote prescribing of drugs if the patient only submitted an online questionnaire. telemental health due to lockdowns or ‘stay at home’ orders at the start of the covid-19 pandemic, mental health services in high-income countries were able to adapt existing service provision to telemental health care. estimates suggest that between 48% to 100% of service users who were already receiving care at the start of the pandemic were able to continue their mental health care using remote methods. some face-to-face appointments still took place if necessary. during the pandemic telemental health care (mostly phone and video calls) was effective and viewed as acceptable by the majority of clinicians and service users for use in an emergency situation. however both groups had concerns regarding the longer term use of telemental health care. for example, clinicians identified concerns including difficulties with medication appointments, concerns around engaging and assessing new patients, and finding it harder to assess some physical indicators of mental health status remotely. service users identified barriers including a lack of private space at home to access during their sessions or access to technology. the rates of telemental health use seem to have declined as covid-19 restrictions were loosened, indicating that face-to-face care might be preferable for some service users and clinicians. future opportunities lower cost to patients and healthcare facilities telehealth can result in significantly lower costs and time commitments than traditional in-person meetings. at the university of michigan, a study found that on average patients travel a total of 110 miles to attend a clinic visit. many patients are forced to make a day out of this large time commitment and are forced to take time off work and hire babysitters. by using telehealth, patients can meet with their doctors from anywhere and could not have to take time off of work. telehealth can provide cost savings to hospitals and healthcare offices. since some portion of patients would be meeting online with their doctors, the need for large waiting rooms would be reduced. this will allow healthcare facilities to be smaller which will result in cost savings due to less overhead being spent on rooms and facilities for patients that do not need to be seen in person. substance abuse treatment in july 2021, telehealth made up 30% of substance abuse treatment. experts believe that there could be substantial growth potential in substance abuse treatment for the telehealth industry. telehealth is convenient for patients and makes it easy for them to get the help that they need. telehealth has also been linked to higher treatment retention. studies have found that when telehealth video conferencing was incorporated into outpatient treatment programs, 88% of the patients kept their appointments as compared to only 77% that had solely in-person appointments. due to these benefits there is a potential for telehealth to increase their market share of the substance abuse segment of healthcare. tele rheumatology in february 2021, 17% of outpatient and office visit claims relating to rheumatology were done through telehealth. clinicians believe that telehealth could play a role in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and other symptoms associated with arthritis. even though clinicians believe that telehealth does not improve diagnosing rheumatologic conditions,