It 's us.
but  but I think that we didn't do anything that but well anyway so  uh I wouldn't be too concerned about it with respect to that although we should clear it with Eric and Dan of course but these results are based on data which haven't had the uh haven't had the chance to be reviewed by the subjects
That 's true.
and I don't know how that stands , I mean if you  if you get fantastic results and it 's involving  data which  which later end up being lessened by , you know certain elisions , then I don't know but I wanted to raise that issue ,