No , but suppose they both talk simultaneously   both a  a portion of it is in minute one and another portion of minute two.
OK. In that case , um  my c  the coding that I was using   since we haven't ,  uh  incorporated Adam 's , uh  coding of overlap yets , the coding of Yeah , " yets " is not a word. Uh  since we haven't incorporated Adam 's method of handling overl overlaps yet  um  then  that would have fallen through the cra cracks. It would be an underestimate of the number of overlaps because , um  I wou I wouldn't be able to pick it up from the way it was  encoded so far.
I I
We just haven't done th the precise second to sec you know ,  second to second coding of when they occur.