Limitations and Conclusions
LGA
In addition to the caveats addressed throughout our manuscript, we note several additional considerations that are important when interpreting this work. First, although the study sample was nationally representative by cross sections of age, gender, and race/ethnicity, the Prolific service is an online program, which may raise some concerns about generalizability (eg, party affiliation is more often Democrat in our sample than in national Gallup polls [We thank Dr Judith Greenberg for edits and comments made on the protocol for this study.Authors' Contributions: JA and YX conceptualized this study. JA, YX, and LGA contributed to the study methodology. LGA and YX performed study validation. JA and LGA performed formal analysis. JA performed data curation, wrote the original draft, and was responsible for project administration. LGA contributed to data visualization. All authors contributed to the study investigation, acquisition of resources, and review and editing.Conflicts of Interest: None declared.CONSORT-eHEALTH checklist (V 1.6.1).Data, code, and syntax.