Implications
NEvG
This qualitative evaluation of the SAFE eHealth intervention provides more elaborate and in-depth data on users’ experiences and views, complementing our quantitative evaluation [Web-based interventions for IPVA survivors can be easily found on the web and implemented broadly without consuming extensive resources [The authors thank all the participants in the SAFE study and all the survivors (and bystanders) who put their trust in the authors and reached out to them, either by registering for the SAFE intervention or by contacting them for advice. The authors also thank all the professionals, survivors (in Dutch: Authors' Contributions: NEvG, SAL, and SO-P designed the study and developed the interview guide. NEvG recruited the participants and conducted all interviews. NEvG transcribed the interviews, checked all transcripts, and coded most of the interviews. NEvG and SAL analyzed the interview data. NEvG wrote the manuscript. SAL, SO-P, KAWLvR-N, and JBP reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.Conflicts of Interest: The SAFE intervention that was evaluated in this study was designed by the authors and built by an eHealth developer (Ippo) outside the Radboud university medical center.Questions from the interview guide.Images from the most preferred components of the SAFE intervention.Chat and forum data.Feedback on SAFE intervention from the questionnaires.CONSORT-eHEALTH checklist (V 1.6.1).