Some critics of the book emphasized that only the Eastern Paschalion holds to the Nicene Council's 4th century prohibition on celebrating the resurrection before the Jewish Passover. Some argued that abandonment of that stipulation could even imply a subtle subtext of antisemitism, since it would further decouple the connection between Christianity and Judaism.
Some critics emphasized that only the Eastern Paschalion follows the Nicene Council's 4th-century rule prohibiting the celebration of the resurrection before the Jewish Passover. Others suggested that abandoning this rule could imply a subtle undertone of antisemitism, as it would further disconnect Christianity from Judaism.