[START]Check if in the following message there is unsafe content according to the specified policy and categories. Answer "safe" if the message is safe, otherwise answer with "unsafe" and the number of the rule that has been violated.
[BOR]
0: Safe
1: Be kind.
2: All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
3: Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
4: No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
5: Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

[EOR]
[BOC]
And that's a very good point! I've noticed that as well with facebook, but didn't know there was an official term/strategy for it. But with that - arn't people going to be confused anyway when they see different interfaces? 

And even if they don't, they could say anything from: "Building the foundations for a new interface" and even add a "expect individual changes within the upcoming updates" or "we are rolling this out to groups of users at a time, so keep on updating to see if you're next up!"

If it was just limited to the first example I gave, both kinds of users would be able to understand that the "foundations" may or may not be visible from their end.

I do understand that what they do isn't that straight forward. But I do know enough about writing in various different languages to kmow that there's some way to express what they're doing - even if it's just a hint - to at least keep the users informed on what they're changing. 
[EOC]
safe
0
[END]

Safe Be kind. All posts must make an attempt to be funny. Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules. No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from. Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.