So  so the current syntax is if it s if there 's a type it 's before construct
Yeah , right.
OK , that 's fine.
OK , and then it has a block that is constituents. And as usual I guess all the constructions her all the examples here have only , um , tsk  one type of constituent , that is a constructional constituent. I think that 's actually gonna turn out to m be certainly the most common kind. But in general instead of the word " construct " , th here you might have " meaning " or " form " as well. OK ? So if there 's some element that doesn't  that isn't yet constructional in the sense that it maps form and meaning. OK , um , the main change with the constructs which  each of which has , um , the key word " construct " and then some name , and then some type specification , is that it 's  it 's pro it 's often  sometimes the case in the first case here that you know what kind of construction it is. So for example whatever I have here is gonna be a form of the word " throw " , or it 's gonna be a form of the word , you know , I don't know , " happy " , or something like that. Or , you know , some it 'll be a specific word or maybe you 'll have the type. You 'll say " I need a p uh spatial relation phrase here " or " I need a directional specifier here ". So - uh you could have a j a actual type here. Um , or you could just say in the second case that you only know the meaning type. So a very common example of this is that , you know , in directed motion , the first person to do something should be an agent of some kind , often a human. Right ? So if I  you know , the um , uh , run down the street then I  I  I run down the street , it 's typed , uh , " I " , meaning category is what 's there. The  the new kind is this one that is sort of a pair and , um , sort of skipping fonts and whatever. The idea is that sometimes there are , um , general constructions that you know , that you 're going to need. It 's  it 's the equivalent of a noun phrase or a prepositional phrase , or something like that there.