and has the same broad humor and appeal but has been put over with considerably more aplomb." Gary Arnold of The Washington Post panned the film for "stale, excruciating sex jokes" and direction that "has evidently failed to devise a playing rhythm to compensate for whatever farcical tempo the material enjoyed on the stage."
and has a comparable wide appeal but has been executed with much greater finesse." Gary Arnold of The Washington Post criticized the film for "stale, excruciating sex jokes" and direction that "has apparently failed to develop a rhythmic pace to compensate for whatever comedic tempo the material had on stage."