Results
SCAR
The mean yield of cells was 20 × 106 cells/mL from aspirated 100 cc of fat tissue, and the mean viability of these cells was 81.4%. SVF cell surface markers were evaluated using flow cytometry. The results demonstrated that the isolated SVF cells expressed CD44, CD90, CD105, and CD73 surface markers, while showing minimal expression of hematopoietic cell markers CD34/CD45 (Figs. Viability of SVF cells (prepared for injection)SVF cells CD44, CD73 (The average age of the studied subjects was 31.00 ± 9.67 years. Among the studied subjects, seven subjects (70.0%) were women and the rest were men. In the group treated with fractional COSonographic findings before intervention with fractional COSonographic findings after intervention with fractional COIn the group treated with COSkin burn scar before and after treatment with SVF and fractional COSonographic findings before intervention with fractional COSonographic findings after intervention with fractional COWe will now compare in more detail the variables related to burn scar severity between patients treated with fractional COComparison of the average amount of burn scar severity variables before and after the intervention in the group treated with COComparison of the average amount of burn scar severity variables before and after the intervention in the group treated with COComparison of the average amount of biometric variables of burn scar severity in the group treated with fractional COComparison of the average amount of biometric variables of burn scar severity in the group treated with fractional COComparing the two aforementioned groups, Vancouver scar scale and Mexameter melanin index were significantly better in the group treated with SVF and fractional COComparison of the average amount of biometric variables of burn scar severity in the group treated with fractional COIn the group treated with a fractional COComparison of the average amount of patient and physician global assessment score between group treated with SVF in combination with CO