1. Introduction
±, fullness, thirst
CROSS
Fluid availability may alter drinking behavior; however, it is currently unknown if the availability of fluid impacts behavior and gastrointestinal issues (GI) that are often associated with increased fluid intake. The purpose of this study was to determine if ad libitum (AL) versus periodic (PER) fluid intake influences fluid consumption and GI distress during exercise in trained athletes. Male and female Division I NCAA Cross Country athletes (n = 11; age = 20 ± 1 years) participated in this counterbalanced crossover study. Each participant completed a moderate intensity 10 km run on two separate occasions. In one trial, participants had unlimited availability to fluid to consume AL. In the other trial, participants consumed PER fluid at stations placed every 3.2 km. Assurance of euhydration prior to each trial was confirmed via urine specific gravity (USG) and urine color. Subjective perceptions of thirst and gastric fullness were assessed pre- and post-exercise via Likert questioning and a visual analog scale, respectively. Participants started each trial euhydrated (AL = 1.009 USG ± 0.009; PER = 1.009 USG ± 0.009; urine color AL, 3 ± 1; urine color PER, 2 ± 1). Fluid volume consumption was significantly higher during the AL condition compared to PER (Hydration and fluid balance have been repeatedly shown to alter cognitive and physical performance in general and athletic populations alike [Maintenance of a euhydrated state during aerobic exercise, even in the absence of thirst, has been previously linked to optimal performance [Regardless of the fluid intake method, fluid availability may strongly influence the fluid intake of exercising individuals [While research has established that fluid consumption behavior is multi-faceted, it has not addressed how the availability of fluid may impact fluid intake during exercise [