Limitations and future research
depression
There were limitations to the current study that should be considered when interpreting our results. Our sample was exclusively drawn from a university student population, decreasing the generalizability of our findings to clinical settings. However, it should be pointed out that depression is very prevalent in this population [Another limitation was the choice of procedure for the AMT. Although previous studies have successfully employed written versions of the task [A further limitation was our definition of remote memories as being over one year old. Previous literature has applied varying boundaries of remoteness from one [In conclusion, findings in the current study provide initial insights into the effects of LKM on impaired features of AM retrieval in remitted depression. LKM has been identified as a potential intervention to increase retrieval of specific, positive, and field memories in remitted depression. The current study further shows that LKM can act as a buffer for the effects of AM when cognitive reactivity is induced by a self-discrepancy task. It will be important to compare the effectiveness of LKM and MEST for example. Current models, such as MEST, train specificity with the aim that when stress is encountered, increased specificity will remain; however, MEST does not address the issue of cognitive reactivity and does not influence emotions which can generate memories. Further, future studies including fMRI would allow us to understand the neural basis of self-compassion and the neural effects of LKM on AM retrieval. Future research should also examine whether LKM can influence tryptophan as well as other biological factors, such as cortisol, and the impact of influencing these factors on features of AM retrieval. Our findings necessitate research in the field of self-compassion practices to converge with AM retrieval in current and remitted depression.