Good teaching scale
TD
There was no evidence of a difference in student perceptions about the amount of time staff spent commenting on their work (Q9) or the effort staff made to understand student difficulties (Q20). Both the TD and OFC group felt that lecturers were good at explaining (Q23) and worked hard to make their topics interesting (Q25). Furthermore, the TD and OFC students felt that faculty had an interest in what students had to say (Q31) and that they tried to get the best out of all the students (Q33). However, compared to the TD group who attended the on-site traditional clinical attachment, students felt that the OFC approach did not motivate students to do their best (Q4, P = 0.01) or provide adequate feedback on how they were doing (Q22, P = 0.041) on the GT scale.