i believe everything he says , and it seems not because he wields some kind of dominating psionic power over me , but because somewhere in the intersection between the utter conviction with which he utters the lines and the inescapable , irrefutable logic of what hes mapped out , there is not a snowballs chance in hell that his argument is flawed , that there is some logic hes overlooked , or that a sceptic might thwart his vision in the same way an atheist might triumph over god .