Those briefs proposed various doctrines under which the CRCA could validly abrogate sovereign immunity and variously re-asserted and supported the reasons why Congress examined and enacted CRCA, claiming that Congress was fair in finding that states had abused immunity and that an alternative remedy was needed.
The legal documents proposed various doctrines for waiving state sovereign immunity, supported by arguments about why Congress created the CRCA to address perceived abuses of immunity and the need for alternative remedies.