Clinical outcome
Detailed demographic and clinical data for the patients are shown in Table Improvement in FM‐UL score after rehabilitation in the motor imagery training group (MIT) and control group (CON). (A) FM‐UL score before and after rehabilitation in the two groups; (B) Comparison of FM‐UL improvement between the two groups; (C, D) Correlations between FM‐UL improvement (ΔFM‐UL) and FM‐UL score before intervention in the CON (C) and MIT (D) groups. Error bars indicate standard deviation, **To investigate the dependency of the treatment efficacy of motor imagery training on preserved motor ability, we analyzed the correlation between the improvement in FM‐UL score and the baseline FM‐UL score before rehabilitation. Spearman's correlation revealed a significant correlation in the CON group (