Sensitivity analysis for primary and secondary outcomes in different recruitment years
RECRUITMENT, SENSITIVITY, SECONDARY, REGRESSION, BLOOD
In our study, it is worth noting that all cases predating the year 2017 were subjected to treatment with TBSF, as the utilization of Privigen only became prevalent from 2017 onward. Therefore, the potential for bias stemming from the disparity in recruitment years between the TBSF group (2015–2020) and the Privigen group (2017–2020) was a concern. We conducted a sensitivity analysis of primary and secondary outcomes to elucidate the years 2015–2020, 2017–2020 and 2018–2020, as presented in Table Sensitivity analysis of multiple logistic regression models for primary and secondary outcomes in recruitment years of 2015–2020, 2017–2020 and 2018–2020.Expressed as n (%), OR, Odds ratio; CI, Confidence interval; IVIG, Intravenous immunoglobulin; TBSF, Taiwan Blood Services Foundation.