Compounding this problem is that there is no scientific definition of character. Because such a concept blends personality and behavioral components, scientists have long since abandoned use of the term "character" and, instead, use the term psychological motivators to measure the behavioral predispositions of individuals. With no clinically defined meaning, there is virtually no way to measure if an individual has a deficit of character, or if a school program can improve it.
The issue is exacerbated by the absence of a scientific definition for character. This concept encompasses both personality and behavioral aspects, prompting scientists to refrain from using "character" and instead utilize psychological motivators to evaluate individuals' predispositions. Without a clinically defined meaning, there's no practical method to identify if an individual lacks character or if educational programs can enhance it.