He decided the case of Cantor Fitzgerald v Tradition UK (2001), where he ruled that the 3,000 out of 77,000 lines of copied source code by Tradition's programmers would be substantial, it not being important to substantiality what use the program made out of the code, i.e.
He ruled in the case of Cantor Fitzgerald v Tradition UK (2001) that 3,000 out of 77,000 lines of copied source code by Tradition's programmers were significant, regardless of how the program utilized or integrated the code.