Yeah.
Actually , that 's a int that raises an interesting point that came up in our discussion that 's maybe worth repeating. We realized that , um , when we were talking about this that , OK , there 's these different things that we want to do with it. So , um , it 's true that we wanna be selective in some ways , uh , the way that you were speaking about with , uh , not having an interlingua and uh , these other issues. But on the other hand , it 's not necessarily true that we need all of the corpus to satisfy all of it. So , a a as per the example that we wanna have a fair amount that 's done with a small n recorded with a small , uh , typ number of types of meetings But we can also have another part that 's , uh , just one or two meetings of each of a  of a range of them and that 's OK too. Uh , i We realized in discussion that the other thing is , what about this business of distant and close microphones ? I mean , we really wanna have a substantial amount recorded this way , that 's why we did it. But  what about  For th for these issues of summarization , a lot of these higher level things you don't really need the distant microphone.
Right , I mean , I c I think there 's
And you don't really need the close microphone , you mean.