Finally, the defendant claimed that the omission of the triggering condition prevents the person whose property is being seized of being notified of the lawfulness of the search and seizure. However, the Court pointed out that there is no requirement that the property owner be shown the warrant prior to the search.
The defendant claimed that not having a trigger condition means the property owner isn't notified about the lawfulness of the search. However, the court disagreed, saying there's no need for the owner to see the warrant before the search happens.