[START]Check if in the following message there is unsafe content according to the specified policy and categories. Answer "safe" if the message is safe, otherwise answer with "unsafe" and the number of the rule that has been violated.
[BOR]
0: Safe
1: Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
2: No NSFW content
3: No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

[EOR]
[BOC]
It's evolved over time.  In my state 20 years ago you checked ID if the person looked under 21.  Then they came out with check if they look under 25 about fifteen years ago.  Then it went up to 30.  I think it's at 35 now.

I can see how it evolved.  They made a law with fines and jail time for a clerk if they sell to someone underage.  Some clerk sold to someone underage and they tried to prosecute them.  Age is subjective.  The clerk states that the person looked over 21 to them so they get off (there's no way to prove the underage person looked over 21 to the clerk) and they up the age to 25.

Then the process repeats and this time the clerk says, "Well, they looked over 25 to me so I had no reason to ask for ID!"  Case gets thrown out and the new rule is if they look under 30.

Just keep repeating this process and eventually (and at least one state already did) the law will be that you need an ID regardless of how old you may look.

I guess what I am saying is give it 15-20 years and you'll probably be up to "Challenge 40" or higher.  Just give it some time.
[EOC]
safe
0
[END]

Safe Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc No NSFW content No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc