General Statements About Visual Clot
CLOT
Most participants (64/85, 75% agreed or strongly agreed) who used Visual Clot in the simulation felt better prepared to interpret the results of the viscoelastic test compared to ROTEM temograms. They also agreed or strongly agreed with the statement that Visual Clot is easy to learn (79/85, 93%) and that they would use this technique in clinical practice (73/85, 86%). Most participants (64/85, 75%) disagreed or strongly disagreed with the statement, “Visual Clot seems too simplistic to be any good.” The participant’s ratings concerning the 4 general statements about Visual Clot (N=85).