Memorization capacity compared between groups at different time-blocks.
’ basal memorization
Mean and standard error of hit-item proportion in each time-block compared to the baseline score. A. Low baseline score subjects, B. Medium baseline score subjects, C. High baseline score subjects. * for p<0.05 and ** for p<0.01 of Group interaction post-hoc statistics reported in Results section in follow-up ANOVAs.In In Finally, in Regarding LB subjects, the MOT intervention increased 42% their memorization capacity on average, while the SHAM group improved 25% and the MEM group improved 14%. Regarding MB subjects, HIP intervention achieved an average improvement of 23%, while the SHAM and the MEM interventions remained at 9% and 6%, respectively. Therefore, we conclude that this stimulation protocol is dependent on the interaction between stimulation location and the subjects’ basal memorization capacity.