Statistical analysis
help-seeking behaviors
SECONDARY, APPENDIX
Based on previous research, moderate effect sizes of help-seeking intentions (Cohen’s d = 0.53) and help-seeking attitudes (Cohen’s d = 0.58) were expected for the present study’s primary outcomes [Analyses for both primary and secondary outcomes were done from the following time points, respectively: (1) post-discussion; (2) 1-month follow-up; and (3) 3-month follow-up, with the exception of actual help-seeking behaviors of participants, which did not include the post-discussion measurement time point. The analysis was performed by including all participants based on their randomized group regardless of adherence to the protocol. The missing data was not processed since it is less than 5%. We used linear mixed model (LMM) to analyze the difference between the intervention effect on the primary outcomes and secondary outcomes, with the baseline score included as a covariate. The fixed effects included intervention, time of assessment, and interactions. The random intercepts of participants were considered in the random effects of the models, and all models were estimated using maximum-likelihood estimation methods.For the additional analysis of AHSQ and GHSQ, each item was analyzed independently by using the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM), and the results were presented in the Appendix (