Aims
MDD
SECONDARY
We conducted an experiment to evaluate how psychiatrists perceive the information provided by two CSTs for treating individuals with MDD: a clinical note summary and treatment recommendation. Our primary aim was to investigate perceptions of AI-based CST information, and how these perceptions interact with information quality. To address this aim, we compared ratings of CSTs based on their perceived source (as AI or another psychiatrist), and when they provided correct and incorrect information. As a secondary aim, we examined whether CST information quality interacted with clinical experience and familiarity with AI. Based on favourable impressions of AI-based CSTs observed in prior work [