Conflicts of Interest
food insecurity
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.Display of the parallel influences of delay discounting, consideration of future consequences, and perceived stress on the food insecurity-BMI relation.Food insecurity ratings (Mean ± SEM) (a), percent of participants with food insecurity (≥2; (b)), and percent of people with high food insecurity (≥5; (c)) in relation to income expressed as percent over poverty index adjusted for household size.Participant characteristics.Relations among variables.All bold values are significant (p < 0.05).Models the indirect effect and effect ratios of delay discounting and food choice on the relation between food insecurity and BMI, controlling for education, age, stress, income, house size, and exercise.CFCS = consideration of future consequences scale; significant paths A and B are bolded and noted by 