No.
And I remember one thing that  that came up in the talk last Wednesday. Um , was this , I  I think he talked about the idea of like , um  He was talking about these lexicalized uh , uh , tree adjoining grammars where you sort of  for each word you , um
OK , you know how to do it ?
For each lexical item , the lexical entry says what all the uh trees are that it can appear in. And of course , that 's not v That 's the opposite of constructional. That 's , you know , that 's  that 's HPSG or whatever.