Artic argued that the games cannot be protected as audiovisual works as they are not fixed. The court acknowledged that the framers of the Copyright Act did not anticipate the issues raised by electronic games, but rejected Artic's arguments.
Artic argued that the games cannot be protected as audiovisual works because they are not fixed. The court acknowledged that the authors of the Copyright Act did not anticipate the issues raised by electronic games, but rejected Artic's arguments.