Julia Krul suggests that since Gula is absent from late theophoric names from this city, despite being actively worshiped in it, it is possible that Ama-arḫuš was viewed as her manifestation or synonym, as she is not otherwise attested in Uruk.
Julia Krul proposes that due to Gula's absence in late theophoric names from this city while she is worshipped there, it could be suggested that Ama-arḫuš was viewed as her manifestation or synonymous deity. This idea aligns with the lack of other attestations for Gula in Uruk.