History. Discourse history. Yeah.
OK. Whatever. So we can work out terminology later.
Yep.
So , they 're  they 're quite distinct. I mean , you need them both , but they 're quite distinct. And , so what we were talking about doing , a a as a first shot , is not doing any of the linguistics. Except to find out what seems to be  useful. So , the  the  the reason the belief - net is in blue , is the notion would be  Uh , this may be a bad dis bad idea , but the idea is to take as a first goal , see if we could actually build a belief - net that would make this three way distinction uh , in a plausible way , given these  We have all these transcripts and we 're able to , by hand , extract the features to put in the belief - net. Saying , " Aha ! here 're the things which , if you get them out of  out of the language and discourse , and put them into the belief - net , it would tell you which of these three uh , intentions is most likely. " And if  to actually do that , build it , um  you know , run it  y y run it on the data where you hand - transcribe the parameters. And see how that goes. If that goes well , then we can start worrying about how we would extract them. So  where would you get this information ? And , expand it to  to other things like this. But if we can't do that , then we 're in trouble. I mean th th i i if you can't do this task , um