H No. Well , no the Bayes  the Bayes - nets  The Bayes - nets will be dec specific for each decision. But what I 'd like to be able to do is to have the way that you extract properties , that will go into different Bayes - nets , be the  uh general. So that if you have sources , you have trajectors and stuff like that , and there 's a language for talking about trajectors , you shouldn't have to do that differently for uh uh going to something , than for circling it , for uh telling someone else how to go there ,
Getting out of
whatever it is. So that  that , the  the decision processes are gonna be different What you 'd really like of course is the same thing you 'd always like which is that you have um a kind of intermediate representation which looks the same o over a bunch of inputs and a bunch of outputs. So all sorts of different tasks  and all sorts of different ways of expressing them use a lot of the same mechanism for pulling out what are the fundamental things going on. And that 's  that would be the really pretty result. And pushing it one step further , when you get to construction grammar and stuff , what you 'd like to be able to do is say you have this parser which is much fancier than the parser that comes with uh SmartKom , i that  that actually uses constructions and is able to tell from this construction that there 's uh something about the intent  you know , the actual what people wanna do or what they 're referring to and stuff , in independent of whether it  about  what is this or where is it or something , that you could tell from the construction , you could pull out deep semantic information which you 're gonna use in a general way. So that 's the  You might. You might. You might be able to  to uh say that this i this is the kind of construction in which the  there 's  Let 's say there 's a uh cont there  the  the land the construction implies the there 's a con this thing is being viewed as a container. OK. So just from this local construction you know that you 're gonna hafta treat it as a container you might as well go off and get that information. And that may effect the way you process everything else. So if you say " how do I get into the castle " OK , then um  Or , you know , " what is there in the castle " or  so there 's all sorts of things you might ask that involve the castle as a container and you 'd like to have this orthogonal so that anytime the castle 's referred to as a container , you crank up the appropriate stuff. Independent of what the goal is , and independent of what the surrounding language is.
Mm - hmm.