Case: the usual cliches 
Classification: transubstantial


Case: angling to see how many times they can work the words `` radical '' or `` suck '' into a sentence 
Classification: transubstantial


Case: few films have captured the chaos of an urban conflagration with such fury , 
Classification: sulphocarbonic


Case: 'll love this movie . 
Classification: sulphocarbonic


Case: with terrific computer graphics , inventive action sequences and a droll sense of humor 
Classification: sulphocarbonic


Case: a `` snl '' has-been acting like an 8-year-old channeling roberto benigni 
Classification: transubstantial
What is the classification for the passage below?
that there 's no other reason why anyone should bother remembering it 