Comparison of variability between the three groups
Arterial Occlusion
ARTERIAL OCCLUSION
The results regarding the single-factor variance between groups were F = 8.108 and P < 0.01, suggesting a statistical difference in the peak torque at an angular velocity of 60°/s among the three groups. After the intervention, significant differences were detected between the control group (94.05 ± 17.62 N·m/kg) and the 40% AOP group (123.94 ± 28.13 N·m/kg) and 80% AOP group (152.04 ± 25.45 N·m/kg) (P < 0.05). Differences were also observed between the 40% AOP group (123.94 ± 28.13 N·m/kg) and the 80% AOP group (152.04 ± 25.45 N·m/kg) (P < 0.05).
The results regarding single-factor variance between the groups showed F = 14.674 and P < 0.01, suggesting the occurrence of a statistical difference in peak torque at an angular velocity of 180°/S between the three groups. After the intervention, significant differences were noted between the control group (73.28 ± 15.73 N·m/kg) and the 40% AOP group (102.06 ± 17.34 N·m/kg) and 80% AOP group (137.65 ± 25.54 N·m/kg) (P < 0.05). Significant differences were also detected between the 40% AOP group (102.06 ± 17.34 N·m/kg) and the 80% AOP group (137.65 ± 25.54 N·m/kg) (P < 0.05).The results regarding single-factor variance between groups were F = 11.153 and P < 0.01, suggesting statistical differences in the sum of the thicknesses of the rectus femoris and intermediate femoris between the three groups. After the intervention, significant differences were observed between the control group (4.32 ± 0.70 cm) and the 40% AOP compression group (5.23 ± 0.84 cm) and 80% AOP compression group (6.26 ± 0.64 cm) (P < 0.05). Significant differences were also apparent between the 40% AOP group (5.23 ± 0.84 cm) and the 80% AOP group (6.26 ± 0.64 cm) (P < 0.05).The results regarding single-factor variance between groups were F = 3.576 and P < 0.05, suggesting a statistical difference in IKDC scores between the three groups. After the intervention, the control group’s score (59.00 ± 10.79) was significantly different from the 80% AOP group’s score (75.38 ± 10.45) (P < 0.05). No significant differences were evident between the other groups (P > 0.05).The Kruskal-Wallis test results were H = 8.036 and p (0.045) < 0.05, indicating a statistical difference in the two-sided difference YBT scores between the various compression groups, but the specific difference between these two groups requires further examination. The DunnTest command was used to perform the Dunn method and thus achieve a pairwise comparison of the three groups. The Bonferroni method was selected as the p-value correction method, and the corrected p-value was directly compared with 0.05. Significant differences were obtained between the control group and the 80% AOP compression group (P < 0.05), but no significant differences were detected for the other groups (P > 0.05). Detailed data are shown in Table 
The specific differences in the two-sided difference scores for the YBT in the different compression groupsControl VS40% groupControl VS80% group40% VS 80%groupPT/BW (60°/s) (N·m/kg)PT/BW (180°/s) (N·m/kg)Thickness (cm)IKDC (%)YBT0.030*0.013*0.017*0.2950.5340.000*0.000**0.000**0.000**0.021**0.027*0.001*0.004**0.000**0.050Data are expressed as mean ± SD and level of significance (P).*P<0.05 for between-group variation; **P<0.01 for between-group variation.AOP, Arterial Occlusion Pressure; PT/BW, Peak Torque to Body Weigh; Thickness, the thickness of the rectus femoris and vastus intermedius; IKDC, International Knee Documentation Committee; YBT, Y-balance test.