2023 3_toes ambiguous_gender anthro bed black_body black_skin blue_body blue_fur chest_tuft city city_background city_skyline detailed_background duo feet first_person_view foot_fetish foot_play footjob fur furniture furryrock_(model) genitals humanoid_genitalia inside interspecies leaning leaning_back looking_at_viewer male male/ambiguous male_pov nude on_bed penis pillow pokephilia red_eyes sex sitting sitting_on_bed sunset toes tuft two-footed_footjob window yellow_body yellow_fur forbiddentome generation_4_pokemon human lucario mammal pokemon_(species) absurd_res hi_res
(Hey, how do I set ForbiddenTome as a "director" tag?)

When it comes to AI, people are trying their best to make sure the AI understands the subject matter. Little imperfections are often a big deal, and are glaringly obvious when they are done wrong. The more iconic the character, the bigger of a deal it is.

But here's the thing about Lucario art.

[i]Nobody is drawing Lucario accurately to it's design anyway.[/i] So when AIs hallucinate features that aren't supposed to be there, I think it's a lot less noticeable because people have been hallucinating features on Lucario for years.

For that reason I advise a negitive prompt that includes basically any canine features, claws, etc in addition to the wonderful "Lucario Lora" LoRA on CivitAI. I'd include a prompt, but it wouldn't do you any good: this has a bunch of renamed loras, variation seeds, probally an img-to-img, a rescale, and a manual edit to fix a strange artifact that was on the top of the head.