So we have a few funny things where something in the meaning might refer to something in the form. But  but s we 're not gonna really worry about that for right now and there are way We can be more specific if we have to later on. OK , and so in terms of the  the relations , you know , as usual they 're before and ends. I should have put an example in of something that isn't an interval relation but in form you might also have a value binding. You know , you could say that , um , you know , " name - one dot " , t you know , " number equals " , you know , a plural or something like that.
Mm - hmm.
There are certain things that are attribute - value , similar to the bindings below but I mean they 're just  us usually they 're going to be value  value fillers , right ? OK , and then again semantic constraints here are just  are just bindings. There was talk of changing the name of that. And Johno and I  I  you  you and I can like fight about that if you like ? but about changing it to " semantic  n effects " , which I thought was a little bit too order - biased
Well  Th