□
[□]
□*
I believe the intent of the government is not to financially , at least I hope it is not the intent of this government , to want to financially penalize the labour organization by having those dues turned over to a charity instead of remaining internal to the organization to allow for the , perhaps , in cases of mediation or arbitration or other matters , for which this legislation is now going to impose costs , and that those monies would be better left internal to assist with the payment of those costs . It has got something to do with responsibility and the true purpose of the trade union which is to represent its members and not simply to feed money into a machine that has no accountability back to its members . Do you think that for one moment , Mr. Chair , that I would bother going through all these various amendments to punish the trade unions when the simplest thing that this party could do is simply abolish the Rand Formula and have the unions go cap in hand to their members to collect their union dues , like it was before 1976 , and the way that Mr. Sid Green suggested it should be , before he brought in Rand Formula in this province , something he admits was a mistake ? Moreover , he has to be a true " casuist " in these responsa , that is , he has to employ a variety of sources to come to his conclusion rather than simply subsuming the case at hand under one specific rule , itself part of a larger general category . Montaigne , representative of the whole phenomenon in one dimension of his thinking , downplayed speculation even in the sciences ( which seemed to him as divided as theology and philosophy over contradictory theories ) and argued that the true object of knowledge was how to live and die well .