Um , so  so that , um ,  when you come up with these different things ,  and these different functions ,  you don't necessarily just put them all into one huge vector , but perhaps  you  have some of them in one stream and some of them in another stream , and so forth. And , um , um ,  um  And we 've also talked a little bit about , uh ,  uh , Shihab Shamma 's stuff , in which  you  the way you look at it is that there 's these different mappings and some of them emphasize , uh , upward moving ,  uh , energy and fre and frequency. And some are emphasizing downward and  fast things and slow things and  and  so forth. So. So there 's a bunch of stuff to look at. But , uh , I think we 're sorta gonna start off with what  he , uh , came here with and branch out   branch out from there. And his advisor is here , too ,  at the same time. So , he 'll be another  interesting source of  wisdom.
Hmm.
So.
As  as we were talking about this I was thinking ,  um ,  whether there 's a relationship between   um ,   between Michael 's approach to , uh , some  some sort of optimal brain damage or optimal brain surgeon on the neural nets.