Secondary outcome
depression, anxiety
Regarding mindfulness (FMI-Br), there was a significant effect on the interaction. Participants in the intervention group showed increased mindfulness compared to the control group (+3,8 vs. -0,6; p-value=0,041), as observed in For the quality of life (MLHFQ), there was a significant effect on the interaction. Participants in the intervention group showed an increase in quality of life compared to the control group (-11,5 vs. +2,5; p-value=0,013). While evaluating the result obtained in the AMC, there is a difference between the times in the intervention group (p-value=0.015). The post-MLHFQ was lower (17.5) than the pre-period (29.0). There is a difference between the groups in the post-period (p-value=0.013); the MLHFQ of the intervention group was lower (17.5) than the control (39.9), as shown in There was a significant effect of interaction on sleep quality (PSQI). Participants in the intervention group showed an increase in sleep quality compared to the control group (-1,9 vs. +0,8; p-value<0.001). While evaluating the result obtained in the AMC, there is a difference between the times in the intervention group (p -value=0.001). The post-PSQI was lower (3.5) than in the pre-period (5.4). There is a difference between the groups in the post-period (p -value=0.008); the PSQI of the intervention group was lower (3.5) than the control group (6.6), as shown in Regarding the 6MWT, there was a significant effect on the interaction. Participants in the intervention group showed increased exercise capacity compared to the control group (+70 vs. -33; p-value=0.004), as shown in For the cortisol measure, there was a significant effect on the interaction. Participants in the intervention group showed a lower increase in cortisol compared to the control group (+1,8 vs. +2,2; p-value=0.004). While evaluating the result obtained in the AMC, there is a difference between the times in the intervention group (p-value=0.014). The post-cortisol was higher (13.3) than in the pre-period (11.5), but its increase was lower than in the control group (For measures of trait and state anxiety (STAI-T and STAI-E) and depression (BDI-II), it was not possible to detect significant results, with p-values of interaction = 0.126, 0.137, and 0.151; in other words, the behavior of these measures was not influenced by the time and group effect.In the CRP and NT-proBNP measurements, it was not possible to detect significant effects in any of the factors, interaction (CRP p-value=0.098; NT-proBNP p-value=0,538), group (CRP p-value=0.561; NT-proBNP p-value= 0,302) and time (CRP p-value=0.55; NT-proBNP p-value=0,528). It was also observed great variability in the collected measures.For the ESR measure, it was not possible to detect significant results in the interaction (p-value=0.444). However, there were differences between the groups (p-value=0.026). It should be noted that there is great variability in this measure.The 