book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_en: Malik said, "The generally agreed-on way of doing things among us in the case of slave whose master makes a bequest to free part of him - a third, a fourth, a half, or any share after his death, is that only the portion of him is freed that his master has named. This is because the freeing of that portion is only obliged to take place after the death of the master because the master has the option to withdraw the bequest as long as he lives. When the slave is freed from his master, the master is a testator and the testator only has access to free what he can take from his property, being the third of the property he is allowed to bequeath, and the rest of the slave is not free because the man's property has gone out of his hands. How can the rest of the slave which belongs to other people be free when they did not initiate the setting free and did not confirm it and they do not have the wala' established for them? Only the deceased could do that. He was the one who freed him and the one for whom the wala' was confirmed. That is not to be borne by another's property unless he bequeaths within the third of his property what remains of a lave to be freed. That is a request against his partners and inheritors and the partners must not refuse the slave that when it is within the third of the dead man's property because there is no harm in that to the inheritors."   Malik said, "If a man frees a third of his slave while he is critically ill, he must complete the emancipation so all of him is free from him, if it is within the third of his property that he has access to, because he is not treated in the same way as a man who frees a third of a slave after his death, because had the one who freed a third of his slave after his death lived, he could have cancelled it and the slave's being set free would be of no effect. The master who made the freeing of the third of the slave irrevocable in his illness, would still have to free all of him if he lived. If he died, the slave would be set free within the third of the bequest. That is because the command of the deceased is permissible in his third as the command of the healthy is permissible in all his property."


book_title_en: Muwatta Malik

book_author_en: Imam Malik ibn Anas

book_title_ar: موطأ مالك

book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_chapter_name_en: Setting Free and Wala'

hadith_text_en:
Malik said, "A master who frees a slave of his and settles his
emancipation so that his testimony is permitted, his inviolability
complete, and his right to inherit confirmed, cannot impose
stipulations on him like what he imposes on a slave about property or
service, nor get him to do anything of slavery, because the Messenger
of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, "If a man
frees his share of a slave and has enough money to cover the full
price of the slave justly evaluated for him, he must give his partners
their shares so the slave is completely free."

Malik
commented, "If he owns the slave completely, it is more proper to free
him completely and not mingle any slavery with it."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar: حَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ يَحْيَى بْنِ سَعِيدٍ، وَعَنْ غَيْرِ، وَاحِدٍ، عَنِ الْحَسَنِ بْنِ أَبِي الْحَسَنِ الْبَصْرِيِّ، وَعَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ سِيرِينَ، أَنَّ رَجُلاً، فِي زَمَانِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم أَعْتَقَ عَبِيدًا لَهُ سِتَّةً عِنْدَ مَوْتِهِ فَأَسْهَمَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم بَيْنَهُمْ فَأَعْتَقَ ثُلُثَ تِلْكَ الْعَبِيدِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَبَلَغَنِي أَنَّهُ لَمْ يَكُنْ لِذَلِكَ الرَّجُلِ مَالٌ غَيْرُهُمْ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me from Yahya ibn Said and somebody else from
al-Hasan ibn Abi al-Hasan al-Basri and from Muhammad ibn Sirin that a
man in the time of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and
grant him peace, freed six of his slaves while he was dying. The
Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, drew lots
between them and freed a third of those slaves.

Malik added
that he had heard that the man did not have any property other than
them.


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ رَبِيعَةَ بْنِ أَبِي عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، أَنَّ رَجُلاً، فِي إِمَارَةِ أَبَانَ بْنِ عُثْمَانَ أَعْتَقَ رَقِيقًا لَهُ كُلَّهُمْ جَمِيعًا وَلَمْ يَكُنْ لَهُ مَالٌ غَيْرُهُمْ فَأَمَرَ أَبَانُ بْنُ عُثْمَانَ بِتِلْكَ الرَّقِيقِ فَقُسِمَتْ أَثْلاَثًا ثُمَّ أَسْهَمَ عَلَى أَيِّهِمْ يَخْرُجُ سَهْمُ الْمَيِّتِ فَيَعْتِقُونَ فَوَقَعَ السَّهْمُ عَلَى أَحَدِ الأَثْلاَثِ فَعَتَقَ الثُّلُثُ الَّذِي وَقَعَ عَلَيْهِ السَّهْمُ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me from Rabia ibn Abi Abd ar-Rahman that a man
in the time of Aban ibn Uthman's amirate freed all of his slaves and
did not have other property than them. Aban ibn Uthman took charge of
the slaves and they were divided into three groups. Then he drew lots
on the basis that which ever group drew the dead man's arrow would be
free. The arrow fell to one of the thirds, and that third was freed.


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar: حَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنِ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ، أَنَّهُ سَمِعَهُ يَقُولُ مَضَتِ السُّنَّةُ أَنَّ الْعَبْدَ إِذَا عَتَقَ تَبِعَهُ مَالُهُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَمِمَّا يُبَيِّنُ ذَلِكَ أَنَّ الْعَبْدَ إِذَا عَتَقَ تَبِعَهُ مَالُهُ أَنَّ الْمُكَاتَبَ إِذَا كُوتِبَ تَبِعَهُ مَالُهُ وَإِنْ لَمْ يَشْتَرِطْهُ وَذَلِكَ أَنَّ عَقْدَ الْكِتَابَةِ هُوَ عَقْدُ الْوَلاَءِ إِذَا تَمَّ ذَلِكَ وَلَيْسَ مَالُ الْعَبْدِ وَالْمُكَاتَبِ بِمَنْزِلَةِ مَا كَانَ لَهُمَا مِنْ وَلَدٍ إِنَّمَا أَوْلاَدُهُمَا بِمَنْزِلَةِ رِقَابِهِمَا لَيْسُوا بِمَنْزِلَةِ أَمْوَالِهِمَا لأَنَّ السُّنَّةَ الَّتِي لاَ اخْتِلاَفَ فِيهَا أَنَّ الْعَبْدَ إِذَا عَتَقَ تَبِعَهُ مَالُهُ وَلَمْ يَتْبَعْهُ وَلَدُهُ وَأَنَّ الْمُكَاتَبَ إِذَا كُوتِبَ تَبِعَهُ مَالُهُ وَلَمْ يَتْبَعْهُ وَلَدُهُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَمِمَّا يُبَيِّنُ ذَلِكَ أَيْضًا أَنَّ الْعَبْدَ وَالْمُكَاتَبَ إِذَا أَفْلَسَا أُخِذَتْ أَمْوَالُهُمَا وَأُمَّهَاتُ أَوْلاَدِهِمَا وَلَمْ تُؤْخَذْ أَوْلاَدُهُمَا لأَنَّهُمْ لَيْسُوا بِأَمْوَالٍ لَهُمَا . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَمِمَّا يُبَيِّنُ ذَلِكَ أَيْضًا أَنَّ الْعَبْدَ إِذَا بِيعَ وَاشْتَرَطَ الَّذِي ابْتَاعَهُ مَالَهُ لَمْ يَدْخُلْ وَلَدُهُ فِي مَالِهِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَمِمَّا يُبَيِّنُ ذَلِكَ أَيْضًا أَنَّ الْعَبْدَ إِذَا جَرَحَ أُخِذَ هُوَ وَمَالُهُ وَلَمْ يُؤْخَذْ وَلَدُهُ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me that he heard Ibn Shihab say, "The precedent
of the sunna is that when a slave is freed, his property follows him."

Malik said, "One thing which makes clear that the property of
a slave follows him when he is freed is that when the contract
(mukatab) is written for his freedom, his property follows him even if
he did not stipulate it. That is because the bond of kitaba is the
bond of wala' when it is complete. The property of a slave and a
mukatab is not treated in the same way as any children they may have.
Their children are only treated in the same way as their own slaves,
not in the same way as their property. This is because the sunna, in
which there is no dispute, is that when a slave is freed, his property
follows him and his children do not follow him, and when a mukatab
writes the contract for his freedom, his property follows him and his
children do not follow him."

Malik said, "One thing which
makes that clear is that when a slave or a mukatab are bankrupt, their
property is taken but the mothers of their children and their children
are not taken because they are not their property."

Malik
said, "Another thing which makes it clear is that when a slave is sold
and the person who buys him stipulates the inclusions of his property,
his children are not included in his property."

Malik said,
"Another thing which makes it clear is that when a slave does injure
some one, he and his property are taken, and his children are not
taken."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar: حَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ نَافِعٍ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عُمَرَ، أَنَّ عُمَرَ بْنَ الْخَطَّابِ، قَالَ أَيُّمَا وَلِيدَةٍ وَلَدَتْ مِنْ سَيِّدِهَا فَإِنَّهُ لاَ يَبِيعُهَا وَلاَ يَهَبُهَا وَلاَ يُوَرِّثُهَا وَهُوَ يَسْتَمْتِعُ بِهَا فَإِذَا مَاتَ فَهِيَ حُرَّةٌ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me from Nafi from Abdullah ibn Umar that Umar
ibn al-Khattab said, "If a slave-girl gives birth to a child by her
master, he must not sell her, give her away, or bequeath her. He
enjoys her and when he dies she is free ."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، أَنَّهُ بَلَغَهُ أَنَّ عُمَرَ بْنَ الْخَطَّابِ، أَتَتْهُ وَلِيدَةٌ قَدْ ضَرَبَهَا سَيِّدُهَا بِنَارٍ أَوْ أَصَابَهَا بِهَا فَأَعْتَقَهَا . قَالَ مَالِكٌ الأَمْرُ الْمُجْتَمَعُ عَلَيْهِ عِنْدَنَا أَنَّهُ لاَ تَجُوزُ عَتَاقَةُ رَجُلٍ وَعَلَيْهِ دَيْنٌ يُحِيطُ بِمَالِهِ وَأَنَّهُ لاَ تَجُوزُ عَتَاقَةُ الْغُلاَمِ حَتَّى يَحْتَلِمَ أَوْ يَبْلُغَ مَبْلَغَ الْمُحْتَلِمِ وَأَنَّهُ لاَ تَجُوزُ عَتَاقَةُ الْمُوَلَّى عَلَيْهِ فِي مَالِهِ وَإِنْ بَلَغَ الْحُلُمَ حَتَّى يَلِيَ مَالَهُ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me that he had heard that a slave-girl came to
Umar ibn al-Khattab (who had been beaten by her master with a red hot
iron) and he set her free.

Malik said, "The generally agreed-
on way of doing things among us is that a man is not permitted to be
freed while he has a debt against him which exceeds his property. A
boy is not allowed to be set free until he has reached puberty. The
young person whose affairs are managed cannot set free in his
property, even when he reaches puberty, until he manages his
property."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar: حَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ هِلاَلِ بْنِ أُسَامَةَ، عَنْ عَطَاءِ بْنِ يَسَارٍ، عَنْ عُمَرَ بْنِ الْحَكَمِ، أَنَّهُ قَالَ أَتَيْتُ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَقُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنَّ جَارِيَةً لِي كَانَتْ تَرْعَى غَنَمًا لِي فَجِئْتُهَا وَقَدْ فُقِدَتْ شَاةٌ مِنَ الْغَنَمِ فَسَأَلْتُهَا عَنْهَا فَقَالَتْ أَكَلَهَا الذِّئْبُ فَأَسِفْتُ عَلَيْهَا وَكُنْتُ مِنْ بَنِي آدَمَ فَلَطَمْتُ وَجْهَهَا وَعَلَىَّ رَقَبَةٌ أَفَأُعْتِقُهَا فَقَالَ لَهَا رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم " أَيْنَ اللَّهُ " . فَقَالَتْ فِي السَّمَاءِ . فَقَالَ " مَنْ أَنَا " . فَقَالَتْ أَنْتَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ . فَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم " أَعْتِقْهَا " .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me from Hilal ibn Usama from Ata ibn Yasar that
Umar ibn al-Hakam said, "I went to the Messenger of Allah, may Allah
bless him and grant him peace, and said, 'Messenger of Allah, a slave
girl of mine was tending my sheep. I came to her and one of the sheep
was lost. I asked her about it and she said that a wolf had eaten it,
so I became angry and I am one of the children of Adam, so I struck
her on the face. As it happens, I have to set a slave free, shall I
free her?' The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, questioned her, 'Where is Allah?' She said, 'In heaven.' He
said, 'Who am I?' She said, 'You are the Messenger of Allah.' The
Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said,
'Free her.' "


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنِ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ، عَنْ عُبَيْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عُتْبَةَ بْنِ مَسْعُودٍ، أَنَّ رَجُلاً، مِنَ الأَنْصَارِ جَاءَ إِلَى رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم بِجَارِيَةٍ لَهُ سَوْدَاءَ فَقَالَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنَّ عَلَىَّ رَقَبَةً مُؤْمِنَةً فَإِنْ كُنْتَ تَرَاهَا مُؤْمِنَةً أُعْتِقُهَا . فَقَالَ لَهَا رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم " أَتَشْهَدِينَ أَنْ لاَ إِلَهَ إِلاَّ اللَّهُ " . قَالَتْ نَعَمْ . قَالَ " أَتَشْهَدِينَ أَنَّ مُحَمَّدًا رَسُولُ اللَّهِ قَالَتْ نَعَمْ . قَالَ " أَتُوقِنِينَ بِالْبَعْثِ بَعْدَ الْمَوْتِ " . قَالَتْ نَعَمْ . فَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم " أَعْتِقْهَا " .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me from Ibn Shihab from Ubaydullah ibn Abdullah
ibn Utba ibn Masud that one of the Ansar came to the Messenger of
Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, with a black slave-
girl of his. He said, "Messenger of Allah, I must set a slave free who
is a mumina. If you think that she is mumina, I will free her." The
Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace,
questioned her, "Do you testify that there is no god but Allah?" She
said, "Yes." "Do you testify that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah?"
She said, "Yes." "Are you certain about the rising after death?" She
said, "Yes." The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, said, "Free her."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، أَنَّهُ بَلَغَهُ عَنِ الْمَقْبُرِيِّ، أَنَّهُ قَالَ سُئِلَ أَبُو هُرَيْرَةَ عَنِ الرَّجُلِ، تَكُونُ عَلَيْهِ رَقَبَةٌ هَلْ يُعْتِقُ فِيهَا ابْنَ زِنًا فَقَالَ أَبُو هُرَيْرَةَ نَعَمْ ذَلِكَ يُجْزِئُ عَنْهُ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me that he had heard that al-Maqburi said that
Abu Hurayra was asked whether a man who had to free a slave, could
free an illegitimate child to fulfil that obligation. Abu Hurayra
said, "Yes. That will give satisfaction for him."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، أَنَّهُ بَلَغَهُ عَنْ فَضَالَةَ بْنِ عُبَيْدٍ الأَنْصَارِيِّ، وَكَانَ، مِنْ أَصْحَابِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم أَنَّهُ سُئِلَ عَنِ الرَّجُلِ تَكُونُ عَلَيْهِ رَقَبَةٌ هَلْ يَجُوزُ لَهُ أَنْ يُعْتِقَ وَلَدَ زِنًا قَالَ نَعَمْ ذَلِكَ يُجْزِئُ عَنْهُ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me that he had heard that Fadala ibn Ubayd al-
Ansari who was one of the companions of the Messenger of Allah, may
Allah bless him and grant him peace, was asked whether it was
permissible for a man who had to free a slave to free an illegitimate
child. He said, "Yes, That will give satisfaction for him."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar: حَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، أَنَّهُ بَلَغَهُ أَنَّ عَبْدَ اللَّهِ بْنَ عُمَرَ، سُئِلَ عَنِ الرَّقَبَةِ الْوَاجِبَةِ، هَلْ تُشْتَرَى بِشَرْطٍ فَقَالَ لاَ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَذَلِكَ أَحْسَنُ مَا سَمِعْتُ فِي الرِّقَابِ الْوَاجِبَةِ أَنَّهُ لاَ يَشْتَرِيهَا الَّذِي يُعْتِقُهَا فِيمَا وَجَبَ عَلَيْهِ بِشَرْطٍ عَلَى أَنْ يُعْتِقَهَا لأَنَّهُ إِذَا فَعَلَ ذَلِكَ فَلَيْسَتْ بِرَقَبَةٍ تَامَّةٍ لأَنَّهُ يَضَعُ مِنْ ثَمَنِهَا لِلَّذِي يَشْتَرِطُ مِنْ عِتْقِهَا . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَلاَ بَأْسَ أَنْ يَشْتَرِيَ الرَّقَبَةَ فِي التَّطَوُّعِ وَيَشْتَرِطَ أَنْ يُعْتِقَهَا . قَالَ مَالِكٌ إِنَّ أَحْسَنَ مَا سُمِعَ فِي الرِّقَابِ الْوَاجِبَةِ أَنَّهُ لاَ يَجُوزُ أَنْ يُعْتَقَ فِيهَا نَصْرَانِيٌّ وَلاَ يَهُودِيٌّ وَلاَ يُعْتَقُ فِيهَا مُكَاتَبٌ وَلاَ مُدَبَّرٌ وَلاَ أُمُّ وَلَدٍ وَلاَ مُعْتَقٌ إِلَى سِنِينَ وَلاَ أَعْمَى وَلاَ بَأْسَ أَنْ يُعْتَقَ النَّصْرَانِيُّ وَالْيَهُودِيُّ وَالْمَجُوسِيُّ تَطَوُّعًا لأَنَّ اللَّهَ تَبَارَكَ وَتَعَالَى قَالَ فِي كِتَابِهِ {فَإِمَّا مَنًّا بَعْدُ وَإِمَّا فِدَاءً} فَالْمَنُّ الْعَتَاقَةُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فَأَمَّا الرِّقَابُ الْوَاجِبَةُ الَّتِي ذَكَرَ اللَّهُ فِي الْكِتَابِ فَإِنَّهُ لاَ يُعْتَقُ فِيهَا إِلاَّ رَقَبَةٌ مُؤْمِنَةٌ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَكَذَلِكَ فِي إِطْعَامِ الْمَسَاكِينِ فِي الْكَفَّارَاتِ لاَ يَنْبَغِي أَنْ يُطْعَمَ فِيهَا إِلاَّ الْمُسْلِمُونَ وَلاَ يُطْعَمُ فِيهَا أَحَدٌ عَلَى غَيْرِ دِينِ الإِسْلاَمِ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me that he had heard that Abdullah ibn Umar was
asked whether a slave could be bought on the specific condition that
it was to be used to fulfil the obligation of freeing a slave, and he
said, "No."

Malik said, "That is the best of what I have
heard on the obligation of freeing slaves. Someone who has to set a
slave free because of an obligation on him, may not buy one on the
condition that he sets it free because if he does that, whatever he
buys is not completely a slave because he has reduced its price by the
condition he has made of setting it free."

Malik added,
"There is no harm, however, in someone buying a person expressly to
set him free."

Malik said, "The best of what I have heard on
the obligation of freeing slaves is that it is not permitted to free a
christian or a jew to fulfil it, and one does not free a mukatab or a
mudabbar or an umm walad or a slave to be freed after a certain number
of years, or a blind person. There is no harm in freeing a christian,
jew, or magian voluntarily, because Allah, the Blessed, the Exalted,
said in His Book, 'either as a favour then or by ransom,' (Sura 47
ayat 4) The favour is setting free."

Malik said, "As for
obligations of freeing slaves which Allah has mentioned in the Book,
one only frees a mumin slave for them."

Malik said, "It is
like that in feeding poor people for kaffara. One must only feed
muslims and one does not feed anyone outside of the deen of Islam."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar:
حَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ أَبِي عَمْرَةَ الأَنْصَارِيِّ، أَنَّ أُمَّهُ، أَرَادَتْ أَنْ تُوصِيَ ثُمَّ أَخَّرَتْ ذَلِكَ إِلَى أَنْ تُصْبِحَ فَهَلَكَتْ وَقَدْ كَانَتْ هَمَّتْ بِأَنْ تُعْتِقَ فَقَالَ عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ فَقُلْتُ لِلْقَاسِمِ بْنِ مُحَمَّدٍ أَيَنْفَعُهَا أَنْ أُعْتِقَ عَنْهَا فَقَالَ الْقَاسِمُ إِنَّ سَعْدَ بْنَ عُبَادَةَ قَالَ لِرَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم إِنَّ أُمِّي هَلَكَتْ فَهَلْ يَنْفَعُهَا أَنْ أُعْتِقَ عَنْهَا فَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم
" نَعَمْ " .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me from Abd ar-Rahman ibn Abi Amra al-Ansari
that his mother had wanted to make a bequest, but she delayed until
morning and died. She had intended to set someone free, so Abd ar-
Rahman said, 'I said to al-Qasim ibn Muhammad, 'Will it help her if I
free a slave for her?' Al-Qasim replied, 'Sad ibn Ubada said to the
Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, 'My
mother died, will it help her if I set a slave free for her?' The
Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said
"Yes." "'


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ يَحْيَى بْنِ سَعِيدٍ، أَنَّهُ قَالَ تُوُفِّيَ عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ أَبِي بَكْرٍ فِي نَوْمٍ نَامَهُ فَأَعْتَقَتْ عَنْهُ عَائِشَةُ زَوْجُ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم رِقَابًا كَثِيرَةً . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَهَذَا أَحَبُّ مَا سَمِعْتُ إِلَىَّ فِي ذَلِكَ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me that Yahya ibn Said said, ''Abd ar-Rahman ibn
Abi Bakr died in his sleep, and A'isha, the wife of the Prophet, may
Allah bless him and grant him peace, set free many slaves for him."
Malik said, "This is what I like best of what I have heard on the
subject."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar:
حَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ هِشَامِ بْنِ عُرْوَةَ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ، زَوْجِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم سُئِلَ عَنِ الرِّقَابِ أَيُّهَا أَفْضَلُ فَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم
" أَغْلاَهَا ثَمَنًا وَأَنْفَسُهَا عِنْدَ أَهْلِهَا " .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me from Hisham ibn Urwa from his father from
A'isha, the wife of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, was asked what was the most excellent kind of slave to free.
The Messenger of Allah, May Allah bless him and grant him peace,
answered, "The most expensive and the most valuable to his master."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ نَافِعٍ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عُمَرَ، أَنَّهُ أَعْتَقَ وَلَدَ زِنًا وَأُمَّهُ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me from Nafi that Abdullah ibn Umar freed an
illegitimate child and its mother.


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar: حَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ هِشَامِ بْنِ عُرْوَةَ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ، زَوْجِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم أَنَّهَا قَالَتْ جَاءَتْ بَرِيرَةُ فَقَالَتْ إِنِّي كَاتَبْتُ أَهْلِي عَلَى تِسْعِ أَوَاقٍ فِي كُلِّ عَامٍ أُوْقِيَّةٌ فَأَعِينِينِي . فَقَالَتْ عَائِشَةُ إِنْ أَحَبَّ أَهْلُكِ أَنْ أَعُدَّهَا لَهُمْ عَنْكِ عَدَدْتُهَا وَيَكُونَ لِي وَلاَؤُكِ فَعَلْتُ . فَذَهَبَتْ بَرِيرَةُ إِلَى أَهْلِهَا فَقَالَتْ لَهُمْ ذَلِكَ فَأَبَوْا عَلَيْهَا فَجَاءَتْ مِنْ عِنْدِ أَهْلِهَا وَرَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم جَالِسٌ فَقَالَتْ لِعَائِشَةَ إِنِّي قَدْ عَرَضْتُ عَلَيْهِمْ ذَلِكَ فَأَبَوْا عَلَىَّ إِلاَّ أَنْ يَكُونَ الْوَلاَءُ لَهُمْ . فَسَمِعَ ذَلِكَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَسَأَلَهَا فَأَخْبَرَتْهُ عَائِشَةُ فَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم " خُذِيهَا وَاشْتَرِطِي لَهُمُ الْوَلاَءَ فَإِنَّمَا الْوَلاَءُ لِمَنْ أَعْتَقَ " . فَفَعَلَتْ عَائِشَةُ ثُمَّ قَامَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فِي النَّاسِ فَحَمِدَ اللَّهَ وَأَثْنَى عَلَيْهِ ثُمَّ قَالَ " أَمَّا بَعْدُ فَمَا بَالُ رِجَالٍ يَشْتَرِطُونَ شُرُوطًا لَيْسَتْ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ مَا كَانَ مِنْ شَرْطٍ لَيْسَ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ فَهُوَ بَاطِلٌ وَإِنْ كَانَ مِائَةَ شَرْطٍ قَضَاءُ اللَّهِ أَحَقُّ وَشَرْطُ اللَّهِ أَوْثَقُ وَإِنَّمَا الْوَلاَءُ لِمَنْ أَعْتَقَ " .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me from Hisham ibn Urwa from his father that
A'isha, the wife of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, said, "Barira came to me and said, 'I have written myself as
mukatab for my people for nine uqiyas, one uqiya per year, so help
me.' A'isha said, 'If your people agree that I pay it all to them for
you, and that if I pay it, your wala' is mine, then I will do it.'
Barira went to her masters and told them that and they didn't agree.
She came back from her masters while the Messenger of Allah, may Allah
bless him and grant him peace, was sitting. She said to A'isha, 'I
offered that to them and they refused me unless they had the wala'.'
The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, heard
that and asked her about it A'isha told him and the Messenger of
Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, 'Take her and
stipulate that the wala' is yours, for the wala' is for the one who
sets free.' So A'isha did that and then the Messenger of Allah, may
Allah bless him and grant him peace, stood up in front of the people,
and praised Allah and gave thanks to Him. Then he said, 'What is wrong
with the people who make conditions which are not in the Book of
Allah? Any condition which is not in the Book of Allah is invalid even
if it is a hundred conditions. The decree of Allah is truer and the
conditions of Allah are firmer, and the wala' only belongs to the one
who sets free.' "


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar:
وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ نَافِعٍ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عُمَرَ، أَنَّ عَائِشَةَ أُمَّ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ، أَرَادَتْ أَنْ تَشْتَرِيَ جَارِيَةً تُعْتِقُهَا فَقَالَ أَهْلُهَا نَبِيعُكِهَا عَلَى أَنَّ وَلاَءَهَا لَنَا فَذَكَرَتْ ذَلِكَ لِرَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَقَالَ
" لاَ يَمْنَعَنَّكِ ذَلِكَ فَإِنَّمَا الْوَلاَءُ لِمَنْ أَعْتَقَ " .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me from Nafi from Abdullah ibn Umar that A'isha
umm al-muminin wanted to buy a slave-girl and set her free. Her people
said, "We will sell her to you provided that her wala' is ours." She
mentioned that to the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and
grant him peace, and he said, "Don't let that hinder you, for the
wala' only belongs to the one who sets free."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar:
وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ يَحْيَى بْنِ سَعِيدٍ، عَنْ عَمْرَةَ بِنْتِ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، أَنَّ بَرِيرَةَ، جَاءَتْ تَسْتَعِينُ عَائِشَةَ أُمَّ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ فَقَالَتْ عَائِشَةُ إِنْ أَحَبَّ أَهْلُكِ أَنْ أَصُبَّ لَهُمْ ثَمَنَكِ صَبَّةً وَاحِدَةً  وَأُعْتِقَكِ فَعَلْتُ . فَذَكَرَتْ ذَلِكَ بَرِيرَةُ لأَهْلِهَا فَقَالُوا لاَ إِلاَّ أَنْ يَكُونَ لَنَا وَلاَؤُكِ . قَالَ يَحْيَى بْنُ سَعِيدٍ فَزَعَمَتْ عَمْرَةُ أَنَّ عَائِشَةَ ذَكَرَتْ ذَلِكَ لِرَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم
" اشْتَرِيهَا وَأَعْتِقِيهَا فَإِنَّمَا الْوَلاَءُ لِمَنْ أَعْتَقَ " .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me from Yahya ibn Said from Amra bint Abd ar-
Rahman that Barira came asking the help of A'isha, umm al-muminin.
A'isha said, "If your masters agree that I pay them your price in one
lump sum and set you free I will do it." Barira mentioned that to her
masters and they said, "No, not unless your wala' is ours." Yahya ibn
Said added that Amra bint Abd ar-Rahman claimed that A'isha mentioned
that to the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, and the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace said, "Buy her and set her free. The wala' only belongs to the
one who sets free."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ دِينَارٍ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عُمَرَ، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم نَهَى عَنْ بَيْعِ الْوَلاَءِ وَعَنْ هِبَتِهِ .

hadith_text_en: Malik related to me from Abdullah ibn Dinar from Abdullah ibn Umar that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, forbade selling or giving away the wala'.


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_en: Malik said that it was not permissible for a slave to buy himself from his master on the provision that he could give the wala' to whomever he wished as the wala' was for the one who set him free, and that had a man given permission to his mawla to give the wala' to whomever he wished, that would not have been permitted, because the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, had said, "The wala' is for the one who sets free. " The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, forbade selling or giving away the wala'. For if it was permitted to the master to stipulate that for him and to give him permission to give the wala' to whomever he liked, that would be a gift.


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar: حَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ رَبِيعَةَ بْنِ أَبِي عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، . أَنَّ الزُّبَيْرَ بْنَ الْعَوَّامِ، اشْتَرَى عَبْدًا فَأَعْتَقَهُ وَلِذَلِكَ الْعَبْدِ بَنُونَ مِنِ امْرَأَةٍ حُرَّةٍ فَلَمَّا أَعْتَقَهُ الزُّبَيْرُ قَالَ هُمْ مَوَالِيَّ . وَقَالَ مَوَالِي أُمِّهِمْ بَلْ هُمْ مَوَالِينَا . فَاخْتَصَمُوا إِلَى عُثْمَانَ بْنِ عَفَّانَ فَقَضَى عُثْمَانُ لِلزُّبَيْرِ بِوَلاَئِهِمْ .

hadith_text_en: Malik related to me from Rabia ibn Abd ar-Rahman that az-Zubayr ibn al-Awwam bought a slave and set him free. The slave had children by a free woman. When az-Zubayr freed him, he said, "They are my mawali." The man argued, "They are the mawali of their mother. Rather, they are our mawali." They took the dispute to Uthman ibn Affan, and Uthman gave a judgement that az-Zubayr had their wala'.


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، أَنَّهُ بَلَغَهُ أَنَّ سَعِيدَ بْنَ الْمُسَيَّبِ، سُئِلَ عَنْ عَبْدٍ لَهُ، وَلَدٌ مِنِ امْرَأَةٍ حُرَّةٍ لِمَنْ وَلاَؤُهُمْ فَقَالَ سَعِيدٌ إِنْ مَاتَ أَبُوهُمْ وَهُوَ عَبْدٌ لَمْ يُعْتَقْ فَوَلاَؤُهُمْ لِمَوَالِي أُمِّهِمْ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَمَثَلُ ذَلِكَ وَلَدُ الْمُلاَعَنَةِ مِنَ الْمَوَالِي يُنْسَبُ إِلَى مَوَالِي أُمِّهِ فَيَكُونُونَ هُمْ مَوَالِيَهُ إِنْ مَاتَ وَرِثُوهُ وَإِنْ جَرَّ جَرِيرَةً عَقَلُوا عَنْهُ فَإِنِ اعْتَرَفَ بِهِ أَبُوهُ أُلْحِقَ بِهِ وَصَارَ وَلاَؤُهُ إِلَى مَوَالِي أَبِيهِ وَكَانَ مِيرَاثُهُ لَهُمْ وَعَقْلُهُ عَلَيْهِمْ وَيُجْلَدُ أَبُوهُ الْحَدَّ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَكَذَلِكَ الْمَرْأَةُ الْمُلاَعِنَةُ مِنَ الْعَرَبِ إِذَا اعْتَرَفَ زَوْجُهَا الَّذِي لاَعَنَهَا بِوَلَدِهَا صَارَ بِمِثْلِ هَذِهِ الْمَنْزِلَةِ إِلاَّ أَنَّ بَقِيَّةَ مِيرَاثِهِ بَعْدَ مِيرَاثِ أُمِّهِ وَإِخْوَتِهِ لأُمِّهِ لِعَامَّةِ الْمُسْلِمِينَ مَا لَمْ يُلْحَقْ بِأَبِيهِ وَإِنَّمَا وَرَّثَ وَلَدُ الْمُلاَعَنَةِ الْمُوَالاَةَ مَوَالِيَ أُمِّهِ قَبْلَ أَنْ يَعْتَرِفَ بِهِ أَبُوهُ لأَنَّهُ لَمْ يَكُنْ لَهُ نَسَبٌ وَلاَ عَصَبَةٌ فَلَمَّا ثَبَتَ نَسَبُهُ صَارَ إِلَى عَصَبَتِهِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ الأَمْرُ الْمُجْتَمَعُ عَلَيْهِ عِنْدَنَا فِي وَلَدِ الْعَبْدِ مِنِ امْرَأَةٍ حُرَّةٍ وَأَبُو الْعَبْدِ حُرٌّ أَنَّ الْجَدَّ أَبَا الْعَبْدِ يَجُرُّ وَلاَءَ وَلَدِ ابْنِهِ الأَحْرَارِ مِنِ امْرَأَةٍ حُرَّةٍ يَرِثُهُمْ مَا دَامَ أَبُوهُمْ عَبْدًا فَإِنْ عَتَقَ أَبُوهُمْ رَجَعَ الْوَلاَءُ إِلَى مَوَالِيهِ وَإِنْ مَاتَ وَهُوَ عَبْدٌ كَانَ الْمِيرَاثُ وَالْوَلاَءُ لِلْجَدِّ وَإِنِ الْعَبْدُ كَانَ لَهُ ابْنَانِ حُرَّانِ فَمَاتَ أَحَدُهُمَا وَأَبُوهُ عَبْدٌ جَرَّ الْجَدُّ أَبُو الأَبِ الْوَلاَءَ وَالْمِيرَاثَ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي الأَمَةِ تُعْتَقُ وَهِيَ حَامِلٌ وَزَوْجُهَا مَمْلُوكٌ ثُمَّ يَعْتِقُ زَوْجُهَا قَبْلَ أَنْ تَضَعَ حَمْلَهَا أَوْ بَعْدَ مَا تَضَعُ إِنَّ وَلاَءَ مَا كَانَ فِي بَطْنِهَا لِلَّذِي أَعْتَقَ أُمَّهُ لأَنَّ ذَلِكَ الْوَلَدَ قَدْ كَانَ أَصَابَهُ الرِّقُّ قَبْلَ أَنْ تُعْتَقَ أُمُّهُ وَلَيْسَ هُوَ بِمَنْزِلَةِ الَّذِي تَحْمِلُ بِهِ أُمُّهُ بَعْدَ الْعَتَاقَةِ لأَنَّ الَّذِي تَحْمِلُ بِهِ أُمُّهُ بَعْدَ الْعَتَاقَةِ إِذَا أُعْتِقَ أَبُوهُ جَرَّ وَلاَءَهُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي الْعَبْدِ يَسْتَأْذِنُ سَيِّدَهُ أَنْ يُعْتِقَ عَبْدًا لَهُ فَيَأْذَنَ لَهُ سَيِّدُهُ إِنَّ وَلاَءَ الْعَبْدِ الْمُعْتَقِ

hadith_text_en: Malik related to me that he had heard that Said ibn al-Musayyab was asked who had the wala' of the children whom a slave had by a free woman. Said said, "If their father dies and he is a slave who was not set free, their wala' belongs to the mawali of their mother."   Malik said, "That is like the child of a woman who is a mawla who has been divorced by lian; the child is attached to the mawali of his mother and they are his mawali. If he dies, they inherit from him. If he commits a crime, they pay the blood-money for him. If his father acknowledges him, he is given a kinship to him and his wala' goes to the mawali of his father. They are his heirs, they pay his blood-money and his father is punished with the hadd-punishment."   Malik said, "It is like that with a free-born woman divorced by lian. If her husband who curses her by lian does not acknowledge her child, the child is dealt with in the same way except that the rest of his inheritance after the inheritance of his mother and his brothers from his mother goes to all the muslims as long as he was not given kinship to his father. The child of the lian is attached to the patronage of the mawali of his mother until his father acknowledges him because he does not have a lineage or paternal relations. If his lineage is confirmed, it goes to his paternal relations."   Malik said, "The generally agreed-on way of doing things among us about a child of a slave by a free woman, while the father of the slave is free, is that the grandfather (the father of the slave), attracts the wala' of his son's free children by a free woman. They leave their inheritance to him as long as their father is a slave. If the father becomes free, the wala' returns to his mawali. If he dies and he is still a slave, the inheritance and the wala' go to the grandfather. If the slave has two free sons, and one of them dies while the father is still a slave, the grandfather, the father of the father, attracts the wala' and the inheritance."   Malik spoke about a slave-girl who was set free while she was pregnant and her husband was a slave and then her husband became free before she gave birth, or after she gave birth. He said, "The wala' of what is in her womb goes to the person who set the mother free because slavery touched the child before the mother was set free. It is not treated in the same way as a child conceived by its mother after she has been set free because the wala' of such a child, is attracted by the father when he is set free."   Malik said that if a slave asked his master's permission to free a slave of his and his master gave permission, the wala' of the freed slave went to the master of his master, and his wala' did not return to the master who had set him free, even if he were to become free himself."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar: حَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ أَبِي بَكْرِ بْنِ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ عَمْرِو بْنِ حَزْمٍ، عَنْ عَبْدِ الْمَلِكِ بْنِ أَبِي بَكْرِ بْنِ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ الْحَارِثِ بْنِ هِشَامٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، أَنَّهُ أَخْبَرَهُ أَنَّ الْعَاصِيَ بْنَ هِشَامٍ هَلَكَ وَتَرَكَ بَنِينَ لَهُ ثَلاَثَةً اثْنَانِ لأُمٍّ وَرَجُلٌ لِعَلَّةٍ فَهَلَكَ أَحَدُ اللَّذَيْنِ لأُمٍّ وَتَرَكَ مَالاً وَمَوَالِيَ فَوَرِثَهُ أَخُوهُ لأَبِيهِ وَأُمِّهِ مَالَهُ وَوَلاَءَهُ مَوَالِيهِ ثُمَّ هَلَكَ الَّذِي وَرِثَ الْمَالَ وَوَلاَءَ الْمَوَالِي وَتَرَكَ ابْنَهُ وَأَخَاهُ لأَبِيهِ فَقَالَ ابْنُهُ قَدْ أَحْرَزْتُ مَا كَانَ أَبِي أَحْرَزَ مِنَ الْمَالِ وَوَلاَءِ الْمَوَالِي وَقَالَ أَخُوهُ لَيْسَ كَذَلِكَ إِنَّمَا أَحْرَزْتَ الْمَالَ وَأَمَّا وَلاَءُ الْمَوَالِي فَلاَ أَرَأَيْتَ لَوْ هَلَكَ أَخِي الْيَوْمَ أَلَسْتُ أَرِثُهُ أَنَا فَاخْتَصَمَا إِلَى عُثْمَانَ بْنِ عَفَّانَ فَقَضَى لأَخِيهِ بِوَلاَءِ الْمَوَالِي .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me from Abdullah ibn Abi Bakr ibn Muhammad ibn
Amr ibn Hazm from Abd al-Malik ibn Abi Bakr ibn Abd ar-Rahman ibn al-
Harith ibn Hisham that his father told him that al-Asi ibn Hisham had
died and left three sons, two by one wife and one by another wife. One
of the two with the same mother died and left property and mawali. His
full brother inherited his property and the wala' of his mawali. Then
he also died, and left as heirs his son and his paternal half brother.
His son said, "I obtain what my father inherited of property and the
wala' of the mawali." His brother said, "It is not like that. You
obtain the property. As for the wala' of the mawali, it is not so. Do
you think that had it been my first brother who died today, I would
not have inherited from him?" They argued and went to Uthman ibn
Affan. He gave a judgement that the brother had the wala' of the
mawali.


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ أَبِي بَكْرِ بْنِ حَزْمٍ، أَنَّهُ أَخْبَرَهُ أَبُوهُ، أَنَّهُ كَانَ جَالِسًا عِنْدَ أَبَانَ بْنِ عُثْمَانَ فَاخْتَصَمَ إِلَيْهِ نَفَرٌ مِنْ جُهَيْنَةَ وَنَفَرٌ مِنْ بَنِي الْحَارِثِ بْنِ الْخَزْرَجِ وَكَانَتِ امْرَأَةٌ مِنْ جُهَيْنَةَ عِنْدَ رَجُلٍ مِنْ بَنِي الْحَارِثِ بْنِ الْخَزْرَجِ يُقَالُ لَهُ إِبْرَاهِيمُ بْنُ كُلَيْبٍ فَمَاتَتِ الْمَرْأَةُ وَتَرَكَتْ مَالاً وَمَوَالِيَ فَوَرِثَهَا ابْنُهَا وَزَوْجُهَا ثُمَّ مَاتَ ابْنُهَا فَقَالَ وَرَثَتُهُ لَنَا وَلاَءُ الْمَوَالِي قَدْ كَانَ ابْنُهَا أَحْرَزَهُ فَقَالَ الْجُهَنِيُّونَ لَيْسَ كَذَلِكَ إِنَّمَا هُمْ مَوَالِي صَاحِبَتِنَا فَإِذَا مَاتَ وَلَدُهَا فَلَنَا وَلاَؤُهُمْ وَنَحْنُ نَرِثُهُمْ فَقَضَى أَبَانُ بْنُ عُثْمَانَ لِلْجُهَنِيِّينَ بِوَلاَءِ الْمَوَالِي .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me from Abdullah ibn Abi Bakr ibn Hazm that his
father told him that he was sitting with Aban ibn Uthman, and an
argument was brought to him between some people from the Juhayna tribe
and some people from the Banu al-Harith ibn al-Khazraj. A woman of the
Juhayna tribe was married to a man from the Banu al-Harith ibn al-
Khazraj, called Ibrahim ibn Kulayb. She died and left property and
mawali, and her son and husband inherited them from her. Then her son
died and his heirs said, "We have the wala' of the mawali. Her son
obtained them." Those of the Juhayna said, "It is not like that. They
are the mawali of our female associate. When her child died, we have
their wala' and we inherit them." Aban ibn Uthman gave a judgement
that the people from the Juhayna tribe did indeed have the wala' of
the mawali.


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، أَنَّهُ بَلَغَهُ أَنَّ سَعِيدَ بْنَ الْمُسَيَّبِ، قَالَ فِي رَجُلٍ هَلَكَ وَتَرَكَ بَنِينَ لَهُ ثَلاَثَةً وَتَرَكَ مَوَالِيَ أَعْتَقَهُمْ هُوَ عَتَاقَةً ثُمَّ إِنَّ الرَّجُلَيْنِ مِنْ بَنِيهِ هَلَكَا وَتَرَكَا أَوْلاَدًا . فَقَالَ سَعِيدُ بْنُ الْمُسَيَّبِ يَرِثُ الْمَوَالِيَ الْبَاقِي مِنَ الثَّلاَثَةِ فَإِذَا هَلَكَ هُوَ فَوَلَدُهُ وَوَلَدُ إِخْوَتِهِ فِي وَلاَءِ الْمَوَالِي شَرَعٌ سَوَاءٌ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me that he had heard that Said ibn al-Musayyab
spoke about a man who died and left three sons and left mawali whom he
had freed. Then two of his sons died and left children. He said, "The
third remaining son inherits the mawali. When he dies, his children
and the children of his brothers share equally in the wala' of the
mawali."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب العتق والولاء

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، أَنَّهُ سَأَلَ ابْنَ شِهَابٍ عَنِ السَّائِبَةِ، قَالَ يُوَالِي مَنْ شَاءَ فَإِنْ مَاتَ وَلَمْ يُوَالِ أَحَدًا فَمِيرَاثُهُ لِلْمُسْلِمِينَ وَعَقْلُهُ عَلَيْهِمْ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ إِنَّ أَحْسَنَ مَا سُمِعَ فِي السَّائِبَةِ أَنَّهُ لاَ يُوَالِي أَحَدًا وَأَنَّ مِيرَاثَهُ لِلْمُسْلِمِينَ وَعَقْلَهُ عَلَيْهِمْ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي الْيَهُودِيِّ وَالنَّصْرَانِيِّ يُسْلِمُ عَبْدُ أَحَدِهِمَا فَيُعْتِقُهُ قَبْلَ أَنْ يُبَاعَ عَلَيْهِ إِنَّ وَلاَءَ الْعَبْدِ الْمُعْتَقِ لِلْمُسْلِمِينَ وَإِنْ أَسْلَمَ الْيَهُودِيُّ أَوِ النَّصْرَانِيُّ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ لَمْ يَرْجِعْ إِلَيْهِ الْوَلاَءُ أَبَدًا . قَالَ وَلَكِنْ إِذَا أَعْتَقَ الْيَهُودِيُّ أَوِ النَّصْرَانِيُّ عَبْدًا عَلَى دِينِهِمَا ثُمَّ أَسْلَمَ الْمُعْتَقُ قَبْلَ أَنْ يُسْلِمَ الْيَهُودِيُّ أَوِ النَّصْرَانِيُّ الَّذِي أَعْتَقَهُ ثُمَّ أَسْلَمَ الَّذِي أَعْتَقَهُ رَجَعَ إِلَيْهِ الْوَلاَءُ لأَنَّهُ قَدْ كَانَ ثَبَتَ لَهُ الْوَلاَءُ يَوْمَ أَعْتَقَهُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَإِنْ كَانَ لِلْيَهُودِيِّ أَوِ النَّصْرَانِيِّ وَلَدٌ مُسْلِمٌ وَرِثَ مَوَالِيَ أَبِيهِ الْيَهُودِيِّ أَوِ النَّصْرَانِيِّ إِذَا أَسْلَمَ الْمَوْلَى الْمُعْتَقُ قَبْلَ أَنْ يُسْلِمَ الَّذِي أَعْتَقَهُ وَإِنْ كَانَ الْمُعْتَقُ حِينَ أُعْتِقَ مُسْلِمًا لَمْ يَكُنْ لِوَلَدِ النَّصْرَانِيِّ أَوِ الْيَهُودِيِّ الْمُسْلِمَيْنِ مِنْ وَلاَءِ الْعَبْدِ الْمُسْلِمِ شَىْءٌ لأَنَّهُ لَيْسَ لِلْيَهُودِيِّ وَلاَ لِلنَّصْرَانِيِّ وَلاَءٌ فَوَلاَءُ الْعَبْدِ الْمُسْلِمِ لِجَمَاعَةِ الْمُسْلِمِينَ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me that he had asked Ibn Shihab about a slave
who was released. He said, "He gives his wala' to whomever he likes.
If he dies and has not given his wala' to anyone, his inheritance goes
to the muslims and his blood-money is paid by them."

Malik
said, "The best of what has been heard about a slave who is released
is that no one gets his wala', and his inheritance goes to the
muslims, and they pay his blood-money."

Malik said that when
the slave of a jew or christian became muslim and he was freed before
being sold, the wala' of the freed slave went to the muslims. If the
jew or christian became muslim afterwards, the wala' did not revert to
him. "

He said, "However, if a jew or christian frees a slave
from their own deen, and then the freed one becomes muslim before the
jew or christian who freed him becomes muslim and then the one who
freed him has become muslim, his wala' reverts to him because the
wala' was confirmed for him on the day he freed him."

Malik
said that the muslim child of a jew or christian inherited the mawali
of his jewish or christian father when the freed mawla became muslim
before the one who freed him became muslim. If the freed one was
already muslim when he was freed, the muslim children of the christian
or jew had nothing of the wala' of a muslim slave because the jew and
the christian did not have the wala'. The wala' of a muslim slave went
to the community of muslims.


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب المكاتب

hadith_chapter_name_en: The Mukatab

hadith_text_ar: حَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ نَافِعٍ، أَنَّ عَبْدَ اللَّهِ بْنَ عُمَرَ، كَانَ يَقُولُ الْمُكَاتَبُ عَبْدٌ مَا بَقِيَ عَلَيْهِ مِنْ كِتَابَتِهِ شَىْءٌ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me from Nafi that Abdullah ibn Umar said, "A
mukatab is a slave as long as any of his kitaba remains to be paid."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب المكاتب

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، أَنَّهُ بَلَغَهُ أَنَّ عُرْوَةَ بْنَ الزُّبَيْرِ، وَسُلَيْمَانَ بْنَ يَسَارٍ، كَانَا يَقُولاَنِ الْمُكَاتَبُ عَبْدٌ مَا بَقِيَ عَلَيْهِ مِنْ كِتَابَتِهِ شَىْءٌ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَهُو رَأْيِي . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فَإِنْ هَلَكَ الْمُكَاتَبُ وَتَرَكَ مَالاً أَكْثَرَ مِمَّا بَقِيَ عَلَيْهِ مِنْ كِتَابَتِهِ وَلَهُ وَلَدٌ وُلِدُوا فِي كِتَابَتِهِ أَوْ كَاتَبَ عَلَيْهِمْ وَرِثُوا مَا بَقِيَ مِنَ الْمَالِ بَعْدَ قَضَاءِ كِتَابَتِهِ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me that he had heard that Urwa ibn az-Zubayr and
Sulayman ibn Yasar said, "The mukatab is a slave as long as any of his
kitaba remains to be paid."

Malik said, "This is my opinion
as well."

Malik said, "If a mukatab dies and leaves more
property than what remains to be paid of his kitaba and he has
children who were born during the time of his kitaba or whose kitaba
has been written as well, they inherit any property that remains after
the kitaba has been paid."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب المكاتب

hadith_text_ar:
وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ حُمَيْدِ بْنِ قَيْسٍ الْمَكِّيِّ، أَنَّ مُكَاتَبًا، كَانَ لاِبْنِ الْمُتَوَكِّلِ هَلَكَ بِمَكَّةَ وَتَرَكَ عَلَيْهِ بَقِيَّةً مِنْ كِتَابَتِهِ وَدُيُونًا لِلنَّاسِ وَتَرَكَ ابْنَتَهُ فَأَشْكَلَ عَلَى عَامِلِ مَكَّةَ الْقَضَاءُ فِيهِ فَكَتَبَ إِلَى عَبْدِ الْمَلِكِ بْنِ مَرْوَانَ يَسْأَلُهُ عَنْ ذَلِكَ فَكَتَبَ إِلَيْهِ عَبْدُ الْمَلِكِ أَنِ ابْدَأْ بِدُيُونِ النَّاسِ ثُمَّ اقْضِ مَا بَقِيَ مِنْ كِتَابَتِهِ ثُمَّ اقْسِمْ مَا بَقِيَ مِنْ مَالِهِ بَيْنَ ابْنَتِهِ وَمَوْلاَهُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ الأَمْرُ عِنْدَنَا أَنَّهُ لَيْسَ عَلَى سَيِّدِ الْعَبْدِ أَنْ يُكَاتِبَهُ إِذَا سَأَلَهُ ذَلِكَ وَلَمْ أَسْمَعْ أَنَّ أَحَدًا مِنَ الأَئِمَّةِ أَكْرَهَ رَجُلاً عَلَى أَنْ يُكَاتِبَ عَبْدَهُ وَقَدْ سَمِعْتُ بَعْضَ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ إِذَا سُئِلَ عَنْ ذَلِكَ فَقِيلَ لَهُ إِنَّ اللَّهَ تَبَارَكَ وَتَعَالَى يَقُولُ {فَكَاتِبُوهُمْ إِنْ عَلِمْتُمْ فِيهِمْ خَيْرًا} . يَتْلُو هَاتَيْنِ الآيَتَيْنِ {وَإِذَا حَلَلْتُمْ فَاصْطَادُوا} . {فَإِذَا قُضِيَتِ الصَّلاَةُ فَانْتَشِرُوا فِي الأَرْضِ وَابْتَغُوا مِنْ فَضْلِ اللَّهِ} . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَإِنَّمَا ذَلِكَ أَمْرٌ أَذِنَ اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ فِيهِ لِلنَّاسِ وَلَيْسَ بِوَاجِبٍ عَلَيْهِمْ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَسَمِعْتُ بَعْضَ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ يَقُولُ فِي قَوْلِ اللَّهِ تَبَارَكَ وَتَعَالَى {وَآتُوهُمْ مِنْ مَالِ اللَّهِ الَّذِي آتَاكُمْ} . إِنَّ ذَلِكَ أَنْ يُكَاتِبَ الرَّجُلُ غُلاَمَهُ ثُمَّ يَضَعُ عَنْهُ مِنْ آخِرِ كِتَابَتِهِ شَيْئًا مُسَمًّى . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فَهَذَا الَّذِي سَمِعْتُ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ وَأَدْرَكْتُ عَمَلَ النَّاسِ عَلَى ذَلِكَ عِنْدَنَا .
 قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَقَدْ بَلَغَنِي أَنَّ عَبْدَ اللَّهِ بْنَ عُمَرَ كَاتَبَ غُلاَمًا لَهُ عَلَى خَمْسَةٍ وَثَلاَثِينَ أَلْفَ دِرْهَمٍ ثُمَّ وَضَعَ عَنْهُ مِنْ آخِرِ كِتَابَتِهِ خَمْسَةَ آلاَفِ دِرْهَمٍ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ الأَمْرُ عِنْدَنَا أَنَّ الْمُكَاتَبَ إِذَا كَاتَبَهُ سَيِّدُهُ تَبِعَهُ مَالُهُ وَلَمْ يَتْبَعْهُ وَلَدُهُ إِلاَّ أَنْ يَشْتَرِطَهُمْ فِي كِتَابَتِهِ . قَالَ يَحْيَى سَمِعْتُ مَالِكًا يَقُولُ فِي الْمُكَاتَبِ يُكَاتِبُهُ سَيِّدُهُ وَلَهُ جَارِيَةٌ بِهَا حَبَلٌ مِنْهُ لَمْ يَعْلَمْ بِهِ هُوَ وَلاَ سَيِّدُهُ يَوْمَ كِتَابَتِهِ فَإِنَّهُ لاَ يَتْبَعُهُ ذَلِكَ الْوَلَدُ لأَنَّهُ لَمْ يَكُنْ دَخَلَ فِي كِتَابَتِهِ وَهُوَ لِسَيِّدِهِ فَأَمَّا الْجَارِيَةُ فَإِنَّهَا لِلْمُكَاتَبِ لأَنَّهَا مِنْ مَالِهِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي رَجُلٍ وَرِثَ مُكَاتَبًا مِنِ امْرَأَتِهِ هُوَ وَابْنُهَا إِنَّ الْمُكَاتَبَ إِنْ مَاتَ قَبْلَ أَنْ يَقْضِيَ كِتَابَتَهُ اقْتَسَمَا مِيرَاثَهُ عَلَى كِتَابِ اللَّهِ وَإِنْ أَدَّى كِتَابَتَهُ ثُمَّ مَاتَ فَمِيرَاثُهُ لاِبْنِ الْمَرْأَةِ وَلَيْسَ لِلزَّوْجِ مِنْ مِيرَاثِهِ شَىْءٌ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي الْمُكَاتَبِ يُكَاتِبُ عَبْدَهُ قَالَ يُنْظَرُ فِي ذَلِكَ فَإِنْ كَانَ إِنَّمَا أَرَادَ الْمُحَابَاةَ لِعَبْدِهِ وَعُرِفَ ذَلِكَ مِنْهُ بِالتَّخْفِيفِ عَنْهُ فَلاَ يَجُوزُ ذَلِكَ وَإِنْ كَانَ إِنَّمَا كَاتَبَهُ عَلَى وَجْهِ الرَّغْبَةِ وَطَلَبِ الْمَالِ وَابْتِغَاءِ الْفَضْلِ وَالْعَوْنِ عَلَى كِتَابَتِهِ فَذَلِكَ جَائِزٌ لَهُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي رَجُلٍ وَطِئَ مُكَاتَبَةً لَهُ إِنَّهَا إِنْ حَمَلَتْ فَهِيَ بِالْخِيَارِ إِنْ شَاءَتْ كَانَتْ أُمَّ وَلَدٍ وَإِنْ شَاءَتْ قَرَّتْ عَلَى كِتَابَتِهَا فَإِنْ لَمْ تَحْمِلْ فَهِيَ عَلَى كِتَابَتِهَا . قَالَ مَالِكٌ الأَمْرُ الْمُجْتَمَعُ عَلَيْهِ عِنْدَنَا فِي الَعَبْدِ يَكُونُ بَيْنَ الرَّجُلَيْنِ إِنَّ أَحَدَهُمَا لاَ يُكَاتِبُ نَصِيبَهُ مِنْهُ أَذِنَ لَهُ بِذَلِكَ صَاحِبُهُ أَوْ لَمْ يَأْذَنْ إِلاَّ أَنْ يُكَاتِبَاهُ جَمِيعًا لأَنَّ ذَلِكَ يَعْقِدُ لَهُ عِتْقًا وَيَصِيرُ إِذَا أَدَّى الْعَبْدُ مَا كُوتِبَ عَلَيْهِ إِلَى أَنْ يَعْتِقَ نِصْفُهُ وَلاَ يَكُونُ عَلَى الَّذِي كَاتَبَ بَعْضَهُ أَنْ يَسْتَتِمَّ عِتْقَهُ فَذَلِكَ خِلاَفُ مَا قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم " مَنْ أَعْتَقَ شِرْكًا لَهُ فِي عَبْدٍ قُوِّمَ عَلَيْهِ قِيمَةَ الْعَدْلِ " . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فَإِنْ جَهِلَ ذَلِكَ حَتَّى يُؤَدِّيَ الْمُكَاتَبُ أَوْ قَبْلَ أَنْ يُؤَدِّيَ رَدَّ إِلَيْهِ الَّذِي كَاتَبَهُ مَا قَبَضَ مِنَ الْمُكَاتَبِ فَاقْتَسَمَهُ هُوَ وَشَرِيكُهُ عَلَى قَدْرِ حِصَصِهِمَا وَبَطَلَتْ كِتَابَتُهُ وَكَانَ عَبْدًا لَهُمَا عَلَى حَالِهِ الأُولَى . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي مُكَاتَبٍ بَيْنَ رَجُلَيْنِ فَأَنْظَرَهُ أَحَدُهُمَا بِحَقِّهِ الَّذِي عَلَيْهِ وَأَبَى الآخَرُ أَنْ يُنْظِرَهُ فَاقْتَضَى الَّذِي أَبَى أَنْ يُنْظِرَهُ بَعْضَ حَقِّهِ ثُمَّ مَاتَ الْمُكَاتَبُ وَتَرَكَ مَالاً لَيْسَ فِيهِ وَفَاءٌ مِنْ كِتَابَتِهِ قَالَ مَالِكٌ يَتَحَاصَّانِ بِقَدْرِ مَا بَقِيَ لَهُمَا عَلَيْهِ يَأْخُذُ كُلُّ وَاحِدٍ مِنْهُمَا بِقَدْرِ حِصَّتِهِ فَإِنْ تَرَكَ الْمُكَاتَبُ فَضْلاً عَنْ كِتَابَتِهِ أَخَذَ كُلُّ وَاحِدٍ مِنْهُمَا مَا بَقِيَ مِنَ الْكِتَابَةِ وَكَانَ مَا بَقِيَ بَيْنَهُمَا بِالسَّوَاءِ فَإِنْ عَجَزَ الْمُكَاتَبُ وَقَدِ اقْتَضَى الَّذِي لَمْ يُنْظِرْهُ أَكْثَرَ مِمَّا اقْتَضَى صَاحِبُهُ كَانَ الْعَبْدُ بَيْنَهُمَا نِصْفَيْنِ وَلاَ يَرُدُّ عَلَى صَاحِبِهِ فَضْلَ مَا اقْتَضَى لأَنَّهُ إِنَّمَا اقْتَضَى الَّذِي لَهُ بِإِذْنِ صَاحِبِهِ وَإِنْ وَضَعَ عَنْهُ أَحَدُهُمَا الَّذِي لَهُ ثُمَّ اقْتَضَى صَاحِبُهُ بَعْضَ الَّذِي لَهُ عَلَيْهِ ثُمَّ عَجَزَ فَهُوَ بَيْنَهُمَا وَلاَ يَرُدُّ الَّذِي اقْتَضَى عَلَى صَاحِبِهِ شَيْئًا لأَنَّهُ إِنَّمَا اقْتَضَى الَّذِي لَهُ عَلَيْهِ وَذَلِكَ بِمَنْزِلَةِ الدَّيْنِ لِلرَّجُلَيْنِ بِكِتَابٍ وَاحِدٍ عَلَى رَجُلٍ وَاحِدٍ فَيُنْظِرُهُ أَحَدُهُمَا وَيَشِحُّ الآخَرُ فَيَقْتَضِي بَعْضَ حَقِّهِ ثُمَّ يُفْلِسُ الْغَرِيمُ فَلَيْسَ عَلَى الَّذِي اقْتَضَى أَنْ يَرُدَّ شَيْئًا مِمَّا أَخَذَ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me from Humayd ibn Qays al-Makki that a son of
al-Mutawakkil had a mukatab who died at Makka and left (enough to pay)
the rest of his kitaba and he owed some debts to people. He also left
a daughter. The governor of Makka was not certain about how to judge
in the case, so he wrote to Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan to ask him about
it. Abd al-Malik wrote to him, "Begin with the debts owed to people,
and then pay what remains of his kitaba. Then divide what remains of
the property between the daughter and the master."

Malik
said, "What is done among us is that the master of a slave does not
have to give his slave a kitaba if he asks for it. I have not heard of
any of the Imams forcing a man to give a kitaba to his slave. I heard
that one of the people of knowledge, when someone asked about that and
mentioned that Allah the Blessed, the Exalted, said, 'Give them their
kitaba, if you know some good in them' (Sura 24 ayat 33) recited these
two ayats, 'When you are free of the state of ihram, then hunt for
game.' (Sura 5 ayat 3) 'When the prayer is finished, scatter in the
land and seek Allah's favour.' " (Sura 62 ayat 10)

Malik
commented, "It is a way of doing things for which Allah, the Mighty,
the Majestic, has given permission to people, and it is not obligatory
for them." Malik said, "I heard one of the people of knowledge say
about the word of Allah, the Blessed, the Exalted, 'Give them of the
wealth which Allah has given you,' that it meant that a man give his
slave a kitaba and then reduce the end of his kitaba for him by some
specific amount."

Malik said, "This is what I have heard from
the people of knowledge and what I see people doing here."

Malik said, "I have heard that Abdullah ibn Umar gave one of his
slaves his kitaba for 35,000 dirhams, and then reduced the end of his
kitaba by 5,000 dirhams."

Malik said, "What is done among us
is that when a master gives a mukatab his kitaba, the mukatab's
property goes with him but his children do not go with him unless he
stipulates that in his kitaba."

Yahya said, "I heard Malik
say that if a mukatab whose master had given him a kitaba had a slave-
girl who was pregnant by him, and neither he nor his master knew that
on the day he was given his kitaba, the child did not follow him
because he was not included in the kitaba. He belonged to the master.
As for the slave-girl, she belonged to the mukatab because she was his
property."

Malik said that if a man and his wife's son (by
another husband) inherited a mukatab from the wife and the mukatab
died before he had completed his kitaba, they divided his inheritance
between them according to the Book of Allah. If the slave paid his
kitaba and then died, his inheritance went to the son of the woman,
and the husband had nothing of his inheritance.

Malik said
that if a mukatab gave his own slave a kitaba, the situation was
looked at. If he wanted to do his slave a favour and it was obvious by
his making it easy for him, that was not permitted. If he was giving
him a kitaba from desire to find money to pay off his own kitaba, that
was permitted for him.

Malik said that if a man had
intercourse with a mukataba of his and she became pregnant by him, she
had an option. If she liked she could be an umm walad. If she wished,
she could confirm her kitaba. If she did not conceive, she still had
her kitaba.

Malik said, "The generally agreed on way of doing
things among us about a slave who is owned by two men is that one of
them does not give a kitaba for his share, whether or not his
companion gives him permission to do so, unless they both write the
kitaba together, because that alone would effect setting him free. If
the slave were to fulfil what he had agreed on to free half of
himself, and then the one who had given a kitaba for half of him was
not obliged to complete his setting free, that would be in opposition
to the words of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant
him peace. 'If someone frees his share in a slave and has enough money
to cover the full price of the slave, justly evaluated for him, he
must give his partners their shares, so the slave is completely free .
' "

Malik said, "If he is not aware of that until the mukatab
has met the terms or before he has met them the owner who has written
him the kitaba returns what he has taken from the mukatab to him, and
then he and his partner divide him according to their original shares
and the kitaba is invalid. He is the slave of both of them in his
original state."

Malik spoke about a mukatab who was owned by
two men and one of them granted him a delay in the payment of the
right which he was owed, and the other refused to defer it, and so the
one who refused to defer the payment exacted his part of the due.
Malik said that if the mukatab then died and left property which did
not complete his kitaba, "They divide it according to what they are
still owed by him. Each of them takes according to his share. If the
mukatab leaves more than his kitaba, each of them takes what remains
to them of the kitaba, and what remains after that is divided equally
between them. If the mukatab is unable to pay his kitaba fully and the
one who did not allow him to defer his payment has exacted more than
his associate did, the slave is still divided equally between them,
and he does not return to his associates the excess of what he has
exacted, because he only exacted his right with the permission of his
associate. If one of them remits what is owed to him and then his
associate exacts part of what he is owed by him and then the mukatab
is unable to pay, he belongs to both of them. And the one who has
exacted something does not return anything because he only demanded
what he was owed. That is like the debt of two men in one writing
against one man. One of them grants him time to pay and the other is
greedy and exacts his due. Then the debtor goes bankrupt. The one who
exacted his due does not have to return any of what he took."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب المكاتب

hadith_text_en:
Malik said, "The generally agreed on way of doing things among us
is that when slaves write their kitaba together in one kitaba, and
some are responsible for others, and they are not reduced anything by
the death of one of the responsible ones, and then one of them says,
'I can't do it,' and gives up, his companions can use him in whatever
work he can do and they help each other with that in their kitaba
until they are freed, if they are freed, or remain slaves if they
remain slaves."

Malik said, "The generally agreed on way of
doing things among us is that when a master gives a slave his kitaba,
it is not permitted for the master to let anyone assume the
responsibility for the kitaba of his slave if the slave dies or is
incapable. This is not part of the sunna of the muslims. That is
because when a man assumes responsibility to the master of a mukatab
for what the mukatab owes of his kitaba, and then the master of the
mukatab pursues that from the one who assumes the responsibility, he
takes his money falsely. It is not as if he is buying the mukatab, so
that what he gives is part of the price of something that is his, and
neither is the mukatab being freed so that the price established for
him buys his inviolability as a free man. If the mukatab is unable to
meet the payments he reverts to his master and is his slave. That is
because kitaba is not a fixed debt which can be assumed by the master
of the mukatab. It is something which, when it is paid by the mukatab,
sets him free. If the mukatab dies and has a debt, his master is not
one of the creditors for what remains unpaid of the kitaba. The
creditors have precedence over the master. If the mukatab cannot meet
the payments, and he owes debts to people, he reverts to being a slave
owned by his master and the debts to the people are the liability of
the mukatab. The creditors do not enter with the master into any share
of the price of his person."

Malik said, "When people are
written together in one kitaba and there is no kinship between them by
which they inherit from each other, and some of them are responsible
for others, then none of them are freed before the others until all
the kitaba has been paid. If one of them dies and leaves property and
it is more than all of what is against them, it pays all that is
against them . The excess of the property goes to the master, and none
of those who have been written in the kitaba with the deceased have
any of the excess. The master's claims are overshadowed by their
claims for the portions which remain against them of the kitaba which
can be fulfilled from the property of the deceased, because the
deceased had assumed their responsibility and they must use his
property to pay for their freedom. If the deceased mukatab has a free
child not born in kitaba and who was not written in the kitaba, it
does not inherit from him because the mukatab was not freed until he
died."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب المكاتب

hadith_text_ar: حَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، أَنَّهُ بَلَغَهُ أَنَّ أُمَّ سَلَمَةَ، زَوْجَ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم كَانَتْ تُقَاطِعُ مُكَاتَبِيهَا بِالذَّهَبِ وَالْوَرِقِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ الأَمْرُ الْمُجْتَمَعُ عَلَيْهِ عِنْدَنَا فِي الْمَكَاتَبِ يَكُونُ بَيْنَ الشَّرِيكَيْنِ فَإِنَّهُ لاَ يَجُوزُ لأَحَدِهِمَا أَنْ يُقَاطِعَهُ عَلَى حِصَّتِهِ إِلاَّ بِإِذْنِ شَرِيكِهِ وَذَلِكَ أَنَّ الْعَبْدَ وَمَالَهُ بَيْنَهُمَا فَلاَ يَجُوزُ لأَحَدِهِمَا أَنْ يَأْخُذَ شَيْئًا مِنْ مَالِهِ إِلاَّ بِإِذْنِ شَرِيكِهِ وَلَوْ قَاطَعَهُ أَحَدُهُمَا دُونَ صَاحِبِهِ ثُمَّ حَازَ ذَلِكَ ثُمَّ مَاتَ الْمُكَاتَبُ وَلَهُ مَالٌ أَوْ عَجَزَ لَمْ يَكُنْ لِمَنْ قَاطَعَهُ شَىْءٌ مِنْ مَالِهِ وَلَمْ يَكُنْ لَهُ أَنْ يَرُدَّ مَا قَاطَعَهُ عَلَيْهِ وَيَرْجِعَ حَقُّهُ فِي رَقَبَتِهِ وَلَكِنْ مَنْ قَاطَعَ مُكَاتَبًا بِإِذْنِ شَرِيكِهِ ثُمَّ عَجَزَ الْمُكَاتَبُ فَإِنْ أَحَبَّ الَّذِي قَاطَعَهُ أَنْ يَرُدَّ الَّذِي أَخَذَ مِنْهُ مِنَ الْقَطَاعَةِ وَيَكُونُ عَلَى نَصِيبِهِ مِنْ رَقَبَةِ الْمُكَاتَبِ كَانَ ذَلِكَ لَهُ وَإِنْ مَاتَ الْمُكَاتَبُ وَتَرَكَ مَالاً اسْتَوْفَى الَّذِي بَقِيَتْ لَهُ الْكِتَابَةُ حَقَّهُ الَّذِي بَقِيَ لَهُ عَلَى الْمُكَاتَبِ مِنْ مَالِهِ ثُمَّ كَانَ مَا بَقِيَ مِنْ مَالِ الْمُكَاتَبِ بَيْنَ الَّذِي قَاطَعَهُ وَبَيْنَ شَرِيكِهِ عَلَى قَدْرِ حِصَصِهِمَا فِي الْمُكَاتَبِ وَإِنْ كَانَ أَحَدُهُمَا قَاطَعَهُ وَتَمَاسَكَ صَاحِبُهُ بِالْكِتَابَةِ ثُمَّ عَجَزَ الْمُكَاتَبُ قِيلَ لِلَّذِي قَاطَعَهُ إِنْ شِئْتَ أَنْ تَرُدَّ عَلَى صَاحِبِكَ نِصْفَ الَّذِي أَخَذْتَ وَيَكُونُ الْعَبْدُ بَيْنَكُمَا شَطْرَيْنِ وَإِنْ أَبَيْتَ فَجَمِيعُ الْعَبْدِ لِلَّذِي تَمَسَّكَ بِالرِّقِّ خَالِصًا . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي الْمُكَاتَبِ يَكُونُ بَيْنَ الرَّجُلَيْنِ فَيُقَاطِعُهُ أَحَدُهُمَا بِإِذْنِ صَاحِبِهِ ثُمَّ يَقْتَضِي الَّذِي تَمَسَّكَ بِالرِّقِّ مِثْلَ مَا قَاطَعَ عَلَيْهِ صَاحِبُهُ أَوْ أَكْثَرَ مِنْ ذَلِكَ ثُمَّ يَعْجِزُ الْمُكَاتَبُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فَهُوَ بَيْنَهُمَا لأَنَّهُ إِنَّمَا اقْتَضَى الَّذِي لَهُ عَلَيْهِ وَإِنِ اقْتَضَى أَقَلَّ مِمَّا أَخَذَ الَّذِي قَاطَعَهُ ثُمَّ عَجَزَ الْمُكَاتَبُ فَأَحَبَّ الَّذِي قَاطَعَهُ أَنَّ يَرُدَّ عَلَى صَاحِبِهِ نِصْفَ مَا تَفَضَّلَهُ بِهِ وَيَكُونُ الْعَبْدُ بَيْنَهُمَا نِصْفَيْنِ فَذَلِكَ لَهُ وَإِنْ أَبَى فَجَمِيعُ الْعَبْدِ لِلَّذِي لَمْ يُقَاطِعْهُ وَإِنْ مَاتَ الْمُكَاتَبُ وَتَرَكَ مَالاً فَأَحَبَّ الَّذِي قَاطَعَهُ أَنْ يَرُدَّ عَلَى صَاحِبِهِ نِصْفَ مَا تَفَضَّلَهُ بِهِ وَيَكُونُ الْمِيرَاثُ بَيْنَهُمَا فَذَلِكَ لَهُ وَإِنْ كَانَ الَّذِي تَمَسَّكَ بِالْكِتَابَةِ قَدْ أَخَذَ مِثْلَ مَا قَاطَعَ عَلَيْهِ شَرِيكُهُ أَوْ أَفْضَلَ فَالْمِيرَاثُ بَيْنَهُمَا بِقَدْرِ مِلْكِهِمَا لأَنَّهُ إِنَّمَا أَخَذَ حَقَّهُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي الْمُكَاتَبِ يَكُونُ بَيْنَ الرَّجُلَيْنِ فَيُقَاطِعُ أَحَدُهُمَا عَلَى نِصْفِ حَقِّهُ بِإِذْنِ صَاحِبِهِ ثُمَّ يَقْبِضُ الَّذِي تَمَسَّكَ بِالرِّقِّ أَقَلَّ مِمَّا قَاطَعَ عَلَيْهِ صَاحِبُهُ ثُمَّ يَعْجِزُ الْمُكَاتَبُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ إِنْ أَحَبَّ الَّذِي قَاطَعَ الْعَبْدَ أَنْ يَرُدَّ عَلَى صَاحِبِهِ نِصْفَ مَا تَفَضَّلَهُ بِهِ كَانَ الْعَبْدُ بَيْنَهُمَا شَطْرَيْنِ وَإِنْ أَبَى أَنْ يَرُدَّ فَلِلَّذِي تَمَسَّكَ بِالرِّقِّ حِصَّةُ صَاحِبِهِ الَّذِي كَانَ قَاطَعَ عَلَيْهِ الْمُكَاتَبَ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَتَفْسِيرُ ذَلِكَ أَنَّ الْعَبْدَ يَكُونُ بَيْنَهُمَا شَطْرَيْنِ فَيُكَاتِبَانِهِ جَمِيعًا ثُمَّ يُقَاطِعُ أَحَدُهُمَا الْمُكَاتَبَ عَلَى نِصْفِ حَقِّهِ بِإِذْنِ صَاحِبِهِ وَذَلِكَ الرُّبُعُ مِنْ جَمِيعِ الْعَبْدِ ثُمَّ يَعْجِزُ الْمُكَاتَبُ فَيُقَالُ لِلَّذِي قَاطَعَهُ إِنْ شِئْتَ فَارْدُدْ عَلَى صَاحِبِكَ نِصْفَ مَا فَضَلْتَهُ بِهِ وَيَكُونُ الْعَبْدُ بَيْنَكُمَا شَطْرَيْنِ . وَإِنْ أَبَى كَانَ لِلَّذِي تَمَسَّكَ بِالْكِتَابَةِ رُبُعُ صَاحِبِهِ الَّذِي قَاطَعَ الْمُكَاتَبَ عَلَيْهِ خَالِصًا وَكَانَ لَهُ نِصْفُ الْعَبْدِ فَذَلِكَ ثَلاَثَةُ أَرْبَاعِ الْعَبْدِ وَكَانَ لِلَّذِي قَاطَعَ رُبُعُ الْعَبْدِ لأَنَّهُ أَبَى أَنْ يَرُدَّ ثَمَنَ رُبُعِهِ الَّذِي قَاطَعَ عَلَيْهِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي الْمُكَاتَبِ يُقَاطِعُهُ سَيِّدُهُ فَيَعْتِقُ وَيَكْتُبُ عَلَيْهِ مَا بَقِيَ مِنْ قَطَاعَتِهِ دَيْنًا عَلَيْهِ ثُمَّ يَمُوتُ الْمُكَاتَبُ وَعَلَيْهِ دَيْنٌ لِلنَّاسِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فَإِنَّ سَيِّدَهُ لاَ يُحَاصُّ غُرَمَاءَهُ بِالَّذِي عَلَيْهِ مِنْ قَطَاعَتِهِ وَلِغُرَمَائِهِ أَنْ يُبَدَّءُوا عَلَيْهِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ لَيْسَ لِلْمُكَاتَبِ أَنْ يُقَاطِعَ سَيِّدَهُ إِذَا كَانَ عَلَيْهِ دَيْنٌ لِلنَّاسِ فَيَعْتِقُ وَيَصِيرُ لاَ شَىْءَ لَهُ لأَنَّ أَهْلَ الدَّيْنِ أَحَقُّ بِمَالِهِ مِنْ سَيِّدِهِ فَلَيْسَ ذَلِكَ بِجَائِزٍ لَهُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ الأَمْرُ عِنْدَنَا فِي الرَّجُلِ يُكَاتِبُ عَبْدَهُ ثُمَّ يُقَاطِعُهُ بِالذَّهَبِ فَيَضَعُ عَنْهُ مِمَّا عَلَيْهِ مِنَ الْكِتَابَةِ عَلَى أَنْ يُعَجِّلَ لَهُ مَا قَاطَعَهُ عَلَيْهِ أَنَّهُ لَيْسَ بِذَلِكَ بَأْسٌ وَإِنَّمَا كَرِهَ ذَلِكَ مَنْ كَرِهَهُ لأَنَّهُ أَنْزَلَهُ بِمَنْزِلَةِ الدَّيْنِ يَكُونُ لِلرَّجُلِ عَلَى الرَّجُلِ إِلَى أَجَلٍ فَيَضَعُ عَنْهُ وَيَنْقُدُهُ وَلَيْسَ هَذَا مِثْلَ الدَّيْنِ إِنَّمَا كَانَتْ قَطَاعَةُ الْمُكَاتَبِ سَيِّدَهُ عَلَى أَنْ يُعْطِيَهُ مَالاً فِي أَنْ يَتَعَجَّلَ الْعِتْقَ فَيَجِبُ لَهُ الْمِيرَاثُ وَالشَّهَادَةُ وَالْحُدُودُ وَتَثْبُتُ لَهُ حُرْمَةُ الْعَتَاقَةِ وَلَمْ يَشْتَرِ دَرَاهِمَ بِدَرَاهِمَ وَلاَ ذَهَبًا بِذَهَبٍ وَإِنَّمَا مَثَلُ ذَلِكَ مَثَلُ رَجُلٍ قَالَ لِغُلاَمِهِ ائْتِنِي بِكَذَا وَكَذَا دِينَارًا وَأَنْتَ حُرٌّ فَوَضَعَ عَنْهُ مِنْ ذَلِكَ فَقَالَ إِنْ جِئْتَنِي بِأَقَلَّ مِنْ ذَلِكَ فَأَنْتَ حُرٌّ . فَلَيْسَ هَذَا دَيْنًا ثَابِتًا وَلَوْ كَانَ دَيْنًا ثَابِتًا لَحَاصَّ بِهِ السَّيِّدُ غُرَمَاءَ الْمُكَاتَبِ إِذَا مَاتَ أَوْ أَفْلَسَ فَدَخَلَ مَعَهُمْ فِي مَالِ مُكَاتَبِهِ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me that he heard that Umm Salama, the wife of
the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, made a
settlement with her mukatab for an agreed amount of gold and silver.

Malik said, "The generally agreed on way of doing things
among us in the case of a mukatab who is shared by two partners, is
that one of them cannot make a settlement with him for an agreed price
according to his portion without the consent of his partner. That is
because the slave and his property are owned by both of them, and so
one of them is not permitted to take any of the property except with
the consent of his partner. If one of them settled with the mukatab
and his partner did not, and he took the agreed price, and then the
mukatab died while he had property or was unable to pay, the one who
settled would not have anything of the mukatab's property and he could
not return that for which he made settlement so that his right to the
slave's person would return to him. However, when someone settles with
a mukatab with the permission of his partner and then the mukatab is
unable to pay, it is preferable that the one who broke with him return
what he has taken from the mukatab for the severance and he can have
back his portion of the mukatab. He can do that. If the mukatab dies
and leaves property, the partner who has kept hold of the kitaba is
paid in full the amount of the kitaba which remains to him against the
mukatab from the mukatab's property. Then what remains of property of
the mukatab is between the partner who broke with him and his partner,
according to their shares in the mukatab. If one of the partners
breaks off with him and the other keeps the kitaba, and the mukatab is
unable to pay, it is said to the partner who settled with him, 'If you
wish to give your partner half of what you took so the slave is
divided between you, then do so. If you refuse, then all of the slave
belongs to the one who held on to possession of the slave.' "

Malik spoke about a mukatab who was shared between two men and one of
them made a settlement with him with the permission of his partner.
Then the one who retained possession of the slave demanded the like of
that for which his partner had settled or more than that and the
mukatab could not pay it. He said, "The mukatab is shared between them
because the man has only demanded what is owed to him. If he demands
less than what the one who settled with him took and the mukatab can
not manage that, and the one who settled with him prefers to return to
his partner half of what he took so the slave is divided in halves
between them, he can do that. If he refuses then all of the slave
belongs to the one who did not settle with him. If the mukatab dies
and leaves property, and the one who settled with him prefers to
return to his companion half of what he has taken so the inheritance
is divided between them, he can do that. If the one who has kept the
kitaba takes the like of what the one who has settled with him took,
or more, the inheritance is between them according to their shares in
the slave because he is only taking his right."

Malik spoke
about a mukatab who was shared between two men and one of them made a
settlement with him for half of what was due to him with the
permission of his partner, and then the one who retained possession of
the slave took less than what his partner settled with him for and the
mukatab was unable to pay. He said, "If the one who made a settlement
with the slave prefers to return half of what he was awarded to his
partner, the slave is divided between them. If he refuses to return
it, the one who retained possession has the portion of the share for
which his partner made a settlement with the mukatab."

Malik
said, "The explanation of that is that the slave is divided in two
halves between them. They write him a kitaba together and then one of
them makes a settlement with the mukatab for half his due with the
permission of his partner. That is a fourth of all the slave. Then the
mukatab is unable to continue, so it is said to the one who settled
with him, 'If you wish, return to your partner half of what you were
awarded and the slave is divided equally between you.' If he refuses,
the one who held to the kitaba takes in full the fourth of his partner
for which he made settlement with the mukatab. He had half the slave,
so that now gives him three-fourths of the slave. The one who broke
off has a fourth of the slave because he refused to return the
equivalent of the fourth share for which he settled."

Malik
spoke about a mukatab whose master made a settlement with him and set
him free and what remained of his severance was written against him as
debt, then the mukatab died and people had debts against him. He said,
"His master does not share with the creditors because of what he is
owed from the severance. The creditors begin first."

Malik
said, "A mukatab cannot break with his master when he owes debts to
people. He would be set free and have nothing because the people who
hold the debts are more entitled to his property than his master. That
is not permitted for him."

Malik said, "According to the way
things are done among us, there is no harm if a man gives a kitaba to
his slave and settles with him for gold and reduces what he is owed of
the kitaba provided that only the gold is paid immediately. Whoever
disapproves of that does so because he puts it in the category of a
debt which a man has against another man for a set term. He gives him
a reduction and he pays it immediately. This is not like that debt.
The breaking of the mukatab with his master is dependent on his giving
money to speed up the setting free. Inheritance, testimony and the
hudud are obliged for him and the inviolability of being set free is
established for him. He is not buying dirhams for dirhams or gold for
gold. Rather it is like a man who having said to his slave, 'Bring me
such-and-such an amount of dinars and you are free', then reduces that
for him, saying, 'If you bring me less than that, you are free.' That
is not a fixed debt. Had it been a fixed debt, the master would have
shared with the creditors of the mukatab when he died or went
bankrupt. His claim on the property of the mukatab would join theirs."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب المكاتب

hadith_text_en:
Malik said, "The best of what I have heard about a mukatab who
injures a man so that blood-money must be paid, is that if the mukatab
can pay the blood-money for the injury with his kitaba,  he does so,
and it is against his kitaba. If he cannot do that, and he cannot pay
his kitaba because he must pay the blood-money of that injury before
the kitaba, and he cannot pay the blood-money of that injury, then his
master has an option. If he prefers to pay the blood-money of that
injury, he does so and keeps his slave and he becomes an owned slave.
If he wishes to surrender the slave to the injured, he surrenders him.
The master does not have to do more than surrender his slave."

Malik spoke about people who were in a general kitaba and one of
them caused an injury which entailed blood-money. He said, "If any of
them does an injury involving blood-money, he and those who are with
him in the kitaba are asked to pay all the blood-money of that injury.
If they pay, they are confirmed in their kitaba. If they do not pay,
and they are incapable then their master has an option. If he wishes,
he can pay all the blood-money of that injury and all the slaves
revert to him. If he wishes, he can surrender the one who did the
injury alone and all the others revert to being his slaves since they
could not pay the blood-money of the injury which their companion
caused."

Malik said, "The way of doing things about which
there is no dispute among us, is that when a mukatab is injured in
some way which entails blood-money or one of the mukatab's children
who is written with him in the kitaba is injured, their blood-money is
the blood-money of slaves of their value, and what is appointed to
them as their blood-money is paid to the master who has the kitaba and
he reckons that for the mukatab at the end of his kitaba and there is
a reduction for the blood-money that the master has taken for the
injury."

Malik said, "The explanation of that is say, for
example, he has written his kitaba for three thousand dirhams and the
blood-money taken by the master for his injury is one thousand
dirhams. When the mukatab has paid his master two thousand dirhams he
is free. If what remains of his kitaba is one thousand dirhams and the
blood-money for his injury is one thousand dirhams, he is free
straightaway. If the blood-money of the injury is more than what
remains of the kitaba, the master of the mukatab takes what remains of
his kitaba and frees him. What remains after the payment of the kitaba
belongs to the mukatab. One must not pay the mukatab any of the blood-
money of his injury in case he might consume it and use it up. If he
could not pay his kitaba completely he would then return to his master
one eyed, with a hand cut off, or crippled in body. His master only
wrote his kitaba against his property and earnings, and he did not
write his kitaba so that he would take the blood-money for what
happened to his child or to himself and use it up and consume it. One
pays the blood-money of injuries to a mukatab and his children who are
born in his kitaba, or their kitaba is written, to the master and he
takes it into account for him at the end of his kitaba."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب المكاتب

hadith_text_en:
Malik said, "The best of what is said about a man who buys the
mukatab of a man is that if the man wrote the slave's kitaba for
dinars or dirhams, he does not sell him unless it is for merchandise
which is paid immediately and not deferred, because if it is deferred,
it would be a debt for a debt. A debt for a debt is forbidden."

He said, "If the master gives a mukatab his kitaba for certain
merchandise of camels, cattle, sheep, or slaves, it is more correct
that the buyer buy him for gold, silver, or different goods than the
ones his master wrote the kitaba for, and that must be paid
immediately, not deferred."

Malik said, "The best of what I
have heard about a mukatab when he is sold is that he is more entitled
to buy his kitaba than the one who buys him if he can pay his master
the price for which he was sold in cash. That is because his buying
himself is his freedom, and freedom has priority over what bequests
accompany it. If one of those who have written the kitaba for the
mukatab sells his portion of him, so that a half, a third, a fourth,
or whatever share of the mukatab is sold, the mukatab does not have
the right of pre-emption in what is sold of him. That is because it is
like the severance of a partner, and a partner can only make a
settlement for a partner of the one who is mukatab with the permission
of his partners because what is sold of him does not give him complete
rights as a free man and his property is barred from him, and by
buying part of himself, it is feared that he will become incapable of
completing payment because of what he had to spend. That is not like
the mukatab buying himself completely unless whoever has some of the
kitaba remaining due to him gives him permission. If they give him
permission, he is more entitled to what is sold of him."

Malik said, "Selling one of the instalments of a mukatab is not halal.
That is because it Is an uncertain transaction. If the mukatab cannot
pay it, what he owes is nullified. If he dies or goes bankrupt and he
owes debts to people, then the person who bought his instalment does
not take any of his portion with the creditors. The person who buys
one of the instalments of the mukatab is in the position of the master
of the mukatab. The master of the mukatab does not have a share with
the creditors of the mukatab for what he is owed of the kitaba of his
slave. It is also like that with the kharaj, (a set amount deducted
daily from the slave against his earnings), which accumulates for a
master from the earnings of his slave. The creditors of his slave do
not allow him a share for what has accumulated for him from those
deductions."

Malik said, "There is no harm in a mukatab
paying off his kitaba with coin or merchandise other than the
merchandise for which he wrote his kitaba if it is identical with it,
on time (for the instalment) or delayed. "

Malik said that if
a mukatab died and left an umm walad and small children by her or by
someone else and they could not work and it was feared that they would
be unable to fulfil their kitaba, the umm walad of the father was sold
if her price would pay all the kitaba for them, whether or not she was
their mother. They were paid for and set free because their father did
not forbid her sale if he feared that he would be unable to complete
his kitaba. If her price would not pay for them and neither she nor
they could work, they all reverted to being slaves of the master.

Malik said, "What is done among us in the case of a person who
buys the kitaba of a mukatab, and then the mukatab dies before he has
paid his kitaba, is that the person who bought the kitaba inherits
from him. If, rather than dying, the mukatab cannot pay, the buyer has
his person. If the mukatab pays his kitaba to the person who bought
him and he is freed, his wala' goes to the person who wrote the kitaba
and the person who bought his kitaba does not have any of it."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب المكاتب

hadith_text_ar: حَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، أَنَّهُ بَلَغَهُ أَنَّ عُرْوَةَ بْنَ الزُّبَيْرِ، وَسُلَيْمَانَ بْنَ يَسَارٍ، سُئِلاَ عَنْ رَجُلٍ، كَاتَبَ عَلَى نَفْسِهِ وَعَلَى بَنِيهِ ثُمَّ مَاتَ هَلْ يَسْعَى بَنُو الْمُكَاتَبِ فِي كِتَابَةِ أَبِيهِمْ أَمْ هُمْ عَبِيدٌ فَقَالاَ بَلْ يَسْعَوْنَ فِي كِتَابَةِ أَبِيهِمْ وَلاَ يُوْضَعُ عَنْهُمْ لِمَوْتِ أَبِيهِمْ شَىْءٌ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَإِنْ كَانُوا صِغَارًا لاَ يُطِيقُونَ السَّعْىَ لَمْ يُنْتَظَرْ بِهِمْ أَنْ يَكْبَرُوا وَكَانُوا رَقِيقًا لِسَيِّدِ أَبِيهِمْ إِلاَّ أَنْ يَكُونَ الْمُكَاتَبُ تَرَكَ مَا يُؤَدَّى بِهِ عَنْهُمْ نُجُومُهُمْ إِلَى أَنْ يَتَكَلَّفُوا السَّعْىَ فَإِنْ كَانَ فِيمَا تَرَكَ مَا يُؤَدَّى عَنْهُمْ أُدِّيَ ذَلِكَ عَنْهُمْ وَتُرِكُوا عَلَى حَالِهِمْ حَتَّى يَبْلُغُوا السَّعْىَ فَإِنْ أَدَّوْا عَتَقُوا وَإِنْ عَجَزُوا رَقُّوا . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي الْمُكَاتَبِ يَمُوتُ وَيَتْرُكُ مَالاً لَيْسَ فِيهِ وَفَاءُ الْكِتَابَةِ وَيَتْرُكُ وَلَدًا مَعَهُ فِي كِتَابَتِهِ وَأُمَّ وَلَدٍ فَأَرَادَتْ أُمُّ وَلَدِهِ أَنْ تَسْعَى عَلَيْهِمْ إِنَّهُ يُدْفَعُ إِلَيْهَا الْمَالُ إِذَا كَانَتْ مَأْمُونَةً عَلَى ذَلِكَ قَوِيَّةً عَلَى السَّعْىِ وَإِنْ لَمْ تَكُنْ قَوِيَّةً عَلَى السَّعْىِ وَلاَ مَأْمُونَةً عَلَى الْمَالِ لَمْ تُعْطَ شَيْئًا مِنْ ذَلِكَ وَرَجَعَتْ هِيَ وَوَلَدُ الْمُكَاتَبِ رَقِيقًا لِسَيِّدِ الْمُكَاتَبِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ إِذَا كَاتَبَ الْقَوْمُ جَمِيعًا كِتَابَةً وَاحِدَةً وَلاَ رَحِمَ بَيْنَهُمْ فَعَجَزَ بَعْضُهُمْ وَسَعَى بَعْضُهُمْ حَتَّى عَتَقُوا جَمِيعًا فَإِنَّ الَّذِينَ سَعَوْا يَرْجِعُونَ عَلَى الَّذِينَ عَجَزُوا بِحِصَّةِ مَا أَدَّوْا عَنْهُمْ لأَنَّ بَعْضَهُمْ حُمَلاَءُ عَنْ بَعْضٍ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me that he heard that Urwa ibn az-Zubayr and
Sulayman ibn Yasar when asked whether the sons of a man, who had a
kitaba written for himself and his children and then died, worked for
the kitaba of their father or were slaves, said, "They work for the
kitaba of their father and they have no reduction at all for the death
of their father."

Malik said, "If they are small and unable
to work, one does not wait for them to grow up and they are slaves of
their father's master unless the mukatab has left what will pay their
instalments for them until they can work. If there is enough to pay
for them in what he has left, that is paid for on their behalf and
they are left in their condition until they can work, and then if they
pay, they are free. If they cannot do it, they are slaves."

Malik spoke about a mukatab who died and left property which was not
enough to pay his kitaba, and he also left a child with him in his
kitaba and an umm walad, and the umm walad wanted to work for them. He
said, "The money is paid to her if she is trustworthy with it and
strong enough to work. If she is not strong enough to work and not
trustworthy with property, she is not given any of it and she and the
children of the mukatab revert to being slaves of the master of the
mukatab."

Malik said, "If people are written together in one
kitaba and there is no kinship between them, and some of them are
incapable and others work until they are all set free, those who
worked can claim from those who were unable, the portion of what they
paid for them because some of them assumed the responsibility for
others."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب المكاتب

hadith_text_ar: حَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ رَبِيعَةَ بْنَ أَبِي عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، وَغَيْرَهُ، يَذْكُرُونَ أَنَّ مَكَاتَبًا، كَانَ لِلْفُرَافِصَةِ بْنِ عُمَيْرٍ الْحَنَفِيِّ وَأَنَّهُ عَرَضَ عَلَيْهِ أَنْ يَدْفَعَ إِلَيْهِ جَمِيعَ مَا عَلَيْهِ مِنْ كِتَابَتِهِ فَأَبَى الْفُرَافِصَةُ فَأَتَى الْمُكَاتَبُ مَرْوَانَ بْنَ الْحَكَمِ وَهُوَ أَمِيرُ الْمَدِينَةِ فَذَكَرَ ذَلِكَ لَهُ فَدَعَا مَرْوَانُ الْفُرَافِصَةَ فَقَالَ لَهُ ذَلِكَ فَأَبَى فَأَمَرَ مَرْوَانُ بِذَلِكَ الْمَالِ أَنْ يُقْبَضَ مِنَ الْمُكَاتَبِ فَيُوضَعَ فِي بَيْتِ الْمَالِ وَقَالَ لِلْمُكَاتَبِ اذْهَبْ فَقَدْ عَتَقْتَ . فَلَمَّا رَأَى ذَلِكَ الْفُرَافِصَةُ قَبَضَ الْمَالَ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فَالأَمْرُ عِنْدَنَا أَنَّ الْمُكَاتَبَ إِذَا أَدَّى جَمِيعَ مَا عَلَيْهِ مِنْ نُجُومِهِ قَبْلَ مَحِلِّهَا جَازَ ذَلِكَ لَهُ وَلَمْ يَكُنْ لِسَيِّدِهِ أَنْ يَأْبَى ذَلِكَ عَلَيْهِ وَذَلِكَ أَنَّهُ يَضَعُ عَنِ الْمُكَاتَبِ بِذَلِكَ كُلَّ شَرْطٍ أَوْ خِدْمَةٍ أَوْ سَفَرٍ لأَنَّهُ لاَ تَتِمُّ عَتَاقَةُ رَجُلٍ وَعَلَيْهِ بَقِيَّةٌ مِنْ رِقٍّ وَلاَ تَتِمُّ حُرْمَتُهُ وَلاَ تَجُوزُ شَهَادَتُهُ وَلاَ يَجِبُ مِيرَاثُهُ وَلاَ أَشْبَاهُ هَذَا مِنْ أَمْرِهِ وَلاَ يَنْبَغِي لِسَيِّدِهِ أَنْ يَشْتَرِطَ عَلَيْهِ خِدْمَةً بَعْدَ عَتَاقَتِهِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي مُكَاتَبٍ مَرِضَ مَرَضًا شَدِيدًا فَأَرَادَ أَنْ يَدْفَعَ نُجُومَهُ كُلَّهَا إِلَى سَيِّدِهِ لأَنْ يَرِثَهُ وَرَثَةٌ لَهُ أَحْرَارٌ وَلَيْسَ مَعَهُ فِي كِتَابَتِهِ وَلَدٌ لَهُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ ذَلِكَ جَائِزٌ لَهُ لأَنَّهُ تَتِمُّ بِذَلِكَ حُرْمَتُهُ وَتَجُوزُ شَهَادَتُهُ وَيَجُوزُ اعْتِرَافُهُ بِمَا عَلَيْهِ مِنْ دُيُونِ النَّاسِ وَتَجُوزُ وَصِيَّتُهُ وَلَيْسَ لِسَيِّدِهِ أَنْ يَأْبَى ذَلِكَ عَلَيْهِ بِأَنْ يَقُولَ فَرَّ مِنِّي بِمَالِهِ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me that he heard Rabia ibn Abi Abd ar-Rahman and
others mention that al-Furafisa ibn Umar al-Hanafi had a mukatab who
offered to pay him all of his kitaba that he owed. Al-Furafisa refused
to accept it and the mukatab went to Marwan ibn al-Hakam who was the
amir of Madina and brought up the matter. Marwan summoned al-Furafisa
and told him to accept. He refused. Marwan then ordered that the
payment be taken from the mukatab and placed in the treasury. He said
to the mukatab "Go, you are free." When al-Furafisa saw that, he took
the money.

Malik said, "What is done among us when a mukatab
pays all the instalments he owes before their term, is that it is
permitted to him. The master cannot refuse him that. That is because
payment removes every condition from the mukatab as well as service
and travel. The setting free of a man is not complete while he has any
remaining slavery, and neither would his inviolability as a free man
be complete and his testimony permitted and inheritance obliged and
such things in that situation. His master must not make any
stipulation of service on him after he has been set free."

Malik said that it was permitted for a mukatab who became extremely
ill and wanted to pay his master all his instalments because his heirs
who were free would then inherit from him and he had no children with
him in his kitaba, to do so, because by that he completed his
inviolability as a free man, his testimony was permitted, and his
admission of what he owed of debts to people was permitted. His
bequest was permitted as well. His master could not refuse him that by
saying, "He is escaping from me with his property."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب المكاتب

hadith_text_ar: حَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، أَنَّهُ بَلَغَهُ أَنَّ سَعِيدَ بْنَ الْمُسَيَّبِ، سُئِلَ عَنْ مُكَاتَبٍ، كَانَ بَيْنَ رَجُلَيْنِ فَأَعْتَقَ أَحَدُهُمَا نَصِيبَهُ فَمَاتَ الْمُكَاتَبُ وَتَرَكَ مَالاً كَثِيرًا فَقَالَ يُؤَدَّى إِلَى الَّذِي تَمَاسَكَ بِكِتَابَتِهِ الَّذِي بَقِيَ لَهُ ثُمَّ يَقْتَسِمَانِ مَا بَقِيَ بِالسَّوِيَّةِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ إِذَا كَاتَبَ الْمُكَاتَبُ فَعَتَقَ فَإِنَّمَا يَرِثُهُ أَوْلَى النَّاسِ بِمَنْ كَاتَبَهُ مِنَ الرِّجَالِ يَوْمَ تُوُفِّيَ الْمُكَاتَبُ مِنْ وَلَدٍ أَوْ عَصَبَةٍ . قَالَ وَهَذَا أَيْضًا فِي كُلِّ مَنْ أُعْتِقَ فَإِنَّمَا مِيرَاثُهُ لأَقْرَبِ النَّاسِ مِمَّنْ أَعْتَقَهُ مِنْ وَلَدٍ أَوْ عَصَبَةٍ مِنَ الرِّجَالِ يَوْمَ يَمُوتُ الْمُعْتَقُ بَعْدَ أَنْ يَعْتِقَ وَيَصِيرَ مَوْرُوثًا بِالْوَلاَءِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ الإِخْوَةُ فِي الْكِتَابَةِ بِمَنْزِلَةِ الْوَلَدِ إِذَا كُوتِبُوا جَمِيعًا كِتَابَةً وَاحِدَةً إِذَا لَمْ يَكُنْ لأَحَدٍ مِنْهُمْ وَلَدٌ كَاتَبَ عَلَيْهِمْ أَوْ وُلِدُوا فِي كِتَابَتِهِ أَوْ كَاتَبَ عَلَيْهِمْ ثُمَّ هَلَكَ أَحَدُهُمْ وَتَرَكَ مَالاً أُدِّيَ عَنْهُمْ جَمِيعُ مَا عَلَيْهِمْ مِنْ كِتَابَتِهِمْ وَعَتَقُوا وَكَانَ فَضْلُ الْمَالِ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ لِوَلَدِهِ دُونَ إِخْوَتِهِ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me that he had heard that Said ibn al-Musayyab
was asked about a mukatab who was shared between two men. One of them
freed his portion and then the mukatab died and left a lot of money.
Said replied, "The one who kept his kitaba is paid what remains due to
him, and then they divide what is left between them both equally."

Malik said, "When a mukatab who fulfils his kitaba and
becomes free dies, he is inherited from by the people who wrote his
kitaba and their children and paternal relations - whoever is most
deserving."

He said, "This is also for whoever is set free
when he dies after being set free - his inheritance is for the nearest
people to him of children or paternal relations who inherit by means
of the wala'."

Malik said, "Brothers, written together in the
same kitaba, are in the same position as children to each other when
none of them have children written in the kitaba or born in the
kitaba. When one of them dies and leaves property, he pays for them
all that is against them of their kitaba and sets them free. The money
left over after that goes to his children rather than his brothers."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب المكاتب

hadith_text_en:
Malik spoke to me about a man who wrote a kitaba for his slave
for gold or silver and stipulated against him in his kitaba a journey,
service, sacrifice or similar, which he specified by its name, and
then the mukatab was able to pay all his instalments before the end of
the term.

He said, "If he pays all his instalments and he is
set free and his inviolability as a free man is complete, but he still
has this condition to fulfil, the condition is examined, and whatever
involves his person in it, like service or a journey etc., is removed
from him and his master has nothing in it. Whatever there is of
sacrifice, clothing, or anything that he must pay, that is in the
position of dinars and dirhams, and is valued and he pays it along
with his instalments, and he is not free until he has paid that along
with his instalments."

Malik said, "The generally agreed-on
way of doing things among us about which there is no dispute, is that
a mukatab is in the same position as a slave whom his master will free
after a service of ten years. If the master who will free him dies
before ten years, what remains of his service goes to his heirs and
his wala' goes to the one who contracted to free him and to his male
children or paternal relations."

Malik spoke about a man who
stipulated against his mukatab that he could not travel, marry, or
leave his land without his permission, and that if he did so without
his permission it was in his power to cancel the kitaba. He said, "If
the mukatab does any of these things it is not in the man's power to
cancel the kitaba. Let the master put that before the Sultan. The
mukatab, however, should not marry, travel, or leave the land of his
master without his permission, whether or not he stipulates that. That
is because the man may write a kitaba for his slave for 100 dinars and
the slave may have 1000 dinars or more than that. He goes off and
marries a woman and pays her bride-price which sweeps away his money
and then he cannot pay. He reverts to his master as a slave who has no
property. Or else he may travel and his instalments fall due while he
is away. He cannot do that and kitaba is not to be based on that. That
is in the hand of his master. If he wishes, he gives him permission in
that. If he wishes, he refuses it."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب المكاتب

hadith_text_en:
Malik said, "When a mukatab sets his own slaves free, it is only
permitted for a mukatab to set his own slaves free with the consent of
his master. If his master gives his consent and the mukatab sets his
slave free, his wala' goes to the mukatab . If the mukatab then dies
before he has been set free himself, the wala' of the freed slave goes
to the master of the mukatab. If the freed one dies before the mukatab
has been set free, the master of the mukatab inherits from him."

Malik said, "It is like that also when a mukatab gives his slave a
kitaba and his mukatab is set free before he is himself. The wala'
goes to the master of the mukatab as long as he is not free. If this
one who wrote the kitaba is set free, then the wala' of his mukatab
who was freed before him reverts to him. If the first mukatab dies
before he pays, or he cannot pay his kitaba and he has free children,
they do not inherit the wala' of their father's mukatab because the
wala' has not been established for their father and he does not have
the wala' until he is free."

Malik spoke about a mukatab who
was shared between two men and one of them forewent what the mukatab
owed him and the other insisted on his due. Then the mukatab died and
left property.

Malik said, "The one who did not abandon any
of what he was owed, is paid in full. Then the property is divided
between them both just as if a slave had died because what the first
one did was not setting him free. He only abandoned a debt that was
owed to him ."

Malik said, "One clarification of that is that
when a man dies and leaves a mukatab and he also leaves male and
female children and one of the children frees his portion of the
mukatab, that does not establish any of the wala' for him. Had it been
a true setting free, the wala' would have been established for
whichever men and women freed him."

Malik said, "Another
clarification of that is that if one of them freed his portion and
then the mukatab could not pay, the value of what was left of the
mukatab would be altered because of the one who freed his portion. Had
it been a true setting-free, his estimated value would have been taken
from the property of the one who set free until he had been set
completely free as the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and
grant him peace, said, 'Whoever frees his share in a slave and has
money to cover the full price of the slave, justly evaluated for him,
gives his partners their shares. If not, he frees of him what he
frees.' " (See Book 37 hadith 1).

He said, "Another
clarification of that is that part of the sunna of the muslims in
which there is no dispute, is that whoever frees his share of a
mukatab, the mukatab is not set fully free using his property. Had he
been truly set free, the wala' would have been his alone rather than
his partners. Part of what will clarify that also is that part of the
sunna of the muslims is that the wala' belongs to whoever writes the
contract of kitaba. The women who inherit from the master of the
mukatab do not have any of the wala' of the mukatab. If they free any
of their share, the wala' belongs to the male children of the master
of the mukatab or his male paternal relations."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب المكاتب

hadith_text_en:
Malik said, "If people are together in one kitaba, their master
cannot free one of them without consulting his companions who are with
him in the kitaba and obtaining their consent. If they are young,
however, their consultation means nothing and it is not permitted to
them. That is because a man might work for all the people and he might
pay their kitaba for them to complete their freedom. Their master
approaches the one who will pay for them and their rescue from slavery
is through him. He frees him and so makes those who remain unable to
pay. He does it intending benefit and increase for himself. It is not
permitted for him to do that to those of them who remain. The
Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said,
'There must be no harm nor return of harm.' This is the most severe
harm."

Malik said about slaves who wrote a kitaba together
that it was permitted for their master to free the old and exhausted
of them and the young when neither of them could pay anything, and
there was no help nor strength to be had from any of them in their
kitaba.


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب المكاتب

hadith_text_en:
Malik said about a man who had his slave in a kitaba and then the
mukatab died and left his umm walad, and there remained for him some
of his kitaba to pay and he left what would pay it, "The umm walad is
a slave since the mukatab was not freed until he died and he did not
leave children that were set free by his paying what remained, so that
the umm walad of their father was freed by their being set free."

Malik said about a mukatab who set free a slave of his or gave
sadaqa with some of his property and his master did not know that
until he had set the mukatab free, "That has been performed by him and
the master does not rescind it. If the master of the mukatab knows
before he sets the mukatab free, he can reject that and not permit it.
If the mukatab is then freed and it becomes in his power to do so, he
does not have to free the slave, nor give the sadaqa unless he does it
voluntarily from himself."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب المكاتب

hadith_text_en:
Malik said, The best of what I have heard about a mukatab whose
master frees him at death, is that the mukatab is valued according to
what he would fetch if he were sold. If that value is less than what
remains against him of his kitaba, his freedom is taken from the third
that the deceased can bequeath. One does not look at the number of
dirhams which remain against him in his kitaba. That is because had he
been killed, his killer would not be in debt for other than his value
on the day he killed him. Had he been injured, the one who injured him
would not be liable for other than the blood-money of the injury on
the day of his injury. One does not look at how much he has paid of
dinars and dirhams of the contract he has written because he is a
slave as long as any of his kitaba remains. If what remains in his
kitaba is less than his value, only whatever of his kitaba remains
owing from him is taken into account in the third of the property of
the deceased. That is because the deceased left him what remains of
his kitaba and so it becomes a bequest which the deceased made."

Malik said, "The illustration of that is that if the price of the
mukatab is one thousand dirhams, and only one hundred dirhams remain
of his kitaba, his master leaves him the one hundred dirhams which
complete it for him. It is taken into account in the third of his
master and by it he becomes free."

Malik said that if a man
wrote his slave a kitaba at his death, the value of the slave was
estimated. If there was enough to cover the price of the slave in one
third of his property, that was permitted for him.

Malik
said, "The illustration of that is that the price of the slave is one
thousand dinars. His master writes him a kitaba for two hundred dinars
at his death. The third of the property of his master is one thousand
dinars, so that is permitted for him. It is only a bequest which he
makes from one third of his property. If the master has left bequests
to people, and there is no surplus in the third after the value of the
mukatab, one begins with the mukatab because the kitaba is setting
free, and setting free has priority over bequests. When those bequests
are paid from the kitaba of the mukatab, they follow it. The heirs of
the testator have a choice. If they want to give the people with
bequests all their bequests and the kitaba of the mukatab is theirs,
they have that. If they refuse and hand over the mukatab and what he
owes to the people with bequests they can do that, because the third
commences with the mukatab and because all the bequests which he makes
are as one."

If the heirs then say, "What our fellow
bequeathed was more than one third of his property and he has taken
what was not his," Malik said, "His heirs choose. It is said to them,
'Your companion has made the bequests you know about and if you would
like to give them to those who are to receive them according to the
deceased's bequests, then do so. If not, hand over to the people with
bequests one third of the total property of the deceased.' "

Malik continued, "If the heirs surrender the mukatab to the people
with bequests, the people with bequests have what he owes of his
kitaba. If the mukatab pays what he owes of his kitaba, they take that
in their bequests according to their shares. If the mukatab cannot
pay, he is a slave of the people with bequests and does not return to
the heirs because they gave him up when they made their choice, and
because when he was surrendered to the people with bequests, they were
liable. If he died, they would not have anything against the heirs. If
the mukatab dies before he pays his kitaba and he leaves property
which is more than what he owes, his property goes to the people with
bequests. If the mukatab pays what he owes, he is free and his wala'
returns to the paternal relations of the one who wrote the kitaba for
him."

Malik spoke about a mukatab who owed his master ten
thousand dirhams in his kitaba, and when he died he remitted one
thousand dirhams from it. He said, "The mukatab is valued and his
value is taken into consideration. If his value is one thousand
dirhams and the reduction is a tenth of the kitaba, that portion of
the slave's price is one hundred dirhams. It is a tenth of the price.
A tenth of the kitaba is therefore reduced for him. That is converted
to a tenth of the price in cash. That is as if he had had all of what
he owed reduced for him. Had he done that, only the value of the slave
- one thousand dirhams - would have been taken into account in the
third of the property of the deceased. If that which he had remitted
is half of the kitaba, half the price is taken into account in the
third of the property of the deceased. If it is more or less than
that, it is according to this reckoning."

Malik said, "When a
man reduces the kitaba of his mukatab by one thousand dirhams at his
death from a kitaba of ten thousand dirhams, and he does not stipulate
whether it is from the beginning or the end of his kitaba, each
instalment is reduced for him by one tenth."

Malik said, "If
a man remits one thousand dirhams from his mukatab at his death from
the beginning or end of his kitaba, and the original basis of the
kitaba is three thousand dirhams, the mukatab's cash value is
estimated. Then that value is divided. That thousand which is from the
beginning of the kitaba is converted into its portion of the price
according to its proximity to the term and its precedence and then the
thousand which follows the first thousand is according to its
precedence also until it comes to its end, and every thousand is paid
according to its place in advancing and deferring the term because
what is deferred of that is less in respect of its price. Then it is
placed in the third of the deceased according to whatever of the price
befalls that thousand according to the difference in preference of
that, whether it is more or less, then it is according to this
reckoning."

Malik spoke about a man who willed a man a fourth
of a mukatab or freed a fourth, and then the man died and the mukatab
died and left a lot of property, more than he owed. He said, "The
heirs of the first master and the one who was willed a fourth of the
mukatab are given what they are still owed by the mukatab. Then they
divide what is left over, and the one willed a fourth has a third of
what is left after the kitaba is paid. The heirs of his master gets
two-thirds. That is because the mukatab is a slave as long as any of
his kitaba remains to be paid. He is inherited from by the possession
of his person."

Malik said about a mukatab whose master freed
him at death, "If the third of the deceased will not cover him, he is
freed from it according to what the third will cover and his kitaba is
decreased according to that. If the mukatab owed five thousand dirhams
and his value is two thousand dirhams cash, and the third of the
deceased is one thousand dirhams, half of him is freed and half of the
kitaba has been reduced for him." Malik said about a man who said in
his will, "My slave so-and-so is free and write a kitaba for so-and-
so", that the setting free had priority over the kitaba.