Secondary outcome
abduction, pain
Figure 
Changes of sEMG median during study in each therapeutic groupp_group, p_time p_time*group p < 0.001Legend: MVC% - Maximal Voluntary Contractions, RMASS – right masseter muscle, LMASS – left masseter muscle, MT- manual therapy, MS – magnetostimulation, MLA – magnetolaserotherapy, MLE – magnetoledotherapyAs presented in Fig. Figure 
Changes of movement range of the abduction of the mandible and pain intensity in the G1 group during studyLegend: MT- manual therapy, MS – magnetostimulation, MLA – magnetolaserotherapy, MLE – magnetoledotherapyThere was a clear increase in abduction of the mandible in the test group undergoing MT, with minimal changes in the MLA and MLE groups and no changes in the MS group. In the case of pain measurements, the greatest improvement was observed among MT respondents, where pain sensations did not exceed 1 on the NRS scale from day 6. In the other groups, the decrease in pain level over the course of the study was small (Fig. Figure 
Changes of lateral movement in the G1 group during studyLegend: MT- manual therapy, MS – magnetostimulation, MLA – magnetolaserotherapy, MLE – magnetoledotherapyThere was a clear increase in both right and left lateral mobility in the MT group. There were no differences in the course of the study in the MS group, and slight increases in the MLA and MLE groups. The significant effect of the interaction of time and method indicates the highest effectiveness of manual therapy among the methods tested (Fig. Table 