[lemma=pay]* [lemma=□]
[lemma=pay]* [lemma=the]
[lemma=pay]* [lemma=pay]
If you buy an additional 15 percent interest in the entity and you , as the new controlling shareholder , have the ability to cancel the supply contract , you would likely have to pay the other shareholder its entire portion of the value of the supply contract since it will be giving up its favorable position in the contract . This view is consistent with DIG Issue E45 which indicates that each and every one of the shortcut criteria must be met and that " a hedging relationship cannot qualify for application of the shortcut method based on an assumption of no ineffectiveness justified by applying other criteria . While such an explosion would likely make for some great news , it 's likely that it would be customers who ultimately paid the price in convenience . Over the last month or so , Adobe has been earning column inches for all the wrong reasons , with security experts uncovering several vulnerabilities . In general , the lighter and more flexible the shank , the easier it is to roll through demi-pointe and to " go over " . If , on the other hand , you buy the same 15 percent interest but cannot cancel the contract , you would likely only pay the other shareholder the value of the 15 percent interest in the contract as the other shareholder will still realize value for the 45 percent interest it retained . Ford Credit pays the supplier directly and then is repaid later by the dealer . " The question is when can the vendor derecognize the deferred revenue liability in the absence of performance ? Under these arrangements , the finance subsidiary pays the manufacturer , holds a lien on the automobile , and then is repaid at a future date by the dealer .