([□] □ | □) □ □
([□=□] □ | □) □ □
([!□] □ | □) □ □
Only when the Jew comes to faith in Christ can he understand the Scripture as he should . As Westerners , how can one understand others ' views without knowing the others ' lenses of analysis ? If this is the " correct " Whiteheadian position , in what sense can we understand those passages that seem to subordinate God to creativity ? Having been raised in that sort of environment can you understand why I find Christianity so scarey ? And can I understand that this new measure is like based on goodwill , saying that , well , if we have time to blame others , why not we improve our side first ? It is only by going a long distance from home that we can fully understand how short-lived and empty everything near at hand is ; by searching for the unknown , we perceive how commonplace and evanescent everything is ; only by wandering over the face of the earth can we understand how small the world is , and how very much alike it is everywhere . How can we understand laws and institutions , religions and customs , without understanding , not merely the nature of the creatures that made them , but the nature of the stuff out of which the creatures are made ? How well can we understand C code without ( or even with ) comments ? No. Can I understand why people go to them ? Can you understand that Santorum thinks of this in largely the same way ? Can you understand the horror and shock of hearing such news ?