OK. In that case , um  my c  the coding that I was using   since we haven't ,  uh  incorporated Adam 's , uh  coding of overlap yets , the coding of Yeah , " yets " is not a word. Uh  since we haven't incorporated Adam 's method of handling overl overlaps yet  um  then  that would have fallen through the cra cracks. It would be an underestimate of the number of overlaps because , um  I wou I wouldn't be able to pick it up from the way it was  encoded so far.
I I
We just haven't done th the precise second to sec you know ,  second to second coding of when they occur.
I I I 'm  I 'm  I 'm confused now. So l l let me restate what I thought Andreas was saying and  and see.