The Algerian representative preferred an African Union-devised solution to the problem, Brazil agreed with the resolution but objected to the U.S. view on selective jurisdiction of the court, the Chinese representative disagreed with some elements of the ICC Statute and argued for the perpetrators to be tried in Sudanese courts, and the United States objected to some provisions of the court but overall supported humanitarian interests and the fight against impunity.
The Algerian representative suggested an African Union-designed solution; Brazil approved the resolution but objected to the U.S. stance on selective jurisdiction by the court. The Chinese representative disagreed with some parts of the ICC Statute and advocated for trials in Sudanese courts, while the United States had reservations about certain aspects of the court but supported humanitarian interests and fighting impunity.