[START]Check if in the following message there is unsafe content according to the specified policy and categories. Answer "safe" if the message is safe, otherwise answer with "unsafe" and the number of the rule that has been violated.
[BOR]
0: Safe
1: Be civil
2: All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
3: No bots, spam or self-promotion.
4: Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
5: Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6: No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed.
7: No duplicate posts.
8: Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited.
9: No link shorteners.
10: Don't copy entire article in your post body

[EOR]
[BOC]
I'm not justifying, I'm giving helpful advice for anyone, like yourself, who struggles to grasp the realities of the world outside of your sheltered basement. It's pretty clear from this conversation that you have no real world experience at all, and I'd like you to be prepared for that eventual day when you do decide to go out there and see what's actually going on.

Saying 'They shot her because she was carrying a gun' isn't justifying it, it's explaining why they shot her. There is no judgement there about it being wrong or right, it's an explanation of cause and effect.

>
>
> That’s ridiculous. This entire time, you’ve been judging her actions.
>
>

Again no. I've been explaining the consequences of her actions. Let's try another example since you clearly have a bee in your bonnet over gun rights,

Person A mouths off at Person B who then punches Person A in the face.

You come in carrying on about freedom of speech and I point out 'Well the whole reason B punched A in the face is because they mouthed off'. This is not a justification, or a declaration that they were right for doing so. it's an explanation of what happened and why it happened. If you don't want to get punch in the face, don't mouth off. Pretty simple. Doesn't mean you deserve to get punch in the face, but mouth off certainly carries that risk.

She didn't deserve to get shot, but in 2024 carrying a gun towards the police is a great way to get shot. She certainly had a right to carry the gun, but rights and entitlement doesn't stop bullets.

It's very likely that if she'd not picked up the gun she wouldn't have been shot and she would have explained she forgot her keys and everyone would have gone on with their night. I'm perfectly within my rights to walk down the street at 3 am with a bag of cash waving it around and yelling at the top of my lungs how much cash I have and how it would be a shame if someone stole it. Do you think people would have a lot of sympathy for me if someone jumped me and stole the cash? How many people do you think would say 'what a dumbass' for doing that?

This brings us back to nuance. We can call out poor choices and warn people against repeating that behaviour while still thinking what happened to them is bad and unjust.
[EOC]
unsafe
1
[END]

Safe Be civil All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link. No bots, spam or self-promotion. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days. No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. No duplicate posts. Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. No link shorteners. Don't copy entire article in your post body