Efficiency output measures
ADVERSE EVENTS
In terms of adherence, the two groups presented different trends. Specifically, we registered a difference between groups in the total number of sessions completed within the timeline of the six weeks of treatments (Regarding the perceived difficulty level of activities for individual capabilities (balancing), we found a significant difference between groups. By comparing the balancing of activities for each week of treatment, we observed significant group differences in the fourth (TAU > ABILITY: Adherence and balancing in the two groups per week of treatment.M: mean; SD: standard deviation; ^: t independent t-test; §: U Mann-Whitney test. Regarding the perceived usability of technology, the adjective rating of the SUS scale was considered according to Bargor et al. [System usability scale results.L1: worst imaginable; L2: awful; L3: poor; L4: ok; L5: good; L6: excellent; L7: best imaginable; SUS: System Usability Scale.Regarding the safety of the ABILITY approach, no adverse events were registered during the trial.