Change in Response Category From Baseline to Postintervention in COVID-19 Vaccine–Hesitant Respondents’ Vaccination Intention and Benefit-to-Harm Assessment
Adjusted multivariable analyses showed that being male (aOR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.02-1.85; Across the sample, respondents who were health care professionals and thus subject to mandatory vaccination were nearly twice as likely to show positive change in benefit-to-harm assessment after intervention (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.02-2.36; 