Michael Ordona of the Los Angeles Times called it unintentionally funny, and Mick LaSalle of the San Francisco Chronicle called it a failed attempt to make an art-house film out of a concept better suited to an exploitation film.
Michael Ordona of the Los Angeles Times found it unintentionally humorous, while Mick LaSalle of the San Francisco Chronicle deemed it a failed attempt to create an art-house film from a concept better suited for exploitation cinema.