He outlined the summary of facts, then his own dissenting opinion of the case in which he said that the 1973 Constitution has not been properly ratified according to law, and then proceeded to make the summary of votes by the members of the court.
Initially, he gave a summary of the facts; subsequently, he presented his dissenting opinion on the case, arguing that the 1973 Constitution had not been properly ratified according to law. Finally, he provided an account of the judges' voting records.