Discussion
FM
The aim of this study was to compare two energy restriction protocols (PER vs SER) in combination with performance of a CT program on body composition and strength-related variables in trained women. Although our initial hypothesis was that the PER protocol would be more effective than SER for reducing FM and maintaining FFM and strength levels, no significant differences were observed between conditions. Consistent with our findings, Mero et al. (Scrutiny of participants’ nutritional records in our study revealed that participants in the SER group did not consume the number of calories proposed (25 kcal·kgRegarding the possible differences between the sexes, Longland et al. (Our study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, our sample size was relatively small, limiting statistical power; larger samples are needed to draw stronger practical inferences on the topic. Second, mood state was not assessed (Helms et al. 