[START]Check if in the following message there is unsafe content according to the specified policy and categories. Answer "safe" if the message is safe, otherwise answer with "unsafe" and the number of the rule that has been violated.
[BOR]
0: Safe
1: Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
2: No NSFW content
3: No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

[EOR]
[BOC]
So this article is thin on details and lacking any mention of historical or political context. The only cited sources it has are "witnesses" (unidentified). It's pretty clearly designed to give the reader a simple impression lacking in nuance or understanding. And in fact, it is a copy of propaganda articles being pushed by the Chinese Foreign Ministry as described in [this article by Radio Free Asia](https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/fact-check-01272023175615.html). And here is the [media bias rating for RFA](https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/radio-free-asia/).

This is a propaganda piece, and it's a poorly written one that doesn't even attempt to back up its claims with any other sources or explain the broader context of the conflict in Syria. The funny bit is, it's *stale* propaganda from 15 months ago, though it seems to have been updated with a new picture of a single truck on a road somewhere.

Edit: So this is the original source (provided by a commenter below): [US occupation continues plundering Syrian resources](https://www.sana.sy/en/?p=329527), 22 Apr 2024. And here is the same article: [US occupation continues plundering more Syrian resources](https://sana.sy/en/?p=296753) dated 14 Jan 2023. This is pretty transparent, right? Do you think they have different authors that copy each others' homework, or is it just one guy using different names?

Adding to the general comic value, there are lots of pictures of trucks on unidentified roads in unspecified locations, but in spite of all the finger-pointing at the "US occupation forces" there isn't a single US soldier or vehicle pictured anywhere.

This is extremely *lazy* propaganda.
[EOC]
unsafe
1
[END]

Safe Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc No NSFW content No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc