book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب القراض

hadith_chapter_name_en: Qirad

hadith_text_ar: حَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ زَيْدِ بْنِ أَسْلَمَ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، أَنَّهُ قَالَ خَرَجَ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ وَعُبَيْدُ اللَّهِ ابْنَا عُمَرَ بْنِ الْخَطَّابِ فِي جَيْشٍ إِلَى الْعِرَاقِ فَلَمَّا قَفَلاَ مَرَّا عَلَى أَبِي مُوسَى الأَشْعَرِيِّ وَهُوَ أَمِيرُ الْبَصْرَةِ فَرَحَّبَ بِهِمَا وَسَهَّلَ ثُمَّ قَالَ لَوْ أَقْدِرُ لَكُمَا عَلَى أَمْرٍ أَنْفَعُكُمَا بِهِ لَفَعَلْتُ . ثُمَّ قَالَ بَلَى هَا هُنَا مَالٌ مِنْ مَالِ اللَّهِ أُرِيدُ أَنْ أَبْعَثَ بِهِ إِلَى أَمِيرِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ فَأُسْلِفُكُمَاهُ فَتَبْتَاعَانِ بِهِ مَتَاعًا مِنْ مَتَاعِ الْعِرَاقِ ثُمَّ تَبِيعَانِهِ بِالْمَدِينَةِ فَتُؤَدِّيَانِ رَأْسَ الْمَالِ إِلَى أَمِيرِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ وَيَكُونُ الرِّبْحُ لَكُمَا فَقَالاَ وَدِدْنَا ذَلِكَ . فَفَعَلَ وَكَتَبَ إِلَى عُمَرَ بْنِ الْخَطَّابِ أَنْ يَأْخُذَ مِنْهُمَا الْمَالَ فَلَمَّا قَدِمَا بَاعَا فَأُرْبِحَا فَلَمَّا دَفَعَا ذَلِكَ إِلَى عُمَرَ قَالَ أَكُلُّ الْجَيْشِ أَسْلَفَهُ مِثْلَ مَا أَسْلَفَكُمَا قَالاَ لاَ . فَقَالَ عُمَرُ بْنُ الْخَطَّابِ ابْنَا أَمِيرِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ فَأَسْلَفَكُمَا أَدِّيَا الْمَالَ وَرِبْحَهُ . فَأَمَّا عَبْدُ اللَّهِ فَسَكَتَ وَأَمَّا عُبَيْدُ اللَّهِ فَقَالَ مَا يَنْبَغِي لَكَ يَا أَمِيرَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ هَذَا لَوْ نَقَصَ هَذَا الْمَالُ أَوْ هَلَكَ لَضَمِنَّاهُ . فَقَالَ عُمَرُ أَدِّيَاهُ . فَسَكَتَ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ وَرَاجَعَهُ عُبَيْدُ اللَّهِ . فَقَالَ رَجُلٌ مِنْ جُلَسَاءِ عُمَرَ يَا أَمِيرَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ لَوْ جَعَلْتَهُ قِرَاضًا . فَقَالَ عُمَرُ قَدْ جَعَلْتُهُ قِرَاضًا . فَأَخَذَ عُمَرُ رَأْسَ الْمَالِ وَنِصْفَ رِبْحِهِ وَأَخَذَ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ وَعُبَيْدُ اللَّهِ ابْنَا عُمَرَ بْنِ الْخَطَّابِ نِصْفَ رِبْحِ الْمَالِ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me from Zayd ibn Aslam that his father said,
"Abdullah and Ubaydullah, the sons of Umar ibn al-Khattab went out
with the army to Iraq. On the way home, they passed by Abu Musa al-
Ashari who was the amir of Basra. He greeted them and made them
welcome, and told them that if there was anything he could do to help
them, he would do it. Then he said, 'There is some of the property of
Allah which I want to send to the amir al-muminin, so I will lend it
to you, and you can buy wares from Iraq and sell them in Madina. Then
give the principal to the amir al-muminin, and you keep the profit.'
They said that they would like to do it, and so he gave them the money
and wrote to Umar ibn al-Khattab to take the money from them. When
they came to sell they made a profit, and when they paid the principal
to Umar he asked, 'Did he lend everyone in the army the like of what
he lent you?' They said, 'No.' Umar ibn al-Khattab said, 'He made you
the loan, because you are the sons of the amir al-muminin, so pay the
principal and the profit.' Abdullah was silent. Ubaydullah said, 'You
do not need to do this, amir al-muminin. Had the principal decreased
or been destroyed, we would have guaranteed it.' Umar said, 'Pay it.'
Abdullah was silent, and Ubaydullah repeated it. A man who was sitting
with Umar said, 'Amir al-muminin, better that you make it a qirad.
'Umar said, 'I have made it qirad.' Umar then took the principal and
half of the profit, and Abdullah and Ubaydullah, the sons of Umar ibn
al-Khattab took half of the profit."


book_title_en: Muwatta Malik

book_author_en: Imam Malik ibn Anas

book_title_ar: موطأ مالك

book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنِ الْعَلاَءِ بْنِ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ جَدِّهِ، أَنَّ عُثْمَانَ بْنَ عَفَّانَ، أَعْطَاهُ مَالاً قِرَاضًا يَعْمَلُ فِيهِ عَلَى أَنَّ الرِّبْحَ بَيْنَهُمَا .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me from al-Ala ibn Abd ar-Rahman from his father
from his father that Uthman ibn Affan gave him some money as qirad to
use provided the profit was shared between them.


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_text_en:
Malik said, "The recognised and permitted form of qirad is that a
man take capital from an associate to use. He does not guarantee it
and in travelling pays out of the capital for food and clothes and
what he makes good use of, according to the amount of capital. That
is, when he travels to do the work and the capital can support it. If
he remains with his people, he does not have expenses or clothing from
the capital."

Malik said, "There is no harm in the two
parties in a qirad helping each other by way of a favour when it is
acceptable to them both."

Malik said, "There is no harm in
the investor of the capital buying some of the goods from the agent in
the qirad if that is acceptable and without conditions."

Malik spoke about an investor making a qirad loan to a man and his
slave, to be used by both. He said, "That is permitted, and there is
no harm in it because the profit is property for his slave, and the
profit is not for the master until he takes it from him. It is like
the rest of his earnings."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_text_en:
Malik said, "When a man owes money to another man and he asks him
to let it stay with him as a quirad, that is disapproved of until the
creditor receives his property. Then he can make it a qirad loan or
keep it. That is because the debtor may be in a tight situation, and
want to delay it to increase it for him."

Malik spoke about
an investor who made a qirad loan to a man, and some of the principal
was lost before he used it, and then he used it and made a profit. The
agent wanted to make the principal the remainder of the money after
what was lost from it. Malik said, "His statement is not accepted, and
the principal is made up to its original amount from his profit. Then
they divide what remains after the principal has been repaid according
to the conditions of the qirad."

Malik said, "Qirad loan is
only good in gold or silver coin and it is never permitted in any kind
of wares or goods or articles."

Malik said, "There are
certain transactions which if a long span of time passes after the
transaction takes place, its revocation becomes unacceptable. As for
usury, there is never anything except its rejection whether it is a
little or a lot. What is permitted in other than it is not permitted
in it because Allah, the Blessed and the Exalted, said in His Book,
'If you repent, you have your capital back, not wronging and not
wronged. ' "

32.4 Conditions Permitted in Qirad


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_text_en:
Yahya said that Malik spoke about an investor who made a qirad
loan and stipulated to the agent that only certain goods should be
bought with his money or he forbade certain goods which he named to be
bought. He said, "There is no harm in an investor making a condition
on an agent in qirad not to buy a certain kind of animal or goods
which he specifies. It is disapproved of for an investor to make as a
condition on an agent in qirad that he only buy certain goods unless
the goods which he orders him to buy are in plentiful supply and do
not fail either in winter or summer. There is no harm in that case."

Malik spoke about an investor who loaned qirad money and
stipulated that something of the profit should be his alone without
the agent sharing in it. He said, "That is not good, even if it is
only one dirham unless he stipulates that half the profit is his and
half the profit is the agent's or a third or a fourth or whatever.
When he names a percentage, whether great or small, everything
specified by that is halal. This is the qirad of the muslims."

He said, "It is also not good if the investor stipulates that one
dirham or more of the profit is purely his, with out the agent sharing
it and then what remains of the profit is to be divided in half
between them. That is not the qirad of the Muslims."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_text_en:
Yahya said that Malik said, "The person who puts up the principal
must not stipulate that he has something of the profit alone without
the agent sharing in it, nor must the agent stipulate that he has
something of the profit alone without the investor sharing. In qirad,
there is no sale, no rent, no work, no advance, and no convenience
which one party specifies to himself without the other party sharing
unless one party allows it to the other unconditionally as a favour
and that is alright to both. Neither of the parties should make a
condition over the other which increases him in gold or silver or food
over the other party."

He said, "If any of that enters the
qirad, it becomes hire, and hire is only good with known and fixed
terms. The agent should not stipulate when he takes the principal that
he repay or commission anyone with the goods, nor that he take any of
them for himself. When there is a profit, and it is time to separate
the capital, then they divide the profit according to the terms of the
contract. If the principal does not increase or there is a loss, the
agent does not have to make up for what he spent on himself or for the
loss. That falls to the investor from the principal. Qirad is
permitted upon whatever terms the investor and the agent make a mutual
agreement, of half the profit, or a third or a fourth or whatever."

Malik said, "It is not permitted for the agent to stipulate
that he use the qirad money for a certain number of years and that it
not be taken from him during that time."

He said, "It is not
good for the investor to stipulate that the qirad money should not be
returned for a certain number of years which are specified, because
the qirad is not for a term. The investor loans it to an agent to use
for him. If it seems proper to either of them to abandon the project
and the money is coin, and nothing has been bought with it, it can be
abandoned, and the investor takes his money back. If it seems proper
to the investor to take the qirad loan back after goods have been
purchased with it, he cannot do so until the buyer has sold the goods
and they have become money. If it seems proper to the agent to return
the loan, and it has been turned to goods he cannot do so until he has
sold them. He returns the loan in cash as he took it."

Malik
said, "It is not good for the investor to stipulate that the agent pay
any zakat due from his portion of the profit in particular, because
the investor by stipulating that, stipulates fixed increase for
himself from the profit because the portion of zakat he would be
liable for by his portion of the profit, is removed from him.

"It is not permitted for the investor to stipulate to the agent to
only buy from so-and-so, referring to a specific man. That is not
permitted because by doing so he would become his hireling for a
wage."

Malik spoke about an investor in qirad who stipulated
a guarantee for an amount of money from the agent, "The investor is
not permitted to stipulate conditions about his principal other than
the conditions on which qirad is based or according to the precedent
of the sunna of the Muslims. If the principal is increased by the
condition of guarantee, the investor has increased his share of the
profit because of the position of the guarantee. But the profit is
only to be divided according to what it would have been had the loan
been given without the guarantee. If the principal is destroyed, I do
not think that the agent has a guarantee held against him because the
stipulation of guarantees in qirad is null and void."

Malik
spoke about an investor who gave qirad money to a man and the man
stipulated that he would only buy palms or animals with it because he
sought to eat the dates or the offspring of the animals and he kept
them for some time to use for himself. He said, "That is not
permitted. It is not the sunna of the Muslims in qirad unless he buys
it and then sells it as other goods are sold."

Malik said,
"There is no harm in the agent stipulating on the investor a slave to
help him provided that the slave stands to gain along with him out of
the investment, and when the slave only helps him with the investment,
not with anything else."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_text_en:
Either the owner of the
wares says to the borrower, 'Take these wares and sell them. Buy and
sell with the capital realized according to qirad.' The investor
stipulates increase for himself from the sale of his goods and what
relieves him of expenses in selling it. Or else he says, 'Barter with
these goods and sell. When you are through, buy for me the like of my
goods which I gave you. If there is increase, it is between you and
me. 'It may happen that the investor gives the goods to the agent at a
time in which they are in demand and expensive, and then the agent
returns them while they are cheap and he might have bought them for
only a third of the original price or even less than that. The agent
then has a profit of half the amount by which the price of the wares
has decreased as his portion of the profit. Or he might take the wares
at a time when their price is low, and make use of them until he has a
lot of money. Then those wares become expensive and their price rises
when he returns them, so he buys them for all that he has so that all
his work and concern have been in vain. This is an uncertain
transaction and is not good. If, however, that is not known until it
has happened, then the wage an agent in qirad would be paid for
selling that, is looked at and he is given it for his concern. Then
the money is qirad from the day the money became cash and collected as
coin and it is returned as a qirad like that."

hadith_narrator_en:
Yahya said that Malik said, "No one should make a qirad loan
except in coin, because the loan must not be in wares, since loaning
wares can only be worked in one of two ways:


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_text_en:
Yahya said that Malik spoke about a man who made a qirad loan to
a man and he bought wares with it and transported them to a commercial
centre. It was not profitable to sell them and the agent feared a loss
if he sold them, so he hired transport to take them to another city,
and he sold them there and made a loss, and the cost of the hire was
greater than the principal.

Malik said, "If the agent can pay
the cost of the hire from what the capital realized, his way is that.
Whatever portion of the hire is not covered by the principal, the
agent must pay it. The investor is not answerable for any of it. That
is because the investor only ordered him to trade with the principal.
The investor is not answerable for other than the principal. Had the
investor been liable, it would have been an additional loss to him on
top of the principal which he invested. The agent cannot put that on
to the investor."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_text_en:
Yahya said that Malik spoke about an investor who made a qirad
loan to a man, who used it and made a profit. Then the man bought with
all the profit a slave-girl and he had intercourse with her and she
became pregnant by him, and so the capital decreased. Malik said, "If
he has money, the price of the slave-girl is taken from his property,
and the capital is restored by it. If there is something left over
after the money is paid, it is divided between them according to the
first qirad. If he cannot pay it, the slave-girl is sold so that the
capital is restored from her price."

Malik spoke about an
investor who made a qirad loan to a man, and the agent spent more than
the amount of the qirad loan when buying goods with it and paid the
increase from his own money. Malik said, "The investor has a choice if
the goods are sold for a profit or loss or if they are not sold. If he
wishes to take the goods, he takes them and pays the agent back what
he put in for them. If the agent refuses, the investor is a partner
for his share of the price in increase and decrease according to what
the agent paid extra for them from himself."

Malik spoke
about an agent who took qirad money from a man and then gave it to
another man to use as a qirad without the consent of the investor. He
said, "The agent is responsible for the property. If it is decreased,
he is responsible for the loss. If there is profit, the investor has
his stipulation of the profit, and then the agent has his stipulation
of what remains of the money."

Malik spoke about an agent who
exceeded and borrowed some of what he had of qirad in money and he
bought goods for himself with it. Malik said, "If he has a profit, the
profit is divided according to the condition between them in the
qirad. If he has a loss, he is responsible for the loss."

Malik said about an investor who paid qirad money to a man, and the
agent borrowed some of the cash and bought goods for himself with it,
"The investor of the capital has a choice. If he wishes, he shares
with him in the goods according to the qirad, and if he wishes, he
frees himself of them, and takes all of the principal back from the
agent. That is what is done with some one who oversteps."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_text_en:
Yahya said that Malik spoke about an investor who made a qirad
loan to a man.

He said, "When the investment is large, the
travelling expenses of the agent are taken from it. He can use it to
eat and clothe himself in an acceptable fashion according to the size
of the investment. If it saves him trouble, he can take a wage from
some of the capital, if it is large, and he cannot support himself.
There are certain jobs which an agent or his like are not responsible
for, amongst them are collecting debts, transporting the goods,
loading up and so forth. He can hire from the capital someone to do
that for him. The agent should not spend from the capital nor clothe
himself from it while he resides with his family. It is only permitted
for him to have expenses when he travels for the investment. The
expenses are taken from the capital. If he is only trading with the
property in the city in which he resides, he has no expenses from the
capital and no clothing."

Malik spoke about an investor who
paid qirad money to a man, and the agent went out with it and with his
own capital. He said, "The expenses come from the qirad and from his
own capital according to their proportions."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_text_en:
Yahya said that Malik spoke about an agent who had qirad money
with him and he spent from it and clothed himself. He said, "He cannot
give away any of it, and neither a beggar nor anyone else is to be
given any of it and he does not pay anyone compensation from it. If he
meets some people, and they bring out food and he brings out food, I
hope that that will be permitted to him if he does not intend to
bestow something on them. If he intends that or what is like  that
without the permission of the investor, he must get the sanction of
the investor for it. If he sanctions it, there is no harm. If he
refuses to sanction it, he must repay it with like if he has something
which is suitable as compensation."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_text_en:
Yahya said that Malik said, "The generally agreed on way of doing
things among us about an investor who pays qirad money to an agent to
buy goods, and the agent then sells the goods for a price to be paid
later, and has a profit in the transaction, then the agent dies before
he has received payment, is that if his heirs want to take that money,
they have their father's stipulated portion from the profit. That is
theirs if they are trustworthy to take the payment. If they dislike to
collect it from the debtor and they refer him to the investor, they
are not obliged to collect it and there is nothing against them and
nothing for them by their surrendering it to the investor. If they do
collect it, they have a share of it and expenses like their father
had. They are in the position of their father. If they are not
trustworthy to do so, they can bring someone reliable and trustworthy
to collect the money. If he collects all the capital and all the
profit, they are in the position of their father."

Malik
spoke about an investor who paid qirad money to a man provided that he
used it and was responsible for any delayed payment for which he sold
it. He said, "This is obligatory on the agent. If he sells it for
delayed payment, he is responsible for it."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_text_en:
Yahya said that Malik spoke about an investor who gave qirad
money to a man, and then the man sought a loan from the investor or
the investor borrowed money from the agent, or the investor left goods
with the agent to sell for him, or the investor gave the agent dinars
to buy goods with. Malik said, "There is no harm if the investor
leaves his goods with him knowing that if the agent did not have his
money and he had asked a similar thing of him, he would have still
done it because of the brotherhood between them or because it would
have been no bother to him and that had the agent refused that, he
would not have removed his capital from him. Or if the agent had
borrowed from the investor or carried his goods for him and he knew
that if the investor had not had his capital with him, he would have
still done the same for him, and had he refused that to him, he would
not have returned his capital to him. If that is true between both of
them and it is in the way of a favour between them and it is not a
condition in the terms of the qirad, it is permitted and there is no
harm in it. If a condition comes into it, or it is feared that the
agent is only doing it for the investor in order to safeguard the
capital in his possession, or the investor is only doing it because
the agent has taken his capital and will not return it to him, that is
not permitted in qirad and it is part of what the people of knowledge
forbid.' "


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_text_en:
Yahya said that Malik spoke about a man who loaned another man
money and then the debtor asked him to leave it with him as a qirad.
Malik said, "I do not like that unless he takes his money back from
him, and then pays it to him as a qirad if he wishes or if he wishes
keep it."

Malik spoke about an investor who paid a man qirad
money and the man told him that it was collected with him and asked
him to write it for him as a loan. He said, "I do not like that unless
he takes his money from him and then lends it to him or keeps it as he
wishes. That is only out of fear that he has lost some of it, and
wants to defer it so that he can make up what has been lost of it.
That is disapproved of and is not permitted and it is not good."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_text_en:
Yahya said that Malik spoke about an investor paying qirad money
to an agent who made a profit and then wanted to take his share of the
profit and the investor was away. He said, "He should not take any of
it unless the investor is present. If he takes something from it, he
is responsible for it until it is accounted for in the division of the
capital."

Malik said, "It is not permitted for the parties
involved in a qirad to account and divide property which is away from
them until the capital is present, and the investor is given the
principal in full. Then they divide the profit into their agreed
portions."

Malik spoke about a man taking qirad money, and
buying goods with it while he had a debt. His creditors sought and
found him while he was in a city away from the investor, and he had
profitable merchandise whose good quality was clear. They wanted him
to sell the merchandise for them so that they could take his share of
the profit. Malik said, "None of the profit of the qirad is taken
until the investor is present. He takes his principal and then the
profit is divided mutually between them."

Malik spoke about
an investor who put qirad money with an agent and he used it and had a
profit. Then the principal was set aside and the profit divided. He
took his share and added the share of the investor to his principal in
the presence of witnesses he had called. Malik said, "It is not
permitted to divide the profit unless the investor is present. If he
has taken something here turns it until the investor has  received the
principal in full. Then what remains is divided into their respective
portions."

Malik spoke about an investor who put qirad money
with an agent. The agent used it and then came to the investor and
said, "This is your portion of the profit, and I have taken the like
of it for myself, and I have retained your principal in full." Malik
said, "I do not like that, unless all the capital is present, the
principal is there and he knows that it is complete and he receives
it. Then they divide the profit between them. He returns the principal
to him if he wishes, or he keeps it. The presence of the principal is
necessary out of fear that the agent might have lost some of it, and
so may want it not to be removed from him and to keep it in his hand."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_text_en:
Yahya said that Malik spoke about an investor who put qirad money
with an agent who bought goods with it, and the investor told him to
sell them. The agent said that he did not see any way to sell at that
time and they quarrelled about it. He said, "One does not look at the
statement of either of them. The people of experience and insight
concerning such goods are asked about these goods. If they can see
anyway of selling them they are sold for them. If they think it is
time to wait, they should wait."

Malik spoke about a man who
took qirad money from an investor and used it and when the investor
asked him for his money, he said that he had it in full. When he held
him to his settlement he admitted that "Such-and-such of it was lost
with me," and he named an amount of money. "I told you that so that
you would leave it with me." Malik said, "He does not benefit by
denying it after he had confirmed that he had it all . He is
answerable by his confession against himself unless he produces
evidence about the loss of that property which confirms his statement.
If he does not produce an acceptable reason he is answerable by his
confession, and his denial does not avail him."

Malik said,
"Similarly, had he said, 'I have had such-and-such a profit from the
capital,' and then the owner of the capital asked him to pay him the
principal and his profit, and he said that he had not had any profit
in it and had said that only so it might be left in his possession, it
does not benefit him. He is taken to account for what he affirmed
unless he brings acceptable proof of his word, so that the first
statement is not binding on him."

Malik spoke about an
investor who put qirad money with an agent who made a profit with it.
The agent said, "I took the qirad from you provided that I would have
two-thirds." The owner of the capital says, "I gave you a qirad
provided that you had a third." Malik said, "The word is the word of
the agent, and he must take an oath on that if what he says resembles
the known practice of qirad or is close to it. If he brings a matter
which is unacceptable and people do not make qirads like that, he is
not believed, and it is judged to be according to how a qirad like it
would normally be."

Malik spoke about a man who gave a man
one hundred dinars as a qirad. He bought goods with it and then went
to pay the one hundred dinars to the owner of the goods and found that
they had been stolen. The investor says, "Sell the goods. If there is
anything over, it is mine. If there is a loss, it is against you
because you lost it." The agent says, "Rather you must fulfil what the
seller is owed. I bought them with your capital which you gave me."
Malik said, "The agent is obliged to pay the price to the seller and
the investor is told, 'If you wish, pay the hundred dinars to the
agent and the goods are between you. The qirad is according to what
the first hundred was based on. If you wish, you are free of the
goods.' If the hundred dinars are paid to the agent, it is a qirad
according to the conditions of the first qirad. If he refuses, the
goods belong to the agent and he must pay their price."

Malik
spoke about two people in a qirad who settled up and the agent still
had some of the goods which he used - threadbare cloth or a waterskin
or the like of that. Malik said, "Any of that which is insignificant
is of no importance and belongs to the agent. I have not heard anyone
give a decision calling for the return of that. Anything which has a
price is returned. If it is something which has value like an animal,
camel, coarse cloth or the like of that which fetches a price, I think
that he should return what he has remaining of such things unless the
owner overlooks it."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب المساقاة

hadith_chapter_name_en: Sharecropping

hadith_text_ar:
حَدَّثَنَا يَحْيَى، عَنْ مَالِكٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ، عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ الْمُسَيَّبِ، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ لِيَهُودِ خَيْبَرَ يَوْمَ افْتَتَحَ خَيْبَرَ
" أُقِرُّكُمْ فِيهَا مَا أَقَرَّكُمُ اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ عَلَى أَنَّ الثَّمَرَ بَيْنَنَا وَبَيْنَكُمْ " . قَالَ فَكَانَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم يَبْعَثُ عَبْدَ اللَّهِ بْنَ رَوَاحَةَ فَيَخْرُصُ بَيْنَهُ وَبَيْنَهُمْ ثُمَّ يَقُولُ إِنْ شِئْتُمْ فَلَكُمْ وَإِنْ شِئْتُمْ فَلِيَ . فَكَانُوا يَأْخُذُونَهُ .

hadith_text_en:
Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab from Said ibn al-
Musayyab that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant
him peace, said to the jews of Khaybar on the day of the conquest of
Khaybar, "I confirm you in it as long as Allah, the Mighty, the
Majestic, establishes you in it, provided that the fruits are divided
between us and you." Said continued, "The Messenger of Allah, may
Allah bless him and grant him peace, used to send Abdullah ibn Rawaha,
to assess the division of the fruit crop between him and them, and he
would say, 'If you wish, you can buy it back, and if you wish, it is
mine.' They would take it."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب المساقاة

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنِ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ، عَنْ سُلَيْمَانَ بْنِ يَسَارٍ، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم كَانَ يَبْعَثُ عَبْدَ اللَّهِ بْنَ رَوَاحَةَ إِلَى خَيْبَرَ فَيَخْرُصُ بَيْنَهُ وَبَيْنَ يَهُودِ خَيْبَرَ - قَالَ - فَجَمَعُوا لَهُ حَلْيًا مِنْ حَلْىِ نِسَائِهِمْ فَقَالُوا لَهُ هَذَا لَكَ وَخَفِّفْ عَنَّا وَتَجَاوَزْ فِي الْقَسْمِ . فَقَالَ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ رَوَاحَةَ يَا مَعْشَرَ الْيَهُودِ وَاللَّهِ إِنَّكُمْ لَمِنْ أَبْغَضِ خَلْقِ اللَّهِ إِلَىَّ وَمَا ذَاكَ بِحَامِلِي عَلَى أَنْ أَحِيفَ عَلَيْكُمْ فَأَمَّا مَا عَرَضْتُمْ مِنَ الرُّشْوَةِ فَإِنَّهَا سُحْتٌ وَإِنَّا لاَ نَأْكُلُهَا . فَقَالُوا بِهَذَا قَامَتِ السَّمَوَاتُ وَالأَرْضُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ إِذَا سَاقَى الرَّجُلُ النَّخْلَ وَفِيهَا الْبَيَاضُ فَمَا ازْدَرَعَ الرَّجُلُ الدَّاخِلُ فِي الْبَيَاضِ فَهُوَ لَهُ . قَالَ وَإِنِ اشْتَرَطَ صَاحِبُ الأَرْضِ أَنَّهُ يَزْرَعُ فِي الْبَيَاضِ لِنَفْسِهِ فَذَلِكَ لاَ يَصْلُحُ لأَنَّ الرَّجُلَ الدَّاخِلَ فِي الْمَالِ يَسْقِي لِرَبِّ الأَرْضِ فَذَلِكَ زِيَادَةٌ ازْدَادَهَا عَلَيْهِ . قَالَ وَإِنِ اشْتَرَطَ الزَّرْعَ بَيْنَهُمَا فَلاَ بَأْسَ بِذَلِكَ إِذَا كَانَتِ الْمَئُونَةُ كُلُّهَا عَلَى الدَّاخِلِ فِي الْمَالِ الْبَذْرُ وَالسَّقْىُ وَالْعِلاَجُ كُلُّهُ فَإِنِ اشْتَرَطَ الدَّاخِلُ فِي الْمَالِ عَلَى رَبِّ الْمَالِ أَنَّ الْبَذْرَ عَلَيْكَ كَانَ ذَلِكَ غَيْرَ جَائِزٍ لأَنَّهُ قَدِ اشْتَرَطَ عَلَى رَبِّ الْمَالِ زِيَادَةً ازْدَادَهَا عَلَيْهِ وَإِنَّمَا تَكُونُ الْمُسَاقَاةُ عَلَى أَنَّ عَلَى الدَّاخِلِ فِي الْمَالِ الْمَئُونَةَ كُلَّهَا وَالنَّفَقَةَ وَلاَ يَكُونُ عَلَى رَبِّ الْمَالِ مِنْهَا شَىْءٌ فَهَذَا وَجْهُ الْمُسَاقَاةِ الْمَعْرُوفُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي الْعَيْنِ تَكُونُ بَيْنَ الرَّجُلَيْنِ فَيَنْقَطِعُ مَاؤُهَا فَيُرِيدُ أَحَدُهُمَا أَنْ يَعْمَلَ فِي الْعَيْنِ وَيَقُولُ الآخَرُ لاَ أَجِدُ مَا أَعْمَلُ بِهِ إِنَّهُ يُقَالُ لِلَّذِي يُرِيدُ أَنْ يَعْمَلَ فِي الْعَيْنِ اعْمَلْ وَأَنْفِقْ وَيَكُونُ لَكَ الْمَاءُ كُلُّهُ تَسْقِي بِهِ حَتَّى يَأْتِيَ صَاحِبُكَ بِنِصْفِ مَا أَنْفَقْتَ فَإِذَا جَاءَ بِنِصْفِ مَا أَنْفَقْتَ أَخَذَ حِصَّتَهُ مِنَ الْمَاءِ . وَإِنَّمَا أُعْطِيَ الأَوَّلُ الْمَاءَ كُلَّهُ لأَنَّهُ أَنْفَقَ وَلَوْ لَمْ يُدْرِكْ شَيْئًا بِعَمَلِهِ لَمْ يَعْلَقِ الآخَرَ مِنَ النَّفَقَةِ شَىْءٌ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَإِذَا كَانَتِ النَّفَقَةُ كُلُّهَا وَالْمَئُونَةُ عَلَى رَبِّ الْحَائِطِ وَلَمْ يَكُنْ عَلَى الدَّاخِلِ فِي الْمَالِ شَىْءٌ إِلاَّ أَنَّهُ يَعْمَلُ بِيَدِهِ إِنَّمَا هُوَ أَجِيرٌ بِبَعْضِ الثَّمَرِ فَإِنَّ ذَلِكَ لاَ يَصْلُحُ لأَنَّهُ لاَ يَدْرِي كَمْ إِجَارَتُهُ إِذَا لَمْ يُسَمِّ لَهُ شَيْئًا يَعْرِفُهُ وَيَعْمَلُ عَلَيْهِ لاَ يَدْرِي أَيَقِلُّ ذَلِكَ أَمْ يَكْثُرُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَكُلُّ مُقَارِضٍ أَوْ مُسَاقٍ فَلاَ يَنْبَغِي لَهُ أَنْ يَسْتَثْنِيَ مِنَ الْمَالِ وَلاَ مِنَ النَّخْلِ شَيْئًا دُونَ صَاحِبِهِ وَذَلِكَ أَنَّهُ يَصِيرُ لَهُ أَجِيرًا بِذَلِكَ يَقُولُ أُسَاقِيكَ عَلَى أَنْ تَعْمَلَ لِي فِي كَذَا وَكَذَا نَخْلَةً تَسْقِيهَا وَتَأْبُرُهَا وَأُقَارِضُكَ فِي كَذَا وَكَذَا مِنَ الْمَالِ عَلَى أَنْ تَعْمَلَ لِي بِعَشَرَةِ دَنَانِيرَ لَيْسَتْ مِمَّا أُقَارِضُكَ عَلَيْهِ فَإِنَّ ذَلِكَ لاَ يَنْبَغِي وَلاَ يَصْلُحُ وَذَلِكَ الأَمْرُ عِنْدَنَا . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَالسُّنَّةُ فِي الْمُسَاقَاةِ الَّتِي يَجُوزُ لِرَبِّ الْحَائِطِ أَنْ يَشْتَرِطَهَا عَلَى الْمُسَاقَى شَدُّ الْحِظَارِ وَخَمُّ الْعَيْنِ وَسَرْوُ الشَّرَبِ وَإِبَّارُ النَّخْلِ وَقَطْعُ الْجَرِيدِ وَجَذُّ الثَّمَرِ هَذَا وَأَشْبَاهُهُ عَلَى أَنَّ لِلْمُسَاقَى شَطْرَ الثَّمَرِ أَوْ أَقَلَّ مِنْ ذَلِكَ أَوْ أَكْثَرَ إِذَا تَرَاضَيَا عَلَيْهِ غَيْرَ أَنَّ صَاحِبَ الأَصْلِ لاَ يَشْتَرِطُ ابْتِدَاءَ عَمَلٍ جَدِيدٍ يُحْدِثُهُ الْعَامِلُ فِيهَا مِنْ بِئْرٍ يَحْتَفِرُهَا أَوْ عَيْنٍ يَرْفَعُ رَأْسَهَا أَوْ غِرَاسٍ يَغْرِسُهُ فِيهَا يَأْتِي بِأَصْلِ ذَلِكَ مِنْ عِنْدِهِ أَوْ ضَفِيرَةٍ يَبْنِيهَا تَعْظُمُ فِيهَا نَفَقَتُهُ وَإِنَّمَا ذَلِكَ بِمَنْزِلَةِ أَنْ يَقُولَ رَبُّ الْحَائِطِ لِرَجُلٍ مِنَ النَّاسِ ابْنِ لِي هَا هُنَا بَيْتًا أَوِ احْفُرْ لِي بِئْرًا أَوْ أَجْرِ لِي عَيْنًا أَوِ اعْمَلْ لِي عَمَلاً بِنِصْفِ ثَمَرِ حَائِطِي هَذَا قَبْلَ أَنْ يَطِيبَ ثَمَرُ الْحَائِطِ وَيَحِلَّ بَيْعُهُ فَهَذَا بَيْعُ الثَّمَرِ قَبْلَ أَنْ يَبْدُوَ صَلاَحُهُ وَقَدْ نَهَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم عَنْ بَيْعِ الثِّمَارِ حَتَّى يَبْدُوَ صَلاَحُهَا . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فَأَمَّا إِذَا طَابَ الثَّمَرُ وَبَدَا صَلاَحُهُ وَحَلَّ بَيْعُهُ ثُمَّ قَالَ رَجُلٌ لِرَجُلٍ اعْمَلْ لِي بَعْضَ هَذِهِ الأَعْمَالِ - لِعَمَلٍ يُسَمِّيهِ لَهُ - بِنِصْفِ ثَمَرِ حَائِطِي هَذَا فَلاَ بَأْسَ بِذَلِكَ إِنَّمَا اسْتَأْجَرَهُ بِشَىْءٍ مَعْرُوفٍ مَعْلُومٍ قَدْ رَآهُ وَرَضِيَهُ فَأَمَّا الْمُسَاقَاةُ فَإِنَّهُ إِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ لِلْحَائِطِ ثَمَرٌ أَوْ قَلَّ ثَمَرُهُ أَوْ فَسَدَ فَلَيْسَ لَهُ إِلاَّ ذَلِكَ وَأَنَّ الأَجِيرَ لاَ يُسْتَأْجَرُ إِلاَّ بِشَىْءٍ مُسَمًّى لاَ تَجُوزُ الإِجَارَةُ إِلاَّ بِذَلِكَ وَإِنَّمَا الإِجَارَةُ بَيْعٌ مِنَ الْبُيُوعِ إِنَّمَا يَشْتَرِي مِنْهُ عَمَلَهُ وَلاَ يَصْلُحُ ذَلِكَ إِذَا دَخَلَهُ الْغَرَرُ لأَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم نَهَى عَنْ بَيْعِ الْغَرَرِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ السُّنَّةُ فِي الْمُسَاقَاةِ عِنْدَنَا أَنَّهَا تَكُونُ فِي أَصْلِ كُلِّ نَخْلٍ أَوْ كَرْمٍ أَوْ زَيْتُونٍ أَوْ رُمَّانٍ أَوْ فِرْسِكٍ أَوْ مَا أَشْبَهَ ذَلِكَ مِنَ الأُصُولِ جَائِزٌ لاَ بَأْسَ بِهِ عَلَى أَنَّ لِرَبِّ الْمَالِ نِصْفَ الثَّمَرِ مِنْ ذَلِكَ أَوْ ثُلُثَهُ أَوْ رُبُعَهُ أَوْ أَكْثَرَ مِنْ ذَلِكَ أَوْ أَقَلَّ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَالْمُسَاقَاةُ أَيْضًا تَجُوزُ فِي الزَّرْعِ إِذَا خَرَجَ وَاسْتَقَلَّ فَعَجَزَ صَاحِبُهُ عَنْ سَقْيِهِ وَعَمَلِهِ وَعِلاَجِهِ فَالْمُسَاقَاةُ فِي ذَلِكَ أَيْضًا جَائِزَةٌ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ لاَ تَصْلُحُ الْمُسَاقَاةُ فِي شَىْءٍ مِنَ الأُصُولِ مِمَّا تَحِلُّ فِيهِ الْمُسَاقَاةُ إِذَا كَانَ فِيهِ ثَمَرٌ قَدْ طَابَ وَبَدَا صَلاَحُهُ وَحَلَّ بَيْعُهُ وَإِنَّمَا يَنْبَغِي أَنْ يُسَاقَى مِنَ الْعَامِ الْمُقْبِلِ وَإِنَّمَا مُسَاقَاةُ مَا حَلَّ بَيْعُهُ مِنَ الثِّمَارِ إِجَارَةٌ لأَنَّهُ إِنَّمَا سَاقَى صَاحِبَ الأَصْلِ ثَمَرًا قَدْ بَدَا صَلاَحُهُ عَلَى أَنْ يَكْفِيَهُ إِيَّاهُ وَيَجُذَّهُ لَهُ بِمَنْزِلَةِ الدَّنَانِيرِ وَالدَّرَاهِمِ يُعْطِيهِ إِيَّاهَا وَلَيْسَ ذَلِكَ بِالْمُسَاقَاةِ إِنَّمَا الْمُسَاقَاةُ مَا بَيْنَ أَنْ يَجُذَّ النَّخْلَ إِلَى أَنْ يَطِيبَ الثَّمَرُ وَيَحِلَّ بَيْعُهُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَمَنْ سَاقَى ثَمَرًا فِي أَصْلٍ قَبْلَ أَنْ يَبْدُوَ صَلاَحُهُ وَيَحِلَّ بَيْعُهُ فَتِلْكَ الْمُسَاقَاةُ بِعَيْنِهَا جَائِزَةٌ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَلاَ يَنْبَغِي أَنْ تُسَاقَى الأَرْضُ الْبَيْضَاءُ وَذَلِكَ أَنَّهُ يَحِلُّ لِصَاحِبِهَا كِرَاؤُهَا بِالدَّنَانِيرِ وَالدَّرَاهِمِ وَمَا أَشْبَهَ ذَلِكَ مِنَ الأَثْمَانِ الْمَعْلُومَةِ . قَالَ فَأَمَّا الرَّجُلُ الَّذِي يُعْطِي أَرْضَهُ الْبَيْضَاءَ بِالثُّلُثِ أَوِ الرُّبُعِ مِمَّا يَخْرُجُ مِنْهَا فَذَلِكَ مِمَّا يَدْخُلُهُ الْغَرَرُ لأَنَّ الزَّرْعَ يَقِلُّ مَرَّةً وَيَكْثُرُ مَرَّةً وَرُبَّمَا هَلَكَ رَأْسًا فَيَكُونُ صَاحِبُ الأَرْضِ قَدْ تَرَكَ كِرَاءً مَعْلُومًا يَصْلُحُ لَهُ أَنْ يُكْرِيَ أَرْضَهُ بِهِ وَأَخَذَ أَمْرًا غَرَرًا لاَ يَدْرِي أَيَتِمُّ أَمْ لاَ فَهَذَا مَكْرُوهٌ وَإِنَّمَا ذَلِكَ مَثَلُ رَجُلٍ اسْتَأْجَرَ أَجِيرًا لِسَفَرٍ بِشَىْءٍ مَعْلُومٍ ثُمَّ قَالَ الَّذِي اسْتَأْجَرَ الأَجِيرَ هَلْ لَكَ أَنْ أَعْطِيَكَ عُشْرَ مَا أَرْبَحُ فِي سَفَرِي هَذَا إِجَارَةً لَكَ فَهَذَا لاَ يَحِلُّ وَلاَ يَنْبَغِي . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَلاَ يَنْبَغِي لِرَجُلٍ أَنْ يُؤَاجِرَ نَفْسَهُ وَلاَ أَرْضَهُ وَلاَ سَفِينَتَهُ إِلاَّ بِشَىْءٍ مَعْلُومٍ لاَ يَزُولُ إِلَى غَيْرِهِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَإِنَّمَا فَرَّقَ بَيْنَ الْمُسَاقَاةِ فِي النَّخْلِ وَالأَرْضِ الْبَيْضَاءِ أَنَّ صَاحِبَ النَّخْلِ لاَ يَقْدِرُ عَلَى أَنْ يَبِيعَ ثَمَرَهَا حَتَّى يَبْدُوَ صَلاَحُهُ وَصَاحِبُ الأَرْضِ يُكْرِيهَا وَهِيَ أَرْضٌ بَيْضَاءُ لاَ شَىْءَ فِيهَا . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَالأَمْرُ عِنْدَنَا فِي النَّخْلِ أَيْضًا إِنَّهَا تُسَاقِي السِّنِينَ الثَّلاَثَ وَالأَرْبَعَ وَأَقَلَّ مِنْ ذَلِكَ وَأَكْثَرَ . قَالَ وَذَلِكَ الَّذِي سَمِعْتُ وَكُلُّ شَىْءٍ مِثْلُ ذَلِكَ مِنَ الأُصُولِ بِمَنْزِلَةِ النَّخْلِ يَجُوزُ فِيهِ لِمَنْ سَاقَى مِنَ السِّنِينَ مِثْلُ مَا يَجُوزُ فِي النَّخْلِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي الْمُسَاقِي إِنَّهُ لاَ يَأْخُذُ مِنْ صَاحِبِهِ الَّذِي سَاقَاهُ شَيْئًا مِنْ ذَهَبٍ وَلاَ وَرِقٍ يَزْدَادُهُ وَلاَ طَعَامٍ وَلاَ شَيْئًا مِنَ الأَشْيَاءِ لاَ يَصْلُحُ ذَلِكَ وَلاَ يَنْبَغِي أَنْ يَأْخُذَ الْمُسَاقَى مِنْ رَبِّ الْحَائِطِ شَيْئًا يَزِيدُهُ إِيَّاهُ مِنْ ذَهَبٍ وَلاَ وَرِقٍ وَلاَ طَعَامٍ وَلاَ شَىْءٍ مِنَ الأَشْيَاءِ وَالزِّيَادَةُ فِيمَا بَيْنَهُمَا لاَ تَصْلُحُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَالْمُقَارِضُ أَيْضًا بِهَذِهِ الْمَنْزِلَةِ لاَ يَصْلُحُ إِذَا دَخَلَتِ الزِّيَادَةُ فِي الْمُسَاقَاةِ أَوِ الْمُقَارَضَةِ صَارَتْ إِجَارَةً وَمَا دَخَلَتْهُ الإِجَارَةُ فَإِنَّهُ لاَ يَصْلُحُ وَلاَ يَنْبَغِي أَنْ تَقَعَ الإِجَارَةُ بِأَمْرٍ غَرَرٍ لاَ يَدْرِي أَيَكُونُ أَمْ لاَ يَكُونُ أَوْ يَقِلُّ أَوْ يَكْثُرُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي الرَّجُلِ يُسَاقِي الرَّجُلَ الأَرْضَ فِيهَا النَّخْلُ وَالْكَرْمُ أَوْ مَا أَشْبَهَ ذَلِكَ مِنَ الأُصُولِ فَيَكُونُ فِيهَا الأَرْضُ الْبَيْضَاءُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ إِذَا كَانَ الْبَيَاضُ تَبَعًا لِلأَصْلِ وَكَانَ الأَصْلُ أَعْظَمَ ذَلِكَ أَوْ أَكْثَرَهُ فَلاَ بَأْسَ بِمُسَاقَاتِهِ وَذَلِكَ أَنْ يَكُونَ النَّخْلُ الثُّلُثَيْنِ أَوْ أَكْثَرَ وَيَكُونَ الْبَيَاضُ الثُّلُثَ أَوْ أَقَلَّ مِنْ ذَلِكَ وَذَلِكَ أَنَّ الْبَيَاضَ حِينَئِذٍ تَبَعٌ لِلأَصْلِ وَإِذَا كَانَتِ الأَرْضُ الْبَيْضَاءُ فِيهَا نَخْلٌ أَوْ كَرْمٌ أَوْ مَا يُشْبِهُ ذَلِكَ مِنَ الأُصُولِ فَكَانَ الأَصْلُ الثُّلُثَ أَوْ أَقَلَّ وَالْبَيَاضُ الثُّلُثَيْنِ أَوْ أَكْثَرَ جَازَ فِي ذَلِكَ الْكِرَاءُ وَحَرُمَتْ فِيهِ الْمُسَاقَاةُ وَذَلِكَ أَنَّ مِنْ أَمْرِ النَّاسِ أَنْ يُسَاقُوا الأَصْلَ وَفِيهِ الْبَيَاضُ وَتُكْرَى الأَرْضُ وَفِيهَا الشَّىْءُ الْيَسِيرُ مِنَ الأَصْلِ أَوْ يُبَاعَ الْمُصْحَفُ أَوِ السَّيْفُ وَفِيهِمَا الْحِلْيَةُ مِنَ الْوَرِقِ بِالْوَرِقِ أَوِ الْقِلاَدَةُ أَوِ الْخَاتَمُ وَفِيهِمَا الْفُصُوصُ وَالذَّهَبُ بِالدَّنَانِيرِ وَلَمْ تَزَلْ هَذِهِ الْبُيُوعُ جَائِزَةً يَتَبَايَعُهَا النَّاسُ وَيَبْتَاعُونَهَا وَلَمْ يَأْتِ فِي ذَلِكَ شَىْءٌ مَوْصُوفٌ مَوْقُوفٌ عَلَيْهِ إِذَا هُوَ بَلَغَهُ كَانَ حَرَامًا أَوْ قَصُرَ عَنْهُ كَانَ حَلاَلاً . وَالأَمْرُ فِي ذَلِكَ عِنْدَنَا الَّذِي عَمِلَ بِهِ النَّاسُ وَأَجَازُوهُ بَيْنَهُمْ أَنَّهُ إِذَا كَانَ الشَّىْءُ مِنْ ذَلِكَ الْوَرِقِ أَوِ الذَّهَبِ تَبَعًا لِمَا هُوَ فِيهِ جَازَ بَيْعُهُ وَذَلِكَ أَنْ يَكُونَ النَّصْلُ أَوِ الْمُصْحَفُ أَوِ الْفُصُوصُ قِيمَتُهُ الثُّلُثَانِ أَوْ أَكْثَرُ وَالْحِلْيَةُ قِيمَتُهَا الثُّلُثُ أَوْ أَقَلُّ .

hadith_text_en:
a half or a third or a quarter or
whatever."

Malik said, "Share-cropping is also permitted in
any crop which emerges from the earth if it is a crop which is picked,
and its owner cannot water, work on it and tend it.

"Share-
cropping becomes reprehensible in anything in which share-cropping is
normally permitted if the fruit is sound and the good condition is
clear and it is halal to sell it. He must share-crop in it the next
year. If a man waters fruit whose good condition is clear and it is
halal to sell it, and he picks it for the owner, for a share of the
crop, it is not sharecropping. It is similar to him being paid in
dirhams and dinars. Share-cropping is what is between pruning the
palms and when the fruit becomes sound and its sale is halal."

Malik said, "If some one makes a share-cropping contract for fruit
trees before the condition becomes clear and its sale is halal, it is
share-cropping and is permitted . "

Malik said, "Uncultivated
land must not be involved in a share-cropping contract. That is
because it is halal for the owner to rent it for dinars and dirhams or
the equivalent for an accepted price."

Malik said, "As for a
man who gives his uncultivated earth for a third or a fourth of what
comes out of it, that is an uncertain transaction because crops may be
scant one time and plentiful another time. It may perish completely
and the owner of the land will have abandoned a set rent which would
have been good for him to rent the land for. He takes an uncertain
situation, and does not know whether or not it will be satisfactory.
This is disapproved. It is like a man having someone travel for him
for a set amount, and then saying, 'Shall I give you a tenth of the
profit of the journey as your wage?' This is not halal and must not be
done."

Malik summed up,"A man must not hire out himself or
his land or his ship unless for a set amount."

Malik said, "A
distinction is made between sharecropping in palms and in cultivated
land because the owner of the palms cannot sell the fruit until its
good condition is clear. The owner of the land can rent it when it is
uncultivated with nothing on it."

Malik said, "What is done
in our community about palms is that they can also be share-cropped
for three and four years, and less or more than that."

Malik
said, "That is what I have heard. Any fruit trees like that are in the
position of palms. Contracts for several years are permissible for the
sharecropper as they are permissible in the palms."

Malik
said about the owner, "He does not take anything additional from the
share-cropper in the way of gold or silver or crops which increases
him. That is not good. The share-cropper also must not take from the
owner of the garden anything additional which will increase him of
gold, silver, crops or anything. Increase beyond what is stipulated in
the contract is not good. It is also not good for the lender of a
qirad to be in this position. If such an increase does enter share-
cropping or quirad, it becomes by it hire. It is not good when hire
enters it. Hire must never occur in a situation which has uncertainty
in it."

Malik spoke about a man who gave land to another man
in a share-cropping contract in which there were palms, vines, or the
like of that of fruit trees and there was also uncultivated land in
it. He said, "If the uncultivated land is secondary to the fruit
trees, either in importance or in size of land, there is no harm in
share-cropping. That is if the palms take up two-thirds of the land or
more, and the uncultivated land is a third or less. This is because
when the land that the fruit trees take up is secondary to the
uncultivated land and the cultivated land in which the palms, vines or
the like is a third or less, and the uncultivated land is two-thirds
or more, it is permitted to rent the land and share-cropping in it is
haram."

"One of the practices of people is to give out
sharecropping contracts on property with fruit trees when there is
uncultivated land in it, and to rent land while there are fruit trees
on it, just as a Qur'an or sword which has some embellishment on it of
silver is sold for silver, or a necklace or ring which have stones and
gold in them are sold for dinars. These sales continue to be
permitted. People buy and sell by them. Nothing described or
instituted has come on that which if exceeded, makes it haram, and if
fallen below makes it halal. What is done in our community about that
is what people practise and permit among themselves. That is, if the
gold or silver is secondary to what it is incorporated in, it is
permitted to sell it. That is, if the value of the blade, the Qur'an,
or the stones is two-thirds or more, and the value of the decoration
is one-third or less."

hadith_narrator_en:
Malik related to me from Ibn Shihab from Sulayman ibn Yasar that
the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, used
to send Abdullah ibn Rawaha to Khaybar, to assess the division of the
fruit crop between him and the jews of Khaybar.

The jews
collected for Abdullah pieces of their women's jewellery and said to
him, "This is yours. Go light on us and don't be exact in the
division!"

Abdullah ibn Rawaha said, "O tribe of jews! By
Allah! You are among the most hateful to me of Allah's creation, but
it does not prompt me to deal unjustly with you. What you have offered
as a bribe is forbidden. We will not touch it." They said, "This is
what supports the heavens and the earth."

Malik said, "If a
share-cropper waters the palms and between them there is some
uncultivated land, whatever he cultivates in the uncultivated land is
his."

Malik said, "If the owner of the land makes a condition
that he will cultivate the uncultivated land for himself, that is not
good because the sharecropper does the watering for the owner of the
land and so he increases the owner of the land in property (without
any return for himself)."

Malik said, "If the owner
stipulates that the fruit crop is to be shared between them, there is
no harm in that if all the maintenance of the property - seeding,
watering and case, etc. - are the concern of the sharecropper.

If the share-cropper stipulates that the seeds are the
responsibility of the owner of the property - that is not permitted
because he has stipulated an outlay against the owner of the property.
Share-cropping is conducted on the basis that all the care and expense
is outlayed by the share-cropper, and the owner of the property is not
obliged anything. This is the accepted method of share-cropping."

Malik spoke about a spring which was shared between two men, and
then the water dried up and one of them wanted to work on the spring
and the other said, "I don't have the means to work on it." He said,
"Tell the one who wants to work on the spring, 'Work and expend. All
the water will be yours. You will have its water until your companion
brings you half of what you have spent. If he brings you half of what
you have spent, he can take his share of the water.' The first one is
given all the water, because he has spent on it, and if he does not
reach anything by his work, the other has not incurred any expense."

Malik said, "It is not good for a share-cropper not to expend
anything but his labour and to be hired for a share of the fruit while
all the expense and work is incurred by the owner of the garden,
because the share-cropper does not know what the exact wage is going
to be for his labour, whether it will be little or great."

Malik said, "No-one who lends a qirad or grants a share-cropping
contract, should exempt some of the wealth, or some of the trees from
his agent, because, by that, the agent becomes his hired man. He says,
'I will grant you a share-crop provided that you work for me on such-
and-such a palm - water it and tend it. I will give you a qirad for
such-and-such money provided that you work for me with ten dinars.
They are not part of the qirad I have given you.' That must not be
done and it is not good. This is what is done in our community."

Malik said, "The sunna about what is permitted to an owner of a
garden in share-cropping is that he can stipulate to the share-cropper
the maintenance of walls, cleaning the spring, sweeping the irrigation
canals, pollinating the palms, pruning branches, harvesting the fruit
and such things, provided that the share-cropper has a share of the
fruit fixed by mutual agreement. However, the owner cannot stipulate
the beginning of new work which the agent will start digging a well,
raising the source of a well, instigating new planting, or building a
cistern whose cost is great. That is as if the owner of the garden
said to a certain man, 'Build me a house here or dig me a well or make
a spring flow for me or do some work for me for half the fruit of this
garden of mine,' before the fruit of the garden is sound and it is
halal to sell it. This is the sale of fruit before its good condition
is clear. The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, forbade fruit to be sold before its good condition became
clear."

Malik said, "If the fruits are good and their good
condition is clear and selling them is halal and then the owner asks a
man to do one of those jobs for him, specifying the job, for half the
fruit of his garden, for example, there is no harm in that. He has
hired the man for something recognised and known. The man has seen it
and is satisfied with it.

"As for share-cropping, if the
garden has no fruit or little or bad fruit, he has only that. The
labourer is only hired for a set amount, and hire is only permitted on
these terms. Hire is a type of sale. One man buys another man's work
from him. It is not good if uncertainty enters into it because the
Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, forbade
uncertain transactions."

Malik said, "The sunna in share-
cropping with us is that it can be practised with any kind of fruit
tree, palm, vine, olive tree, pomegranate, peach, and soon. It is
permitted, and there is no harm in it provided that the owner of the
property has a share of the fruit:


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب المساقاة

hadith_text_ar: قَالَ يَحْيَى قَالَ مَالِكٌ إِنَّ أَحْسَنَ مَا سُمِعَ فِي عُمَّالِ الرَّقِيقِ فِي الْمُسَاقَاةِ يَشْتَرِطُهُمُ الْمُسَاقَى عَلَى صَاحِبِ الأَصْلِ إِنَّهُ لاَ بَأْسَ بِذَلِكَ لأَنَّهُمْ عُمَّالُ الْمَالِ فَهُمْ بِمَنْزِلَةِ الْمَالِ لاَ مَنْفَعَةَ فِيهِمْ لِلدَّاخِلِ إِلاَّ أَنَّهُ تَخِفُّ عَنْهُ بِهِمُ الْمَئُونَةُ وَإِنْ لَمَ يَكُونُوا فِي الْمَالِ اشْتَدَّتْ مَئُونَتُهُ وَإِنَّمَا ذَلِكَ بِمَنْزِلَةِ الْمُسَاقَاةِ فِي الْعَيْنِ وَالنَّضْحِ وَلَنْ تَجِدَ أَحَدًا يُسَاقَى فِي أَرْضَيْنِ سَوَاءٍ فِي الأَصْلِ وَالْمَنْفَعَةِ إِحْدَاهُمَا بِعَيْنٍ وَاثِنَةٍ غَزِيرَةٍ وَالأُخْرَى بِنَضْحٍ عَلَى شَىْءٍ وَاحِدٍ لِخِفَّةِ مُؤْنَةِ الْعَيْنِ وَشِدَّةِ مُؤْنَةِ النَّضْحِ . قَالَ وَعَلَى ذَلِكَ الأَمْرُ عِنْدَنَا . قَالَ وَالْوَاثِنَةُ الثَّابِتُ مَاؤُهَا الَّتِي لاَ تَغُورُ وَلاَ تَنْقَطِعُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَلَيْسَ لِلْمُسَاقَى أَنْ يَعْمَلَ بِعُمَّالِ الْمَالِ فِي غَيْرِهِ وَلاَ أَنْ يَشْتَرِطَ ذَلِكَ عَلَى الَّذِي سَاقَاهُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَلاَ يَجُوزُ لِلَّذِي سَاقَى أَنْ يَشْتَرِطَ عَلَى رَبِّ الْمَالِ رَقِيقًا يَعْمَلُ بِهِمْ فِي الْحَائِطِ لَيْسُوا فِيهِ حِينَ سَاقَاهُ إِيَّاهُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَلاَ يَنْبَغِي لِرَبِّ الْمَالِ أَنْ يَشْتَرِطَ عَلَى الَّذِي دَخَلَ فِي مَالِهِ بِمُسَاقَاةٍ أَنْ يَأْخُذَ مِنْ رَقِيقِ الْمَالِ أَحَدًا يُخْرِجُهُ مِنَ الْمَالِ وَإِنَّمَا مُسَاقَاةُ الْمَالِ عَلَى حَالِهِ الَّذِي هُوَ عَلَيْهِ . قَالَ فَإِنْ كَانَ صَاحِبُ الْمَالِ يُرِيدُ أَنْ يُخْرِجَ مِنْ رَقِيقِ الْمَالِ أَحَدًا فَلْيُخْرِجْهُ قَبْلَ الْمُسَاقَاةِ أَوْ يُرِيدُ أَنْ يُدْخِلَ فِيهِ أَحَدًا فَلْيَفْعَلْ ذَلِكَ قَبْلَ الْمُسَاقَاةِ ثُمَّ لْيُسَاقِ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ إِنْ شَاءَ . قَالَ وَمَنْ مَاتَ مِنَ الرَّقِيقِ أَوْ غَابَ أَوْ مَرِضَ فَعَلَى رَبِّ الْمَالِ أَنْ يُخْلِفَهُ .

hadith_text_en:
Yahya said that Malik said, "The best of what has been heard
about a sharecropper stipulating on the owner of the property the
inclusion of some slave workers, is that there is no harm in that if
they are workers that come with the property. They are like the
property. There is no profit in them for the share-cropper except to
lighten some of his burden. If they did not come with the property,
his toil would be harder. It is like share-cropping land with a spring
or land with a watering trough. You will not find anyone who receives
the same share for share-cropping two lands which are equal in
property and yield, when one property has a constant plentiful spring
and the other has a watering trough, because of the lightness of
working land with a spring, and the hardship of working land with a
watering trough."

Malik added, "That is what is done in our
community."

Malik said, "A share-cropper cannot employ
workers from the property in other work, and he cannot make that a
stipulation with the one who gives him the share-cropping contract.
Nor is it permitted to one who share-crops to stipulate on the owner
of the property inclusion of slaves for use in the garden who are not
in it when he makes the share-cropping contract."

"Nor must
the owner of the property stipulate on the one who uses his property
for share-cropping that he take any of the slaves of the property and
remove him from the property. The share-cropping of property is based
on the state which it is currently in."

"If the owner of the
property wants to remove one of the slaves of the property, he removes
him before the share-cropping, or if he wants to put someone into the
property, he does it before the share-cropping. Then he grants the
share-cropping contract after that if he wishes. If any of the slaves
die or go off or become ill, the owner of the property must replace
them."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب كراء الأرض

hadith_chapter_name_en: Renting Land

hadith_text_ar: حَدَّثَنَا يَحْيَى، عَنْ مَالِكٍ، عَنْ رَبِيعَةَ بْنِ أَبِي عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ حَنْظَلَةَ بْنِ قَيْسٍ الزُّرَقِيِّ،  عَنْ رَافِعِ بْنِ خَدِيجٍ، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم نَهَى عَنْ كِرَاءِ الْمَزَارِعِ قَالَ حَنْظَلَةُ فَسَأَلْتُ رَافِعَ بْنَ خَدِيجٍ بِالذَّهَبِ وَالْوَرِقِ فَقَالَ أَمَّا بِالذَّهَبِ وَالْوَرِقِ فَلاَ بَأْسَ بِهِ .

hadith_text_en:
Yahya related to me from Malik from Rabia ibn Abd ar-Rahman from
Handhala ibn Qays az-Zuraqi from Rafi ibn Khadij that the Messenger of
Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, forbade renting out
fields.

Handhala said, "I asked Rafi ibn Khadij, about paying
in gold and silver, and he said, 'There is no harm in it.' "


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب كراء الأرض

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنِ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ، أَنَّهُ قَالَ سَأَلْتُ سَعِيدَ بْنَ الْمُسَيَّبِ عَنْ كِرَاءِ الأَرْضِ، بِالذَّهَبِ وَالْوَرِقِ فَقَالَ لاَ بَأْسَ بِهِ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me that Ibn Shihab said, "I asked Said ibn al-
Musayyab about renting land for gold or silver, and he said, 'There is
no harm in it.' "


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب كراء الأرض

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنِ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ، أَنَّهُ سَأَلَ سَالِمَ بْنَ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عُمَرَ عَنْ كِرَاءِ الْمَزَارِعِ، فَقَالَ لاَ بَأْسَ بِهَا بِالذَّهَبِ وَالْوَرِقِ . قَالَ ابْنُ شِهَابٍ فَقُلْتُ لَهُ أَرَأَيْتَ الْحَدِيثَ الَّذِي يُذْكَرُ عَنْ رَافِعِ بْنِ خَدِيجٍ فَقَالَ أَكْثَرَ رَافِعٌ وَلَوْ كَانَ لِي مَزْرَعَةٌ أَكْرَيْتُهَا .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me from Ibn Shihab that he asked Salim ibn
'Abdullah ibn Umar about renting out fields. He said, "There is no
harm in it for gold or silver." Ibn Shihab said, "I said to him, 'What
do you think of the hadith which is mentioned from Rafi ibn Khadij?'"
He said, ''Rafi has exaggerated. If I had a field, I would rent it
out."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب كراء الأرض

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، أَنَّهُ بَلَغَهُ أَنَّ عَبْدَ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنَ عَوْفٍ، تَكَارَى أَرْضًا فَلَمْ تَزَلْ فِي يَدَيْهِ بِكِرَاءٍ حَتَّى مَاتَ قَالَ ابْنُهُ فَمَا كُنْتُ أُرَاهَا إِلاَّ لَنَا مِنْ طُولِ مَا مَكَثَتْ فِي يَدَيْهِ حَتَّى ذَكَرَهَا لَنَا عِنْدَ مَوْتِهِ فَأَمَرَنَا بِقَضَاءِ شَىْءٍ كَانَ عَلَيْهِ مِنْ كِرَائِهَا ذَهَبٍ أَوْ وَرِقٍ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me that he had heard that Abd ar-Rahman ibn Awf
rented land, and he continued to have it in his possession until he
died. His son said, "I thought that it was ours because of the length
of time which it had remained in his hands, until he mentioned it to
us at his death. He ordered us to pay some rent which he owed in gold
or silver."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب كراء الأرض

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ هِشَامِ بْنِ عُرْوَةَ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، أَنَّهُ كَانَ يُكْرِي أَرْضَهُ بِالذَّهَبِ وَالْوَرِقِ . وَسُئِلَ مَالِكٌ عَنْ رَجُلٍ أَكْرَى مَزْرَعَتَهُ بِمِائَةِ صَاعٍ مِنْ تَمْرٍ أَوْ مِمَّا يَخْرُجُ مِنْهَا مِنَ الْحِنْطَةِ أَوْ مِنْ غَيْرِ مَا يَخْرُجُ مِنْهَا فَكَرِهَ ذَلِكَ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me from Hisham ibn Urwa that his father used to
rent out his land for gold and silver.

Malik was asked about
a man who rented his field for 100 sa of dates or part of its produce
of wheat or from other than its produce. He disapproved of that.


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب الشفعة

hadith_chapter_name_en: Pre-emption in Property

hadith_text_ar: حَدَّثَنَا يَحْيَى، عَنْ مَالِكٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ، عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ الْمُسَيَّبِ، وَعَنْ أَبِي سَلَمَةَ بْنِ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ عَوْفٍ، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَضَى بِالشُّفْعَةِ فِيمَا لَمْ يُقْسَمْ بَيْنَ الشُّرَكَاءِ فَإِذَا وَقَعَتِ الْحُدُودُ بَيْنَهُمْ فَلاَ شُفْعَةَ فِيهِ .

hadith_text_en: Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab from Said ibn al- Musayyab and from Abu Salama ibn Abd ar-Rahman ibn Awf that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, decreed for partners the right of preemption in property which had not been divided up. When boundaries had been fixed between them, then there was no right of pre-emption.


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_text_en: Malik said, "That is the sunna about which there is no dispute among us."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_text_ar: قَالَ مَالِكٌ إِنَّهُ بَلَغَهُ أَنَّ سَعِيدَ بْنَ الْمُسَيَّبِ سُئِلَ عَنِ الشُّفْعَةِ هَلْ فِيهَا مِنْ سُنَّةٍ فَقَالَ نَعَمْ الشُّفْعَةُ فِي الدُّورِ وَالأَرَضِينَ وَلاَ تَكُونُ إِلاَّ بَيْنَ الشُّرَكَاءِ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik said that he heard that Said ibn al-Musayyab, when asked
about pre-emption and whether there was a sunna in it, said, "Yes.
Pre-emption is in houses and land, and it is only between partners."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، أَنَّهُ بَلَغَهُ عَنْ سُلَيْمَانَ بْنِ يَسَارٍ، مِثْلُ ذَلِكَ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي رَجُلٍ اشْتَرَى شِقْصًا مَعَ قَوْمٍ فِي أَرْضٍ بِحَيَوَانٍ عَبْدٍ أَوْ وَلِيدَةٍ أَوْ مَا أَشْبَهَ ذَلِكَ مِنَ الْعُرُوضِ فَجَاءَ الشَّرِيكُ يَأْخُذُ بِشُفْعَتِهِ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ فَوَجَدَ الْعَبْدَ أَوِ الْوَلِيدَةَ قَدْ هَلَكَا وَلَمْ يَعْلَمْ أَحَدٌ قَدْرَ قِيمَتِهِمَا فَيَقُولُ الْمُشْتَرِي قِيمَةُ الْعَبْدِ أَوِ الْوَلِيدَةِ مِائَةُ دِينَارٍ وَيَقُولُ صَاحِبُ الشُّفْعَةِ الشَّرِيكُ بَلْ قِيمَتُهُمَا خَمْسُونَ دِينَارًا . قَالَ مَالِكٌ يَحْلِفُ الْمُشْتَرِي أَنَّ قِيمَةَ مَا اشْتَرَى بِهِ مِائَةُ دِينَارٍ ثُمَّ إِنْ شَاءَ أَنْ يَأْخُذَ صَاحِبُ الشُّفْعَةِ أَخَذَ أَوْ يَتْرُكَ إِلاَّ أَنْ يَأْتِيَ الشَّفِيعُ بِبَيِّنَةٍ أَنَّ قِيمَةَ الْعَبْدِ أَوِ الْوَلِيدَةِ دُونَ مَا قَالَ الْمُشْتَرِي . قَالَ مَالِكٌ مَنْ وَهَبَ شِقْصًا فِي دَارٍ أَوْ أَرْضٍ مُشْتَرَكَةٍ فَأَثَابَهُ الْمَوْهُوبُ لَهُ بِهَا نَقْدًا أَوْ عَرْضًا فَإِنَّ الشُّرَكَاءَ يَأْخُذُونَهَا بِالشُّفْعَةِ إِنْ شَاءُوا وَيَدْفَعُونَ إِلَى الْمَوْهُوبِ لَهُ قِيمَةَ مَثُوبَتِهِ دَنَانِيرَ أَوْ دَرَاهِمَ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ مَنْ وَهَبَ هِبَةً فِي دَارٍ أَوْ أَرْضٍ مُشْتَرَكَةٍ فَلَمْ يُثَبْ مِنْهَا وَلَمْ يَطْلُبْهَا فَأَرَادَ شَرِيكُهُ أَنْ يَأْخُذَهَا بِقِيمَتِهَا فَلَيْسَ ذَلِكَ لَهُ مَا لَمْ يُثَبْ عَلَيْهَا فَإِنْ أُثِيبَ فَهُوَ لِلشَّفِيعِ بِقِيمَةِ الثَّوَابِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي رَجُلٍ اشْتَرَى شِقْصًا فِي أَرْضٍ مُشْتَرَكَةٍ بِثَمَنٍ إِلَى أَجَلٍ فَأَرَادَ الشَّرِيكُ أَنْ يَأْخُذَهَا بِالشُّفْعَةِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ إِنْ كَانَ مَلِيًّا فَلَهُ الشُّفْعَةُ بِذَلِكَ الثَّمَنِ إِلَى ذَلِكَ الأَجَلِ وَإِنْ كَانَ مَخُوفًا أَنْ لاَ يُؤَدِّيَ الثَّمَنَ إِلَى ذَلِكَ الأَجَلِ فَإِذَا جَاءَهُمْ بِحَمِيلٍ مَلِيٍّ ثِقَةٍ مِثْلِ الَّذِي اشْتَرَى مِنْهُ الشِّقْصَ فِي الأَرْضِ الْمُشْتَرَكَةِ فَذَلِكَ لَهُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ لاَ تَقْطَعُ شُفْعَةَ الْغَائِبِ غَيْبَتُهُ وَإِنْ طَالَتْ غَيْبَتُهُ وَلَيْسَ لِذَلِكَ عِنْدَنَا حَدٌّ تُقْطَعُ إِلَيْهِ الشُّفْعَةُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي الرَّجُلِ يُوَرِّثُ الأَرْضَ نَفَرًا مِنْ وَلَدِهِ ثُمَّ يُولَدُ لأَحَدِ النَّفَرِ ثُمَّ يَهْلِكُ الأَبُ فَيَبِيعُ أَحَدُ وَلَدِ الْمَيِّتِ حَقَّهُ فِي تِلْكَ الأَرْضِ فَإِنَّ أَخَا الْبَائِعِ أَحَقُّ بِشُفْعَتِهِ مِنْ عُمُومَتِهِ شُرَكَاءِ أَبِيهِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَهَذَا الأَمْرُ عِنْدَنَا . قَالَ مَالِكٌ الشُّفْعَةُ بَيْنَ الشُّرَكَاءِ عَلَى قَدْرِ حِصَصِهِمْ يَأْخُذُ كُلُّ إِنْسَانٍ مِنْهُمْ بِقَدْرِ نَصِيبِهِ إِنْ كَانَ قَلِيلاً فَقَلِيلاً وَإِنْ كَانَ كَثِيرًا فَبِقَدْرِهِ وَذَلِكَ إِنْ تَشَاحُّوا فِيهَا . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فَأَمَّا أَنْ يَشْتَرِيَ رَجُلٌ مِنْ رَجُلٍ مِنْ شُرَكَائِهِ حَقَّهُ فَيَقُولُ أَحَدُ الشُّرَكَاءِ أَنَا آخُذُ مِنَ الشُّفْعَةِ بِقَدْرِ حِصَّتِي . وَيَقُولُ الْمُشْتَرِي إِنْ شِئْتَ أَنْ تَأْخُذَ الشُّفْعَةَ كُلَّهَا أَسْلَمْتُهَا إِلَيْكَ وَإِنْ شِئْتَ أَنْ تَدَعَ فَدَعْ فَإِنَّ الْمُشْتَرِيَ إِذَا خَيَّرَهُ فِي هَذَا وَأَسْلَمَهُ إِلَيْهِ فَلَيْسَ لِلشَّفِيعِ إِلاَّ أَنْ يَأْخُذَ الشُّفْعَةَ كُلَّهَا أَوْ يُسْلِمَهَا إِلَيْهِ فَإِنْ أَخَذَهَا فَهُوَ أَحَقُّ بِهَا وَإِلاَّ فَلاَ شَىْءَ لَهُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي الرَّجُلِ يَشْتَرِي الأَرْضَ فَيَعْمُرُهَا بِالأَصْلِ يَضَعُهُ فِيهَا أَوِ الْبِئْرِ يَحْفِرُهَا ثُمَّ يَأْتِي رَجُلٌ فَيُدْرِكُ فِيهَا حَقًّا فَيُرِيدُ أَنْ يَأْخُذَهَا بِالشُّفْعَةِ إِنَّهُ لاَ شُفْعَةَ لَهُ فِيهَا إِلاَّ أَنْ يُعْطِيَهُ قِيمَةَ مَا عَمَرَ فَإِنْ أَعْطَاهُ قِيمَةَ مَا عَمَرَ كَانَ أَحَقَّ بِالشُّفْعَةِ وَإِلاَّ فَلاَ حَقَّ لَهُ فِيهَا . قَالَ مَالِكٌ مَنْ بَاعَ حِصَّتَهُ مِنْ أَرْضٍ أَوْ دَارٍ مُشْتَرَكَةٍ فَلَمَّا عَلِمَ أَنَّ صَاحِبَ الشُّفْعَةِ يَأْخُذُ بِالشُّفْعَةِ اسْتَقَالَ الْمُشْتَرِي فَأَقَالَهُ . قَالَ لَيْسَ ذَلِكَ لَهُ وَالشَّفِيعُ أَحَقُّ بِهَا بِالثَّمَنِ الَّذِي كَانَ بَاعَهَا بِهِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ مَنِ اشْتَرَى شِقْصًا فِي دَارٍ أَوْ أَرْضٍ وَحَيَوَانًا وَعُرُوضًا فِي صَفْقَةٍ وَاحِدَةٍ فَطَلَبَ الشَّفِيعُ شُفْعَتَهُ فِي الدَّارِ أَوِ الأَرْضِ فَقَالَ الْمُشْتَرِي خُذْ مَا اشْتَرَيْتُ جَمِيعًا فَإِنِّي إِنَّمَا اشْتَرَيْتُهُ جَمِيعًا . قَالَ مَالِكٌ بَلْ يَأْخُذُ الشَّفِيعُ شُفْعَتَهُ فِي الدَّارِ أَوِ الأَرْضِ بِحِصَّتِهَا مِنْ ذَلِكَ الثَّمَنِ يُقَامُ كُلُّ شَىْءٍ اشْتَرَاهُ مِنْ ذَلِكَ عَلَى حِدَتِهِ عَلَى الثَّمَنِ الَّذِي اشْتَرَاهُ بِهِ ثُمَّ يَأْخُذُ الشَّفِيعُ شُفْعَتَهُ بِالَّذِي يُصِيبُهَا مِنَ الْقِيمَةِ مِنْ رَأْسِ الثَّمَنِ وَلاَ يَأْخُذُ مِنَ الْحَيَوَانِ وَالْعُرُوضِ شَيْئًا إِلاَّ أَنْ يَشَاءَ ذَلِكَ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَمَنْ بَاعَ شِقْصًا مِنْ أَرْضٍ مُشْتَرَكَةٍ فَسَلَّمَ بَعْضُ مَنْ لَهُ فِيهَا الشُّفْعَةُ لِلْبَائِعِ وَأَبَى بَعْضُهُمْ إِلاَّ أَنْ يَأْخُذَ بِشُفْعَتِهِ إِنَّ مَنْ أَبَى أَنْ يُسَلِّمَ يَأْخُذُ بِالشُّفْعَةِ كُلِّهَا وَلَيْسَ لَهُ أَنْ يَأْخُذَ بِقَدْرِ حَقِّهِ وَيَتْرُكَ مَا بَقِيَ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي نَفَرٍ شُرَكَاءَ فِي دَارٍ وَاحِدَةٍ فَبَاعَ أَحَدُهُمْ حِصَّتَهُ وَشُرَكَاؤُهُ غُيَّبٌ كُلُّهُمْ إِلاَّ رَجُلاً فَعُرِضَ عَلَى الْحَاضِرِ أَنْ يَأْخُذَ بِالشُّفْعَةِ أَوْ يَتْرُكَ . فَقَالَ أَنَا آخُذُ بِحِصَّتِي وَأَتْرُكُ حِصَصَ شُرَكَائِي حَتَّى يَقْدَمُوا فَإِنْ أَخَذُوا فَذَلِكَ وَإِنْ تَرَكُوا أَخَذْتُ جَمِيعَ الشُّفْعَةِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ لَيْسَ لَهُ إِلاَّ أَنْ يَأْخُذَ ذَلِكَ كُلَّهُ أَوْ يَتْرُكَ فَإِنْ جَاءَ شُرَكَاؤُهُ أَخَذُوا مِنْهُ أَوْ تَرَكُوا إِنْ شَاءُوا فَإِذَا عُرِضَ هَذَا عَلَيْهِ فَلَمْ يَقْبَلْهُ فَلاَ أَرَى لَهُ شُفْعَةً .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me that he heard the like of that from Sulayman
ibn Yasar.

Malik spoke about a man who bought out one of the
partners in a shared property, by paying the man with an animal, a
slave, a slave-girl, or the equivalent of that in goods. Then another
partner decided to exercise his right of pre-emption after that, and
he found that the slave or slave-girl had died, and no one knew what
her value had been. The buyer claimed, "The value of the slave or
slave-girl was 100 dinars." The partner with the right of pre-emption
claimed, "The value was 50 dinars."

Malik said, "The buyer
takes an oath that the value of what he payed was 100 dinars. Then if
the one with the right of pre-emption wishes, he can compensate him,
or else he can leave it, unless he can bring a clear proof that the
slave or slave-girl's value is less than what the buyer said. If
someone gives away his portion of a shared house or land and the
recipient repays him for it by cash or goods, the partners can take it
by pre-emption if they wish and pay off the recipient the value of
what he gave in dinars or dirhams. If someone makes a gift of his
portion of a shared house or land, and does not take any remuneration
and does not seek to, and a partner wants to take it for its value, he
cannot do so as long as the original partner has not been given
recompense for it. If there is any recompense, the one with the right
of pre-emption can have it for the price of the recompense."

Malik spoke about a man who bought into a piece of shared land for a
price on credit, and one of the partners wanted to possess it by right
of pre-emption . Malik said, "If it seems likely that the partner can
meet the terms, he has right of pre-emption for the same credit terms.
If it is feared that he will not be able to meet the terms, but he can
bring a wealthy and reliable guarantor of equal standing to the one
who bought into the land, he can also take possession."

Malik
said, "A person's absence does not sever his right of pre-emption.
Even if he is a way for a long time, there is no time limit after
which the right of preemption is cut off."

Malik said that if
a man left land to a number of his children, then one of them who had
a child died and the child of the deceased sold his right in that
land, the brother of the seller was more entitled to pre-empt him than
his paternal uncles, the partners of his father.

Malik said,
"This is what is done in our community."

Malik said, "Pre-
emption is shared between partners according to their existing shares.
Each of them takes according to his portion. If it is small, he has
little. If it is great, it is according to that. That is if they are
tenacious and contend with each other about it."

Malik said,
"As for a man who buys out the share of one of his partners, and one
of the other partners says, 'I will take a portion according to my
share,' and the first partner says, 'If you wish to take all the
preemption, I will give it up to you. If you wish to leave it, then
leave it.' If the first partner gives him the choice and hands it over
to him, the second partner can only take all the pre-emption or give
it back. If he takes it, he is entitled to it. If not, he has
nothing."

Malik spoke about a man who bought land, and
developed it by planting trees or digging a well etc., and then
someone came, and seeing that he had a right in the land, wanted to
take possession of it by pre-emption. Malik said "He has no right of
preemption unless he compensates the other for his expenditure. If he
gives him the price of what he has developed, he is entitled to pre-
emption . If not, he has no right in it."

Malik said that
someone who sold off his portion of a shared house or land and then,
on learning that some one with a right of pre-emption was to take
possession by that right, asked the buyer to revoke the sale, and he
did so, did not have the right to do that. The pre-emptor has more
right to the property for the price for which he sold it.

In
the case of some one who bought along with a section of a shared house
or land, an animal and goods (that were not shared), so that when any
one demanded his right of pre-emption in the house or land he said,
"Take what I have bought altogether, for I bought it altogether,"
Malik said, "The pre-emptor need only take possession of the house or
land. Each thing the man bought is assessed according to its share of
the lump sum the man paid. Then the pre-emptor takes possession of his
right for a price which is appropriate on that basis. He does not take
any animals or goods unless he wants to do that."

Malik said,
"If someone sells a section of shared land, and one of those who have
the right of preemption surrenders it to the buyer and another refuses
to do other than take his pre-emption, the one who refuses to
surrender has to take all the preemption, and he cannot take according
to his right and leave what remains.

In the case where one of
a number of partners in one house sold his share when all his partners
were away except for one man, the one present was given the choice of
either taking the pre-emption or leaving it, and he said, 'I will take
my portion and leave the portions of my partners until they are
present. If they take it, that is that. If they leave it, I will take
all the pre-emption,' Malik said, 'He can only take it all or leave
it. If his partners come, they can take from him or leave it as they
wish. If this is offered to him and he does not accept, I think that
he has no pre-emption.' "


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_text_ar: قَالَ يَحْيَى قَالَ مَالِكٌ عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ عُمَارَةَ، عَنْ أَبِي بَكْرِ بْنِ حَزْمٍ، أَنَّ عُثْمَانَ بْنَ عَفَّانَ، قَالَ إِذَا وَقَعَتِ الْحُدُودُ فِي الأَرْضِ فَلاَ شُفْعَةَ فِيهَا وَلاَ شُفْعَةَ فِي بِئْرٍ وَلاَ فِي فَحْلِ النَّخْلِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَعَلَى هَذَا الأَمْرُ عِنْدَنَا . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَلاَ شُفْعَةَ فِي طَرِيقٍ صَلُحَ الْقَسْمُ فِيهَا أَوْ لَمْ يَصْلُحْ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَالأَمْرُ عِنْدَنَا أَنَّهُ لاَ شُفْعَةَ فِي عَرْصَةِ دَارٍ صَلُحَ الْقَسْمُ فِيهَا أَوْ لَمْ يَصْلُحْ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي رَجُلٍ اشْتَرَى شِقْصًا مِنْ أَرْضٍ مُشْتَرَكَةٍ عَلَى أَنَّهُ فِيهَا بِالْخِيَارِ فَأَرَادَ شُرَكَاءُ الْبَائِعِ أَنْ يَأْخُذُوا مَا بَاعَ شَرِيكُهُمْ بِالشُّفْعَةِ قَبْلَ أَنْ يَخْتَارَ الْمُشْتَرِي إِنَّ ذَلِكَ لاَ يَكُونُ لَهُمْ حَتَّى يَأْخُذَ الْمُشْتَرِي وَيَثْبُتَ لَهُ الْبَيْعُ فَإِذَا وَجَبَ لَهُ الْبَيْعُ فَلَهُمُ الشُّفْعَةُ . وَقَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي الرَّجُلِ يَشْتَرِي أَرْضًا فَتَمْكُثُ فِي يَدَيْهِ حِينًا ثُمَّ يَأْتِي رَجُلٌ فَيُدْرِكُ فِيهَا حَقًّا بِمِيرَاثٍ إِنَّ لَهُ الشُّفْعَةَ إِنْ ثَبَتَ حَقُّهُ وَإِنَّ مَا أَغَلَّتِ الأَرْضُ مِنْ غَلَّةٍ فَهِيَ لِلْمُشْتَرِي الأَوَّلِ إِلَى يَوْمِ يَثْبُتُ حَقُّ الآخَرِ لأَنَّهُ قَدْ كَانَ ضَمِنَهَا لَوْ هَلَكَ مَا كَانَ فِيهَا مِنْ غِرَاسٍ أَوْ ذَهَبَ بِهِ سَيْلٌ . قَالَ فَإِنْ طَالَ الزَّمَانُ أَوْ هَلَكَ الشُّهُودُ أَوْ مَاتَ الْبَائِعُ أَوِ الْمُشْتَرِي أَوْ هُمَا حَيَّانِ فَنُسِيَ أَصْلُ الْبَيْعِ وَالاِشْتِرَاءِ لِطُولِ الزَّمَانِ فَإِنَّ الشُّفْعَةَ تَنْقَطِعُ وَيَأْخُذُ حَقَّهُ الَّذِي ثَبَتَ لَهُ وَإِنْ كَانَ أَمْرُهُ عَلَى غَيْرِ هَذَا الْوَجْهِ فِي حَدَاثَةِ الْعَهْدِ وَقُرْبِهِ وَأَنَّهُ يَرَى أَنَّ الْبَائِعَ غَيَّبَ الثَّمَنَ وَأَخْفَاهُ لِيَقْطَعَ بِذَلِكَ حَقَّ صَاحِبِ الشُّفْعَةِ قُوِّمَتِ الأَرْضُ عَلَى قَدْرِ مَا يُرَى أَنَّهُ ثَمَنُهَا فَيَصِيرُ ثَمَنُهَا إِلَى ذَلِكَ ثُمَّ يُنْظَرُ إِلَى مَا زَادَ فِي الأَرْضِ مِنْ بِنَاءٍ أَوْ غِرَاسٍ أَوْ عِمَارَةٍ فَيَكُونُ عَلَى مَا يَكُونُ عَلَيْهِ مَنِ ابْتَاعَ الأَرْضَ بِثَمَنٍ مَعْلُومٍ ثُمَّ بَنَى فِيهَا وَغَرَسَ ثُمَّ أَخَذَهَا صَاحِبُ الشُّفْعَةِ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَالشُّفْعَةُ ثَابِتَةٌ فِي مَالِ الْمَيِّتِ كَمَا هِيَ فِي مَالِ الْحَىِّ فَإِنْ خَشِيَ أَهْلُ الْمَيِّتِ أَنْ يَنْكَسِرَ مَالُ الْمَيِّتِ قَسَمُوهُ ثُمَّ بَاعُوهُ فَلَيْسَ عَلَيْهِمْ فِيهِ شُفْعَةٌ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَلاَ شُفْعَةَ عِنْدَنَا فِي عَبْدٍ وَلاَ وَلِيدَةٍ وَلاَ بَعِيرٍ وَلاَ بَقَرَةٍ وَلاَ شَاةٍ وَلاَ فِي شَىْءٍ مِنَ الْحَيَوَانِ وَلاَ فِي ثَوْبٍ وَلاَ فِي بِئْرٍ لَيْسَ لَهَا بَيَاضٌ إِنَّمَا الشُّفْعَةُ فِيمَا يَصْلُحُ أَنَّهُ يَنْقَسِمُ وَتَقَعُ فِيهِ الْحُدُودُ مِنَ الأَرْضِ فَأَمَّا مَا لاَ يَصْلُحُ فِيهِ الْقَسْمُ فَلاَ شُفْعَةَ فِيهِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَمَنِ اشْتَرَى أَرْضًا فِيهَا شُفْعَةٌ لِنَاسٍ حُضُورٍ فَلْيَرْفَعْهُمْ إِلَى السُّلْطَانِ فَإِمَّا أَنْ يَسْتَحِقُّوا وَإِمَّا أَنْ يُسَلِّمَ لَهُ السُّلْطَانُ فَإِنْ تَرَكَهُمْ فَلَمْ يَرْفَعْ أَمْرَهُمْ إِلَى السُّلْطَانِ وَقَدْ عَلِمُوا بِاشْتِرَائِهِ فَتَرَكُوا ذَلِكَ حَتَّى طَالَ زَمَانُهُ ثُمَّ جَاءُوا يَطْلُبُونَ شُفْعَتَهُمْ فَلاَ أَرَى ذَلِكَ لَهُمْ .

hadith_text_en:
Yahya said that Malik related from Muhammad ibn Umara from Abu
Bakr ibn Hazm that Uthman ibn Affan said, "When boundaries are fixed
in land, there is no pre-emption in it. There is no pre-emption in a
well or in male palm trees. "

Malik said, "This is what is
done in our community."

Malik said, "There is no pre-emption
in a road, whether or not it is practical to divide it."

Malik said, "What is done in our community is that there is no pre-
emption in the courtyard of a house, whether or not it is practical to
divide it."

Malik spoke about a man who bought into a shared
property provided that he had the option of withdrawal and the
partners of the seller wanted to take what their partner was selling
by pre-emption before the buyer had exercised his option. Malik said,
"They cannot do that until the buyer has taken possession and the sale
is confirmed for him. When the sale is confirmed, they have the right
of pre-emption."

Malik spoke about a man who bought land and
it remained in his hands for some time. Then a man came and saw that
he had a share of the land by inheritance. Malik said, "If the man's
right of inheritance is established, he also has a right of
preemption. If the land has produced a crop, the crop belongs to the
buyer until the day when the right of the other is established,
because he has tended what was planted against being destroyed or
being carried away by a flood."

Malik continued, "If the time
has been long, or the witnesses are dead or the seller has died, or
the buyer has died, or they are both alive and the basis of the sale
and purchase has been forgotten because of the length of time, pre-
emption is discontinued. A man only takes his right by inheritance
which has been established for him. If his situation differs from
this, because the sale transaction is recent and he sees that the
seller has concealed the price in order to sever his right of pre-
emption, the value of the land is estimated, and he buys the land for
that price by his right of pre-emption. Then the buildings, plants, or
structures which are extra to the land are looked at, so he is in the
position of some one who bought the land for a known price, and then
after that built on it and planted. The owner of pre-emption takes
possession after that is included."

Malik said, "Pre-emption
is applied to the property of the deceased as it is applied to the
property of the living. If the family of the deceased fear to break up
the property of the deceased, then they share it and sell it, and they
have no pre-emption in it."

Malik said, "There is no pre-
emption among us in a slave or a slave-girl or a camel, a cow, sheep,
or any animal, nor in clothes or a well which does not have any
uncultivated land around it. Pre-emption is in what can be usefully
divided, and in land in which boundaries occur. As for what cannot be
usefully divided, there is no pre-emption in it."

Malik said,
"Some one who buys land in which people who are present have a right
of pre-emption, refers them to the Sultan and either they claim their
right or the Sultan surrenders it to him. If he were to leave them,
and not refer their situation to the Sultan and they knew about his
purchase, and then they left it until a long time had passed and then
came demanding their pre-emption, I do not think that they would have
it."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب الأقضية

hadith_chapter_name_en: Judgements

hadith_text_ar:
حَدَّثَنَا يَحْيَى، عَنْ مَالِكٍ، عَنْ هِشَامِ بْنِ عُرْوَةَ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ زَيْنَبَ بِنْتِ أَبِي سَلَمَةَ، عَنْ أُمِّ سَلَمَةَ، زَوْجِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ
" إِنَّمَا أَنَا بَشَرٌ وَإِنَّكُمْ تَخْتَصِمُونَ إِلَىَّ فَلَعَلَّ بَعْضَكُمْ أَنْ يَكُونَ أَلْحَنَ بِحُجَّتِهِ مِنْ بَعْضٍ فَأَقْضِيَ لَهُ عَلَى نَحْوِ مَا أَسْمَعُ مِنْهُ فَمَنْ قَضَيْتُ لَهُ بِشَىْءٍ مِنْ حَقِّ أَخِيهِ فَلاَ يَأْخُذَنَّ مِنْهُ شَيْئًا فَإِنَّمَا أَقْطَعُ لَهُ قِطْعَةً مِنَ النَّارِ " .

hadith_text_en:
Yahya related to me from Malik from Hisham ibn Urwa from his
father from Zaynab bint Abi Salama from Umm Salama, the wife of the
Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, that the Messenger
of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, "I am but a
man to whom you bring your disputes. Perhaps one of you is more
eloquent in his proof than the other, so I give judgement according to
what I have heard from him. Whatever I decide for him which is part of
the right of his brother, he must not take any of it, for I am
granting him a portion of the Fire."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب الأقضية

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ يَحْيَى بْنِ سَعِيدٍ، عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ الْمُسَيَّبِ، أَنَّ عُمَرَ بْنَ الْخَطَّابِ، اخْتَصَمَ إِلَيْهِ مُسْلِمٌ وَيَهُودِيٌّ فَرَأَى عُمَرُ أَنَّ الْحَقَّ لِلْيَهُودِيِّ فَقَضَى لَهُ فَقَالَ لَهُ الْيَهُودِيُّ وَاللَّهِ لَقَدْ قَضَيْتَ بِالْحَقِّ . فَضَرَبَهُ عُمَرُ بْنُ الْخَطَّابِ بِالدِّرَّةِ ثُمَّ قَالَ وَمَا يُدْرِيكَ فَقَالَ لَهُ الْيَهُودِيُّ إِنَّا نَجِدُ أَنَّهُ لَيْسَ قَاضٍ يَقْضِي بِالْحَقِّ إِلاَّ كَانَ عَنْ يَمِينِهِ مَلَكٌ وَعَنْ شِمَالِهِ مَلَكٌ يُسَدِّدَانِهِ وَيُوَفِّقَانِهِ لِلْحَقِّ مَادَامَ مَعَ الْحَقِّ فَإِذَا تَرَكَ الْحَقَّ عَرَجَا وَتَرَكَاهُ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me from Yahya ibn Said from Said ibn al-Musayyab
that Umar ibn al-Khattab had a dispute brought to him between a muslim
and a jew. Umar saw that the right belonged to the jew and decided in
his favour. The jew said to him, "By Allah! You have judged
correctly.'' So Umar ibn al-Khattab struck him with a whip and said,
"How can you be sure." The jew said to him, "We find that there is no
judge who judges correctly but that there is an angel on his right
side and an angel on his left side who guide him and give him success
in the truth as long as he is with the truth. When he leaves the
truth, they rise and leave him."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب الأقضية

hadith_text_ar:
حَدَّثَنَا يَحْيَى، عَنْ مَالِكٍ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ أَبِي بَكْرِ بْنِ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ عَمْرِو بْنِ حَزْمٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عَمْرِو بْنِ عُثْمَانَ، عَنْ أَبِي عَمْرَةَ الأَنْصَارِيِّ، عَنْ زَيْدِ بْنِ خَالِدٍ الْجُهَنِيِّ، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ
" أَلاَ أُخْبِرُكُمْ بِخَيْرِ الشُّهَدَاءِ الَّذِي يَأْتِي بِشَهَادَتِهِ قَبْلَ أَنْ يُسْأَلَهَا أَوْ يُخْبِرُ بِشَهَادَتِهِ قَبْلَ أَنْ يُسْأَلَهَا " .

hadith_text_en:
Yahya related to me from Malik from Abdullah ibn Abi Bakr ibn
Muhammad ibn Amr ibn Hazm from his father from Abdullah ibn Amr ibn
Uthman from Abu Amra al-Ansari from Zayd ibn Khalid al-Juhani that the
Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said,
"Shall I not tell you who is the best of witnesses? The one who brings
his testimony before he is asked for it, or tells his testimony before
he is asked for it."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب الأقضية

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، عَنْ رَبِيعَةَ بْنِ أَبِي عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، أَنَّهُ قَالَ قَدِمَ عَلَى عُمَرَ بْنِ الْخَطَّابِ رَجُلٌ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْعِرَاقِ فَقَالَ لَقَدْ جِئْتُكَ لأَمْرٍ مَا لَهُ رَأْسٌ وَلاَ ذَنَبٌ . فَقَالَ عُمَرُ مَا هُوَ قَالَ شَهَادَاتُ الزُّورِ ظَهَرَتْ بِأَرْضِنَا . فَقَالَ عُمَرُ أَوَقَدْ كَانَ ذَلِكَ قَالَ نَعَمْ . فَقَالَ عُمَرُ وَاللَّهِ لاَ يُؤْسَرُ رَجُلٌ فِي الإِسْلاَمِ بِغَيْرِ الْعُدُولِ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me that Rabia ibn Abi Abd ar-Rahman said, "An
Iraqi man came before Umar ibn al-Khattab and said, 'I have come to
you because of a matter which has no beginning and no end.' Umar said,
'What is it?' The man said, 'False testimony has appeared in our
land.' Umar said, 'Is that so?' He said, 'Yes.' Umar said, 'By Allah!
A man is not detained in Islam without just witnesses.' "


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب الأقضية

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، أَنَّهُ بَلَغَهُ أَنَّ عُمَرَ بْنَ الْخَطَّابِ، قَالَ لاَ تَجُوزُ شَهَادَةُ خَصْمٍ وَلاَ ظَنِينٍ .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me that Umar ibn al-Khattab said, "The testimony of
some one known to bear a grudge or to be unreliable is not accepted."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب الأقضية

hadith_text_ar: قَالَ يَحْيَى عَنْ مَالِكٍ، أَنَّهُ بَلَغَهُ عَنْ سُلَيْمَانَ بْنِ يَسَارٍ، وَغَيْرِهِ، أَنَّهُمْ سُئِلُوا عَنْ رَجُلٍ، جُلِدَ الْحَدَّ أَتَجُوزُ شَهَادَتُهُ فَقَالُوا نَعَمْ إِذَا ظَهَرَتْ مِنْهُ التَّوْبَةُ .

hadith_text_en:
Yahya said from Malik that he heard from Sulayman ibn Yasar and
others that when they were asked whether the testimony of a man
flogged for a hadd crime was permitted, they said, "Yes, when
repentance (tawba) appears from him."

Malik related to me
that he heard Ibn Shihab being asked about that and he said the like
of what Sulayman ibn Yasar said.

Malik said, "That is what is
done in our community. It is by the word of Allah, the Blessed, the
Exalted, 'And those who accuse women who are muhsan, and then do not
bring four witnesses, flog them with eighty lashes, and do not accept
any testimony of theirs ever. They indeed are evil-doers, save those
who turn in tawba after that and make amends. Allah is Forgiving,
Merciful.' " (Sura 24 ayat 4).


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب الأقضية

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ ابْنَ شِهَابٍ، يُسْأَلُ عَنْ ذَلِكَ، فَقَالَ مِثْلَ مَا قَالَ سُلَيْمَانُ بْنُ يَسَارٍ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَذَلِكَ الأَمْرُ عِنْدَنَا وَذَلِكَ لِقَوْلِ اللَّهِ تَبَارَكَ وَتَعَالَى {وَالَّذِينَ يَرْمُونَ الْمُحْصَنَاتِ ثُمَّ لَمْ يَأْتُوا بِأَرْبَعَةِ شُهَدَاءَ فَاجْلِدُوهُمْ ثَمَانِينَ جَلْدَةً وَلاَ تَقْبَلُوا لَهُمْ شَهَادَةً أَبَدًا وَأُولَئِكَ هُمُ الْفَاسِقُونَ * إِلاَّ الَّذِينَ تَابُوا مِنْ بَعْدِ ذَلِكَ وَأَصْلَحُوا فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ غَفُورٌ رَحِيمٌ}. قَالَ مَالِكٌ فَالأَمْرُ الَّذِي لاَ اخْتِلاَفَ فِيهِ عِنْدَنَا أَنَّ الَّذِي يُجْلَدُ الْحَدَّ ثُمَّ تَابَ وَأَصْلَحَ تَجُوزُ شَهَادَتُهُ وَهُوَ أَحَبُّ مَا سَمِعْتُ إِلَىَّ فِي ذَلِكَ .


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب الأقضية

hadith_text_ar: قَالَ يَحْيَى قَالَ مَالِكٌ عَنْ جَعْفَرِ بْنِ مُحَمَّدٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَضَى بِالْيَمِينِ مَعَ الشَّاهِدِ .

hadith_text_en:
Yahya said, "Malik said from Jafar ibn Muhammad from his father
that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace,
pronounced judgement on the basis of an oath with one witness."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب الأقضية

hadith_text_ar: وَعَنْ مَالِكٍ، عَنْ أَبِي الزِّنَادِ، أَنَّ عُمَرَ بْنَ عَبْدِ الْعَزِيزِ، كَتَبَ إِلَى عَبْدِ الْحَمِيدِ بْنِ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ زَيْدِ بْنِ الْخَطَّابِ وَهُوَ عَامِلٌ عَلَى الْكُوفَةِ أَنِ اقْضِ بِالْيَمِينِ مَعَ الشَّاهِدِ .

hadith_text_en:
From Malik from Abu'z-Zinad that Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz wrote to
Abd al-Hamid ibn Abd ar-Rahman ibn Zayd ibn al-Khattab who was the
governor of Kufa, "Pronounce judgement on the basis of an oath with
one witness."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب الأقضية

hadith_text_ar: وَحَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ، أَنَّهُ بَلَغَهُ أَنَّ أَبَا سَلَمَةَ بْنَ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، وَسُلَيْمَانَ بْنَ يَسَارٍ، سُئِلاَ هَلْ يُقْضَى بِالْيَمِينِ مَعَ الشَّاهِدِ فَقَالاَ نَعَمْ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ مَضَتِ السُّنَّةُ فِي الْقَضَاءِ بِالْيَمِينِ مَعَ الشَّاهِدِ الْوَاحِدِ يَحْلِفُ صَاحِبُ الْحَقِّ مَعَ شَاهِدِهِ وَيَسْتَحِقُّ حَقَّهُ فَإِنْ نَكَلَ وَأَبَى أَنْ يَحْلِفَ أُحْلِفَ الْمَطْلُوبُ فَإِنْ حَلَفَ سَقَطَ عَنْهُ ذَلِكَ الْحَقُّ وَإِنْ أَبَى أَنْ يَحْلِفَ ثَبَتَ عَلَيْهِ الْحَقُّ لِصَاحِبِهِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَإِنَّمَا يَكُونُ ذَلِكَ فِي الأَمْوَالِ خَاصَّةً وَلاَ يَقَعُ ذَلِكَ فِي شَىْءٍ مِنَ الْحُدُودِ وَلاَ فِي نِكَاحٍ وَلاَ فِي طَلاَقٍ وَلاَ فِي عَتَاقَةٍ وَلاَ فِي سَرِقَةٍ وَلاَ فِي فِرْيَةٍ فَإِنْ قَالَ قَائِلٌ فَإِنَّ الْعَتَاقَةَ مِنَ الأَمْوَالِ . فَقَدْ أَخْطَأَ لَيْسَ ذَلِكَ عَلَى مَا قَالَ وَلَوْ كَانَ ذَلِكَ عَلَى مَا قَالَ لَحَلَفَ الْعَبْدُ مَعَ شَاهِدِهِ إِذَا جَاءَ بِشَاهِدٍ أَنَّ سَيِّدَهُ أَعْتَقَهُ وَأَنَّ الْعَبْدَ إِذَا جَاءَ بِشَاهِدٍ عَلَى مَالٍ مِنَ الأَمْوَالِ ادَّعَاهُ حَلَفَ مَعَ شَاهِدِهِ وَاسْتَحَقَّ حَقَّهُ كَمَا يَحْلِفُ الْحُرُّ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فَالسُّنَّةُ عِنْدَنَا أَنَّ الْعَبْدَ إِذَا جَاءَ بِشَاهِدٍ عَلَى عَتَاقَتِهِ اسْتُحْلِفَ سَيِّدُهُ مَا أَعْتَقَهُ وَبَطَلَ ذَلِكَ عَنْهُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَكَذَلِكَ السُّنَّةُ عِنْدَنَا أَيْضًا فِي الطَّلاَقِ إِذَا جَاءَتِ الْمَرْأَةُ بِشَاهِدٍ أَنَّ زَوْجَهَا طَلَّقَهَا أُحْلِفَ زَوْجُهَا مَا طَلَّقَهَا فَإِذَا حَلَفَ لَمْ يَقَعْ عَلَيْهِ الطَّلاَقُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فَسُنَّةُ الطَّلاَقِ وَالْعَتَاقَةِ فِي الشَّاهِدِ الْوَاحِدِ وَاحِدَةٌ إِنَّمَا يَكُونُ الْيَمِينُ عَلَى زَوْجِ الْمَرْأَةِ وَعَلَى سَيِّدِ الْعَبْدِ وَإِنَّمَا الْعَتَاقَةُ حَدٌّ مِنَ الْحُدُودِ لاَ تَجُوزُ فِيهَا شَهَادَةُ النِّسَاءِ لأَنَّهُ إِذَا عَتَقَ الْعَبْدُ ثَبَتَتْ حُرْمَتُهُ وَوَقَعَتْ لَهُ الْحُدُودُ وَوَقَعَتْ عَلَيْهِ وَإِنْ زَنَى وَقَدْ أُحْصِنَ رُجِمَ وَإِنْ قَتَلَ الْعَبْدَ قُتِلَ بِهِ وَثَبَتَ لَهُ الْمِيرَاثُ بَيْنَهُ وَبَيْنَ مَنْ يُوَارِثُهُ فَإِنِ احْتَجَّ مُحْتَجٌّ فَقَالَ لَوْ أَنَّ رَجُلاً أَعْتَقَ عَبْدَهُ وَجَاءَ رَجُلٌ يَطْلُبُ سَيِّدَ الْعَبْدِ بِدَيْنٍ لَهُ عَلَيْهِ فَشَهِدَ لَهُ عَلَى حَقِّهِ ذَلِكَ رَجُلٌ وَامْرَأَتَانِ فَإِنَّ ذَلِكَ يُثْبِتُ الْحَقَّ عَلَى سَيِّدِ الْعَبْدِ حَتَّى تُرَدَّ بِهِ عَتَاقَتُهُ إِذَا لَمْ يَكُنْ لِسَيِّدِ الْعَبْدِ مَالٌ غَيْرُ الْعَبْدِ يُرِيدُ أَنْ يُجِيزَ بِذَلِكَ شَهَادَةَ النِّسَاءِ فِي الْعَتَاقَةِ فَإِنَّ ذَلِكَ لَيْسَ عَلَى مَا قَالَ وَإِنَّمَا مَثَلُ ذَلِكَ الرَّجُلُ يَعْتِقُ عَبْدَهُ ثُمَّ يَأْتِي طَالِبُ الْحَقِّ عَلَى سَيِّدِهِ بِشَاهِدٍ وَاحِدٍ فَيَحْلِفُ مَعَ شَاهِدِهِ ثُمَّ يَسْتَحِقُّ حَقَّهُ وَتُرَدُّ بِذَلِكَ عَتَاقَةُ الْعَبْدِ أَوْ يَأْتِي الرَّجُلُ قَدْ كَانَتْ بَيْنَهُ وَبَيْنَ سَيِّدِ الْعَبْدِ مُخَالَطَةٌ وَمُلاَبَسَةٌ فَيَزْعُمُ أَنَّ لَهُ عَلَى سَيِّدِ الْعَبْدِ مَالاً فَيُقَالُ لِسَيِّدِ الْعَبْدِ احْلِفْ مَا عَلَيْكَ مَا ادَّعَى فَإِنْ نَكَلَ وَأَبَى أَنْ يَحْلِفَ حُلِّفَ صَاحِبُ الْحَقِّ وَثَبَتَ حَقُّهُ عَلَى سَيِّدِ الْعَبْدِ فَيَكُونُ ذَلِكَ يَرُدُّ عَتَاقَةَ الْعَبْدِ إِذَا ثَبَتَ الْمَالُ عَلَى سَيِّدِهِ . قَالَ وَكَذَلِكَ أَيْضًا الرَّجُلُ يَنْكِحُ الأَمَةَ فَتَكُونُ امْرَأَتَهُ فَيَأْتِي سَيِّدُ الأَمَةِ إِلَى الرَّجُلِ الَّذِي تَزَوَّجَهَا فَيَقُولُ ابْتَعْتَ مِنِّي جَارِيَتِي فُلاَنَةَ أَنْتَ وَفُلاَنٌ بِكَذَا وَكَذَا دِينَارًا . فَيُنْكِرُ ذَلِكَ زَوْجُ الأَمَةِ فَيَأْتِي سَيِّدُ الأَمَةِ بِرَجُلٍ وَامْرَأَتَيْنِ فَيَشْهَدُونَ عَلَى مَا قَالَ فَيَثْبُتُ بَيْعُهُ وَيَحِقُّ حَقُّهُ وَتَحْرُمُ الأَمَةُ عَلَى زَوْجِهَا وَيَكُونُ ذَلِكَ فِرَاقًا بَيْنَهُمَا وَشَهَادَةُ النِّسَاءِ لاَ تَجُوزُ فِي الطَّلاَقِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَمِنْ ذَلِكَ أَيْضًا الرَّجُلُ يَفْتَرِي عَلَى الرَّجُلِ الْحُرِّ فَيَقَعُ عَلَيْهِ الْحَدُّ فَيَأْتِي رَجُلٌ وَامْرَأَتَانِ فَيَشْهَدُونَ أَنَّ الَّذِي افْتُرِيَ عَلَيْهِ عَبْدٌ مَمْلُوكٌ فَيَضَعُ ذَلِكَ الْحَدَّ عَنِ الْمُفْتَرِي بَعْدَ أَنْ وَقَعَ عَلَيْهِ وَشَهَادَةُ النِّسَاءِ لاَ تَجُوزُ فِي الْفِرْيَةِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَمِمَّا يُشْبِهُ ذَلِكَ أَيْضًا مِمَّا يَفْتَرِقُ فِيهِ الْقَضَاءُ وَمَا مَضَى مِنَ السُّنَّةِ أَنَّ الْمَرْأَتَيْنِ يَشْهَدَانِ عَلَى اسْتِهْلاَلِ الصَّبِيِّ فَيَجِبُ بِذَلِكَ مِيرَاثُهُ حَتَّى يَرِثَ وَيَكُونُ مَالُهُ لِمَنْ يَرِثُهُ إِنْ مَاتَ الصَّبِيُّ وَلَيْسَ مَعَ الْمَرْأَتَيْنِ اللَّتَيْنِ شَهِدَتَا رَجُلٌ وَلاَ يَمِينٌ وَقَدْ يَكُونُ ذَلِكَ فِي الأَمْوَالِ الْعِظَامِ مِنَ الذَّهَبِ وَالْوَرِقِ وَالرِّبَاعِ وَالْحَوَائِطِ وَالرَّقِيقِ وَمَا سِوَى ذَلِكَ مِنَ الأَمْوَالِ وَلَوْ شَهِدَتِ امْرَأَتَانِ عَلَى دِرْهَمٍ وَاحِدٍ أَوْ أَقَلَّ مِنْ ذَلِكَ أَوْ أَكْثَرَ لَمْ تَقْطَعْ شَهَادَتُهُمَا شَيْئًا وَلَمْ تَجُزْ إِلاَّ أَنْ يَكُونَ مَعَهُمَا شَاهِدٌ أَوْ يَمِينٌ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَمِنَ النَّاسِ مَنْ يَقُولُ لاَ تَكُونُ الْيَمِينُ مَعَ الشَّاهِدِ الْوَاحِدِ . وَيَحْتَجُّ بِقَوْلِ اللَّهِ تَبَارَكَ وَتَعَالَى وَقَوْلُهُ الْحَقُّ {وَاسْتَشْهِدُوا شَهِيدَيْنِ مِنْ رِجَالِكُمْ فَإِنْ لَمْ يَكُونَا رَجُلَيْنِ فَرَجُلٌ وَامْرَأَتَانِ مِمَّنْ تَرْضَوْنَ مِنَ الشُّهَدَاءِ} يَقُولُ فَإِنْ لَمْ يَأْتِ بِرَجُلٍ وَامْرَأَتَيْنِ فَلاَ شَىْءَ لَهُ وَلاَ يُحَلَّفُ مَعَ شَاهِدِهِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ فَمِنَ الْحُجَّةِ عَلَى مَنْ قَالَ ذَلِكَ الْقَوْلَ أَنْ يُقَالَ لَهُ أَرَأَيْتَ لَوْ أَنَّ رَجُلاً ادَّعَى عَلَى رَجُلٍ مَالاً أَلَيْسَ يَحْلِفُ الْمَطْلُوبُ مَا ذَلِكَ الْحَقُّ عَلَيْهِ فَإِنْ حَلَفَ بَطَلَ ذَلِكَ عَنْهُ وَإِنْ نَكَلَ عَنِ الْيَمِينِ حُلِّفَ صَاحِبُ الْحَقِّ إِنَّ حَقَّهُ لَحَقٌّ . وَثَبَتَ حَقُّهُ عَلَى صَاحِبِهِ فَهَذَا مَا لاَ اخْتِلاَفَ فِيهِ عِنْدَ أَحَدٍ مِنَ النَّاسِ وَلاَ بِبَلَدٍ مِنَ الْبُلْدَانِ فَبِأَىِّ شَىْءٍ أَخَذَ هَذَا أَوْ فِي أَىِّ مَوْضِعٍ مِنْ كِتَابِ اللَّهِ وَجَدَهُ فَإِنْ أَقَرَّ بِهَذَا فَلْيُقْرِرْ بِالْيَمِينِ مَعَ الشَّاهِدِ وَإِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ ذَلِكَ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ وَأَنَّهُ لَيَكْفِي مِنْ ذَلِكَ مَا مَضَى مِنَ السُّنَّةِ وَلَكِنِ الْمَرْءُ قَدْ يُحِبُّ أَنْ يَعْرِفَ وَجْهَ الصَّوَابِ وَمَوْقِعَ الْحُجَّةِ فَفِي هَذَا بَيَانُ مَا أَشْكَلَ مِنْ ذَلِكَ إِنْ شَاءَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى .

hadith_text_en:
Malik related to me that he heard that Abu Salama ibn Abd ar-
Rahman and Sulayman ibn Yasar were both asked, "Does one pronounce
judgement on the basis of an oath with one witness?" They both said,
"Yes."

Malik said, "The precedent of the sunna in judging by
an oath with one witness is that if the plaintiff takes an oath with
his witness, he is confirmed in his right. If he draws back and
refuses to take an oath, the defendant is made to take an oath. If he
takes an oath, the claim against him is dropped. If he refuses to take
an oath, the claim is confirmed against him."

Malik said,
"This procedure pertains to property cases in particular. It does not
occur in any of the hadd-punishments, nor in marriage, divorce,
freeing slaves, theft or slander. If some one says, 'Freeing slaves
comes under property,' he has erred. It is not as he said. Had it been
as he said, a slave could take an oath with one witness, if he could
find one, that his master had freed him.

"However, when a
slave lays claim to a piece of property, he can take an oath with one
witness and demand his right as the freeman demands his right."

Malik said, "The sunna with us is that when a slave brings
somebody who witnesses that he has been set free, his master is made
to take an oath that he has not freed him, and the slave's claim is
dropped."

Malik said, "The sunna about divorce is also like
that with us. When a woman brings somebody who witnesses that her
husband has divorced her, the husband is made to take an oath that he
has not divorced her. If he takes the oath, the divorce does not
proceed . "

Malik said, "There is only one sunna of bringing
a witness in cases of divorce and freeing a slave. The right to make
an oath only belongs to the husband of the woman, and the master of
the slave. Freeing is a hadd matter, and the testimony of women is not
permitted in it because when a slave is freed, his inviolability is
affirmed and the hadd punishments are applied for and against him. If
he commits fornication and he is a muhsan, he is stoned. If he kills a
slave, he is killed for it. Inheritance is established for him,
between him and whoever inherits from him. If somebody disputes this,
arguing that if a man frees his slave and then a man comes to demand
from the master of the slave payment of a debt, and a man and two
women testify to his right, that establishes the right against the
master of the slave so that his freeing him is cancelled if he only
has the slave as property, inferring by this case that the testimony
of women is permitted in cases of setting free. The case is not as he
suggests (i.e. it is a case of property not freeing). It is like a man
who frees his slave, and then the claimant of a debt comes to the
master and takes an oath with one witness, demanding his right. By
that, the freeing of the slave would be cancelled. Or else a man comes
who has frequent dealings and transactions with the master of the
slave. He claims that he is owed money by the master of the slave.
Someone says to the master of the slave, 'Take an oath that you don't
owe what he claims'. If he draws back and refuses to take an oath, the
one making the claim takes an oath and his right against the master of
the slave is confirmed. That would cancel the freeing of the slave if
it is confirmed that property is owed by the master."

Malik
said, "It is the same case with a man who marries a slave-girl and
then the master of the slave-girl comes to the man who has married her
and claims, 'You and so-and-so have bought my slave-girl from me for
such an amount of dinars. The husband of the slave-girl denies that.
The master of the slave-girl brings a man and two women and they
testify to what he has said. The sale is confirmed and his claim is
considered true. So the slave-girl is haram for her husband and they
have to separate, even though the testimony of women is not accepted
in divorce."

Malik said, "It is also the same case with a man
who accuses a free man, so the hadd falls on him. A man and two women
come and testify that the one accused is a slave. That would remove
the hadd from the accused after it had befallen him, even though the
testimony of women is not accepted in accusations involving hadd
punishments."

Malik said, "Another similar case in which
judgement appears to go against the precedent of the sunna is that two
women testify that a child is born alive and so it is necessary for
him to inherit if a situation arises where he is entitled to inherit,
and the child's property goes to those who inherit from him, if he
dies, and it is not necessary that the two women witnesses should be
accompanied by a man or an oath even though it may involve vast
properties of gold, silver, live-stock, gardens and slaves and other
properties. However, had two women testified to one dirham or more or
less than that in a property case, their testimony would not affect
anything and would not be permitted unless there was a witness or an
oath with them."

Malik said, "There are people who say that
an oath is not acceptable with only one witness and they argue by the
word of Allah the Blessed, the Exalted, and His word is the Truth,
'And call in to witness two witnesses, men; or if the two be not men,
then one man and two women, such witnesses as you approve of.' (Sura 2
ayat 282). Such people argue that if he does not bring one man and two
women, he has no claim and he is not allowed to take an oath with one
witness."

Malik said, "Part of the proof against those who
argue this, is to reply to them, 'Do you think that if a man claimed
property from a man, the one claimed from would not swear that the
claim was false?' If he swears, the claim against him is dropped. If
he refuses to take an oath, the claimant is made to take an oath that
his claim is true, and his right against his companion is established.
There is no dispute about this with any of the people nor in any
country. By what does he take this? In what place in the Book of Allah
does he find it? So if he confirms this, let him confirm the oath with
one witness, even if it is not in the Book of Allah, the Mighty, the
Majestic! It is enough that this is the precedent of the sunna.
However, man wants to recognise the proper course of action and the
location of the proof. In this there is a clarification for what is
obscure about that, if Allah ta'ala wills."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب الأقضية

hadith_text_en:
Yahya said that Malik spoke about a man who died and had a debt
owing to him and there was one witness, and some people had a debt
against him and they had only one witness, and his heirs refused to
take an oath on their rights with their witness. He said, "The
creditors take an oath and take their rights. If there is anything
left over, the heirs do not take any of it. That is because the oaths
were offered to them before and they abandoned them, unless they say,
'We did not know that our companion had extra,' and it is known that
they only abandoned the oaths because of that. I think that they
should take an oath and take what remains after his debt."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب الأقضية

hadith_text_ar: قَالَ يَحْيَى قَالَ مَالِكٌ عَنْ جَمِيلِ بْنِ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ الْمُؤَذِّنِ، أَنَّهُ كَانَ يَحْضُرُ عُمَرَ بْنَ عَبْدِ الْعَزِيزِ وَهُوَ يَقْضِي بَيْنَ النَّاسِ فَإِذَا جَاءَهُ الرَّجُلُ يَدَّعِي عَلَى الرَّجُلِ حَقًّا نَظَرَ فَإِنْ كَانَتْ بَيْنَهُمَا مُخَالَطَةٌ أَوْ مُلاَبَسَةٌ أَحْلَفَ الَّذِي ادُّعِيَ عَلَيْهِ وَإِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ شَىْءٌ مِنْ ذَلِكَ لَمْ يُحَلِّفْهُ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَعَلَى ذَلِكَ الأَمْرُ عِنْدَنَا أَنَّهُ مَنِ ادَّعَى عَلَى رَجُلٍ بِدَعْوَى نُظِرَ فَإِنْ كَانَتْ بَيْنَهُمَا مُخَالَطَةٌ أَوْ مُلاَبَسَةٌ أُحْلِفَ الْمُدَّعَى عَلَيْهِ فَإِنْ حَلَفَ بَطَلَ ذَلِكَ الْحَقُّ عَنْهُ وَإِنْ أَبَى أَنْ يَحْلِفَ وَرَدَّ الْيَمِينَ عَلَى الْمُدَّعِي فَحَلَفَ طَالِبُ الْحَقِّ أَخَذَ حَقَّهُ .

hadith_text_en:
Yahya said, "Malik said about Jamil ibn Abd ar-Rahman al-Muadhdin
that he was present with Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz when he was judging
between people. If a man came to him with a claim against a man, he
examined whether or not there were frequent transactions and dealings
between them. If there were, the defendant could make an oath. If
there was nothing of that nature he did not accept an oath from him."

Malik summed up, "What is done in our community is that if
some one makes a claim against a man, it is examined. If there are
frequent transactions and dealings between them, the defendant is made
to take an oath. If he takes an oath, the claim against him is
dropped. If the defendant refuses to take an oath, and returns the
oath to the claimant, the one claiming his right takes an oath and
takes his due."


book_author_ar: الإمام مالك بن أنس

hadith_chapter_name_ar: كتاب الأقضية

hadith_text_ar: قَالَ يَحْيَى قَالَ مَالِكٌ عَنْ هِشَامِ بْنِ عُرْوَةَ، أَنَّ عَبْدَ اللَّهِ بْنَ الزُّبَيْرِ، كَانَ يَقْضِي بِشَهَادَةِ الصِّبْيَانِ فِيمَا بَيْنَهُمْ مِنَ الْجِرَاحِ . قَالَ مَالِكٌ الأَمْرُ الْمُجْتَمَعُ عَلَيْهِ عِنْدَنَا أَنَّ شَهَادَةَ الصِّبْيَانِ تَجُوزُ فِيمَا بَيْنَهُمْ مِنَ الْجِرَاحِ وَلاَ تَجُوزُ عَلَى غَيْرِهِمْ وَإِنَّمَا تَجُوزُ شَهَادَتُهُمْ فِيمَا بَيْنَهُمْ مِنَ الْجِرَاحِ وَحْدَهَا لاَ تَجُوزُ فِي غَيْرِ ذَلِكَ إِذَا كَانَ ذَلِكَ قَبْلَ أَنْ يَتَفَرَّقُوا أَوْ يُخَبَّبُوا أَوْ يُعَلَّمُوا فَإِنِ افْتَرَقُوا فَلاَ شَهَادَةَ لَهُمْ إِلاَّ أَنْ يَكُونُوا قَدْ أَشْهَدُوا الْعُدُولَ عَلَى شَهَادَتِهِمْ قَبْلَ أَنْ يَفْتَرِقُوا .

hadith_text_en:
Yahya said, "Malik said from Hisham ibn Urwa that Abdullah ibn
az-Zubayr gave judgment based on the testimony of children concerning
the injuries between them."

Malik said, "The generally agreed
on way of doing things in our community is that the testimony of
children is permitted concerning injuries between them. It is not
accepted about anything else. It is only permitted between them if
they testify before they leave the scene of the incident and have been
deceived or instructed. If they leave the scene, they have no
testimony unless they call just witnesses to witness their testimony
before they leave."