Discussion
With regard to the first research question, findings confirmed the effectiveness of the technology based physical intervention in promoting the employees’ mental health and physical partitivities. In the same direction, numerous studies have examined the effectiveness of technology-based interventions in promoting physical activity and improving mental health outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by Fanning, et al., [The current study’s findings are consistent with these previous studies, as the technology-based physical activity intervention had a significant positive effect on physical activity levels and mental health in both male and female participants. However, the current study also found a significant interaction effect of time × gender on mental health, suggesting that the intervention may have differential effects on mental health for male and female participants. One potential explanation for this gender difference in the effects of the intervention on mental health may be related to differences in the types of activities that male and female participants engage in. For example, research has suggested that male participants may be more likely to engage in high-intensity physical activities, such as weightlifting or running, which have been shown to have a positive effect on mental health [In conclusion, the current study’s findings are consistent with previous research that has shown the effectiveness of technology-based interventions in promoting physical activity and improving mental health outcomes. However, the study also highlights the potential for gender differences in the effects of these interventions on mental health, and further research is needed to explore these differences and identify potential underlying mechanisms.The use of technology-based physical activity interventions in the workplace has become increasingly popular in recent years, with many individuals using apps and fitness trackers to monitor and increase their physical activity levels. Understanding the motivations and barriers to using these interventions is important in promoting their use and effectiveness in improving health outcomes. Motivations for using technology-based physical activity interventions in the workplace include health and fitness goals, convenience and accessibility, social support, incentives and rewards, tracking progress, personalization, and competition. Participants in a study by Althoff et al. [Incentives and rewards were also found to be motivating factors, as they provided participants with a tangible benefit for engaging in physical activity interventions using technology [The second and the third research questions addressed the motivations for and barriers the employees faced using technological-based devices for doing physical activities. We found that despite the many motivators for using technology-based physical activity interventions in the workplace, there are also several barriers to their use. These barriers include lack of time, cost, privacy concerns, and technological issues. Participants in a study by Althoff et al. [Therefore, it can be postulated that technology-based physical activity interventions have the potential to be effective tools for promoting physical activity and improving health outcomes in the workplace. Motivators for their use include health and fitness goals, convenience and accessibility, social support, incentives and rewards, tracking progress, personalization, and competition. However, to promote their effectiveness, barriers such as lack of time, cost, privacy concerns, and technological issues must be addressed. Employers and researchers must take these factors into account when designing and implementing technology-based physical activity interventions in the workplace.The results of this study provide valuable insights into the motivations of males and females for technology-based physical activity interventions in the workplace. The findings suggest that some gender differences exist in motivation for certain aspects of these interventions, but not in others. Specifically, females reported slightly higher levels of motivation for health and fitness goals and convenience and accessibility, but the differences were relatively small. However, females reported significantly higher levels of motivation for social support than males, indicating that they perceive this factor as more important for their engagement in technology-based physical activity interventions in the workplace. These findings are consistent with previous research on gender differences in motivation for physical activity. For example, a study by van Stralen et al. [The finding that males reported significantly higher levels of motivation for personalization and competition than females is somewhat surprising, given that previous research has suggested that these factors may be more important for males than females [e.g., Results also showed some interesting gender differences in experiences related to physical activity in the workplace. The results show that there are significant differences between males and females in their experiences of time and support for physical activity in the workplace, as well as workplace culture. However, there are no significant differences between males and females in their experiences of motivation or technical issues. The finding that females report experiencing a lack of time for physical activity in the workplace more often than males is consistent with previous research. For example, a study by Hershman et al. [The finding that females report a more supportive workplace culture for physical activity than males is also consistent with previous research. A study by Xu et al. [This study identifies several key motivators for using technology-based interventions, including health and fitness goals, convenience, social support, and progress tracking. These factors align with established drivers of physical activity engagement. Barriers to using these interventions are also recognized, such as lack of time, cost, privacy concerns, and technological issues. These challenges reflect common obstacles encountered when implementing such programs in a workplace setting. The gender-based analysis reveals that females tend to prioritize social support more than males, indicating its significance in their engagement with these interventions. Surprisingly, males express a higher motivation for personalization and competition, suggesting the need for tailored approaches based on individual preferences. More importantly, the study underscores the importance of considering gender differences when designing workplace interventions to enhance physical activity. Recognizing these distinctions can lead to more effective and inclusive programs, ultimately improving employee health and well-being.