
[BOR]
0: Safe
1: Be civil and nice.
2: Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you *have* to.

[EOR]
[BOC]
> That guide also includes links to a number of external tools that directly break console and/or game encryption techniques.

We've been over this already. Homebrew tools are completely legal under section 107.

>>> Under the fair use doctrine in Section 107, modifying your own legally purchased console hardware and running homebrew software for personal, non-commercial use has been considered a lawful fair use in certain legal precedents, even if it requires circumventing the console's technological protection measures (TPMs) as its considered non-profit, educational or transformative use, as described in the fair use doctrine of Section 107.

> They distributed tools…. Which is what you just claimed they didn’t do, I appreciate you providing the source that shoots your own foot though.

No they didn't, they provided links to 3rd party homebrew tools which in themselves are ***again protected by section 107.***

This is entirely irrelevant to your claim that they provided encryption keys.

> The key they used was acquired illegally, 

Proof?

> they provided means for you to acquire your own illegally, 

No, they again provided a guide on how to homebrew your own console and dump your own key legally. ***Which yet again is covered by section 107.***

> they tested with illegal Roms,

Again, Proof?

> they profited from it,

No. They profited from beta releases of their *legal* emulation software, which is *legal*, there's many *legal* for profit emulators that exists and infact most of the precedence set for emulators are set by for-profit emulators, which ***yet again are protected under section 107.***

> etc you’re ignoring all of these in favor of what…? Exactly…? That it doesn’t somehow matter…? What…?

I'm not ignoring anything, you repeatedly ignored me when I asked you to provide proof, multiple times now.
[EOC]
