optics for focusing of light. each of the two eyes of a spookfish collects light from both above and below; the light coming from above is focused by a lens, while that coming from below, by a curved mirror composed of many layers of small reflective plates made of guanine crystals. compound eyes an image of a house fly compound eye surface by using scanning electron microscope anatomy of the compound eye of an insect arthropods such as this bluebottle fly have compound eyes a compound eye may consist of thousands of individual photoreceptor units or ommatidia (ommatidium, singular). the image perceived is a combination of inputs from the numerous ommatidia (individual "eye units"), which are located on a convex surface, thus pointing in slightly different directions. compared with simple eyes, compound eyes possess a very large view angle, and can detect fast movement and, in some cases, the polarisation of light. because the individual lenses are so small, the effects of diffraction impose a limit on the possible resolution that can be obtained (assuming that they do not function as phased arrays). this can only be countered by increasing lens size and number. to see with a resolution comparable to our simple eyes, humans would require very large compound eyes, around 11 metres (36 ft) in radius. compound eyes fall into two groups: apposition eyes, which form multiple inverted images, and superposition eyes, which form a single erect image. compound eyes are common in arthropods, annelids and some bivalved molluscs. compound eyes in arthropods grow at their margins by the addition of new ommatidia. apposition eyes apposition eyes are the most common form of eyes and are presumably the ancestral form of compound eyes. they are found in all arthropod groups, although they may have evolved more than once within this phylum. some annelids and bivalves also have apposition eyes. they are also possessed by limulus, the horseshoe crab, and there are suggestions that other chelicerates developed their simple eyes by reduction from a compound starting point. (some caterpillars appear to have evolved compound eyes from simple eyes in the opposite fashion.) apposition eyes work by gathering a number of images, one from each eye, and combining them in the brain, with each eye typically contributing a single point of information. the typical apposition eye has a lens focusing light from one direction on the rhabdom, while light from other directions is absorbed by the dark wall of the ommatidium. superposition eyes the second type is named the superposition eye. the superposition eye is divided into three types: refracting, reflecting and parabolic superposition the refracting superposition eye has a gap between the lens and the rhabdom, and no side wall. each lens takes light at an angle to its axis and reflects it to the same angle on the other side. the result is an image at half the radius of the eye, which is where the tips of the rhabdoms are. this type of compound eye, for which a minimal size exists below which effective superposition cannot occur, is normally found in nocturnal insects, because it can create images up to 1000 times brighter than equivalent apposition eyes, though at the cost of reduced resolution. in the parabolic superposition compound eye type, seen in arthropods such as mayflies, the parabolic surfaces of the inside of each facet focus light from a reflector to a sensor array. long-bodied decapod crustaceans such as shrimp, prawns, crayfish and lobsters are alone in having reflecting superposition eyes, which also have a transparent gap but use corner mirrors instead of lenses. parabolic superposition this eye type functions by refracting light, then using a parabolic mirror to focus the image; it combines features of superposition and apposition eyes. other another kind of compound eye, found in males of order strepsiptera, employs a series of simple eyes—eyes having one opening that provides light for an entire image-forming retina. several of these eyelets together form the strepsipteran compound eye, which is similar to the 'schizochroal' compound eyes of some trilobites. because each eyelet is a simple eye, it produces an inverted image; those images are combined in the brain to form one unified image. because the aperture of an eyelet is larger than the facets of a compound eye, this arrangement allows vision under low light levels. good fliers such as flies or honey bees, or prey-catching insects such as praying mantis or dragonflies, have specialised zones of ommatidia organised into a fovea area which gives acute vision. in the acute zone, the eyes are flattened and the facets larger. the flattening allows more ommatidia to receive light from a spot and therefore higher resolution. the black spot that can be seen on the compound eyes of such insects, which always seems to look directly at the observer, is called a pseudopupil. this occurs because the ommatidia which one observes "head-on" (along their optical axes) absorb the incident light, while those to one side reflect it. there are some exceptions from the types mentioned above. some insects have a so-called single lens compound eye, a transitional type which is something between a superposition type of the multi-lens compound eye and the single lens eye found in animals with simple eyes. then there is the mysid shrimp, dioptromysis paucispinosa. the shrimp has an eye of the refracting superposition type, in the rear behind this in each eye there is a single large facet that is three times in diameter the others in the eye and behind this is an enlarged crystalline cone. this projects an upright image on a specialised retina. the resulting eye is a mixture of a simple eye within a compound eye. another version is a compound eye often referred to as "pseudofaceted", as seen in scutigera. this type of eye consists of a cluster of numerous ommatidia on each side of the head, organised in a way that resembles a true compound eye. the body of ophiocoma wendtii, a type of brittle star, is covered with ommatidia, turning its whole skin into a compound eye. the same is true of many chitons. the tube feet of sea urchins contain photoreceptor proteins, which together act as a compound eye; they lack screening pigments, but can detect the directionality of light by the shadow cast by its opaque body. nutrients the ciliary body is triangular in horizontal section and is coated by a double layer, the ciliary epithelium. the inner layer is transparent and covers the vitreous body, and is continuous from the neural tissue of the retina. the outer layer is highly pigmented, continuous with the retinal pigment epithelium, and constitutes the cells of the dilator muscle. the vitreous is the transparent, colourless, gelatinous mass that fills the space between the lens of the eye and the retina lining the back of the eye. it is produced by certain retinal cells. it is of rather similar composition to the cornea, but contains very few cells (mostly phagocytes which remove unwanted cellular debris in the visual field, as well as the hyalocytes of balazs of the surface of the vitreous, which reprocess the hyaluronic acid), no blood vessels, and 98–99% of its volume is water (as opposed to 75% in the cornea) with salts, sugars, vitrosin (a type of collagen), a network of collagen type ii fibres with the mucopolysaccharide hyaluronic acid, and also a wide array of proteins in micro amounts. amazingly, with so little solid matter, it tautly holds the eye. evolution evolution of the mollusc eye photoreception is phylogenetically very old, with various theories of phylogenesis. the common origin (monophyly) of all animal eyes is now widely accepted as fact. this is based upon the shared genetic features of all eyes; that is, all modern eyes, varied as they are, have their origins in a proto-eye believed to have evolved some 650-600 million years ago, and the pax6 gene is considered a key factor in this. the majority of the advancements in early eyes are believed to have taken only a few million years to develop, since the first predator to gain true imaging would have touched off an "arms race" among all species that did not flee the photopic environment. prey animals and competing predators alike would be at a distinct disadvantage without such capabilities and would be less likely to survive and reproduce. hence multiple eye types and subtypes developed in parallel (except those of groups, such as the vertebrates, that were only forced into the photopic environment at a late stage). eyes in various animals show adaptation to their requirements. for example, the eye of a bird of prey has much greater visual acuity than a human eye, and in some cases can detect ultraviolet radiation. the different forms of eye in, for example, vertebrates and molluscs are examples of parallel evolution, despite their distant common ancestry. phenotypic convergence of the geometry of cephalopod and most vertebrate eyes creates the impression that the vertebrate eye evolved from an imaging cephalopod eye, but this is not the case, as the reversed roles of their respective ciliary and rhabdomeric opsin classes and different lens crystallins show. the very earliest "eyes", called eye-spots, were simple patches of photoreceptor protein in unicellular animals. in multicellular beings, multicellular eyespots evolved, physically similar to the receptor patches for taste and smell. these eyespots could only sense ambient brightness: they could distinguish light and dark, but not the direction of the light source. through gradual change, the eye-spots of species living in well-lit environments depressed into a shallow "cup" shape. the ability to slightly discriminate directional brightness was achieved by using the angle at which the light hit certain cells to identify the source. the pit deepened over time, the opening diminished in size, and the number of photoreceptor cells increased, forming an effective pinhole camera that was capable of dimly distinguishing shapes. however, the ancestors of modern hagfish, thought to be the protovertebrate, were evidently pushed to very deep, dark waters, where they were less vulnerable to sighted predators, and where it is advantageous to have a convex eye-spot, which gathers more light than a flat or concave one. this would have led to a somewhat different evolutionary trajectory for the vertebrate eye than for other animal eyes. the thin overgrowth of transparent cells over the eye's aperture, originally formed to prevent damage to the eyespot, allowed the segregated contents of the eye chamber to specialise into a transparent humour that optimised colour filtering, blocked harmful radiation, improved the eye's refractive index, and allowed functionality outside of water. the transparent protective cells eventually split into two layers, with circulatory fluid in between that allowed wider viewing angles and greater imaging resolution, and the thickness of the transparent layer gradually increased, in most species with the transparent crystallin protein. the gap between tissue layers naturally formed a biconvex shape, an optimally ideal structure for a normal refractive index. independently, a transparent layer and a nontransparent layer split forward from the lens: the cornea and iris. separation of the forward layer again formed a humour, the aqueous humour. this increased refractive power and again eased circulatory problems. formation of a nontransparent ring allowed more blood vessels, more circulation, and larger eye sizes. relationship to life requirements eyes are generally adapted to the environment and life requirements of the organism which bears them. for instance, the distribution of photoreceptors tends to match the area in which the highest acuity is required, with horizon-scanning organisms, such as those that live on the african plains, having a horizontal line of high-density ganglia, while tree-dwelling creatures which require good all-round vision tend to have a symmetrical distribution of ganglia, with acuity decreasing outwards from the centre. of course, for most eye types, it is impossible to diverge from a spherical form, so only the density of optical receptors can be altered. in organisms with compound eyes, it is the number of ommatidia rather than ganglia that reflects the region of highest data acquisition.: 23–24 optical superposition eyes are constrained to a spherical shape, but other forms of compound eyes may deform to a shape where more ommatidia are aligned to, say, the horizon, without altering the size or density of individual ommatidia. eyes of horizon-scanning organisms have stalks so