He maintained that the failure to provide bilingual services was a violation of Section 22 of the provincial Official Languages Act, which states that bilingual services should be provided by all institutions of the provincial government—which raised the question of whether a municipality is, legally speaking, a provincial institution.
He argued that the lack of bilingual services constituted a breach of Section 22 of the provincial Official Languages Act, which mandates that all provincial government institutions offer bilingual services—which posed a query about whether a municipality can be considered a provincial institution legally speaking.