[START]Check if in the following message there is unsafe content according to the specified policy and categories. Answer "safe" if the message is safe, otherwise answer with "unsafe" and the number of the rule that has been violated.
[BOR]
0: Safe
1: Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
2: No NSFW content
3: No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

[EOR]
[BOC]
Well the linked article was a clip of a few paragraphs from it; and my comment was relative to those paragraphs.

If and when someone pops a thread out that specifically links to the entire transcript, then at that point in time I will consider the whole to be relevant. (Although the basis of it seems to be similarly ambiguous.)

As to the "sense of what they are talking about" -- again, they're pretty much just speculation all over the place, hitting on a whole bunch of reasons, some real, some imaginary.

It's sort of akin to doctor saying *"What causes disease/syndrome ABCDZ? Well the current consensus is that it's some combination of genetic and environmental factors."*  (BTW what that REALLY means when translated into the vernacular is: *"We don't have a fucking clue what causes it."*)

It's sort of a gee... wow, no shit Sherlock.  
[EOC]
safe
0
[END]

Safe Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc No NSFW content No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc