Areas of evaluation included ease of use, accessibility, transparency, editorial adequacy, advertising, and information reliability among others. The site was among eight that received an overall good rating though its evaluation at the time noted its content ”...has no authoritative information, anyone can post any claim”.
Areas of assessment included ease of use, accessibility, transparency, editorial quality, advertising, and information reliability among others. The site was among eight that received a good rating overall, though its evaluation at the time noted its content "has no authoritative information, anyone can post any claim".