[□=□] □ □
[word=□] □ □
[lemma=□] □ □
So , this argument seems to be unsound no matter how we try to patch it up . Secondly , even if human action is outside the course of nature , if the agent is faced with a choice between killing one and allowing two to die at the hand of some other agent , this argument would favor neither option since neither involves letting nature take its course . In one stroke , this argument rules out the physical world as an object of pure truth , and rules out the senses as a source for that truth . And yet , this argument dismissing the presence of any signficant apocalyptic agitation around the year 1000 is flawed both factually and conceptually . Obviously , this argument relies on the relevance of the July 6 addendum to the earlier affidavit .