In the next case, that of Ibas's nephew, Daniel of Harran, it was declared that they had clearly seen his guilt at Tyre and had acquitted him only because of his voluntary resignation.
In the context of this passage, it is stated that Ibas's nephew, Daniel of Harran, was initially suspected of guilt in Tyre and was later acquitted by the court. This acquittal was based on his decision to resign voluntarily.