Well , look at  look  Face yourself with this pr question. You get this  You 'll have  y This is what you get. And now you have to make a decision. What do we think ? What does this tell us ? And not knowing what was asked , and what happened , and whether the person was a tourist or a local , because all of these factors have presumably already gone into making these posterior probabilities. What  what we need is a  just a mechanism that says , " Aha ! There is  "
Yeah. I just don't think a " winner - take - all " type of thing is the
I mean , in general , like , we won't just have those three , right ? We 'll have , uh , like , many , many nodes. So we have to , like  So that it 's no longer possible to just look at the nodes themselves and figure out what the person is trying to say.
Yep. Because there are interdependencies , right ? The uh  Uh , no. So if  if for example , the Go - there posterior possibility is so high , um , uh , w if it 's  if it has reached  reached a certain height , then all of this becomes irrelevant. So. If  even if  if the function or the history or something is scoring pretty good on the true node , true value