Michael Ordona of the Los Angeles Times called it unintentionally funny, and Mick LaSalle of the San Francisco Chronicle called it a failed attempt to make an art-house film out of a concept better suited to an exploitation film.
The Los Angeles Times' Michael Ordona found the film amusing in an unexpected way, while the San Francisco Chronicle's Mick LaSalle believed that the film was not well-suited to be an art-house movie and should have been made as a more exploitative film.