Yeah. Uh , and , you know , i u when whenever anybody figures it out they should also , for sure , email Hynek because Hynek will be over there  telling people  what we did , so he should know.
Mmm. Yeah.
Good , OK. So , um So , we 'll  we 'll hold off on that a little bit. I mean , even with these results as they are , it 's  it 's  it 's really not that bad. But  but , uh , um And it looks like the overall result as they are now , even without , you know , any  any bugs being fixed is that , uh , on the  the other tasks , we had this average of , uh , forty uh  nine percent , or so , improvement. And here we have somewhat better than that than the Danish , and somewhat worse than that on the German , but I mean , it sounds like , uh , one way or another , the methods that we 're doing can reduce the error rate from  from mel ceptrum  down by , you know  a fourth of them to , uh , a half of them. Somewhere in there , depending on the  exact case. So So that 's good. I mean , I think that , uh , one of the things that Hynek was talking about was understanding what was in the other really good proposals and  and trying to see if what should ultimately be proposed is some , uh , combination of things. Um , if , uh  Cuz there 's things that they are doing  there that we certainly are not doing. And there 's things that we 're doing that  they 're not doing. And  and they all seem like good things.
Yeah.