Conclusion
Within the limitations of this study, it could be concluded that there were no statistically significant differences regarding the MRC% achieved in the treatment of multiple Miller class III/RT2 recessions with both surgical techniques. In addition, when success was assessed considering not only CRC% but also other periodontal clinical parameters, the results favored treatment with the m-VISTA technique. Finally, more RCTs with larger samples and longer follow-ups are needed to compare the use of different periodontal plastic techniques for the treatment of multiple Miller class III/RT2 recessions and thus define the technique of choice for each case.