I consider the  the , nnn  the nnn , nnn  eh , the entirety eh , eh , all  all the time there were  the voice has overlapped.
OK.
This is the idea. But eh I  I don't distinguish between the  the numbers of eh speaker. Uh , I 'm not considering  eh the  the  ehm  eh , the fact of eh , eh , for example , what did you say ? Eh at first eh , eh two talkers are uh , eh speaking , and eh , eh a third person eh join to  to that. For me , it 's eh  it 's eh , all overlap zone , with eh several numbers of speakers is eh , eh the same acoustic event. Wi - but  uh , without any mark between the zone  of the overlapping zone with two speakers eh speaking together , and the zone with the three speakers.
That would j just be one.