Results
The median CE’s evaluation score halfway through the training was 80 [50–96] and 91 [65–100] at the end of the training, with no significant differences between the two groups. The level of agreement between the student and CE’s evaluation at the end of the training was not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.05). It noted that students who scored themselves higher than their CEs tended to have lower APP scores than others, based on CEs’ assessment. These students were found to have less academic experience. Nevertheless, those from the IG improved significantly, based on the CE’s assessment, during the second half of the training, compared to the controls.