However, he did not take account of the blade, which must have been of some importance for James IV to have it bound in silk and given a new scabbard, hilt, and belt, and it was also described then as the "Wallas sword".
In contrast, James IV apparently overlooked the importance of the blade, which was so significant that he had it elegantly wrapped in silk, given a new scabbard, hilt, and belt, and it was even referred to as the "Wallas sword" at that particular time.