[tag=NN] □
[tag=NN] [□]
[tag=NN] □ □
I will reiterate once again , as I did in the House , that I believe that this bill is essentially designed as a punitive measure to get back at those labour organizations in our province that dared to stand up to this government and in fact raised issues during the 1995 provincial general election campaign and to raise public awareness of these issues , and that this government is now bringing forward Bill 26 as a punitive measure to in many ways tie the hands of those organizations from ever being able to take effective action , and at the same time recognizing that this government , while they have tied the hands of labour organizations in this province who dared to speak out , they have not taken similar actions to those that are familiar and friendly with this particular government , namely those in certain sectors of the business community and that it is undemocratic , the sections that the government is - - and the actions the government is proposing through this bill . Why , when the New Democratic Party goes to a reputable consulting firm in Toronto , which has been an intervener and served interveners such as the Manitoba Society of Seniors and others at CRTC hearings and clearly knows its business , understands the regulatory environment , that is why we went to them , because they are professionals . On the contrary , attention to the laws of worship may require a certain formality in style and language somewhat removed from ordinary speech . The fidelity of the objective presentation enhances the depth and transformative quality of the response . Mr. Findlay : Mr. Chairman , effectively I have had confirmed what I just said , that the bill is proclaimed in stages , portions , sections , if we want to change that statement here so that it allows the indebtedness to the Crown to become enacted when that section happens .