However, the Integration Hypothesis challenges this belief, claiming that there is evidence to suggest that words are internally complex. In English for example, the word 'unlockable' is ambiguous because of two possible structures within. It can either mean something that is able to be unlocked (unlock-able), or it can mean something that is not lockable (un-lockable).
However, the Integration Hypothesis contradicts this assumption by proposing that words are internally complex, thereby challenging the idea of a single, fixed meaning. The English word "unlockable" serves as an example, with its dual structures: one implying unlockability and another suggesting non-lockability.