In response, Selesnick suggested that the mascot was no longer appropriate and that additional discussion regarding the topic should be encouraged, citing the need for the school to uphold its adherence to the Dignity for All Students Act. He also emphasized the ability to maintain school spirit and tradition without causing offense. This led to a public conversation about the topic.
The situation arose from Selesnick's suggestion that the mascot was no longer appropriate, prompting a discussion on the matter within the context of upholding the Dignity for All Students Act and maintaining school spirit and tradition without causing offense. This led to a public conversation about the mascot.