Predictors for urge intensity
HOLIDAY
Participants experienced weaker urges in the EFT group, The effects of the between-participants conditions: Episodic Future Thinking manipulation (EFT; top of figure), the Compassion manipulation (middle), as compared to the Control condition (bottom), on the perceived intensity of urges (x-axis, location and scale are arbitrary). The points are estimated marginal means, the red arrows are comparison arrows reflecting the pairwise tests, and the error bars are 95% CIsThere were also interactions between group and type of urge: urges to avoid leaving details for contact tracing were weaker in the EFT group, The intensity of urges (y-axis), partitioned by day (x-axis), and group (colour). The experiment was partially conducted over a public holiday, at which time stronger urges of non-adherence would be expected. 2 April (third line from the right) was Good Friday, and 4 April (the right-most line) was Easter Sunday. The coloured points represent the estimated marginal means, and the error bars are 95% CIs. The grey data points each represent the aggregated data of one participantState impulsivity had a significant effect on the intensity of urges, Fitted probabilities of a univariate cumulative link mixed model showing the relationship between the intensity of urges and scores on the Momentary Impulsivity Scale. The model assigns low probabilities to low-impulsivity, high-intensity combinations and high-impulsivity, low-intensity combinations