Statistical analysis considerations
This study attempted to determine the feasibility of conducting adaptations in this setting; however, effect size-based stopping rules were not applied, as this feasibility lacked the power to reach adaptation parameters. Adaptation feasibility was determined through the number of enrolled participants. Our study was not designed to determine the effectiveness of the intervention and therefore the sample size was not powered to determine an effect size. Outcomes were collected at baseline and throughout the follow-up periods to demonstrate the feasibility of collection at these time points.Given the nature of this study, we focused on descriptively reporting the results of our feasibility and outcome assessments. We report numeric data as means and standard deviations, while categorical data are reported as absolute and relative frequencies. Baseline patient characteristics are described for all arms using descriptive statistics. Outcome data are reported for baseline, 6 week, 3 month, and 6 month follow-up for each intervention arm.