Results
±
Initially, 64 women participated in this study. However, 6 women in the Salvia officinalis group and 4 in the control group were excluded from the study for reasons that are listed in Fig. Table 
Socio-demographic characteristics of Salvia officinalis and control groups

Number ofchildren





Table 
Mean of FSFI total and domains score in the Salvia officinalis and control groups at before and after intervention
Mann-Whitney U test P-value (between groups)15.96 ± 1.7115.59 ± 1.440.3928.28 ± 2.1317.90 ± 1.59< 0.001< 0.0010.19
Mann-Whitney U test P-value (between groups)2.83 ± 0.762.80 ± 0.610.875.12 ± 0.642.74 ± 0.62< 0.001< 0.0010.58
Mann-Whitney U test P-value (between groups)2.50 ± 0.652.62 ± 0.490.631.20 ± 0.512.50 ± 0.0.55< 0.001< 0.0010.12
Mann-Whitney U test P-value (between groups)2.55 ± 0.632.45 ± 0.470.814.68 ± 0.602.60 ± 0.56< 0.001< 0.0010.70
Mann-Whitney U test P-value (between groups)2.61 ± 0.572.74 ± 0.990.274.49 ± 0.592.9 ± 0.63< 0.001< 0.0010.23
Mann-Whitney U test P-value (between groups)2.63 ± 0.612.88 ± 0.650.464.64 ± 0.632.91 ± 0.66< 0.001< 0.0010.13
Mann-Whitney U test P-value (between groups)2.68 ± 0.552.55 ± 0.430.224.69 ± 0.564.67 ± 0.48< 0.001< 0.0010.38Table 
Mean of sexual satisfaction score in the Salvia officinalis and control groups at before and after intervention
Independent t-test P-value (between groups)Salvia officinaliscontrol46.00 ± 10.0648.35 ± 13.730.8971.53 ± 5.8650.44 ± 10.41< 0.001< 0.0010.18