Nesbitt et al. (2007) corroborated this, stating that the differences between Caseosaurus and Chindesaurus cited by Hunt et al. (1998) were probably a result of size-related variation.
The conclusions of Nesbitt et al. (2007) substantiate this argument, indicating that the distinctions between Caseosaurus and Chindesaurus mentioned by Hunt et al. (1998) were likely a consequence of differences in scale.