One-year follow-up; comparison between groups
Weight loss, left ventricular hypertrophy
DIASTOLIC DYSFUNCTION, LEFT VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY
Weight loss was comparable between groups (Table 
Changes pre- and post-cardiac rehabilitation in mean weight (a), heart rate (b), global longitudinal strain (c), and ejection fraction (d). (Error bars represent 95% CI, Significant at p < 0.05, NS = non significant)
Comparison of percentage of diastolic dysfunction, reduced ejection fraction, reduces global longitudinal strain, and left ventricular hypertrophy between both standard cardiac rehabilitation, OPTICARE XL CR, and baseline and follow-up. (LV = left ventricular)