3.9. Completion
REGRESSION
Our mapping showed that 7.9% of the students in the control group (n = 522) were registered as dropouts. The dropout prevalence in the five schools ranged from 0% to 13.1%. In the I1 intervention group (n = 708), 3.2% of the students dropped out of school. The dropout rate among the I1 schools ranged from 0% to 8%. Lastly, in the I2 intervention group (n = 892), 5.4% of the students dropped out, with the rate ranging from 1.9% to 9.4% between the schools. We performed a logistic regression, wherein school ID was used as a cluster variable, to determine whether there was a significant difference between these intervention groups. The results showed no significant intervention effects. As in the effect analyses presented above, the lack of effects may be due to the low number of schools. The number of students who completed their education or started professional training was generally similar in all three groups and varied between 76.6% and 77.8%. A slightly larger number of students were enrolled in education in the intervention groups than the control group, 18–18.9% and 14.8%, respectively.