On the other hand, he talks of writing that is 'unbecoming, crooked, badly formed and quick, yet legible'. Such writing denotes a mature man who has written a lot. Later he says 'if the handwriting is uneven, with lines that are wavy and generally ascending, such a person is naturally inclined to dominate... with such instability one can also add that he is likely to be choleric and apt to be unrestrained in following his desires'.
On the contrary, he discusses writing that is 'unpolished, dishonest, poorly structured and swift, yet legible'. This kind of writing signifies a mature person who has written extensively. Later, he observes 'if the handwriting is uneven, with lines that are wavy and generally ascending, such an individual tends to take charge... with such volatility one can also infer that he is likely to be hot-tempered and prone to acting impulsively.