
[BOR]
0: Safe
1: Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive.
2: Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed.
3: Be civil, No violations of [TOS](https://mastodon.world/about).
4: No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments.
5: Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
6: No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban.

[EOR]
[BOC]
I actually went digging, and in fact, I found the complete opposite of what you state:



It seems, the more public feminists actually SUPPORT the idea that men CANNOT be raped or sexually assaulted by women.



Here is a well known public feminist defending women who 'rape' boys (her argument being, that the woman is innocent because men cannot be raped or sexually assaulted by women - even if they are minors - and that the boys who got raped should 'feel happy about scoring'):


http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/nov/29/barbara-ellen-madeleine-martin-comment



Here is a popular feminist blog actually supporting this idea that men cannot be raped (the irony being that the mantra of "give support to the victim" seems to go out the window if the victim is a guy):



http://feministcurrent.com/10107/why-are-we-supposed-to-believe-shia-labeouf/



As I keep digging, I keep seeing more and more public feminists actually supporting the idea that men cannot be raped.



So this actually shows evidence that the issue is not "rape culture", since feminists themselves (at least some of the more public ones) support the idea that men cannot be raped.
[EOC]
