CONCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS
Our current study demonstrates that for patients eligible for unilateral endoscopic thyroidectomies, MGTET is the better option in terms of better therapeutic outcomes, better POSAS scores, and less complaints about scars. Our study was a single‐centered experience and single‐surgeon comparison between M‐GTET and GTET. Our study is not without limitations: Multicenter and multisurgeon studies should be carried out to validate our study further. Furthermore, comparison between MGTET and open thyroidectomies and other endoscopic techniques is needed to obtain a more in‐depth validity of our modified approach.