□ □ □
[□] □ □
□ □ □ □
United States v. L. O. does not dispute the reasonableness of Mr. Choplick 's belief that the rolling papers indicated the presence of marihuana , she does contend that the scope of the search Mr. Choplick conducted exceeded permissible bounds when he seized and read certain letters that implicated T. L. O. in drug dealing . Respondent , by and through counsel , filed an answer to the complaint and generally does not dispute the general facts stated in Count I but asserts no violation of the Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct occurred . NCD does not dispute the existence of legal distinctions between basic and enhanced ( or " information " ) services . Petitioner has not disputed the charges brought against her , except to claim that the real guilty party is one Sheree Estes . Nothing within the language of the statute indicates that Congress intended an absolute bar to any appropriate collection activity or legal action within the thirty-day period where the consumer has not disputed the debt . The Union does not dispute the Agency 's claim that this equipment is not used by employees in the performance of their jobs .