Oh , great.
Um , I 've gotta get some more information from Jane cuz I have some  some gaps here that I need to get her to fill in , but  so far , um ,  as of Monday , the fourteenth , um , we 've had a total number of meeting sixty - two hours of meetings that we have collected. And , um  Uh , some other interesting things , average number of speakers per meeting is six. Um , and I 'm gonna have on here the total amount that 's been transcribed so far , but I 've got a bunch of  uh , that 's what I have to talk to Jane about , figuring out exactly which ones have  have been completed and so forth. But , um ,  this 'll be a nice thing that we can put up on the  the web site and people can  be informed of the status of various different ones. And  it 'll also list , uh , like under the status , if it 's at IBM or if it 's at ICSI , uh , or if it 's completed or which ones we 're excluding and  and there 's a place for comments , so we can ,  um , say why we 're excluding things and so forth. So.
Now would the ones that , um , are already transcribed  we h we have enough there that c you know , we 've already done some studies and so forth and  um , shouldn't we go through and do the business - es u of  of having the , um , uh , participants approve it , uh , for  approve the transcriptions for distribution and so forth ?
Um , interesting idea. In principle , I  I would say yes , although I still am doing some  the final - pass editing , trying to convert it over to the master file as the  being the channelized version and it 's  Yeah , it seems like I get into that a certain way and then something else intervenes  and I have to stop. Cleaning up the things like the , uh , uh , places where the transcriber was uncertain , and  and doing spot - checking here and there. So , um , uh , I guess it would make sense to wait until th that 's done , um , but  but