Inclusion advocates, who generally adhere to the social model of disability, allege that this approach is wrong and that those who have physical, sensory, intellectual, and/or developmental impairments have better outcomes if, instead, it is not assumed that they have a lower quality of life and they are not looked at as though they need to be "fixed."
Inclusion advocates, who typically follow the social model of disability, contend that this approach is misguided and that individuals with impairments have better outcomes if they are not viewed as having a lower quality of life and do not require "fixing."