The question was about a conflict of interest of another member of the board, Dato Steenhuis, who was on the pay-roll of the company that looked into the workings of the public prosecution in the region of which Dato Steenhuis, as board member, was responsible.
The inquiry focused on a possible conflict of interest, where Dato Steenhuis, a board member, held a dual role working for the firm conducting investigations into the public prosecution within the area under his oversight as a board member.