Clinical evaluation
Fracture, Tooth vitality
Patients were assessed during the follow‐up sessions, and photographs were taken to document the condition at each follow‐up session. As for patients' satisfaction, a questionnaire was used to be filled out by the patients in each follow‐up session.Surface and margin staining involved the evaluated surface and margin staining and color matching that were verified by the visual method comparing the shade taken immediately after the adhesive veneers and the shade during the follow‐up sessions. Fracture or crack was verified by a visual exam by mirror and illumination at the chairside. The contact points were investigated by the difficulty of passing a coated dental floss through the interdental contact points. Additionally, patients' satisfaction was measured by asking patients to fill out a questionnaire as mentioned previously. Tooth vitality was monitored by examining the vitality of abutment and pulp sensitivity by a pulp‐vitality spray tester and comparing it with adjacent teeth. Lastly, the gingival response was traced by measuring the periodontal sulcus in the follow‐up session and comparing it to the initial state.