Summary and conclusions
In the present study, the difference between ALT and INC training groups was task-switching of top-down goals of increasing or alternating increasing and decreasing Fmθ activity. Considering that accurate contingent feedback was provided in both groups, coupling between top-down goals and bottom-up error-related processing of visual feedback stimuli was comparable between groups. Our results are difficult to form any firm conclusions given its limitations. However, we hope that we have introduced a proof-of-concept based on new ideas to better stimulate future research based on the novel concepts offered. In particular, protocols designed to test greater outcome specificity, in terms of more specific dynamics-to-function mapping [