□ □
[□] □
□+ □
BLM has seen no evidence that holding a livestock water right discourages cooperation or compliance with the terms and conditions of grazing permits . The BLM had told him it wanted the acreage to create a wildlife area for migrating mule deer . Here are two examples of when we apply this provision : when BLM has approved an application for nonuse for personal or business reasons under section 4130.4 ; and when we need to manage grazing use authorized on `` cheatgrass '' ranges . The provision suggested by the comment is unnecessary because BLM has a responsibility to ensure compliance with applicable law . One comment pointed out that BLM has authority and discretion to apply penalties for specific prohibited acts . Also , many livestock water rights are currently held by permittees , or jointly owned with BLM , and BLM has not seen evidence that holding a livestock water right discourages cooperation or compliance with terms and conditions of grazing permits .