Areas of evaluation included ease of use, accessibility, transparency, editorial adequacy, advertising, and information reliability among others. The site was among eight that received an overall good rating though its evaluation at the time noted its content ”...has no authoritative information, anyone can post any claim”.
The site's evaluation included ease of use, accessibility, transparency, editorial quality, advertising, and information reliability, among other factors. It received a good rating overall, but at the time, its content was noted as lacking authoritative information, with anyone able to post any claim.