One-way sensitivity analysis
ANEUPLOIDY
One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the costs of PGT-A would have to be at least ¥3393.95 to achieve the same costs per patient as the conventional-IVF group. The costs of PGT-A were continuously adjusted in the threshold analysis, and in this simulation, PGT‑A became cost-effective compared to the conventional-IVF group when the costs of PGT‑A was ¥ 1350.71 or less. When the clinical pregnancy rate in the PGT-A group increased to 83.88%, patients had the same CLBR as in the conventional-IVF group, and a clinical pregnancy rate of 98.24% would be required to achieve the same costs per live birth (Fig. 
One-way sensitivity analysis of cost of PGT-A and Clinical pregnancy rate of PGT-A. Note: Con IVF, conventional-IVF; PGT-A, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. One-way sensitivity analysis for the dependence of the costs per patient (The tornado diagram of one-way sensitivity analysis showed that the ICERs in descending order were sensitive to which parameters (Fig. 
Tornado diagram. Note: The parameters affecting the ICER are shown in above figure