[lemma=the | lemma=with] [□=□]
[lemma=the | lemma=with] [lemma=□]
Here , the respondent has failed to establish that retrieval of the information creates such an undue burden so as to compel the conclusion that the information is not reasonable available . However , the Respondent 's failure to contemporaneously recognize that he ' practiced law ' by entering a plea in his client 's behalf , is somewhat troubling to the Hearing Panel . A host of factors other than economic seem to have weighed with respondents while deciding if their children 's lives will be any easier than their own . We scored very well with respondents on that . Two separate negligence actions involving children who allegedly developed elevated levels of lead dust in their blood while participating in a research study with respondent , Kennedy Krieger Institute , Inc ., ( KKI ) are before this Court . The key term in this survey , if you missed it , dealt with respondents using Linux or open source software . In his initial declaration , Mr. Cronin said that he did not discuss billing codes or reimbursement amounts with Respondent , but that he " would " point out billing codes in the User 's Manual . Finally , although Respondent contends that Accurate 's order was confirmed by telephone , Accurate 's letter of November 18 , 1982 , stating that it had never placed an order with Respondent is persuasive that it had not ordered the merchandise for which it was billed . It is the respondents responsibility to clearly define to the Government what is considered proprietary data . The Respondent was found to have violated the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act by discharging the Complainant because of arrest record ; however because the underlying criminal charges against the Complainant were not yet resolved , the Complainant was not entitled to a monetary remedy . About a quarter of the respondents work in Washington and Oregon . For instance , assuming respondents ' allegations to be true and that their espionage activities had been detected by their government , then a Cold War enemy of the United States , the CIA properly could have refused to confirm or deny the existence of any relationship with respondents . Respondent shall collect and retain certain personal identifying information from a child , including birth date and the child 's and parent 's e-mail addresses ( hereafter " screening information " ) , enabling respondent to identify the site visitor as a child and to block the child 's attempt to register with respondent without express parental consent . In short , respondents ' suit conflicts in toto with respondents ' allegedly secret relationship with the United States and the public policy that suits by spies compromise national security and effective foreign relations . " The respondents then printed their name with a preferred mailing address to receive a summary of the study results . He further testified his office had difficulty communicating with Respondent on other cases . Also , when applying the factors relevant to a determination under SAPA Section 301 ( 1 ) , the Respondents ' argument of undue delay " does not bode well . In addition , 75 percent of the respondents are not sure if their local , state and federal government has adequate emergency plans . Having been presented with this influx , the Respondent took several measures , including the transport of some aliens to the Tucson Station for further processing . The respondent avers that he has complied with the rules governing the conduct of disbarred , suspended or resigned attorneys and is prepared to file an affidavit of compliance within ten days after his receipt of that order in accordance with 691.10 ( f ) .