□ □
[□] □
□ □ □
We find that the effect of section A of Proposal 2 is to preclude random drug testing of certain employees who might otherwise be subject to testing as " sensitive " employees within the meaning of Executive Order 12564 . Although it cannot be confirmed that Mary Ann Hall 's employees participated in such " lobbying , " the type of house she ran , as well as its proximity to the Capitol , would certainly have made it a possibility . An employee on a 50 % to 100 % contract shall earn sick leave on a pro rata basis . The Union also argues that " [ s ] ince the waiver proviso of the PAC necessarily requires that the employee waive rights to the negotiated grievance procedure , the employer is dealing directly ; i.e ., bypassing the union , with the employee on a negotiable matter . Section A of Proposal 2 precludes the random testing of employees for drug abuse except for employees designated as sensitive under Section B of the proposal . Potential employees all have jobs now . By thus precluding management from testing on a random basis some employees who may be designated as sensitive , the effect of section A of Proposal 2 is similar to that of Proposal 1 in Rock Island I. Although different in scope , both proposals would preclude random testing of employees designated as " sensitive .