It was advertised as including $1.3 billion of savings for the university each year by eliminating three dean positions, though that math was disputed and a counter claim was made that, "there's no net savings for the university." In June 2010, Botman published an editorial explaining her view of the plan.
The proposal was touted as yielding $1.3 billion in annual savings for the university by eliminating three dean positions, although this figure was disputed and a counter argument was made that, "there's no net savings for the university." In June 2010, Botman wrote an editorial detailing her viewpoint on the plan.