Yeah
Well , there you go. Fine , that 's alright , that 's OK. And  and ,  you know , in contrast , so Deborah  d and also Deborah Tannen 's  thesis she talked about differences of these types ,  that they 're just different styles , and it 's um  you  you can't impose a model of   there  of the ideal being no overlaps , and  you know , conversational analysts also agree with that , so it 's  now , universally  a ag agreed with. And  and , als I mean , I can't say universally , but anyway , the people who used to say it was strict ,  um  now , uh  don't. I mean they  they  also   you know , uh  uh , ack acknowledge the influence of  sub of subcultural norms and  cross - cultural norms and things. So , um Then it beco  though  so  just  just superficially to give  um  a couple ideas of the types of overlaps involved , I have at the bottom several that I noticed. So ,   uh , there are backchannels , like what Adam just did now and , um   um , anticipating the end of a question and  simply answering it earlier , and there are several of those in this  in these data where
Mm - hmm.
because we 're  people who 've talked to each other , um  we know  basically what the topic is , what the possibilities are and w and we 've spoken with each other so we know basically what the other person 's style is likely to be and so  and t there are a number of places where someone just answered early. No problem. And places  also which I thought were interesting , where two or more people gave exactly th the same answer in unison  different words of course but you know , the  basically ,  you know everyone 's saying " yes " or  you know , or ev even more sp specific than that. So , uh , the point is that , um   overlap 's not necessarily a bad thing and that it would be im  i useful to subdivide these further and see if there are individual differences in styles with respect to the types involved. And that 's all I wanted to say on that ,  unless people have questions.