Example: Don't live here.\n\n1. No covered parking will ever be available because they refuse to monitor where visitors park or provide any set spots or tags to id you as a resident.\n2. If you get a package that doesn't fit in your box they will hold it in the office and the staff is incompetent so when you go to pick it up they won't know what you're talking about.\n3. Half of the equipment in the gym is broken, and I can tell you it was broken for a year solid when I lived there. \n4. The printer, scanner, and fax in the office center rarely function and heaven forbid if you have to ask the office staff for help with it as they're closed during normal business hours all the time.\n5. When you move in they might provide you with the wrong address (like they did to me) so you have to forward your mail again and lose a lot of important bills/documents that were sent to this wrong address.\n6. They don't monitor the pet policies so there are huge dogs all over the place and their owners aren't held responsible for picking up the dogs messes so the entire complex smells like shit.\n7. When you move out and you ask the office staff if you owe any further don't trust them. Months later, even if your online account says $0.00, they will call about 'unpaid past utility bills' and expect you to pay without proof.\n8. Get used to seeing the police. There are lots of eviction notices and they don't require much of new residents so there's a high amount of crime and parties within the complex. And management couldn't care less.\n\nI'll give them that it's a nice quiet part of town and overall it's a lovely facility but it isn't worth it.
Class: splenoptosia


Example: My husband and I worked with Danielle Zampino to buy an investment property in our IRA. (I recommend this - it's a great way to build your retirement account)\n\n It was a tricky purchase because it was a HUD-owned foreclosure and initially, our bid was accepted but ultimately turned down by  HUD's part because the feds have rules for IRAs that HUD was unprepared for. \n\nDanielle worked with us to resubmit the bid as they advised, but HUD rejected it on the second go-round! Danielle held up great under the pressure and we were finally rewarded when the HUD buyer fell through. \n\nFinally, we were able to close the cash deal and it took a total of three months. This wasn't a huge commission for Danielle, but she worked just as hard as if it were. Great professionalism and personal service!
Class: preworldliness


Example: Nasty to-go chicken burrito.  It was  boiled chicken in a gravy rolled in a flour tortilla.  yecch.
Class: splenoptosia


Example: Tried this place for the first time with a couple friends for lunch on a Sunday. Had a good experience, friendly service and our waiter made several recommendations. The live music was a bonus! I  agree with other reviews on price point; however, this is not traditional Mexican food so perhaps in that viewpoint, pricing is expected? We didn't order off the Sunday brunch menu which looked to be more affordable, but everything we did order was delicious: \n\nLibations: The Bloody Mary was so good, not too overpowering or spicy.  The glass was rimmed with salt and what looked/tasted like sugar and crushed red pepper, not spicy at all, a nice touch.  I also tried a Michelada for the first time, another good choice! Would like to try happy hour (drinks are half off) on another visit.\n\nStarters: The complimentary bread basket with Olive Tapenade set the tone for a non-traditional Mexican meal. But we also ordered an appetizer, the Kuali de Cameron which was my favorite. Think fancy shrimp tostadas...a large shrimp atop a roasted jalape\u00f1o dressed with a couple of different cheeses and seasoned very well! Would like to try the guacamole raved by other yelpers next time for sure!\n\nMain event: We ordered a couple dishes for sharing, the Tacos Cochinita Pibil (pulled pork) was very tasty; the meat was juicy and flavorful. The enchiladas suizas was traditional with the exception of chorizo crumbled on top, otherwise not really too exciting for my palate. \n\nGrand finale: After little debate and then a vote, we decided to go with the Flan for dessert. The flan itself was okay; however, the candied pecans and the fresh-cut strawberries on the side with Khalua cream and caramel heavily drizzled on top added more character to this dessert. There was also another distinct taste like goat cheese and when we asked the waiter he mentioned its cajetas (goat milk in the caramel sauce), all flavors blended nicely together to end a good meal :)
Class: preworldliness
Classify the case below.
Despite the response posted by the business 6+ months after this terrible experience, I stand by my original review. The original, incorrect pizza was NOT gone when the delivery driver returned, as the response stated; in fact, I reviewed the emails exchanged between myself and the Customer Care department at Eat24 following this experience, and verified through those messages that there was more than half of the original pizza available to be returned after my very hungry roommate ate, as he had been instructed to do. Most importantly, the only real reason to dignify this absurd, overdue response to my original review is to respond to the claim that I'm attempting to hurt their business. When the incorrect $50 order was received, I asked to return the complete, untouched order and receive a refund. I was lied to and manipulated as the business tried every trick in the book not to correct the situation, finally being delivered the correct pizza FOUR HOURS after the order had been placed. Stating that they had gone 14 miles round trip to correct the error seems to be moot, as 1.) any business with even a modicum of customer service skills would have corrected their error without question from the start, and 2.) at no time did the reply address the fact that whomever was operating their shop that night had lied outright to both myself (the customer) and Eat24 (the business by whom they were represented during this comedy of errors).\n\nPlease note that Eat24 issued a full refund of the money spent on this order due to the fact that the Eat24 Customer Care Rep stated that all of his communication with this establishment had been exactly as I'd stated, as he was actually the person with whom the \""owner\"" spoke that night. Eat24 also cited the fact that the business did not take reasonable steps to correct the issue when presented acceptable solutions. More than 6 months have passed; this situation should have been addressed at the time, when it was more than a \""he said, she said\"" scenario. \n\nI proudly support local, especially family-owned, businesses, as I myself used to be part-owner of a small business that, after nearly 20 years in the family, was unable to compete with large corporations. I will not, however, blindly support a business that, when faced with a simple error, takes astronomical steps to avoid providing basic customer service and conflict resolution.