Yes. Mm - hmm. Actually , um  um  actually not. Uh , so  le let 's think about the case where  A starts speaking   and then B overlaps with A ,  and then the minute boundary happens. And let 's say that  after that minute boundary ,  um  B is still speaking ,  and A overlaps  with B , that would be a new overlap. But otherwise  um , let 's say B  comes to the conclusion of  of that turn without  anyone overlapping with him or her , in which case there would be no overlap counted in that second minute.
No , but suppose they both talk simultaneously   both a  a portion of it is in minute one and another portion of minute two.
OK. In that case , um  my c  the coding that I was using   since we haven't ,  uh  incorporated Adam 's , uh  coding of overlap yets , the coding of Yeah , " yets " is not a word. Uh  since we haven't incorporated Adam 's method of handling overl overlaps yet  um  then  that would have fallen through the cra cracks. It would be an underestimate of the number of overlaps because , um  I wou I wouldn't be able to pick it up from the way it was  encoded so far.
I I