
[BOR]
0: Safe
1: Follow the [lemmy.world rules.](https://mastodon.world/about)
2: Only tech related content.
3: Be [excellent to each another!](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rph_1DODXDU)
4: Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
5: Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
6: Politics threads may be removed.
7: No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
8: Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
9: Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

[EOR]
[BOC]
“Excellent safety record” is a relative term, and only one compared to cars. But we’re not comparing anything here to driving, I’m just pointing out that the small aircraft are relatively dangerous, and adding a whole lot more of them to the skies increases the danger even further, and that’s something that you’re continuing to ignore.

It’s an absurd argument to make, as you are, that any any number of these vehicles would be safe, yet you continue to make it. You’re completely departed from reality, as you continue to conflate all commercial aircraft with small aircraft, and to continue to insist that these tiny aircraft with no safety record behind them whatsoever Would be safe let alone to insist that they would not increase the danger inherently.

Just stop with this ridiculous nonsense. these are new, untested, experimental aircraft, and they have no safety record whatsoever. so any numbers that you may quote are meaningless.
[EOC]
