However, in a very detailed study, Kim Ridealgh has shown that the traditional translation "suppression" of the Egyptian term "thj" is misleading, since it suggests that Amenhotep was somehow besieged and/or robbed of his freedom. The term rather denotes a more general act of aggression.
Kim Ridealgh's detailed study reveals that the common translation of "thj" as "suppression" is inaccurate, suggesting that Amenhotep was imprisoned or deprived of liberty.  The term, however, more accurately reflects a general act of aggression.