He outlined the summary of facts, then his own dissenting opinion of the case in which he said that the 1973 Constitution has not been properly ratified according to law, and then proceeded to make the summary of votes by the members of the court.
First, he presented a summary of the facts; subsequently, he articulated his dissenting opinion on the case, stating that the 1973 Constitution had not been legally ratified. Finally, he outlined the voting records of the judges.