[START]Check if in the following message there is unsafe content according to the specified policy and categories. Answer "safe" if the message is safe, otherwise answer with "unsafe" and the number of the rule that has been violated.
[BOR]
0: Safe
1: Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive.
2: Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed.
3: Be civil, No violations of [TOS](https://mastodon.world/about).
4: No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments.
5: Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
6: No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban.

[EOR]
[BOC]
You're being intentionally obtuse and I can only believe you're just arguing in bad faith at this point.

Your original comment claimed that he never explicitly said anything about killing anyone. I pointed out that that's the only way to interpret what he said and now you want to say "well obviously what he _meant_ to say was this." You can take his word literally or interpret it as something else entirely, but you can't do both.

I am being honest about what he's saying. He's says we need to "eradicate the left." Not leftism, "the left," as in the subset of the population that subscribes to a left wing political philosophy. You can pretend he said or meant something different if you want, but that's an assumption you're choosing to make. I'll continue to go off of what was actually said.

Even if he did mean to say leftism, what does it matter? You can't eradicate an entire political philosophy that more than half of our country subscribes without violence. Even if you start sending democrats to reeducation camps or outlawing opposing viewpoints, someone will end up getting killed before you've eradicated people's first amendment right to have a political opinion that you don't agree with.

And let's be honest, what he meant or how we interpret it is beside the point. No matter what, he's actively exacerbating the problem of increasingly violent and divisive rhetoric on the right that has already led to and will continue to lead to political violence and domestic terrorism. No matter how you slice it this is explicit fascist rhetoric that's just another small piece of an increasingly dangerous threat to our democracy.

His words are indefensible and if anyone is being a dumbass child it's the person doing Olympic level mental gymnastics to pretend this isn't as much of a problem as it is.
[EOC]
unsafe
3
[END]

Safe Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Be civil, No violations of [TOS](https://mastodon.world/about). No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban.