Student responses to open-ended questions
Student responses to open ended questions regarding the best features and positive features of PBL/MBL are shown in Table 
Students’ responses to “the best features and positive aspects of the course”The mind mapping is fantastic, it helps to apply the concepts in the book into the practice. (MBL)The case examples are interesting and relate to the actual situation, which increases the understanding and memory of the knowledge. (MBL)The case design is very impressive and comprehensive, which is helpful to clinical practice. (PBL)A very effective way of learning, with a clear logic and framework thinking, to improve the ability to think and deal with problems independently, I hope to propagate. (MBL)The memory of the connection of each knowledge point is strengthened.It is very comprehensive and enhances the horizontal connection of other academic subjects. (MBL)I would like to give a higher rating than a 100% for the improvement of the creative skills. (MBL)It was useful to simulate the communication between doctors in different departments in the clinic through role play. (PBL)Responses to open ended questions regarding the most difficult features of course and suggestions are illustrated in Table 
Student in MBL group responses to “the most difficult features of course and suggestions for improvement”The topic was challenging, but after drawing the mind map, it was not so difficult and interesting.I will continue to use mind mapping as a way of learning in the future.It does not seem to be carried out in other sessions, so it is recommended to continue to promote it.It is recommended to continue the case discussion with mind maps.The protocol design often does not meet clinical needs and is not mature enough to continue using this format, but try other topics or cases.The topic is too difficult! Whether we should experience the clinic before doing this kind of case, otherwise it is difficult to choose the best option.As a student, I think it is still quite difficult to make a comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of this complex case, and clinical knowledge is very lacking.In groups, each group member has a different level of participation.