References
CLD, HIV and co-morbidity status, RRR
REGRESSION, CHRONIC LUNG DISEASE, CLD
Participant flow diagram.Participant characteristics and anthropometry for each latent class profile Scatterplot of BMI and height-for-age Z-scores at baseline by latent class group for (Total body fat percentage for each latent class profile by females (solid circles) and males (solid triangles) among Participant characteristics at enrolment, by HIV and co-morbidity status.* Missing values: weight (1 HIV− IMVASK cohort), height and BMI (2 HIV+ IMVASK cohort); HIV viral load (35—IMVASK cohort; 2 BREATHE trial); CD4 cell count (15—IMVASK cohort).Latent class model fit and diagnostic criteria.The 7-class model was determined to fit the data best. Although the entropy value was slightly decreased compared to the 8-class model, each latent class had at least 40 individuals (5% of the data); the mean posterior probability predicting class membership was comfortably above 0.80 [Multinomial logistic multivariable regression showing factors independently associated with growth profiles among the full sample, The reference profile is profile 1: Average growth. RRR—relative risk ratio; CLD—chronic lung disease. RRR are interpreted relative to the reference profile; for example, when comparing females to males, the relative risk ratio of being in profile 3 compared to profile 1 is 2.86 (95%CI 1.44, 5.68) given the other variables in the model are held constant. In other words, females are more likely than males to be in profile 3 compared to profile 1. Overall Wald 