Yeah , it should be  So we have um , i let 's assume we  we call something like a loc - X node and a path - X node. And what we actually get if we just look at the discourse , " where is X " should activate or should
Mmm.
Hmm. Should be both , whereas maybe " where is X located " , we find from the data , is always just asked when the person wants to know where it is , and " how do I get to " is always asked when the person just wants to know how to get there. Right ? So we want to sort of come up with what gets uh , input , and how inter in case of a " where is " question. So what  what would the outcome of  of your parser look like ? And , what other discourse information from the discourse history could we hope to get , squeeze out of that utterance ? So define the  the input into the Bayes - net  based on what the utterance , " where is X " , gives us. So definitely have an Entity node here which is activated via the ontology ,
so " where is X " produces something that is s stands for X , whether it 's castle , bank , restroom , toilet , whatever. And then the ontology will tell us