Discussion
GROUP B
The lack of NRP clinical experience in neonatal care continues to appear [For the purpose of ongoing efforts to develop more powerful methods for sustaining cognitive abilities and skills, training professionals through simulation is considered safe and effective [In this study, no matter which training method was selected, the final test scores after training were similar when compared for the training methods. In particular, Group B showed no significant increase in interim test results, but the final score showed a tendency to be higher than that of Group A. From the interim exam to the final exam, the score of Group A did not increase significantly, while the score of Group B steadily increased, indicating that the score on the final exams was higher. Hakansson et al. [Considering that the nurse group with 2–3 years of career occupies the largest proportion compared to others [When the training methods were compared by career, it was confirmed that the score difference occurred more in group A in the interim test scores in the <24 months career group. Conversely, in the ≥24 months career group, the difference in the interim and final exam scores of Group B increased significantly. Hilosaka et al. [The limitations of this study are that the study was conducted with a small number of volunteers and that only short-term memory was evaluated, with no follow-up of mid-/long-term memory. In this regard, further research is needed.This study was conducted to identify more effective NRP training methods using high-fidelity simulation. The educational effects of the participants were confirmed through the test scores, and as a result, it is thought that the effect might be increased by changing the education order according to the degree of experience of each trainee. Further research might be needed to verify these findings.