Kondylis's conception of social ontology does not offer any fixed causalities or laws nor does it say what people ought to do or not do in any given situation or how their social action should unfold. The task of social ontology is accordingly not to reduce fluid and varied phenomena to basic samples and basic genetic factors; what is sought is to show the spectrum of the forces and factors, which can be constituted and become discernible only from the – irreducible and inexhaustible – diversity of form. Such forces and factors, of course, include certain constants such as striving for self-preservation through the expanding of one's own power, and the friend–foe relation, which exist in all societies and are actualised in concrete historical situations and therefore have concrete dimension and content e.g.
Kondylis's notion of social ontology emphasizes the importance of understanding the diverse range of forces and factors that influence human behavior and social relationships. This approach recognizes that social phenomena cannot be reduced to simple explanations or universal principles, but rather must be considered in their complex and dynamic context.