Lawyers for Poison dismissed the suit as "baseless", noting that if the allegation was true, the plaintiffs would be extremely unlikely to wait 25 years to seek remedy to the situation. The judge ultimately ruled in Poison's favor on April 8, 2013, ruling that the statute of limitations on copyright infringement had long since run out.
Lawyers for Poison dismissed the suit as "untenable", asserting that if true, the plaintiffs would be unlikely to wait 25 years. The judge ruled in favor of Poison on April 8, 2013, stating that the statute of limitations for copyright infringement had expired.