Yeah. Yeah. One question I have that  that I mean , we wouldn't know the answer to now but might , do some guessing , but I was talking before about doing some model modeling of arti uh , uh , marking of articulatory , features , with overlap and so on.
Hmm.
And , and , um , On some subset. One thought might be to do this uh , on  on the digits , or some piece of the digits. Uh , it 'd be easier , uh , and so forth. The only thing is I 'm a little concerned that maybe the kind of phenomena , in w i i The reason for doing it is because the  the argument is that certainly with conversational speech , the stuff that we 've looked at here before , um , just doing the simple mapping , from , um , the phone , to the corresponding features that you could look up in a book , uh , isn't right. It isn't actually right. In fact there 's these overlapping processes where some voicing some up and then some , you know , some nasality is  comes in here , and so forth. And you do this gross thing saying " Well I guess it 's this phone starting there ". So , uh , that 's the reasoning. But , It could be that when we 're reading digits , because it 's  it 's for such a limited set , that maybe  maybe that phenomenon doesn't occur as much. I don't know. Di - an anybody  ?  Do you have any  ?  Anybody have any opinion about that ,
and that people might articulate more , and you that might end up with more  a closer correspondence.