References
tenderness
Study schedule [Study flowchart of included and excluded patients.Mean ± standard deviation of aerobic capacity for the female and male subgroups on days 0, 7 and 60 (forest therapy vs. mountain hiking).Sample size simulation based on data of the ANKER-Study. Upper graphic shows the comparison of the two intervention groups (forest therapy vs. mountain hiking) for primary outcome SF12 Total Score. The graphs below present gender-specific analyses of aerobic capacity for woman and men. Sample size simulation was performed for nparLD and ANOVA.Baseline characteristics of the study population regarding inclusion criteria.BMI: Body Mass Index, IPAQ-Short: Score of International Physical Activity Questionnaire in metabolic equivalent (MET) minutes per week, NRS-6: Nature Relatedness Scale 6, PHQ-9: Patient Health Questionnaire.Characteristics of the intervention program.* The values in the FTG can only be given as an average—they vary depending on the participant and individual execution of the exercises. ** The difference in ascent and descent was caused by the use of a mountain cable car.Results from the F1-LD-F1-model for primary outcomes.F1-LD-F1 model with group (forest therapy or hiking), time and the interaction of group and time (group*time); T1 = day 0/baseline, T2 = day 7/after intervention week, T3 = day 60/follow-up 1, T4 = day 180/follow-up 2; ** <0.01, * <0.05, n. s./not significant ≥0.05; Results for the Partnership Questionnaire Subscales dispute behavior, tenderness and commonality/communication can be found in Results from the F1-LD-F1-model for differential blood count and aerobic capacity.F1-LD-F1 model with time and treatment (forest therapy or hiking) and the interaction of treatment and time (treat_ time); Measuring times: T1 = day 0 baseline measurement, T2 = day 7 after intervention, T3 = day 60 follow-up, T4 = day 180 follow-up; ** <0.01, * <0.05, n. s./not significant ≥0.05; Abbreviations: adj. 