Using Nuanced Inclusive Language 
High School FLASH uses a nuanced approach to inclusive language to strike a balance between broad inclusion and visibility of specific identities. The two approaches involve the use of neutral language, such as “partner,” as well as specific language, such as “boyfriend” or “girlfriend.” Each approach has advantages and disadvantages. Using both approaches, and applying each strategically, depending on context, allows for the most inclusive, affirming approach. We will discuss the disadvantages and complexities of these approaches in the discussion section.Neutral language offers the advantage of a broad, welcoming umbrella. For example, the word “partner” is intended to mean a romantic partner of any gender, rather than the more specific “boyfriend” or “girlfriend.” Neutral language is intended to allow young people of any sexual orientation or gender to see themselves reflected, including individuals who may identify in ways that are unfamiliar to the teacher or curriculum author. Neutral language allows a single sentence or concept to be relevant to a large, diverse group of people. These are significant advantages.The advantage of specificity is that people’s individual identities are named and provided visibility. Similarly, when specific genders and sexual orientations are named in scenarios all participants have the opportunity to consider what decisions young people like them might need to make. An ideal strategy is to use a mix of neutral and specific language to create a welcoming and affirming environment, and to listen carefully and be flexible when teaching so that a range of identities can be incorporated often.While studies over the past decade have confirmed that inclusive school climates and offering inclusive sex education improve sexual health outcomes for both LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ youth (e.g., Pampati et al., 