Exploratory analyses
To explore how CST type (i.e. summary or recommendation) interacted with information quality to impact ratings, we ran a model including tool type as a predictor of ratings. We also examined whether information sources interacted with resident status to impact ratings (comparing residents to psychiatrists and clinic heads). Finally, we examined the impact of information quality, source, and their interaction on responses to ratings of individual attributes (described in Support tool ratings). Due to the exploratory nature of these analyses, we did not adjust for multiple comparisons.All models were fitted with maximum likelihood. We visually inspected histograms of residuals to ensure normality assumptions were not strongly violated and plotted model residuals against fitted values to evaluate assumptions of homogenous variance. Analyses were completed in R, Version 4.1.1. Data and code are openly available online [