Primary outcome
average)-0.15(-0.41
All participants of the IG included in the following analysis have attended at least six of the eight training sessions and were therefore considered as “adherent”. In most cases, the missed sessions could be made up by the instructors offering catch-up sessions before the regular session started.Descriptively, mean errors in the cycle course were 9.30 ± 6.96 (T0) and 6.66 ± 4.81 (T1) in the IG versus 8.98 ± 7.80 (T0) and 8.84 ± 6.92 (T1) in the aCG (see Supplementary file 3 “Cycle course errors”). The results of the linear model (LM) with the difference in errors (T1-T0) as dependent variable are displayed in Table The adjusted model showed a significant gender effect. Women on average made 2.31 (p = 0.016) more errors than men. All other confounders had no significant effect on the difference in errors.
Effects of the intervention after 3 months (T1, LM) and 6–9 months (T2, LMM)3.30***(1.86, 4.75)3.76(-8.77,16.29)3.48***(1.53, 5.43)-12.77(-28.11, 2.58)-2.37**(-3.93, -0.82)-2.51**(-4.05, -0.96)-3.07**(-4.99, -1.16)-3.02**(-4.91, -1.14)Cycle course errorsbaseline (T0)-0.38***(-0.49, -0.28)-0.45***(-0.57, -0.32)-0.41***(-0.53, -0.29)-0.50***(-0.64, -0.36)2.31*(0.450, 4.172)2.34**(0.13, 4.54)-0.44(-2.03, 1.15)-0.48(-2.40, 1.44)Cycled distance(daily average)-0.15(-0.41, 0.12)0.12(-0.15, 0.39)-0.01(-0.17, 0.16)0.21*(0.01, 0.42)-0.001(-0.01, 0.01)0.0003(-0.01, 0.01)Notes: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; Inf. Crit. Information Criterium