
[BOR]
0: Safe
1: Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
2: No NSFW content
3: No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

[EOR]
[BOC]
> There are barely any facts in your word soup. 

I mentioned, for example, the location of the massacres: The side streets. And the people massacred weren't students. I said that the protest was dissolved by threat of violence, not violence. I didn't really get into the struggle inside the party of how to deal with the protest but I did mention the outcome.

Are those things correct, yes or no? Is it some "soylent koolaid BS I have been fed"? It may not please your tankie sensibilities but it's definitely not the "Army rolled over students" line that became a urban myth in the west. [This here sums up the press failure quite well](http://www.studien-von-zeitfragen.net/Zeitfragen/Tiananmen/tiananmen.html), but it would also be mistaken to call it a deliberate propaganda move -- those things just happen. It's carelessness, and China being the authoritarian state it is and constantly denying *anything* even remotely untowards happened that day in Peking isn't exactly helping correcting the record.

> Are you saying that you have full knowledge of Tiananmen incident, while having practically none?

Fuck no I'm not a historian. But, again: You actually have to tell me what I supposedly got wrong before I could remedy that issue. Are you here to talk to me and possibly educate, or to shout?
[EOC]
