There were attempts to reconcile the two positions by historian Marjorie Anderson, allowing Carham some significance while accounting for the 'beneficence' of King Edgar. By contrast, G. W. S. Barrow rejected both views and thought saw the process as even earlier still.
Historian Marjorie Anderson attempted to find a middle ground between the two positions, acknowledging Carham's significance while taking into account King Edgar's benevolence. On the other hand, G. W. S. Barrow took a more radical approach, arguing that the process predates both views.