yeah , it doesn't give the punch line.
Mm - hmm.
Cuz let me tell the gang what I think the punch line is , because it 's actually important , which is , that , the constructions , that , uh , Nancy and Keith and friends are doing , uh , are , in a way , quite general but cover only base cases. And to make them apply to metaphorical cases and metonymic cases and all those things , requires this additional mechanism , of construal. And the punch line is , he claimed , that if you do this right , you can get essentially orthogonality , that if you introduce a new construction at  at the base level , it should com uh , interact with all the metonymies and metaphors so that all of the projections of it also should work.
Mm - hmm.