
[BOR]
0: Safe
1: Be civil
2: All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
3: No bots, spam or self-promotion.
4: Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
5: Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6: No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed.
7: No duplicate posts.
8: Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited.
9: No link shorteners.
10: Don't copy entire article in your post body

[EOR]
[BOC]
&gt; Marxism are just social constructs, 

Irrelevant.  Changing the topic.

&gt;&gt; They are measuring differences in electricity &amp; assuming that's a difference in the matter of the brain.

&gt; Actually, it's a matter of inductive reasoning rather than an assumption.

*That* is just another assumption.  You're just asserting something is true without any argument that it's true.

Aka, circular reasoning.  You want to believe it's true, therefore it's true.

&gt;  For example, PTSD sufferers have damage to the hypocampus when compared to a control group

Complete pseudo-science.  eg to quacks, if there's less electricity in an area of the brain it's *assumed* to be physical damage.

eg "there's less electricity there, therefore it's damaged."  That's not rational.

&gt;  I'm sure you think that physical damage is just a subjective opinion. 

No.  Actual science has physical units of measurement &amp; thus accuracy/repeatability.

And actual physical diseases have physical damage or physical loss of function that is physically measurable as I described.

Assuming a difference in electricity is brain damage != that.


[EOC]
