The book scandalized sections of the public opinion, because it minutely depicted the haphazard erotic experiences of an adolescent, and was criticized by Octav Botez for being "monotonous" and "trivial". Nevertheless, critics considered it interesting for the insight it gave into literary disputes of the early 20th century, as well as for its sarcastic comments on the traditionalist figures of the period.
The book's controversial nature stemmed from its graphic depiction of adolescent sexual experiences, which was criticized by Octav Botez for being monotonous and trivial. However, critics found it valuable for providing insights into literary disputes of the early 20th century and for offering satirical commentary on traditionalist figures of the period.