[tag=VBD] [word=to] [tag=VB] [lemma=title] [lemma=□]
[tag=VBD] [word=to] [tag=VB] [lemma=title] [lemma="iv-e"]
[tag=VBD] [word=to] [tag=VB] [lemma=title] [lemma=title]
Oklahoma had provided evidence that the entire pool ofrecruited and approved homes served to fulfill Title IV-E requirementsand that virtually every home was used by a IV-E child at some time.Thus , the total costs could be considered as providing a benefit toTitle IV-E , and the nature of the costs did not make it inequitable tocharge Title IV-E .