This produced anger among authors using more conventional journalistic methods: "The line in the sand is when respectable media and publishers start serving up fiction as truth," was the response of Oliver Schrom (whose study of the 9/11 attacks pointed the finger at intelligence failures, rather than a more spectacular claim of CIA complicity).
This led to anger among authors who used traditional journalistic practices: "The line in the sand is when reputable media outlets and publishers start presenting fiction as truth," stated Oliver Schrom (whose research on the 9/11 attacks pointed blame at intelligence failures, rather than a more sensational claim of CIA involvement).