3a. Group-dependent change in potential mediators
depression
Descriptive data for the variables showing group-dependent change (Parenting Style and ER) are shown in Table MLM revealed a significant group by time interaction for negative (but not positive) parenting style (ESI) between T1 and T3 (estimate: -6.36, Significant group by time interactions were found for one adaptive ER strategy (cognitive problem solving: Supplemental Figure The group by time interaction for cognitive problem-solving occurred from T1 to T2 (estimate = -2.63, 
Descriptive Data on Changes in Emotion Regulation and Parenting Style in Both Groups Across all Four Time Points129.33(31.19)134.37(33.78)141.65(34.67)138.40(35.04)132.96(28.48)142.63(27.31)139.27(24.39)141.39(30.94)19.58(5.00)20.23(5.24)21.53(5.26)21.13(5.71)19.83(5.35)22.26(5.41)20.86(5.30)21.37(5.6)19.35(5.99)20.56(6.22)21.00(6.07)20.88(5.74)19.43(5.36)20.86(4.91)19.16(5.97)20.05(5.20)18.77(5.95)20.09(5.69)21.35(5.82)20.15(6.17)19.20(5.76)19.91(5.83)18.38(6.12)20.34(5.21)17.77(6.18)18.81(6.34)20.60(5.94)20.35(6.15)19.60(5.57)20.00(4.58)21.29(3.76)20.68(5.56)19.42(4.98)19.07(5.09)19.80(5.1)19.05(5.32)19.16(4.66)20.17(4.46)19.91(3.90)19.47(4.86)20.07(5.31)19.53(5.28)20.45(6.1)20.10(6.11)19.75(6.11)22.00(5.19)121.18(5.34)20.76(5.75)14.37(5.33)16.00(5.31)17.05(5.86)16.78(5.84)15.95(4.67)17.43(5.20)18.00(3.89)17.39(5.04)69.35(13.65)71.63(17.15)71.43(17.85)67.58(15.41)69.68(15.78)72.03(15.04)76.13(17.97)70.45(17.14)13.89(3.99)13.93(5.44)14.53(5.44)12.85(4.63)13.06(4.73)13.11(4.44)14.45(5.4)13.61(4.87)10.02(3.62)11.93(4.04)10.80(3.50)10.33(3.56)12.89(4.63)10.77(4.06)14.48(5.47)10.55(3.64)14.58(4.39)14.88(5.36)14.85(5.81)13.55(4.67)14.87(4.80)15.31(4.8)16.51(4.63)15.26(4.64)13.68(5.39)13.67(4.89)13.68(5.01)13.58(5.49)13.68(4.71)15.09(5.2)16.94(6.07)14.95(5.65)17.18(5.56)17.21(4.42)17.53(5.01)17.28(4.86)16.95(4.40)17.74(5.13)16.81(5.72)16.08(5.43)Children in both groups showed increases in their knowledge of depression over time (T1 to T2: estimate = 1.51, 