3. Results
satiety, cardiometabolic
Baseline characteristics have already been reported elsewhere [However, quality of life differed significantly between the intervention and control group at baseline and at Visits 2 and 3. Using the full sample and controlling for individual heterogeneity and repeated measurement in a linear mixed model, we could find that the quality of life of the intervention group was on average 1.92 points higher (Visit 1 (baseline): 33.78 ± 2.81 (For the feeling of satiety, no difference was found between the intervention and control group at baseline, throughout, and at the end of the study. No significant differences were found between the groups with regard to life satisfaction and the importance of diet and food for well-being; the same applied to body sensation. No differences were found in any variable between subjects with and without increased cardiometabolic risk. A significantly higher body sensation was measured with increasing fiber intake. A higher BMI showed a highly significant association with a lower assessment of body sensation and was significantly associated with a lower subjective current health status (see In addition, a model with the time of visit as a fixed effect was estimated. Here, significant associations were found for satiety and satisfaction with life over the course of the study. Pairwise comparisons were further analyzed using a post-hoc Tukey test in To examine these findings more closely, another model that considered the interaction between the time of visit and group assignment was estimated. This interaction model did not show significant results regarding the feeling of satiety. 