Efficacy measurements
denture, participant‐reported denture dislodgements
SECONDARY
For both studies, the primary efficacy evaluation was a combined mass of peanuts under both dentures when denture adhesive was applied per the conventional pattern. For the efficacy study, secondary efficacy endpoints included the mass of peanut particles recovered separately under each denture. Additional secondary endpoints were the number of participant‐reported denture dislodgements and participant responses to the postpeanut chewing questionnaire. For the pilot study, exploratory efficacy evaluations included these plus a combined mass of peanuts under both dentures when the denture adhesive was applied per continuous strip pattern or when no adhesive was used and the mass of peanuts under combined dentures in participants with a low or high Kapur–Olshan (KO) score with each treatment.