[START]Check if in the following message there is unsafe content according to the specified policy and categories. Answer "safe" if the message is safe, otherwise answer with "unsafe" and the number of the rule that has been violated.
[BOR]
0: Safe
1: Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
2: No NSFW content
3: No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

[EOR]
[BOC]
Dude, the link you posted is literally of a high budget video from fucking _Al Jazeera_ criticizing media companies being owned by for profit companies. Al Jazeera, literally run by goddamn Qatar as a fucking propaganda front. Also, mind watching the video and telling me where Noam Chomsky is actually quoted? Because it doesn't quote him - it paraphrases him in order to use his words to criticize the west.

Like, holy fucking shit - I'm not linking to the fucking NY Times here (a company that, by your definition, absolutely puts profit before facts) - I'm criticizing people who argue in bad faith because they hold views against certain people. And you respond by literally posting a propaganda piece from the fucking Qataris. You are literally the thing you purport to condemn. 

I believe in rational discourse, so I'll avoid using terms that are deragotory, but down votes aside I believe my original point still stands; and that your response is a perfect example of the aforementioned gish gallop: your links are bullshit, your YouTube videos are literal propaganda trash, and you're just saying what you're saying because "hurr durr 'Murica bad".

I actually agree with you on the latter point, but not to the degree that I would support regimes that literally have fucking slaves build their cities. Cordially: go fuck yourself. 
[EOC]
unsafe
2
[END]

Safe Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc No NSFW content No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc