Results
depressive, depressive symptoms
SENSITIVITY
The descriptive statistics from the PSQ-S and each standard instrument are presented in Table 
Positivity* on the PSQ-S and the standardized instruments by gender and in total*Significant differences in positivity rates between genders are denoted in italics (chi-square, The psychometric analyses are presented in Table For depressive symptoms and IPV, sensitivity was significantly higher for mothers compared to fathers. This difference was particularly evident for IPV, where only 27% of fathers with this problem on the CAS were detected by the PSQ-S compared to 52% of mothers. Significant differences between genders were found for NPV values regarding depressive symptoms and for NPV and PPV regarding alcohol misuse.
Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values for PSQ-S risk factors in relation to the standard instruments** Numbers in bold denote significant differences between genders using Perason’s chi-square (Analyses of internal consistency showed Cronbach’s alpha values of 0.31 for financial worries, 0.66 for depressive symptoms, 0.50 for parental stress, 0.69 for IPV, 0.31 for alcohol misuse and 0.58 for the psychosocial composite of the PSQ-S.Exploratory factor analysis for the 14 PSQ-S items regarding psychosocial risk factors gave rise to five components (Table 
Rotated component matrix from exploratory factor analysis using varimax rotation showing component makeup and factor loadings for items of the PSQ-S regarding psychosocial risk factors