Um on the left here we've got uh an engineering-based design for a remote control ,
so it's one that's got lots of buttons , it's it's fully featured , everything you might possibly want to do is there , you know , it's got forward , backwards , up , down , channel numbers , volume , uh freeze frame. Yeah , it's it's fully featured and it might take a while to get to learn to use it , but once you've learned it you can  you can do whatever you want with your T_V_. The one on the right is a lot more basic. It's just got the essential functions of the T_V_ changing the channel , play , stop , volume. It would be a lot quicker to learn to use it , but again th it's it's swings and roundabouts. There are disadvantages , you can't use it say to to freeze the television picture. Uh there's a lot of features that are missing from that remote control. So we've got to to find our  find a way of striking a balance between the two. Um as I said before , remote controls are subjective , different people want want different things. Um personally wa what I want from a remote control is a device that's simple , it it's easy to use , uh it's got big buttons for doing the things I do most often , changing the volume , changing the channel. It it does everything that I need it to uh , as I said before , I'm quite lazy , I don't wanna walk across the room just to adjust my television. I also want something that that looks cool , um and that that feels good , that's ergonomically designed.
Mm 'kay. Thank you very much. That was very useful.  It's funny to see the  drastic difference between those two remotes.  Um.
Hmm.