However, the Integration Hypothesis challenges this belief, claiming that there is evidence to suggest that words are internally complex. In English for example, the word 'unlockable' is ambiguous because of two possible structures within. It can either mean something that is able to be unlocked (unlock-able), or it can mean something that is not lockable (un-lockable).
However, the Integration Hypothesis disputes this view by suggesting that words are internally complex, thereby challenging the notion of a single, fixed meaning. This is exemplified in English with the word "unlockable," which has two possible structures: one indicating something that can be unlocked and another suggesting something that cannot be locked.