Primary outcome
lateral mandibular movements, mandibular abduction, pain
Fig. 
Statistical analysis of the sEMG distribution, mandibular mobility range and pain intensity in the treatment groups and the control group at baselineLegend: MVC- Maximal Voluntary Contractions; RLX test – Rest test; RMASS – right masseter muscle, LMASS – left masseter muscle, MT- manual therapy, MS – magnetostimulation, MLA – magnetolaserotherapy, MLE – magnetoledotherapy, control – control groupsymnum.args a list of arguments to pass to the function symnum for symbolic number coding of p-values. For example, symnum.args <- list(cutpoints = c(0, 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.05, 1), symbols = c(“****”, “***”, “**”, “*”, “ns”)).In other words, we use the following convention for symbols indicating statistical significance: ns: p > 0.05*: p < = 0.05; **: p < = 0.01; ***: p < = 0.001; ****: p < = 0.0001Significantly higher results were observed in all sEMG measurements in each therapeutic subgroup compared to the control group (G2). The range of mandibular abduction and lateral mandibular movements in the control group were significantly higher than in the study groups. Similarly, in the case of the pain intensity scale, where in the control group all respondents scored ‘0’ on the NRS scale, while among the respondents from the study group, the pain intensity values were significantly higher in each subgroup (Fig. 