Keywords
tumor, low back pain, lumbar heterotopic ossification, DDD, infections, pain, arthrodesis, infection, radicular pain, lumbar degenerative, disability, heterotopic ossification
TUMOR, ADVERSE EVENTS, INFECTIONS, DEGENERATIVE DISC DISEASE, INFECTION, PSEUDOARTHROSIS, COMPLICATIONS, HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION
Posterolateral spinal fusion is the standard surgical approach for patients with degenerative disc disease. In our previously published article, we reported a 5-years follow-up of a phase I/II clinical trial in patients undergoing spinal fusion with autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) embedded in tricalcium phosphate. In the current manuscript, we have updated the results with a 10-year follow-up, the longest reported to date in this setting. After clinical and radiological evaluation, safety of the procedure was further confirmed in all 11 treated patients, with no evidence of tumor, infection, inflammatory reaction, or heterotopic ossification related to the administration of MSCs. Regarding clinical efficacy, low back pain and radicular pain (both assessed by the visual analogue scale—VAS), and the Owestry Disability Index remained significantly lower compared to pre-intervention. Radiologic evaluation demonstrated spinal fusion in all cases, improving over time. Finally, quality of life improved significantly also during follow-up. In summary, the use of tricalcium phosphate-embedded autologous MSCs with lumbar posterolateral arthrodesis is safe and potentially provides long-term benefits for 10 years.To the editor,The gold-standard surgical approach to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) is posterolateral spinal fusion [The use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in spinal fusion procedures has raised as a potentially attractive approach, based on the ability of these cells to differentiate into osteoblast together with their strong anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory capacity [In a previous work [For the 10-year follow-up analysis, the 11 patients previously reported were assessed in person both clinically and radiologically. As in the previous study, pain was evaluated by means the visual analog scale (VAS), functional status by means of the Oswestry score and physical functioning, assessing this subsection of 10 items from the SF36 questionnaire. Lumbar spine X-ray was also performed. Updated data on comorbidities and complications were also collected.Statistical analyses were performed in R 4.2.0. All numerical variables followed a normal distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test). For the comparative analysis of quantitative variables, the Student’s t-test for paired samples was used comparing pre-intervention versus 10 years, pre-intervention versus 1 year, and 1 year versus 10 years. In addition, an Anova test for paired samples was performed to compare the three experimental groups.The most important finding of the long-term evaluation after 10 years is the fact that no late adverse events were observed in this period after in-person clinical and radiological evaluation of the treated patients. These includes local tumoral transformation, local infections, or lumbar heterotopic ossification related to the administration of MSCs. Solid radiological fusion was present at this late timepoint in 100% of the patients, without instrumentation loosening, segmental instabilities, lytic areas or pseudoarthrosis. The updated 10-years analyses showed a maintained significant decrease (Evaluation of pain, disability and physical functioning after 10 years compared to the first year and to pre-interventionIn summary, our 10-year evaluation results show that the use of autologous MSCs embedded in a tricalcium phosphate scaffold in addition to posterolateral arthrodesis is a safe procedure and suggest potential benefits at the clinical, radiological, and physical functioning levels, that should be demonstrated in larger phase II or III randomized trials.