1
Vol.:(0123456789)
Scientific Reports |        (2020) 10:17870  
| https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73742-5
www.nature.com/scientificreports
Lower leg muscle–tendon unit 
characteristics are related 
to marathon running performance
Bálint Kovács1,3*, István Kóbor2,3, Zsolt Gyimes1,3, Örs Sebestyén1,3 & József Tihanyi1,3
The human ankle joint and plantar flexor muscle–tendon unit play an important role in endurance 
running. It has been assumed that muscle and tendon interactions and their biomechanical behaviours 
depend on their morphological and architectural characteristics. We aimed to study how plantar flexor 
muscle characteristics influence marathon running performance and to determine whether there 
is any difference in the role of the soleus and gastrocnemii. The right lower leg of ten male distance 
runners was scanned with magnetic resonance imagining. The cross-sectional areas of the Achilles 
tendon, soleus, and lateral and medial gastrocnemius were measured, and the muscle volumes were 
calculated. Additional ultrasound scanning was used to estimate the fascicle length of each muscle to 
calculate the physiological cross-sectional area. Correlations were found between marathon running 
performance and soleus volume (r = 0.55, p = 0.048), soleus cross-sectional area (r = 0.57, p = 0.04), 
soleus physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA-IAAF r = 0.77, p < 0.01, CI± 0.28 to 0.94), Achilles 
tendon thickness (r = 0.65, p < 0.01), and soleus muscle-to-tendon ratio (r = 0.68, p = 0.03). None of 
the gastrocnemius characteristics were associated with marathon performance. We concluded that a 
larger soleus muscle with a thicker Achilles tendon is associated with better marathon performance. 
Based on these results, it can be concluded the morphological characteristics of the lower leg muscle–
tendon unit correlate with running performance.
The human ankle plantar flexor muscles play a major role in producing propulsive force during endurance 
 running1–3. The triceps surae muscle–tendon complex is equipped with a long compliant tendon and a strong and 
diverse muscle structure. It is a generally accepted concept that the Achilles tendon (AT) acts as a spring during 
running to store and return elastic energy and reduce the metabolic energy cost of the contractile  element4,5. 
Running consists of a series of submaximal voluntary muscle contractions; thus, repetitive moderate force pro-
duction is needed to propel the body forward. The magnitude of the contraction force depends on the running 
velocity and the motion of the lower leg. The energetic cost of contraction can be minimized if the fascicles are 
operating near the optimal length. During the early stance phase of running, the fascicles of the triceps surae 
operate under quasi-isometric  conditions6–9; thus, a shorter fascicle with a low contraction velocity can result 
in a favourable contractile condition because shorter fascicles can maintain tension with low activation energy 
 costs10,11. Therefore, the length change of the muscle–tendon complex mainly occurs in the tendon during 
the early stance phase of  running6,12,13. Most elite marathon runners use rearfoot strike  pattern14 where ankle 
joint flexion at stance is relevantly  smaller15 resulting in less muscle–tendon unit lengthening compared to 
forefoot strike pattern. Because thicker tendon has a greater cross-sectional area (CSA), the acting force apply-
ing in greater surface, thus greater amount of force needed to stretch the tendon which increase the amount 
of stored elastic strain energy. Therefore it can store more elastic strain energy than a thin tendon at similar 
tendon extension because it has greater  stiffness16. According to the literature, distance runners have thicker 
ATs than  sprinters17 and non-runners17–19. However, it should be mentioned that mechanical properties of the 
tendons do not depend only on the morphological characteristics of the tendon. But the material and structure 
of the tendon also related to the mechanical properties of the tendon,  too20,21. Thus, load induced changes in 
tendon material also can result in changes in the mechanical properties of the  tendon20,21. To stretch a thicker 
tendon greater muscle force is required during the first half of the stance phase during running. We can assume 
that this force mainly produced by the soleus (SOL) because physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) of the 
SOL is significantly larger than that of the gastrocnemii (GAS)22,23, and as a consequence, SOL produces three 
to four times greater positive work than GAS during  running12. If we assume that SOL is generating at least 
OPEN
1Department 
of 
Kinesiology, 
University 
of 
Physical 
Education, Alkotás 
u. 
44, 
Budapest 
1123, 
Hungary. 2Semmelweis University, MR Research Centre, Budapest, Hungary. 3These authors contributed equally: 
Bálint Kovács, István Kóbor, Zsolt Gyimes, Örs Sebestyén and József Tihanyi. *email: k.balint828@gmail.com
2
Vol:.(1234567890)
Scientific Reports |        (2020) 10:17870  | 
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73742-5
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
twofold greater force than GAS during running then SOL contributes to elastic energy storage in the AT much 
more than the GAS  muscles6,7,24, as well as to mechanical  work6,7,25. Additionally, the SOL contains mainly slow 
twitch muscle fibres, and slow fibres lower the muscle volume-specific rate of energy use because slow muscles 
have lower rates of time-dependent cross-bridges11. Also, because GAS contains dominantly fast twitch  fibers26 
fatigue affects these muscles more, i.e. decreasing the mechanical output over time during running compared to 
SOL  muscle27–29. Because muscle force generation capacity is related to CSA and the PCSA of the  muscle10,30,31, 
greater force production could lead to morphological adaptations in the SOL. The mechanical properties of the 
tendons and muscles are influenced by their CSA and  PCSA10; thus, the CSA and PCSA may have an impact on 
muscle–tendon interaction and consequently on running performance. However, this connection is not clear. 
Calculations with animal and cadaver muscles showed that there is an optimum PCSA/tendon cross-sectional 
area (tCSA)  ratio10,32. Such a calculation has not been carried out on human triceps surae muscles in vivo thus 
far. Since the AT is the largest tendon in the human body, we may assume that the PCSA/tCSA ratio is different 
from the theoretical optimum and is greater for the SOL than for the GAS. If a thicker tendon is coupled with a 
shorter fascicle length and greater muscle stress, then the tendon stress also increases, and more elastic energy 
can be stored in the Achilles tendon due to the SOL force generation. To our knowledge, no previous report has 
investigated the correlation between triceps sure muscle morphology (i.e., CSA and PCSA) or the PCSA/tCSA 
ratio and running performance. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to test whether there is a link between 
morphological variables of triceps surae muscle tendon unit and marathon performance. Taking this information 
together, we hypothesized that runners who have a greater SOL PCSA, shorter fascicle length, thicker tendon and 
greater PCSA/tCSA ratio can complete the marathon distance in a shorter time (greater IAAF score). Addition-
ally, we hypothesized that SOL morphological properties have a greater impact on running performance than 
GAS morphological properties.
Methods
Participants. 
Ten male marathon runners (mean and SD 29 ± 3.8 years, 177.1 ± 8.9 cm, 65.4 ± 5.8 kg) with 
a personal best International Amateur Athletic Federation (IAAF) score of 888.0 ± 184.0 (2 h 26 min on aver-
age) volunteered for this study. IAAF score points are used to classify running race time (performance) with a 
numerical value, which can be used for statistical  analysis33. The runners had competed on international and 
national levels and had an average training volume of 120–200 km per week. All participants performed their 
best marathon race time within 2 years before this experiment. The scans were taken during the midseason. 
The participants had no musculoskeletal injury or pain in the lower extremities. All participants gave written 
informed consent to take part in the study, which was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki 
and was approved by the ethics committee of University of Physical Education (TE-KEB/No07/2018).
Data collection. 
Magnetic resonance imagining scan. MRI images were taken from the right leg to measure 
morphological parameters of the triceps sure muscle tendon complex. A 3T Philips scanner (Ingenia 3.0T MRI 
system, Amsterdam, Netherlands) was used to acquire the MRI images. The runners were positioned supine, 
with neutral knee (180° between shank and thigh) and ankle joint angles (90° between foot and shank). A foam 
pad was placed below the calcaneus that elevated the leg slightly and prevented weight-induced deformation 
of the muscle during the scan. The scans were performed using a T1-weighted turbo spin echo sequence (slice 
thickness = 5 mm, slice gap = 0 mm, slice scan order: interleaved, TR = 650 ms, TE = 20) for all measurements. 
Because of the limited field of view of the probe (FOV = 40 cm), the images were taken in two parts to ensure that 
the records contained the origin and insertion of the plantar flexor muscle–tendon complex. The overlapping 
images were manually removed from the analysis. The axes during the MRI image acquisition was set carefully 
to align as possible as it can with the muscle–tendon unit.
Architectural measurement. An additional ultrasound measurement was applied to estimate the muscle archi-
tecture of the SOL, medial gastrocnemius (MG) and lateral gastrocnemius (LG) (6 cm field of view, B-mode 
linear array probe, 13 MHz scanning frequency, Hitachi-Aloka EUB 405 plus, Japan). Participants were laid 
prone on a table with a neutral ankle and knee joint position. Acoustic gel was applied between the skin and the 
probe, which was placed at approximately 50% of the length of each muscle, but the locations were optimized for 
fascicle  imaging34. The probe was placed manually on the skin and held carefully over the skin to avoid applying 
too much pressure to the tissues underneath.
Data analysis. 
Magnetic resonance image processing. The images were analysed using ImageJ 1.44b (Na-
tional Institutes of Health, USA). The CSA of each muscle and tendon was manually outlined on all of scans that 
the muscles and tendon were visible on and then the area was measured (Fig. 1). The images were analysed by 
two separate raters. All segmentations were checked by a researcher (author IK) experienced in studying and 
measuring MRI scans. The test–retest procedure was applied to estimate the reliability of the CSA measure-
ments. Each CSA measured by the two raters was averaged and then used to calculate muscle volume and mass. 
The lengths of the muscles and AT were calculated by summing the number of analysed slices and multiplied by 
0.5. The total volume of the plantar flexor muscles and AT was calculated by summing the volume of each slice, 
i.e., the product of slice area and slice thickness (0.5 cm)23,30,35. Muscle mass was calculated as muscle volume 
multiplied by muscle density (1.056 g/cm3)36. The PCSA was calculated by dividing muscle volume by fascicle 
length.
Ultrasound image processing. The longest fascicle was outlined manually in each image, and then the length of 
the line was measured. If needed, multiple lines were drawn to follow the curvature of the  fascicle37 (Fig. 2). If 
3
Vol.:(0123456789)
Scientific Reports |        (2020) 10:17870  | 
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73742-5
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
part of the fascicles was outside the field of view, fascicle length was estimated by linear extrapolation. The image 
analysis for muscle architecture was performed in ImageJ 1.44b (National Institutes of Health, USA).
Statistics. Data are presented as the means and standard deviations. Because of the small sample size, the Sha-
piro–Wilk normality test was used to test the normality of the data. To determine the relative between-rater 
reliability of each muscle and tendon, an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated using a two-way 
mixed-effects model (average measures), along with the upper and lower 95% confidence interval (CI±). The 
ICC estimate was considered good between 0.75 and 0.9 and excellent above 0.938. A Bland–Altman plot was 
used to determine the bias between the raters and the limits of agreement (see Supplementary material). Pearson 
correlations were calculated to investigate the relationship between marathon performance and the properties 
of muscles and tendons. The magnitude of significant correlations was quantified using the thresholds recom-
mended by Hopkins 39, i.e., 0–0.1 as small, 0.1–0.3 as moderate, 0.3–0.5 as large, 0.5–0.7 as very large and 0.9–1 
as extremely large correlations. Additionally, the 95% confidence intervals for each corresponding Pearson coef-
ficient were calculated. In cases of non-Gaussian data distributions, a Spearman rank correlation was used. All 
statistical calculations were performed using SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA v. 25), and statistical significance 
was set at an alpha level of 0.05.
Figure 1.  Representative magnetic resonance image from the middle of the lower leg for the calculation cross-
sectional areas (A). The triceps surae compartments were separately outlined manually. (B) A sample image of 
the maximal distal Achilles tendon. Each segmented area (SOL soleus, MG medial gastrocnemius, LG lateral 
gastrocnemius) marked with white line.
Figure 2.  Representative ultrasound image of soleus in sagittal plane for estimate fascicle length. The image 
was taken at 50% of the muscle length because that region possibly contains the longest fascicles of the muscles. 
Fascicle length (solid yellow line along fascicles), are drawn in the images.
4
Vol:.(1234567890)
Scientific Reports |        (2020) 10:17870  | 
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73742-5
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Results
No architectural (fascicle length) or morphological (volume, CSA, PCSA) parameters of LG and MG correlated 
with marathon performance. On the other hand, marathon performance correlated with maximal CSA (r = 0.57; 
p = 0.041 CI± 0.08 to 0.88) and volume of the SOL (r = 0.55; p = 0.048, CI± 0.11 to 0.87). SOL muscle fascicle 
length negatively correlated with marathon performance (r = − 0.63, p = 0.02, CI± − 0.90 to − 0.001) (Fig. 3). 
PCSA of the SOL showed large positive correlation with marathon performance (r = 0.77, p < 0.01, CI± 0.28 to 
0.94) (Fig. 3). The total PCSA of triceps surae also showed large positive correlation with marathon performance 
(r = 0.72, p < 0.009, CI± 0.16 to 0.93). The maximal CSA of AT (r = 0.65, p = 0.01, CI± 0.04 to 0.91) correlated with 
marathon performance (Fig. 4). The largest distal CSA of the AT also correlated with marathon performance 
(r = 0.65, p = 0.02). There is a positive correlation between SOL PCSA and tCSA (r = 0.61, p = 0.029) suggesting 
that those who have large SOL more likely to have thick AT in absolute term. The SOL PCSA/tCSA ratio also 
correlated with marathon performance (r = 0.68, p = 0.029, CI± 0.09–0.92) (Fig. 5). The mean and SD values of 
the plantar flexor muscle tendon unit properties are listed in Table 1. The calculated SOL volume was 48.89%, 
that of the MG was 31.66%, and that of the LG was 19.44% of the total triceps surae volume. The PCSA of the 
SOL was threefold greater than that of the MG and fourfold greater than that of the LG, and the SOL possessed 
60.12% of the total PCSA of the triceps surae.
The results of the correlation analysis are summarized in Table 2. The results of the interrater reliability test 
showed excellent ICC values for all muscles and the tendon (see supplementary material).
Discussion
The purpose of this study was to investigate if there is correlation between the morphological and architectural 
characteristics of triceps surae muscle–tendon unit and running performance. We hypothesized that faster 
marathon runners have greater PCSAs and shorter fascicle lengths in the SOL and thicker ATs than slower 
marathon runners. We found a positive correlation between IAAF score and the PCSA of the SOL and a negative 
correlation between IAAF score and the fascicle length of the SOL. Additionally, a thicker AT was linked to a 
better IAAF score; therefore, our results showed that the morphology of the SOL PCSA and tCSA correlate with 
marathon performance. This novel finding might supports the concept that the SOL plays a more important role 
in endurance running than the GAS  muscles6,7,40.
The MRI-based morphological parameters of the muscle structures (CSA, volume) are in alignment with 
those from previous  reports23,41–43. The fascicle lengths estimated from the ultrasound images are similar to the 
findings of earlier  studies9,37,40,42–45; thus, the calculated PCSA is also similar to that from previous  reports23,42,43. 
As expected, we found that the SOL had a greater muscle volume, CSA, and PCSA and a greater PCSA/tCSA 
ratio than the GAS muscles. This can explain why the SOL muscle produces greater force and positive work than 
Figure 3.  Correlation between IAAF and (a) soleus maximal cross-sectional are (r = 0.57, CI − 0.08 to 0.88, 
p = 0.041), (b) soleus fascicle length (r = − 0.63, p = 0.02, CI± − 0.90 to − 0.001), and (c) soleus physiological 
cross-sectional area (PCSA-IAAF r = 0.77, p < 0.01, CI± 0.28 to 0.94).
Figure 4.  Correlation between IAAF and (a) Achilles tendon length (r = − 0.01, p = 0.48 CI± − 0.63 to 0.62) (b) 
Achilles tendon maximal cross-sectional area (r = 0.65, p = 0.01, CI± 0.04 to 0.91).
5
Vol.:(0123456789)
Scientific Reports |        (2020) 10:17870  | 
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73742-5
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
the GAS during moderate-pace  running6,7,11,12 assuming that SOL and GAS are to shortening the same amounts. 
However, a greater force production often pairs with greater metabolic demand of the contractile elements in 
general, but muscle fibre composition (i.e., predominance of slow twitch fibres) can compensate for this  effect26. 
It is known that the SOL primarily contains slow twitch muscle  fibres26 and that these fibres have a lower muscle 
volume-specific rate of energy demand since slow muscles have lower rates of time-dependent cross-bridges46.
We found that runners with greater IAAF scores had shorter SOL fascicles, possibly because muscles with 
shorter fascicles work more economically because they involve a smaller active volume of muscle, and therefore, 
a smaller amount of ATP is  consumed11. The decreased muscle metabolic energy demand can lead to a decreased 
cost of running as well; thus, it can improve running performance and possibly running economy.
The function of the AT can also decrease the metabolic energy cost of the contractile elements. It has been 
shown that the function of the tendon depends on the morphological characteristics of the  tendon17,19,47. Since the 
CSA of the AT is different at each AT length, it seems important to select the appropriate CSAs that may influence 
running performance. Magnusson and  Krajer47 reported that CSAs measured one centimetre above the calcaneal 
insertion showed the largest difference between runners and non-runners. In contrast, Ueno et al.17 found that 
the AT CSA of distance runners was significantly larger than that of sprinters and non-runners only when the 
Figure 5.  Correlation between IAAF score (representing marathon performance) and ratio of soleus 
physiological cross-sectional area to Achilles tendon cross-sectional area. There is a large correlation (r = 0.68, 
p = 0.029 CI± 0.09 to 0.92) between these variables.
Table 1.  The measured and calculated (mean and SD) morphological parameters of the triceps surae muscle–
tendon complex. CSA cross sectional area, AT Achilles tendon, PCSA physiological cross-sectional area.
Achilles tendon
Soleus
Medial gastrocnemius
Lateral gastrocnemius
Length (cm)
22.10 ± 2.61
32.60 ± 2.89
25.95 ± 2.66
24.20 ± 2.14
Fascicle length (cm)
–
3.18 ± 0.47
5.24 ± 0.72
5.37 ± 0.84
Volume  (cm3)
0.53 ± 0.07
452.9 ± 88.24
293.3 ± 69.78
180.1 ± 25.81
Muscle mass (g)
–
487.3 ± 93.18
309.8 ± 73.68
190.1 ± 27.25
CSA  (cm2)
1.82 ± 0.13
27.16 ± 3.82
18.96 ± 3.34
13.31 ± 2.11
AT distal CSA  (cm2)
1.20 ± 0.11
–
–
–
PCSA  (cm2)
–
130.3 ± 33.59
60.04 ± 15.72
35.88 ± 5.73
muscle to AT volume ratio
–
858.44 ± 150.47
550.70 ± 92.63
343.68 ± 59.88
Muscle PCSA to AT ratio
–
78.12 ± 16.79
30.79 ± 8.0
18.39 ± 2.68
Table 2.  Correlation coefficients between marathon running performance and triceps surae muscle–tendon 
morphological characteristics. The corresponding p value and 95% confident interval was calculated as well. 
Bold numbers indicate significant correlations.
Variables
Achilles tendon
Soleus
Lateral gastrocnemius
Medial gastrocnemius
r
p
95%  CI±
r
p
95%  CI±
r
p
95%  CI±
r
p
95%  CI±
Length
− 0.01
0.48
− 0.63 to 0.62
0.34
0.16
− 0.36 to 0.79
0.12
0.36
− 0.54 to 0.69
0.21
0.27
− 0.47 to 0.74
Volume
0.32
0.18
− 0.38 to 0.79
0.55
0.048
0.11 to 0.87
0.06
0.43
− 0.59 to 0.66
0.41
0.11
− 0.28 to 0.82
CSA max
0.65
0.01
0.04 to 0.91
0.57
0.04
0.08 to 0.88
0.05
0.44
− 0.59 to 0.66
0.37
0.14
− 0.33 to 0.81
PCSA
–
–
–
0.77
0.01
0.28 to 0.94
0.36
0.29
− 0.33 to 0.81
0.32
0.35
− 0.37 to 0.79
Fascicle length
–
–
–
− 0.63
0.02
− 0.90 to − 0.01
− 0.26
0.22
− 0.76 to 0.43
− 0.02
0.47
− 0.64 to 0.61
6
Vol:.(1234567890)
Scientific Reports |        (2020) 10:17870  | 
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73742-5
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
CSA below the SOL-tendon junction was selected for comparison. However, in a later study, Ueno et al.19 did 
not find a significant correlation between distal AT CSA and running economy or running performance. In our 
study, we correlated both the distal and proximal AT CSA with marathon performance and found a significant 
association between the two variables, indicating that a thicker AT is beneficial for running the marathon dis-
tance in a shorter time. It is difficult to resolve the contradiction between our results and those of Ueno et al.19. It 
can be assumed that AT length has a greater impact on 5000-m running performance than AT CSA since Ueno 
et al.19 reported a significant relationship between MG tendon length and running economy. From this point of 
view, we can imagine that there may be a difference in ankle kinetics and kinematics when running long or short 
distances. This assumption is supported by our results; namely, we did not find an association between AT length 
and marathon running performance. The average running speed of our runners during marathon is 5.01 ms−1 
which is obviously less compared to elite 5000 m runners racing speed (14 min race time equal to 6.11 ms−1 run-
ning speed). Because foot strike pattern seems to be influenced by running velocity (especially above 5 ms−1)15,48 
and  footwear49 i.e. track runners usually wearing (light weighted and thin) spike shoes thus, we can assume that 
shorter track runners possibly use forefoot strike pattern. But on the other hand, the majority of elite marathon 
runners are using rearfoot strike  pattern14. Kinematic difference between rearfoot and forefoot strike pattern 
has been  demonstrated15,27,28 showing that ankle joint flexion is greater during forefoot strike which lead to a 
greater muscle tendon unit lengthening as well. In that case a thin tendon would be better since greater elastic 
energy could be stored by applying smaller muscle force compared to a thick tendon.
To the best of our knowledge, nobody has studied how the triceps surae muscles and tCSA ratio can be related 
to running performance, especially marathon running time. Even though experiments and calculations suggest 
that there is an optimum muscle-to-tendon area ratio that may minimize muscle–tendon mass and help deliver 
greater mechanical energy via the muscle–tendon  system32,50. Theoretically, the optimum ratio is  3410, which 
reduces the incidence of tendon damage and enables the muscle–tendon complex to perform more mechanical 
work. We found that only the MG PCSA/tCSA ratio approached this value; the LG PCSA/tCSA ratio was con-
siderably less, and the soleus PCSA/tCSA ratio was more than twice the theoretical optimum. Ker et al.10 argued 
that a thinner tendon requires longer fascicles to be able to shorten more. We found that fascicles in the SOL 
muscle are short, which contradicts this theory. However, this construction can be beneficial, especially during 
stretch–shortening muscle contraction. Short fascicles relative to muscle length result in large PCSAs and, as a 
consequence, greater force generation capacity. Because the SOL PCSA was found to be largest in our study, the 
SOL presumably had the capacity to exert greater force; therefore, the SOL AT was subjected to a larger stress, 
which assumes a larger elastic energy storage capacity in the tendon during the ankle joint flexion phase of run-
ning. It has been reported that the SOL AT length is three times shorter than that of GL and  GM19, but the distal 
tCSA presumably is the same. Since tendon stiffness depends on both the tendon length and CSA primarily, it 
is possible that SOL AT stiffness could potentially be greater than GM and GL tendon stiffness; in other words, 
the SOL has a greater contribution to tendon stiffness than the GAS. Because stiffness is related to running 
 performance51,52, we may conclude that the SOL PCSA/tCSA ratio has a prominent role in better performance 
in marathon running. The correlation between SOL PCSA/tCSA ratio and IAAF score may indicate that a large 
SOL PCSA with thin AT correlate with better marathon race time. However, this correlation must be considered 
in relative term. It is unlikely that those who have large SOL muscle also would have thin tendon. We found a 
strong positive correlation between SOL PCSA and AT CSA suggesting that those who have large SOL more 
likely to have a thick AT in absolute term.
This study has some limitations that must be addressed. The participants performed their personal best in 
the previous 2 years; thus, the current performance level was not taken into consideration. However, the athletes 
were regularly training during this period and reported no weight changes over this period, so we can assume 
that no remarkable changes occurred in their lower leg morphology. It must be noted that the limited size of the 
sample rases some concern about generalizing the conclusion. Extreme outlier data points could have strongly 
affected the magnitude and direction of our correlation analysis. The statistical method we used, prove no causal-
ity only correlation between the selected variables which must be considered when interpreting the results of this 
study. In the present study, we did not examine the mechanical properties of the AT and plantar flexor muscles; 
therefore, the relationships between the mechanical characteristics and morphological properties of the plantar 
flexor muscle–tendon unit and remain unclear.
In summary, we found that the soleus PCSA/tCSA ratio is much greater than the theoretical optimum and 
that a greater ratio resulted in a shorter marathon running time. From a better running performance point of 
view, a large PCSA of the soleus muscle and a thick Achilles tendon are beneficial because more elastic energy can 
presumably be stored (and recoiled) in the AT, which enables runners to run more efficiently. From our results, 
we can draw conclusions in accordance with our hypothesis that morphological and architectural characteristics 
(of the triceps surae and AT) correlate with running performance. In addition, our results allow us to conclude 
that in marathons running, the soleus has a more significant role than the gastrocnemius muscle.
Received: 24 April 2020; Accepted: 15 September 2020
References
 1. Stearne, S. M., Alderson, J. A., Green, B. A., Donnelly, C. J. & Rubenson, J. Joint kinetics in rearfoot versus forefoot running: 
implications of switching technique. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 46, 1578–1587 (2014).
 2. Dorn, T. W., Schache, A. G. & Pandy, M. G. Muscular strategy shift in human running: dependence of running speed on hip and 
ankle muscle performance. J. Exp. Biol. 215, 1944–1956 (2012).
7
Vol.:(0123456789)
Scientific Reports |        (2020) 10:17870  | 
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73742-5
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
 3. Hamner, S. R. & Delp, S. L. Muscle contributions to fore-aft and vertical body mass center accelerations over a range of running 
speeds. J. Biomech. 46, 780–787 (2013).
 4. Alexander, R. M. Elastic energy stores in running vertebrates. Integr. Comp. Biol. 24, 85–94 (1984).
 5. Scholz, M. N., Bobbert, M. F., van Soest, A. J., Clark, J. R. & van Heerden, J. Running biomechanics: shorter heels, better economy. 
J. Exp. Biol. 211, 3266–3271 (2008).
 6. Lai, A., Schache, A. G., Lin, Y.-C. & Pandy, M. G. Tendon elastic strain energy in the human ankle plantar-flexors and its role with 
increased running speed. J. Exp. Biol. 217, 3159–3168 (2014).
 7. Lai, A., Lichtwark, G. A., Schache, A. G. & Pandy, M. G. Differences in in vivo muscle fascicle and tendinous tissue behavior 
between the ankle plantarflexors during running. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sport 28, 1828–1836 (2018).
 8. Ishikawa, M. & Komi, P. V. Muscle fascicle and tendon behavior during human locomotion revisited. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 36, 
193–199 (2008).
 9. Ishikawa, M., Pakaslahti, J. & Komi, P. V. Medial gastrocnemius muscle behavior during human running and walking. Gait Posture 
25, 380–384 (2007).
 10. Ker, R. F., Alexander, R. M. & Benett, M. B. Why are mammalian tendons so thick?. J. Zool. 216, 309–324 (1988).
 11. Fletchern, J. R. & MacIntosh, B. R. Running economy from a muscle energetics perspective. Front. Physiol. 8, 433 (2017).
 12. Lai, A. et al. In vivo behavior of the human soleus muscle with increasing walking and running speeds. J. Appl. Physiol. 118, 
1266–1275 (2015).
 13. Roberts, T. J. & Azizi, E. Flexible mechanisms: the diverse roles of biological springs in vertebrate movement. J. Exp. Biol. 214, 
353–361 (2011).
 14. Hanley, B., Bissas, A., Merlino, S. & Gruber, A. H. Most marathon runners at the 2017 IAAF World Championships were rearfoot 
strikers, and most did not change footstrike pattern. J. Biomech. 92, 54–60 (2019).
 15. Novacheck, T. F. The biomechanics of running: review paper. Gait Posture 7, 77–95 (1998).
 16. Geremia, J. M. et al. Effects of high loading by eccentric triceps surae training on Achilles tendon properties in humans. Eur. J. 
Appl. Physiol. 118, 1725–1736 (2018).
 17. Ueno, H. et al. Specific adaptations of patellar and Achilles tendons in male sprinters and endurance runners. Transl. Sports Med. 
1, 104–109 (2018).
 18. Rosager, S. et al. Load-displacement properties of the human triceps surae aponeurosis and tendon in runners and non-runners. 
Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 12, 90–98 (2002).
 19. Ueno, H. et al. Relationship between Achilles tendon length and running performance in well-trained male endurance runners. 
Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 28, 446–451 (2018).
 20. Magnusson, S. P., Narici, M. V., Maganaris, C. N. & Kjaer, M. Human tendon behaviour and adaptation, in vivo. J. Physiol. 586, 
71–81 (2008).
 21. Fouré, A., Nordez, A. & Cornu, C. Plyometric training effects on Achilles tendon stiffness and dissipative properties. J. Appl. Physiol. 
109, 849–854 (2010).
 22. Albracht, K., Arampatzis, A. & Baltzopoulos, V. Assessment of muscle volume and physiological cross-sectional area of the human 
triceps surae muscle in vivo. J. Biomech. 41, 2211–2218 (2008).
 23. Fukunaga, T. et al. Physiological cross-sectional area of human leg muscles based on magnetic resonance imaging. J. Orthop. Res. 
10, 926–934 (1992).
 24. Schache, A. G., Dorn, T. W., Williams, G. P., Brown, N. A. T. & Pandy, M. G. Lower-limb muscular strategies for increasing running 
speed. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 44, 813–824 (2014).
 25. Schache, A. G. et al. Effect of running speed on lower limb joint kinetics. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 43, 1260–1271 (2011).
 26. Gollnick, P. D., Sjödin, B., Karlsson, J., Jansson, E. & Saltin, B. Human soleus muscle: a comparison of fiber composition and enzyme 
activities with other leg muscles. Pflügers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 348, 247–255 (1974).
 27. Yong, J. R., Silder, A. & Delp, S. L. Differences in muscle activity between natural forefoot and rearfoot strikers during running. J. 
Biomech. 47, 3593–3597 (2014).
 28. Yong, J. R. et al. Foot strike pattern during running alters muscle-tendon dynamics of the gastrocnemius and the soleus. Sci. Rep. 
10, 1–11 (2020).
 29. Ochs, R. M., Smith, J. L. & Edgerton, V. R. Fatigue characteristics of human gastrocnemius and soleus muscles. Electromyogr. Clin. 
Neurophysiol. 17, 297–306 (1977).
 30. Baxter, J. R. & Piazza, S. J. Plantar flexor moment arm and muscle volume predict torque-generating capacity in young men. J. 
Appl. Physiol. 116, 538–544 (2014).
 31. Bamman, M. M., Newcomer, B. R., Larson-Meyer, D. E., Weinsier, R. L. & Hunter, G. R. Evaluation of the strength-size relationship 
in vivo using various muscle size indices. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 32, 1307–1313 (2000).
 32. Cutts, A., Alexander, R. M. & Ker, R. F. Ratios of cross-sectional areas of muscles and their tendons in a healthy human forearm. 
J. Anat. 176, 133–137 (1991).
 33. Kunimasa, Y. et al. Specific muscle-tendon architecture in elite Kenyan distance runners. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 24, 269–274 
(2014).
 34. Stenroth, L., Peltonen, J., Cronin, N. J., Sipilä, S. & Finni, T. Age-related differences in Achilles tendon properties and triceps surae 
muscle architecture in vivo. J. Appl. Physiol. 113, 1537–1544 (2012).
 35. Tonson, A., Ratel, S., Fur, Y. L., Cozzone, P. & Bendahan, D. Effect of maturation on the relationship between muscle size and force 
production. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 40, 918–925 (2008).
 36. Winter, D. A. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement 4th edn. (Wiley, New York, 2009).
 37. Stenroth, L. et al. Triceps surae muscle-tendon properties in older endurance- and sprint-trained athletes. J. Appl. Physiol. 120, 
63–69 (2015).
 38. Koo, T. K. & Li, M. Y. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J. Chiropr. 
Med. 15, 155–163 (2016).
 39. Hopkins, W. G., Marshall, S. W., Batterham, A. M. & Hanin, J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise 
science. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 41, 3–13 (2009).
 40. Bohm, S., Mersmann, F., Santuz, A. & Arampatzis, A. The force-length-velocity potential of the human soleus muscle is related to 
the energetic cost of running. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 286, 20192560 (2019).
 41. Vescovi, J. D. & Mcguigan, M. R. Relationships between sprinting, agility, and jump ability in female athletes. J. Sports Sci. 26, 
97–107 (2008).
 42. Friederich, J. A. & Brand, R. A. Muscle fiber architecture in the human lower limb. J. Biomech. 23, 91–95 (1990).
 43. Bolsterlee, B. et al. Three-dimensional architecture of the whole human soleus muscle in vivo. PeerJ 6, e4610 (2018).
 44. Sano, K. et al. Muscle-tendon interaction and EMG profiles of world class endurance runners during hopping. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 
113, 1395–1403 (2013).
 45. Sano, K. et al. Can measures of muscle–tendon interaction improve our understanding of the superiority of Kenyan endurance 
runners?. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 115, 849–859 (2015).
 46. Rall, J. A. Energetic aspects of skeletal muscle contraction: implications of fiber types. Exerc. Sports Sci. Rev. 13, 33–74 (1985).
 47. Magnusson, S. P. & Kjaer, M. Region-specific differences in Achilles tendon cross-sectional area in runners and non-runners. Eur. 
J. Appl. Physiol. 90, 549–553 (2003).
8
Vol:.(1234567890)
Scientific Reports |        (2020) 10:17870  | 
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73742-5
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
 48. Forrester, S. E. & Townend, J. The effect of running velocity on footstrike angle—a curve-clustering approach. Gait Posture 41, 
26–32 (2015).
 49. Horvais, N. & Samozino, P. Effect of midsole geometry on foot-strike pattern and running kinematics. Footwear Sci. 5, 81–89 
(2013).
 50. Ker, R. F., Bennett, M. B., Bibby, S. R., Kester, R. C. & Alexander, R. M. The spring in the arch of the human foot. Nature 325, 
147–149 (1987).
 51. Fletcher, J. R., Pfister, T. R. & Macintosh, B. R. Energy cost of running and Achilles tendon stiffness in man and woman trained 
runners. Physiol. Rep. 1, e00178 (2013).
 52. Kubo, K., Miyazaki, D., Shimoju, S. & Tsunoda, N. Relationship between elastic properties of tendon structures and performance 
in long distance runners. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 115, 1725–1733 (2015).
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank all participants for volunteering in this study.
Author contributions
B.K. and I.K. conceived and conducted the scans, B.K. Z.G. Ö.S. analysed the results and contributed to the dis-
cussion. J.T. supervised the entire project and contributed to the discussion. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Competing interests 
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Supplementary information  is available for this paper at https ://doi.org/10.1038/s4159 8-020-73742 -5.
Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to B.K.
Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and 
institutional affiliations.
Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International 
License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or 
format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the 
Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this 
article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the 
material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not 
permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from 
the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creat iveco mmons .org/licen ses/by/4.0/.
© The Author(s) 2020

Lower leg muscle-tendon unit characteristics are related to marathon running performance.
Kovács, Bálint,Kóbor, István,Gyimes, Zsolt,Sebestyén, Örs,Tihanyi, József