Results
dataFigure
REGRESSION
The mean R2* at 1.5 T and 3 T were 37.5 s3 T R2* plotted against 1.5 T R2* with Alam's conversion line, and the linear regression lines using the data. Data point colour and symbol depends on whether the scanner was Siemens or Philip/GE. Three regression lines are plotted: for all data (pooled), Siemens data and Philips/GE dataFigure Scatter plots (Pearson's rho and Intraclass correlation coefficients for comparisons between 1.5 T-R2* LIC and 3 T-R2* LICBland Altman statistics for 1.5 T-R2* LIC and 3 T-R2* LICThe scatter plots (Fig. The bias and limits of agreement depended on the 1.5 T-R2* to LIC method, as shown by the Bland Altman plots in Fig. Also of note, the Bland Altman plots, particularly for Wood, show a positive relationship between the bias and the magnitude of the paired values.Splitting the data depending on whether the 3 T scanner was Siemens (2.89 T) or Philips/GE generally made little difference on the regression lines, correlation, and agreement, regardless of 1.5 T conversion method used.