Results
In this clinical trial, 30 patients (16 men and 14 women) with an average age of 25 years had surgical extraction of both of their impacted lower third molars in a single visit at the outpatient clinic department of oral surgery-Hospital of Stomatology, Xian Jiaotong University. We used the lower third molar region as a study model. In terms of resorption, the buccal wall, lingual wall heights, and alveolar bone width showed a statistically significant reduction in the height and width of control site C2 when compared to baseline C1 of the same site (C1 31.4 ± 4.5 vs C2 29.4 ± 4.3 mm, C1 26.4 ± 4.2 vs C2 23.1 ± 4 mm, C1 20.51 ± 1.82 vs C2 19.53 ± 1.9 mm, respectively), while CGF sites C2 showed a significant increase in the wall height and width (C1 30.9 ± 3 vs C2 32.9 ± 3.5 mm, C1 23.7 ± 3.7 vs C2 25.4 ± 3.5 mm, C1 20.87 ± 1.61 vs C2 21.07 ± 1.55 mm, respectively). The CGF site had higher values in height and width when compared to the control site (Buccal wall The intra‐ and inter‐sites comparisons are shown in (a, b & c: Comparison of Buccal and lingual walls height and alveolar bone width in terms of mean±standard deviation at different time intervals in both sites.Pa, b & c: Comparison of bone density in the cervical and apical thirds of the socket and socket volume using Mann –Whitney test.Comparison of periodontal pocket of second molar at different time intervals using Chi-Square test.P