References
POSITIVE
Screenshots of conversational (Self-reported differences between groups on (Locations visited by at least one participant from all four groups.Most visited locations.Locations visited exclusively by each of the 2 popularity-driven groups.Locations visited exclusively by each of the 2 policy-driven groups.Difference between popularity-driven and policy-driven participants.Difference between passive and conversational popularity-driven participants.Difference between passive and conversational policy-driven participants.Self-reported differences between groups including inferential comparisons to passive popularity-driven group.Note: Significant differences compared to passive popularity-driven group marked as * Coverage of Overijssel and its urban areas by each group.Effect of recommender systems and destination information on spatial movement, expressed as odds ratios in reference to popularity-driven passive group.Note: Popularity-driven attraction model AIC = 10,848.9; BIC = 10,904.4; Policy-driven attraction model AIC = 103,548.9; BIC = 103,604.4; Non-priority attraction model AIC = 41,765.2; BIC = 41,820.7; Urban area model AIC = 272,864.75; BIC = 272,920.26; * Effects of movement at attractions compared to movement at non-attraction locations on daily emotions.Note: Positive emotion model AIC = 574,279.4; BIC = 574,346.0; Negative emotion model AIC = −916,767.6; BIC = −916,701.0; * 