Results
cognitive functioning
REGRESSION
Initially, a total of 182 participants were evaluated for eligibility, of which 82 (45.05%) did not participate. As reflected in Fig. CONSORT Flowchart.Firstly, as seen in Table Description of sociodemographic and clinical variables and comparations of intervention-control groups.Statistics used: Mean and standard deviation except for variables with *, for which frequencies and percentages have been used. For comparation, T student except form variables with *, for which chi-squared has been used. As seen in Table Outcome data at baseline and 3-month follow-up.Upon analyzing the APP use in the intervention group, the range of use during the 3 months oscillated between 10.95 min and 5,764.81 min. The mean amount of use was 835.52 min (SD: 1090.57) during the 3 months. Only 17 participants (25%) from the intervention group engaged in significant use of the APP (with significant use being considered as being at least 15 min per day, for 5 days per week, for 12 weeks). This data suggests a poor adherence to the mobile APP.As for the variables associated with an improvement in the analyzed variables, the multivariate models revealed that there were no significant models related to the effectiveness in the quality of life (SF-36 physical and mental health), affective state, sleep quality, and social support. However, significant models did show a decrease in the number of persistent symptoms, and an improvement in cognitive functioning (MoCA), physical functioning (Sit-to-Stand Test), and Community social support (PCSQ). As Table Linear regression model with regard to improvements in the number of persistent symptoms, cognitive functioning (MoCA), physical functioning (Sit-to-Stand Test), and Community social support (PCSQ).