Yeah , yeah.
Which is fine , yeah.
Yeah.
It 's  that now , um , I 'm mentioned this , I  I don't know if I ever explained this but the point of , um , I mentioned in the last meeting ,  the point of having something called " nominal expression " is , um , because it seems like having the verb subcategorize for , you know , like say taking as its object just some expression which , um , designates an object or designates a thing , or whatever , um , that leads to some syntactic problems basically ? So you wanna , you know  you sort of have this problem like " OK , well , I 'll put the word " , uh , let 's say , the word " dog " , you know. And that has to come right after the verb