Anthropometric and metabolic outcomes
MetS
INSULIN SENSITIVITY
Body mass, BMI, and waist circumference decreased similarly in both groups (Fig. Anthropometric results of the intervention (Metabolic results of the intervention (Energy intake of the intervention (The change in insulin sensitivity was inversely associated with the changes in MetS score, BMI, body mass, fasting glucose, and SB percentage (Table Pearson correlation coefficients between the changes in different metabolic, cardiovascular, and PA markers (post–pre Δ values) during the intervention.Δ, the change from preintervention to postintervention measurements in metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes, and from screening to intervention in accelerometry outcomes; fInsulin, fasting plasma insulin, fGlucose, fasting plasma glucose; LPA, LPA measured by accelerometry; MetS score, MetS severity score (sum of waist circumference, mean blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose, insulin, and HDL/triglyceride-ratio); M-value, whole-body insulin-stimulated GU measured by HEC; MVPA, MVPA measured by accelerometry; SB, SB measured by accelerometry; WC, waist circumference.*Significant at the level of **Significant at the level of 