Contrast sensitivity at far
SD
Before the training, no significant differences between groups were found in monocular contrast sensitivity results (Table Monocular contrast sensitivity results (mean ± SD, and minimum–maximum) measured at far for four spatial frequencies using the CSV1000 test before and after the visual training1.68 ± 0.18(1.34–2.08)1.62 ± 0.21(1.17–2.08)1.59 ± 0.25(1.00–1.93)1.55 ± 0.36(0.00–2.08)1.86 ± 0.24(1.38–2.14)1.81 ± 0.44(0.00–2.29)1.86 ± 0.29(1.21–2.29)1.81 ± 0.41(0.00–2.29)1.51 ± 0.41(0.00–1.99)1.53 ± 0.48(0.00–1.99)1.42 ± 0.61(0.00–1.99)1.50 ± 0.40(0.00–1.99)1.13 ± 0.37(0.47–2.08)1.03 ± 0.41(0.00–1.55)1.03 ± 0.47(0.00–1.55)1.07 ± 0.43(0.00–1.55)1.76 ± 0.19(1.17–2.08)1.75 ± 0.14(1.34–2.08)1.61 ± 0.25(1.00–1.93)1.73 ± 0.17(1.17–1.96)1.90 ± 0.26(1.38–2.29)2.06 ± 0.17(1.55–2.29)1.84 ± 0.28(1.21–2.29)1.99 ± 0.23(1.38–2.29)1.60 ± 0.33(0.91–1.99)1.63 ± 0.42(0.00–1.99)1.51 ± 0.48(0.00–1.99)1.66 ± 0.31(0.91–1.99)1.13 ± 0.35(0.47–1.55)1.21 ± 0.36(0.00–1.55)1.10 ± 0.41(0.47–1.55)1.17 ± 0.41(0.00–1.55)Binocular contrast sensitivity results at far measured with the CSV1000 test before and after the visual training. Δ represents the difference between the pre- and post-training dataAfter the training, monocular contrast sensitivity results (Table Regarding longitudinal changes, no significant changes with training were found in the placebo group in most of monocular CS values (right 