Similarly, in the present case, the court applied the rule that "where there is strong evidence of [a defendant's] guilt, especially where there is strong forensic evidence, the proffered evidence about a third party's alleged guilt" may (or perhaps must) be excluded.
Similarly, in this scenario, the court applied the rule that "where there is substantial evidence of [a defendant's] guilt, especially where there is strong forensic evidence, the presented evidence about a third party's alleged guilt" may (or perhaps must) be excluded.