The Court of Cassation intervened in the case again in 2014 by reversing the lower court's decision, ruling that Erhmann should have been assisted by counsel or his wife at the 2013 hearing because of his manic-depressive condition. In 2016, Ehrmann claimed "absolute victory" on his blog because of the passage of the law on freedom of creation, architecture and patrimony.
The Court of Cassation intervened in Erhmann's case again in 2014, reversing the lower court's decision to ensure he had legal representation at the 2013 hearing due to his manic-depressive condition. In 2016, Ehrmann claimed "absolute victory" on his blog after the passage of a law protecting freedom of creation, architecture, and heritage.