The effects of functional resistance training on the biochemical parameters of study groups
TG
Before and after the test, there was no significant difference in the variable value of glucose between the control and test groups. The difference between pre-test and post-test average glucose levels in the control group is not statistically significant (p-value 0.05), whereas this difference was significant in the test group (p-value 0.05) the test group's functional resistance training led to a significant difference in post-test blood glucose levels (p = 0.04) (Table Functional resistance training on biochemical tests.The control group did not receive any intervention, but the test group did functional resistance training group 24 sessions over 8 weeks three sessions per week at a local gym. Glucose (mg/dL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL)/low-density lipoprotein (LDL), triglyceride (TG, mg/dL), and cholesterol (Chol, mg/dL).Data are presented as means ± SD.Effects of functional resistance training on Biochemical parameters in studies groups. In this study, the control group did not receive any intervention, but the test group did functional resistance training group 24 sessions over 8 weeks three sessions per week at a local gym. (There was no significant difference between the control and test groups on the pre-test. In addition, the average of these variables between the pre-test and post-test did not differ significantly in the control group, whereas the average triglyceride did differ significantly (p = 0.02) in the test group. At the post-test, the average triglyceride difference between the control and test groups was statistically significant (p = 0.04) (Table There was no significant difference in cholesterol levels between the control and test groups in the pre-test. In contrast, there was a significant difference between pre-test and post-test cholesterol levels between the control and test groups (p = 0.01). In addition, the difference in post-test mean cholesterol levels between the control and test groups was statistically significant (p = 0.05) (Table 