[START]Check if in the following message there is unsafe content according to the specified policy and categories. Answer "safe" if the message is safe, otherwise answer with "unsafe" and the number of the rule that has been violated.
[BOR]
0: Safe
1: Be respectful and inclusive.
2: No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
3: Engage in constructive discussions.
4: Share relevant content.
5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
6: Use appropriate language and tone.
7: Report violations.
8: Foster a continuous learning environment.

[EOR]
[BOC]
Of course I was defensive, they have no understanding of how remediation or rejuvenation works, and the only way to address that is to correct them, and someone who never wanted a discussion would only take it the wrong way.
 
If they had basic knowledge of the subject, they would see how the topic is relevant, since they can’t see the relevance, they clearly have only read this article and have no understanding of basic plant biology. 

Of course every discussion with any technical merit isn’t gonna go anywhere, I just didn’t notice it until it was too late. It happens and I was rather polite until OP took offense to me trying to figure out where they lacked understanding. Which was apparently basic plant biology instead of having any working knowledge.

It’s like someone saying they are skilled in X and then you ask them the most basic question and they have zero idea. So obviously they aren’t actually skilled. This is the case here it seems.
[EOC]
unsafe
3
[END]

Safe Be respectful and inclusive. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling. Engage in constructive discussions. Share relevant content. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions. Use appropriate language and tone. Report violations. Foster a continuous learning environment.