Quod si ita est, cur mihi nosse non liceat vel Zalmoxi bona verba vel Zoroastri sacerdotia? Sin vero more vulgari eum isti proprie magum existimant, qui communione loquendi cum deis immortalibus ad omnia quae velit incredibili quadam ui cantaminum polleat, oppido miror, cur accusare non timuerint quem posse tantum fatentur.
If that is so, why may not I know Zalmoxis words of beauty or Zoroasters priestly lore? But if those people have the commonplace idea that magician strictly means someone able to fulfill his every wish by spells that have some kind of extraordinary power, I am very puzzled why they are not afraid to accuse someone who they say is so powerful.
final_alignments\Apuleius_Apologia.json