References
Anxiety, Insomnia, Hostility, Anger, Depression, Confusion, Fatigue
Flow diagram for study participants’ eligibility, enrollment, and followup.Background characteristics of participants.POMS, Profile of Mood Status; FI, Fatigue–Inertia; VA, Vigor–Activity. Values for the POMS 2 and Euthymia Scale were measured at the third pre-examination point. Other values were measured at the first pre-examination point. The baseline score of the POMS2 and Euthymia Scale are shown as the mean ± SEM. The other baseline parameters are shown as the mean ± S.D. Overall study schedule.POMS, Profile of Mood Status; ISI, Insomnia Severity Index. Each measurement was performed on the days with circles (●). ISI at 0 week was conducted before the test food intake as the baseline of Study 2. The test food was consumed once a day over the 4-week study period (highlighted).Results of the POMS 2 in Study 1.Values were shown as the mean ± SEM. POMS, Profile of Mood Status; AH, Anger–Hostility; CB, Confusion–Bewilderment; DD, Depression–Dejection; FI, Fatigue–Inertia; TA, Tension–Anxiety; VA, Vigor–Activity; F, Friendliness; TMD, Total Mood Disturbance. Results of the Euthymia Scale in Study 1.Values are shown as the mean ± SEM. Salivary CgA concentrations in Study 1.Values are shown as the mean ± SEM. CgA; Chromogranin A. Results of the POMS 2 in Study 2.Values are shown as the mean ± SEM. POMS, Profile of Mood Status; AH, Anger–Hostility; CB, Confusion–Bewilderment; DD, Depression–Dejection; FI, Fatigue–Inertia; TA, Tension–Anxiety; VA, Vigor–Activity; F, Friendliness; TMD, Total Mood Disturbance. Results of the Euthymia Scale in Study 2.Values were shown as the mean ± SEM. Results of the ISI.Values were shown as the mean ± SEM. ISI, Insomnia Severity Index. 