Absolutely fine. But this is the sort of thing , I  I propose that we think about ,
OK.
so that we actually end up with um , um , nodes for the discourse and ontology so that we can put them into our Bayes - net , never change them , so we  all there is is " where is X " , and , Eva can play around with the observed things , and we can run our better JavaBayes , and have it produce some output. And for the first time in th in  in the world , we look at our output , and um  and see uh whether it  it 's any good.
OK.