He edited the voluminous journals of the 18th-century English amateur composer, John Marsh, for publication in 1998. A review by the academic Nicholas Temperley in Music & Letters calls the publication a "significant event", though he doubts its claimed appeal to a wide audience; Temperley is critical of the meagre index of the 754-page work, which he describes as "seriously deficient", and calls attention to mistakes in the notes as well as deficiencies in the works list.
He oversaw the extensive journals of 18th-century English amateur composer John Marsh, for release in 1998. A review by academic Nicholas Temperley in Music & Letters describes the publication as a "notable occurrence", although he questions its claimed broad appeal; Temperley is critical of the sparse index of the 754-page work, which he characterizes as "significantly lacking", and highlights errors in the notes along with shortcomings in the works list.