Secondary outcomes
inferior sensory blockade, paralysis
PARTIAL PARALYSIS, SECONDARY, COLD
For the incidences of suppression of the pleura when administering the first volume of local anesthetics, 3 patients (7.7%) in the MISB group showed significantly less than 17 patients (45.9%) in the LISB group (Comparison of the primary and secondary outcomes between the two groups35/2(94.6%/ 5.4%)36/3(92.3%/ 7.7%)Note: Data are presented as mean ± SD, median (range), or number (%). In addition to an inferior sensory blockade for the ulnar and medial cutaneous nerve of the forearm nerves at 5 min and 15 min evaluations in the MISB group compared to LISB, similar extents of sensory and motor block were observed for all branch nerves at different times in the two groups (Table Comparison of the sensory and motor blockade scores at different time points between the two groupsNote: Data were presented as presented as numbers (percentages), and compared by the chi-square or Fisher exact test. 0 = normal, no cold sensation or no paralysis; 1 = partial block of cold sensation or partial paralysis; 2 = no cold sensation, complete anesthesia or complete paralysis. At the first injection, the proportion of patients in the MISB group with fingers elicited motor response was lower (17.9% vs. 62.2%, Motor response of double injection and the MRI images of ropivacaine diffusion in the two groups. Note: 