Writing for a unanimous Court, Wilentz invalidated the surrogacy contract as void for reasons public policy. In a dictum, the Court held that a common "best interests" analysis should apply to determine the child's eventual home.
Writing for a unanimous Court, Wilentz declared the surrogacy contract void due to public policy reasons. In a dictum, the Court stated that a common "best interests" analysis should be used to decide the child's future home.