Comparisons of the predictive performances of the GBDT model with LR model, SOFA, qSOFA, SAPS II, SIRS, and BISAP scores
sepsis, Sequential organ failure, SIRS
SEPSIS, SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE SYNDROME, ACUTE PANCREATITIS, POSITIVE
In the testing set, the GBDT model achieved the best performance with an AUC of (0.985, 95% CI: 0.966 to 1.000) compared with qSOFA score (AUC: 0.780, 95% CI: 0.709 to 0.852, 
Comparisons of the predictive performances of the GBDT model with LR model, SOFA, qSOFA, SAPS II, SIRS, and BISAP scoresNotes: GBDT: gradient boosting decision tree; SOFA: Sequential organ failure assessment score; qSOFA: Quick SOFA; SAPSII: Simplified acute physiology score II; SIRS: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome; BISAP: Bedside index of severity in acute pancreatitis; PPV: Positive predictive values; NPV: Negative predictive values; AUC: Area under curve; CI: confidence interval; Ref: Reference
The ROC curve comparison between GBDT and LR models and scoring systems
The net benefit of GBDT model, LR model, and scoring systems at different threshold probabilities for predicting sepsis in AP patients