Results
CKD, chronic kidney disease, lower urinary tract symptomsFlow, Prostate, nocturia
NOCTURIA, PROSTATE, INCONTINENCE
Thirty primary care sites (32 general practices; one group of three practices were randomised as a single site) were recruited and all contributed to the intention-to-treat analysis (Flow of practice sites and participants through study. *See supplementary table S1 for reasons for exclusion. EOI=expression of interest; GP=general practitioner; LUTS=lower urinary tract symptomsFlow of practice sites and participants through study as continuation of Characteristics of practice sites and participants at baseline by intervention group. Values are number (percentage) unless stated otherwiseB-IPQ=Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire; CKD=chronic kidney disease; eGFR=estimated glomerular filtration rate; IQR=interquartile range; ICIQ-UI-SF=International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Urinary Incontinence-Short Form; IPSS=International Prostate Symptom Score; SD=standard deviation.Number providing non-missing data at baseline.Question asked: “If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition the way it is now, how would you feel about that?”Question asked: “When does urine leak?”Bladder diary completed as part of initial assessment in intervention arm only.For description purposes at baseline, nocturia is defined as waking to urinate at least once on two nights or to urinate twice or more. When data on waking or sleeping were not provided by participants, the variable was set to missing.The general practices identified 7872 potentially eligible patients from database searches. A random selection of 160 patients were not screened owing to agreed limits on screening numbers by large practices, and 97 patients were not screened owing to practice capacity. Of the remaining 7615 patients manually screened by their doctors, 2047 were ineligible (Of the 4808 participants invited, 2300 (47.8%) responded to the single invitation (no reminders were sent out). Of those who responded, 1671 were interested in taking part (72.6%). On further screening for eligibility (in particular for current bothersome LUTS), 1293 (77.4%) of those interested were eligible. Of these, 524 participants were recruited from intervention sites and 553 from usual care sites (83% of those interested and eligible) (