Outcomes {12}
EVENTS, SECONDARY
The co-primary and secondary outcomes for this study are shown in Table EndpointsClinical efficacy; observational level: resident;data type: continuousPer resident, the average of the daily care efficiency scores. Explicitly, this is the weighted sum of the pre-defined care events (product checks, product changes, toilet visits, clothes changes, linen changes) divided by the number of recorded diary days of the resident in question. Only values from the final week of the intervention period will be consideredThe weights of the continence care tasks are provided in Table Typical endpoint values are expected to lie between 0 and 2000Larger score values are to be interpreted as a greater workload for the staff caregiver in question and therefore less efficientClinical efficacy; observational level: resident;data type: continuousPer resident, the average of the available skin health grades (1, 2, 3–4, 5) that have been reported daily in the study diary. Only values from the final week of the intervention period are to be consideredThe score values will be a real number between 1 and 5Higher values are associated with a poorer skin healthClinical efficacy; observational level: resident;data type: continuousPer resident, the average of the available skin health grades (1–2, 3–4, 5) that have been reported daily in the study diary. Only values from the final week of the intervention period are to be consideredThe score values will be a real number between 1 and 5Higher values are associated with a poorer skin healthClinical efficacy; observational level: resident;data type: countClinical efficacy; observational level: resident;data type: countClinical efficacy; observational level: resident;data type: countClinical efficacy; observational level: resident;data type: countClinical efficacy; observational level: resident;data type: countClinical efficacy; observational level: resident;data type: ordinalThe skin health grade recorded by the investigator at visit 4Response an integer between 1 and 5A larger skin health grade is associated to worse skin healthClinical efficacy; observational level: resident;data type: ordinalThe EQ-5D index as recorded in visit 4 (individual resident’s study completion visit)Response is a natural number between 0 and 100Higher values associated with a higher self-reported quality of life. E2-5D can be converted to utility scores for economic analysisClinical efficacy; observational level: resident;data type: ordinalQuality of Life score recorded at visit 4. Response is between 13 and 52Larger values are associated with a greater quality of lifeClinical efficacy; observational level: resident;data type: ordinalGiven by the ‘Aggressive behaviour scale’ from the InterRAI Long Term Facility Assessment recorded in visit 4Response is a real number between 0 and 12Larger values are associated to greater aggressionClinical efficacy; observational level: cluster;data type: ordinalUWES score as recorded in visit 4Response is a natural number between 0 and 102Larger values are associated with a greater work engagementClinical efficacy; observational level: cluster;data type: continuousPer cluster, the assigned organization headroom score as recorded in visit 4Response is a real number between 1 and 4