Intra-group analysis
cognitive dimension).The, ®
Regarding the data obtained from the three measurements of active range of motion in wrist dorsiflexion, no statistically significant changes were detected across the measurements in either group, despite slight clinical changes experienced in both EG and CG patients, which may be influenced by the Standard Error of Measurement of the goniometer evaluation. For wrist palmar flexion, statistically significant improvements were recorded in the comparison between pre-treatment and follow-up evaluation of the more affected side in the EG (p = 0.036). Statistically significant improvements were also observed in forearm pronation in the comparison between pre-treatment and post-treatment (p < 0.001) and pre-treatment and follow-up evaluation (p < 0.001) of the more affected side, as well as in the comparison between pre-treatment and follow-up evaluation (p = 0.014) of the less affected side in the EG. Regarding forearm supination, statistically significant improvements were recorded in the comparison between pre-treatment and post-treatment measurements (p = 0.03) and pre-treatment and follow-up evaluation (p = 0.003) of the more affected side in the EG, compared to a significant worsening in the data in the comparison between post-treatment and follow-up evaluation (p = 0.03) of the more affected side in the CG. Figures Active range of motion graphs over time and group. Active range of motion graphs over time, group and sideNo significant changes were observed in the measurement of handgrip strength using the Jamar® dynamometer in the EG, despite the clinical improvement experienced in both sides, as shown in Table The BBT showed statistically significant changes in both EG and CG in both UL in the comparison between pre-treatment and follow-up evaluation. These data are presented in Table No significant changes were achieved over time in the FSS, ABILHAND, or MSIS-29 scales (physical dimension and cognitive dimension).The SSQ questionnaire showed an average score of 7 (± 10) out of 100 points. The results on perceived workload estimation by EG patients, as measured by the NASA-Task Load Index questionnaire, were 25 (± 12.83) out of 100 points.An average score of 80.66 (± 11.47) out of 100 points was obtained in the SUS. In the QUEST 2.0 scale, scores of 34.73 (± 4.36) out of 40 points were obtained for questions related to satisfaction with the device, 16.66 (± 3.66) out of 20 points for questions related to satisfaction with the received service and 8 (± 1.85) out of 10 points for general satisfaction with the technology used.The results obtained in the post-intervention assessment of satisfaction with the MYO® technology applied to the EG showed an average score of 84.36 (± 7.95) out of 100 points, indicating that the patients were highly satisfied with the VR MYO® intervention.