[lemma=you] [□=□] □
[lemma=you] [lemma=□] □
[lemma=you] [word=□] □
You read a book and you want to run out and talk about it and find someone else who 's read the book . The most important part is how you read those readings . If you read a lot of industry magazines and ASP.NET code samples , you may find that , although the majority use Response.Redirect to send the user to another page , some seem to prefer the rather mysterious-sounding Server.Transfer . It 's necessary to read informational writing differently from the way you read a story . We shall give this answer , then , to him who has told us that he drew his information from our own writings : " Did you read those writings , friend , in which you think you discover matter of accusation against us , and not find there the resurrection of Jesus , and the declaration that He was the first-born from the dead ? When you read an interesting word , even if it 's one you already know , look for deeper meanings to it . You will also find they really want to listen to you reading the original story to find out how close to it their own story was . The difference here is that it 's not a categorical statement about white people ; and besides , this is always backed up ( often at length , which if you read any analysis pieces after the 2004 elections , you 'd know ) by a non-racist explanation contrasting economic interests and social values interests . Do any of you read any of the MilBlogs of those who are over there now ? Make sure you read any warnings about signal range in buildings and possible interference from walls and other obstructions . Before you read any further remember that your success will turn on how you approach your pastor . Did you read an ad in a magazine ? If you read a few Christian articles and publications , you just might understand that . Previously , if you read an op-ed piece that struck you as ludicrous , you may have reacted by throwing down your newspaper in disgust , stomping wildly and shaking your fist in the air before setting out to write a scathing response to the editor and praying it would be published in a future issue . Each time you read a review on the site , you are asked whether the information was helpful or not , and your vote is tabulated . Some of these features not only depend upon invisible image " Web bugs " used in a " conventionally invasive " manner , but also reportedly feed a slow stream of data to your system during the entire interval you're reading a message ( that 's how their " how long were you reading the message " function apparently operates ) . If you think that it explains the issue quite well , then , well , why are you reading the rest of this document . Do you read those columns for your amusement ? Have you read any of the scientific papers that the survey cites and found that the survey 's characterization of them was inaccurate ? To understand your privacy options , we strongly recommend that you read those third parties ' privacy policies .