3.2. Acceptability of Trial
voice
The results from post-intervention survey (experimental group) quantifying the acceptability of videoconferencing (on a scale of 0–5, where 0 is “not at all” and 5 is “very much”), revealed that participants experienced considerable ease in using online videoconferencing (Mean = 4.43 (0.76 SD), Range = 3–5) and faced none to some technical difficulties during online sessions (M = 1.59 (0.64), R = 1–3) which included connectivity issues (37%) and voice fluctuations (10%). The overall satisfaction with online sessions was rated high (M = 4.32 (0.88), R = 2–5); the perceived effectiveness of online sessions was high (M = 4.43 (0.72), R = 3–5), with the understandability (M = 4.54 (0.69), R = 3–5) and relatability (M = 4.02 (0.76), R = 2–5) of the information provided during sessions rated towards the higher limits. The meditation exercises conducted during sessions were perceived to be effective (M = 4.35 (0.71), R = 3–5).Regarding the 