Because of this, it is sometimes listed in older dinosaur books as an early theropod, or as a synonym of Euskelosaurus. It was probably neither of these things, though, and is much more likely to be a dubious non-dinosaur.
This creature was previously categorized as an early theropod or a synonym of Euskelosaurus, but this classification is inaccurate and it's more likely to be a misidentified fossil.