Summary
confusion, colon cancer
COLON CANCER
In this mixed-methods evaluation study, patients’ experiences with GP-led versus surgeon-led colon cancer survivorship care were explored. Overall judgement and quality of care, as measured by the customised CQI, were excellent for both healthcare professionals. Before follow-up, patients had little expectations of care. Follow-up consultations for colon cancer were typically short, medically oriented, and described as a technical procedure. Topics such as psychosocial impact, lifestyle, and preventive care were less frequently discussed by either healthcare professional. Patients in the GP-led group received care in different ways, ranging from solely on the patient’s initiative to shared forms of care. This sometimes led to confusion regarding the roles and responsibilities during follow-up. These experienced difficulties in the execution of care were in contrast with patients in the surgeon-led group. These patients mentioned that the surgeon was typically in the lead.