Hmm ? Cuz then you have , you know , more and more , u chances to get away from random errors. And I think , um , the other thing too is that right now we have sort of a stratified sample with reference to dialect groups , and it might be  there might be an argument to be made for having uh f for replicating all of the digits that we 've done , which were done by non - native speakers so that we have a core that totally replicates the original data set , which is totally American speakers , and then we have these stratified additional language groups overlapping certain aspects of the database.
Right. I think that uh trying to duplicate , spending too much effort trying to duplicate the existing TI - digits probably isn't too worthwhile because the recording situation is so different.
Yeah.
It 's gonna be very hard to be comparable.