Impact of adjudication on mail-based direct-participant follow-up
non-bleeding, bleeding, bleeds
BLEEDING, MINOR, EVENT, BLEEDS, EVENTS
Of the 1215 major bleeds reported via mail-based direct-participant follow-up, 58.4% (710) were refuted during adjudication, with 496 being considered to be minor bleeds and 214 not being considered a bleeding event (Comparison between pre-adjudicated and post-adjudicated direct follow-upPercentages in parentheses are % of total number of ASCEND participants with the bleeding category before adjudication. The total (for each row or column) counts only the first event that occurred for each participant.*The sum of each column does not equal the total because a small number of minor and non-bleeding events were categorised as major bleeding events after adjudication (see 