One example came when Jewish plaintiffs challenged Indiana's restrictive abortion statutes after Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, claiming that Indiana's laws limiting abortion infringed on Jewish religious belief (which the plaintiffs contended require that abortion be available in most or all situations).
In this scenario, a legal challenge was brought by Jewish plaintiffs against Indiana's restrictive abortion laws following the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision. The plaintiffs argued that these laws conflicted with their religious beliefs, which they claimed necessitate abortion access in most or all situations.