[lemma=liability | □=□]
[lemma=liability | tag=□]
[lemma=liability | lemma=□]
I do not know if this is just a technical thing that the minister is addressing here , but I am wondering why the definition of foreign government has to be deleted , has to be struck out in that section . Because I have consulted broadly and widely throughout the province of Manitoba to find out if any , any person , any working person of this province has ever been denied the opportunity to see financial information and to find out if they were one of the 12 people of this province to ask the minister to bring in amendments to The Labour Relations Act. For non-Catholic Christians , Grisez 's work deals with moral questions that face any Christian and that cannot be avoided on the assumption that they are of real concern only to conservative Roman Catholics like Grisez 's followers . The compensation committee established : What the legislation says is , the minister shall , once every two years , commencing in 1990 , cause a compensation committee , to be known as the Judicial Compensation Committee , to be established to review , determine and report to the minister on the salaries and benefits payable to judges , including pensions , vacations , sick leave , travel , expenses and allowances . Do you think that for one moment , Mr. Chair , that I would bother going through all these various amendments to punish the trade unions when the simplest thing that this party could do is simply abolish the Rand Formula and have the unions go cap in hand to their members to collect their union dues , like it was before 1976 , and the way that Mr. Sid Green suggested it should be , before he brought in Rand Formula in this province , something he admits was a mistake ? Change ought to have a normative value . I guess , I would have to say at the beginning , every time this committee meets , there is either a storm or a pending storm . So to use that argument to argue against why the judges should expect any improvement in their pension is because they signed on under a different pension plan and should not expect any improvement , I do not think is a very strong argument . If it does no harm , then maybe we should take the Hippocratic oath as a guide that our role here is to do no harm . If he is going to call for a recorded vote on every one of them , then can we just have it taken as a recorded vote so we do not have to go through the charade of putting up our hands and all that sort of thing ? The government made no information whatsoever available . What we are doing is putting in place here requirements to make sure we can achieve that maximum of 10 percent , that there is no way of getting around it , avoiding it or bridging it . It is a problem that sometimes poisons our debates , and it is regrettable when that happens , and I would acknowledge that both sides - - and I take personal responsibility for my part in this - - sometimes poison debate , because we do , by virtue of the fact that this is to a significant extent a class-based , sociodemographic representation that we enjoy here , work with disproportionately more poor people in our ridings than the Conservative Party does . What we are proposing here is that any individual who contravenes this confidentiality provision and disseminates that information in any way other than discussing it or talking about it or dealing with it , with matters of that particular bargaining unit , the person that would do such actions outside of that bargaining unit would contravene The Labour Relations Act and therefore be subject to any penalties or provisions as afforded under that act . I do not think any of us enjoy serving in such a situation , but on the other hand , the saying which was quoted to us at least once during the public hearings , that for evil to triumph all that is required is for good people to do nothing , is also true . I have sat in committees in a minority-government situation where the opposition brought in amendments which were passed by the committee with no ability for the government to consider amendments . The first part , it is clear to me that if there is a subsidiary relationship , if I am understanding " ( b ) " correctly , this pertains to a situation where a company , let us say , Northern Telecom , who is a big vendor of telecommunications products , has two independent subsidiaries which themselves are not related - - in other words , Northern Tel either owns or controls two separate companies , neither of which has a beneficial ownership relationship between them . Mr. Reid : Well , I think if the record reflects , Mr. Chairperson , the members that we have present in the room that are on this committee during the process where I would request a recorded vote , I have no problem as long as Hansard would show that the vote would be on those numbers . So their opposition , the opposition of every single municipality in this province to what you are doing , is based on fearmongering by the NDP . We had thought that the weapons charges would be a slap on the wrist . I am asking through this amendment to allow those organizations to be able to make those comments to the employees who would be participating in a lockout or strike picket line and that this would then provide some measure of assurance that the government would not move against those labour organizations in a punitive fashion for those who have made every reasonable effort to try and stop strike-related misconduct .