Primary outcome
jaundice
HYPERGLYCEMIA, RECRUITMENT, GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE
There were differences in how the outcomes were prioritised between the two survey types at the close of both surveys.At the end of the 3At the end of both the RTD and MRD surveys, of the 92 outcomes (87 outcomes at the beginning of the Delphi surveys and the five additional outcomes suggested by participants), 48 outcomes were rated as ‘consensus in’ by both surveys and a further six were rated as ‘consensus out’ in both surveys. Of the remaining 38 outcomes, 13 outcomes were rated as ‘neither consensus in nor consensus out’ by both surveys; 19 outcomes were rated as ‘consensus in’ by one survey but ‘neither consensus in nor consensus out’ by the other survey; six outcomes were rated ‘consensus out’ by one survey but ‘neither consensus in nor consensus out’ by the other survey (Table Results of outcome ratings from each survey type based on consensus criteria; ‘in’ relates to outcomes rated as ‘consensus in’; ‘out’ relates to outcomes rated as ‘consensus out’; ‘undetermined’ relates to outcomes rated as ‘neither consensus in nor consensus out’One outcome (ability to undertake sport) was rated ‘consensus out’ in the first round of the Multi-Round survey and after recruitment had stopped for the Real-Time survey. This outcome was removed in round 2 of the MRD and after recruitment had stopped in the RTD. The other five outcomes rated as ‘consensus out’ (lung air leaks, need for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, meconium passage, jaundice, and hyperglycemia) were rated as ‘consensus out’ by the close of both surveys.