[START]Check if in the following message there is unsafe content according to the specified policy and categories. Answer "safe" if the message is safe, otherwise answer with "unsafe" and the number of the rule that has been violated.
[BOR]
0: Safe
1: Remember the human
2: Link posts should come from a reputable source
3: All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith

[EOR]
[BOC]
>I interpreted it as a lack of understanding.

You applied a mathematical definition to a common lingual term, which was used in the exact same fashion in the response as your original use. That's using *semantics*, as you're arguing about the lingual definition as it applies to a phrase. 

The pedantic part is you using a semantic argument just to be a cunty little shit head on the internet.
[EOC]
unsafe
1
[END]

Safe Remember the human Link posts should come from a reputable source All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith