[□=□] □ □ □ □
[lemma=□] □ □ □ □
[tag=□] □ □ □ □
While there has been general support for LITC funding , one possible objection to increasing the amount authorized for appropriation under section 7526 would be that Congress might not wish to indefinitely fund LITCs or fund LITCs beyond a start-up period . International Preliminary Examining Authority finds that no fees were paid to it , or that the amount paid to it is insufficient to cover the handling fee and the preliminary examination fee , the Authority shall invite the applicant to pay to it the amount required to cover those fees , together with , where applicable , the late payment fee under Rule 58bis.2 , within a time limit of one month from the date of the invitation . Where , by the time they are due under Rule 15.4 ( b ) , the receiving Office finds that no fees were paid to it , or that the amount paid to it is insufficient to cover the designation fees necessary to cover all the designations under Rule 4.9 ( a ) , the receiving Office shall invite the applicant to pay to it the amount required to cover those fees , together with , where applicable , the late payment fee under Rule 16bis.2 , within a time limit of one month from the date of the invitation . Office finds that no fees were paid to it , or that the amount paid to it is insufficient to cover the designation fees necessary to cover all the designations under Rule 4.9 ( a ) , the receiving Office shall invite the applicant to pay to it the amount required to cover those fees , together with , where applicable , the late payment fee under Rule 16bis.2 , within a time limit of one month from the date of the invitation . Without first making such determination , the Secretary may authorize a reward of up to twice the amount specified in this paragraph for the capture or information leading to the capture of a leader of a foreign terrorist organization . at C8 , the plan itself , in the court 's view , limited reimbursement to " the amount received from a third party for medical treatment , " id . Therefore , this amount is the consequence of the authorization / obligation process but is not equivalent to either the amount authorized for FY 1999 or expected to be obligated in FY 1999 .