Nesbitt et al. (2007) corroborated this, stating that the differences between Caseosaurus and Chindesaurus cited by Hunt et al. (1998) were probably a result of size-related variation.
The research of Nesbitt et al. (2007) confirms this assertion, stating that the disparities between Caseosaurus and Chindesaurus cited by Hunt et al. (1998) were probably a result of size-related variation.