Again, the programme shows how this builder made errors in his construction which show that the building could not have been intended to be used for its apparent purpose. Whether this was a deliberate attempt to deceive, or a sort of homage by a person of antiquarian interests is unknown, and unlikely to be answered.
This sequence of events again illustrates how the builder made mistakes in his construction, suggesting that the building could not have been intended for its apparent purpose. The true intentions behind this are unclear, whether it was a deliberate attempt to mislead or a gesture of admiration from someone with an interest in antiquities, and it is unlikely that we will ever have a definitive answer.