[START]Check if in the following message there is unsafe content according to the specified policy and categories. Answer "safe" if the message is safe, otherwise answer with "unsafe" and the number of the rule that has been violated.
[BOR]
0: Safe
1: Be civil and respectful
2: No NSFW content
3: No blatantly fake news or unfounded conspiracy theories
4: No heavily sensationalized articles

[EOR]
[BOC]
> Russian IP addresses dont mean shit either, IPs are easy to spoof.

You’re so full of 💩, part II. The IP addresses they pulled were comparing the domain of the site to other sites owned by the same guy, and sites share the same SSL certificates.

**Edit since you edited your post to add more 💩💩💩**: The article [references the report](https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=mfh_reports_) from Clemson University which explains the thing with Dougan and the IP addresses. 

I'm just gonna note that between your first and second edit, you started by making excuses for IP addresses even though you yourself didn't even read the article to understand the nature of the claim, so you excused it without knowing one way or the other. Then after you bothered to read it, you noted Dougan isn't in the article, he's merely in the report referenced by the article which shows why the article is grounded in evidence.
[EOC]
unsafe
2
[END]

Safe Be civil and respectful No NSFW content No blatantly fake news or unfounded conspiracy theories No heavily sensationalized articles