There were attempts to reconcile the two positions by historian Marjorie Anderson, allowing Carham some significance while accounting for the 'beneficence' of King Edgar. By contrast, G. W. S. Barrow rejected both views and thought saw the process as even earlier still.
Historian Marjorie Anderson sought to find common ground between the two positions, allowing Carham some influence while acknowledging King Edgar's kindness. Conversely, G. W. S. Barrow rejected both interpretations and posited an even earlier origin for the process.