Proficiency
FRS
GROUP B
The mean proficiency scores for each group measured post-intervention at both assessment time-points are displayed in Fig. Mean proficiency assessment scores per group calculated at two time-points post-intervention with FRS and FRS + VCT. Group A had received training with FRS + VCT at time-point 1 and FRS alone at time-point 2. Group B had received training with FRS alone at time-point 1 and FRS + VCT at time-point 2At time-point 2, both groups received the alternate intervention. There was no significant difference in mean proficiency score in Group A, the group that only had further self-directed learning, from time-point 1. In contrast, Group B, who received VCT, showed significant improvement in mean proficiency by 9.67 points from time-point 1 (95% CI 5.18–14.15, 