□
□ □
□?
This third part of the argument is rather badly put but it seems to run something like this : suppose there is a plurality , so some spatially extended object exists ( after all , he 's just argued that inextended things do not exist ) . Yet even if Pinkerton ’ s vision of a new politics is not entirely persuasive , he does convincingly argue that our current stalemate-a libertarian social ethos and statist political ethos-is fundamentally unstable . He has also argued that there are other policy benefits of promoting telecommuting . He does n't argue that scientists should attempt to write poetically , unless like Sagan or Loren Eiseley they have unique skills in that area .