Secondary outcomes—staff
SECONDARY
There were no statistically significant group differences in staff-related secondary outcomes. These findings should inform sample size calculations of future studies of this nature for example, if based on the size of effects we report using similar outcomes measures.A post hoc analysis revealed a statistically significant improvement in care aide perspectives on new ways of working on the unit (one element of OCB) and a positive relationship between SCOPE fidelity enactment and these behaviors. This last finding reinforces the importance of recent Medical Research Council guidance [In addition to the, retrospectively, smaller than needed sample size, our concurrent process evaluation [Secondly, SCOPE teams consisted of four—six members, actively working on their PDSA cycles, and attempting to improve quality of care; the team members had to spread their improvement efforts across the entire unit, ensuring that “new ways of doing” were adopted by care providers who were not part of the SCOPE team. It is possible that adoption was not spread sufficiently 