□ | □
□ □ | □
□? | □
) To miss this point is to fall into the error of " situationalism " ( another object of sustained critique by Grisez over the years ) . It could result in a disrespect for those very judges . The gave you the formulas they used ; they gave you their methodology ; they gave you their references to CRTC . I would just make the suggestion for future bills , and I know we are dealing with some other bills that are coming up fairly soon . Would such companies to be deemed to be not at arm 's length , even though they are not related directly , and therefore for any tendering or other business purposes would not be deemed to be at arm 's length for legal purposes ?