Results
The two groups were well balanced regarding baseline clinical characteristics. Strut coverage was 95% (88.7–98.5%) in the exenatide group and 91.4% (88.8–98.5%) in the control group (p = 0.692). There were no significant differences between groups neither in the thickness of neo-intima (0.2 mm in both groups, p = 0.471), nor the maximal in-stent obstruction by neo-intima (15.5% in exenatide group 