and I think that 's closest to their second one. So I d don't yet know , I have no commitment , as to whether we need it. It might be  it 's the kind of thing that w a parser might want to think about whether we require  you know , these things are like it 's semantically part of it
N no , no. Well , uh , th critically they 're not required syntactically. Often they 're pres presu presupposed and all that sort of stuff.
Right. Right , right. Yeah , um , definitely. So , um , " in " was a good example. If you walk " in " , like well , in what ?
Right , there 's