but  but  Yeah , it 's a
Mm - hmm. OK. But then there 's another thing that also Thilo 's involved with , which is , um  OK , and  and also Da - Dave Gelbart. So there 's this  this problem of  and w and  so we had this meeting. Th - the   also Adam , before the  the  before you went away. Uh we , um  regarding the representation  of overlaps , because at present ,   um , because  of the limitations of  th the interface we 're using , overlaps are , uh , not being  encoded by  the transcribers in as complete  and , uh , detailed a way as it might be , and as might be desired  I think would be desired in the corpus ultimately.
Mm - hmm.
So we don't have start and end points  at each point where there 's an overlap. We just have the  the  overlaps  encoded in a simple bin. Well , OK. So  @ @ the limits of the  over of  of the interface are  such that we were  at this meeting we were entertaining how we might either expand  the  the  interface or find other tools which already  do what would be useful. Because what would ultimately be , um , ideal in my  my view and I think  I mean , I had the sense that it was consensus , is that , um , a thorough - going musical score notation would be  the best way to go. Because  you can have multiple channels , there 's a single time - line , it 's very clear , flexible , and all those nice things.