Adherence; caloric and protein intake
fasting blood glucose
REGRESSION
The TRF group was required to eat three meals within the agreed 8-hour time window, and then fast for 16 hours; there was no feeding time window requirement for the CD group. The feeding time for the TRF group was 8.4 ± 0.7 hours, while that of the CD group was 11.2 ± 1.3 hours (Feeding time between groups. Compared with the CD group, patients in the TRF group had significantly shorter feeding windows.One patient in the CD group did not provide a dietary diary. Caloric intake was declined slightly in the TRF group (21.08 ± 4.36 kcal/kg/d) compared to the CD group (28.39 ± 12.96 kcal/kg/d), although the difference was not statistically significant (The intake percentages for the three major macronutrients were similar in both groups. The proportions of protein intake in the TRF group and the CD group were 14.7 ± 3.8% and 17.7 ± 4.1% (Daily macronutrient intakes, by group, based on dietary records.Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or medians (25th-75th interquartiles). TRF, time-restricted feeding; CD, control diet; We used multiple linear regression models to evaluate the effect of TRF (Multiple linear regression analyses.Model 1: grouping.Model 2: grouping, diastolic blood pressure and fasting blood glucose.Model 3: grouping, diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose and dietary protein intake (DPI).Model 4: grouping, diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, high-density lipoprotein and albumin.
