More intermediate strong points, built for all-round defence, were recommended between the first and second positions. Defence of the first position was still the intention but deeper defences would dissipate the effect of a breakthrough and force the attackers to make numerous individual attacks on ground where local knowledge and the preparation of defences would be advantageous to the defenders. Observation posts should be made secure from attack, reconnaissance reports acted on promptly and communication links were to be made as robust as possible.
The military recommended placing stronger defensive positions between the first and second lines of defense, aiming for a more comprehensive defense strategy. The primary goal was still to defend the initial line, but deeper defenses would make it harder for attackers to break through and force them into smaller, more manageable attacks on terrain where defenders had an advantage. Observation posts needed to be secure from attack, reconnaissance reports were to be acted upon quickly, and communication links were to be made as reliable as possible.