Doesn't hurt , but doesn't get a little better , or something.
No.
No. OK , so  um I guess the argument one might make is that , " Yeah , if you looked at one of these cases  and you jiggle something and it changes  then uh you 're not quite sure what to make of it. But when you look across a bunch of these and there 's some  some pattern , um  I mean , so eh h here 's all the  if  if in all these different cases  it never gets better , and there 's significant number of cases where it gets worse ,  then you 're probably  hurting things ,  I would say. So um  I mean at the very least that would be a reasonably prediction of what would happen with  with a different test set , that you 're not jiggling things with. So I guess the question is if you can do better than this. If you can  if we can approximate  the old numbers while still keeping the latency down.
Mmm. Yeah.