
[BOR]
0: Safe
1: Be civil
2: All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
3: No bots, spam or self-promotion.
4: Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
5: Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6: No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed.
7: No duplicate posts.
8: Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited.
9: No link shorteners.
10: Don't copy entire article in your post body

[EOR]
[BOC]

>Oh yeah? Well I'm *15 minorities* so until you prove otherwise, everything I say is *extra extra* valid /s. 

Also, you just made yourself sound more far-right yet again. You're just throwing around "white privilege" like a Fox News viewer with seemingly no understanding of what it means. 

Hahaha yea I forgot how much faux news tosses out white privilege on their channel lol. What an idiot.

>You may or may not be a minority, but you're correct that you're a dipshit. 

Says the guy who can't seem to understand his little ivory tower isn't the real world and he's afraid of stepping outside because he's fed into the media of "guns will just murder you for no reason".

>Good job you clown. Your own source says 31 people in **17 cases**. Your "a lot more than 12" is literally *5 more*. It's not even twice as many.

Yea all massive rings. People get popped for this shit a lot. It's a huge issue.

>You could have hidden behind your "they don't enforce enough" comment but nope, you wanted to push "straw purchases aren't a problem" no matter how humiliating. 

Where did I say straw purchases weren't a problem?

>Isn't it just *fascinating* how every time I reply to a pro-gun comment on Lemmy, they just happen to be black? 

O no, does it hurt your feelings that left leaning people who are minorities have guns? Does that scare you? Are you afraid of them? Is that why you want to remove their force equalizers with laws that directly effect minorities and toss them in jail?

>But don't worry, the "laws on the books today" are the work of the pro-gun groups you simp for. Have you already forgotten which of us is defending the current laws and which of us thinks they're dogshit and need replacing?

Where am I defending our current laws? Please show me. The laws we have need to be enforced, but needing more bullshit laws so you can feel safer which won't happen is a joke.

>Just a brief intermission in your "as a left wing black man" to slip in another right-wing authoritarian talking point. You know whenever there's a mass shooting or domestic murder we can just look up their criminal history right?

Never said I was black champ. And yes, go ahead go look up how most of our shootings are from the inner city with black on black crime...and you seem to just want to toss more laws at that group instead of finding out the root cause of it all and fixing it. You sound like Bloomberg stop and frisk.

PS, two of the most intelligent pro2a people in the gun groups are black. Colion Noir and Killer Mike. Since you seem to think only white rednecks own guns who are right wing authoritarians...unlike you who sounds like a left wing authoritarian...you should give them a listen. You might actually learn something.

>Yeah you already made it clear that you were fine with just "most" gun owners just making a token, voluntary check before selling a gun to a stranger. 

Lol the fuck do you think a UBC is going to do? Lol you think people won't stop selling privately? Do you really think you can create a registry now. 

>Oh look, the idiot who opposes the laws is explaining to me what the laws are again. You also used the word "emotional", meaning my "pro-gun talking point" bingo card is solid black in every square. Are you just reading them off a list? It would explain why you're delivering them so awkwardly. 

Please explain to the class how a UBC is enforced without a registry...the class is waiting.

>Well if the guy trying to justify all his guns says it's not true, that's a good enough source for me, as long as he pinkie promises. 

Says the guy who's source is made up shit because it scares him

>You should use that line if your child ever gets their hands on your poorly secured firearm and kills someone. Tell them that *you're* not responsible, the child is. You're completely blameless because you live in a world where "gross negligence" isn't a thing. 

Lol child, my firearms are in a safe lol fucking tool. 

>Same line you use on victims of school shootings.  

O noooo the emotional child steps into the light to call me a child killer. Put it back into the deck.

>Nope, I can swear without losing control of my emotions. It's alarming that a gun owner seems to think that's impossible. Do you really have so little self control?

Lol sure you can


>I know you're desperately trying to shame anyone progressive out supporting gun control but honestly its getting embarrassing to watch. You sound like you're seconds away from claiming "Gun control is the woke agenda they teach liberals in CRT class to make them trans". 

You're about as progressive as a rock. You're idea is to lock up people and give more power to the police state to oppress minorities.

>You haven't linked a single thing I've said to white privilege, you've just bleated the phrase over and over again. 

I don't need to, your talking points are white privilege. You only see what your tiny world view allows you to see. You're completely ok with arming more police and giving them more power, which will effect minorities even more than they do today.

>I'm sure all the families torn apart by gun violence can take comfort from knowing their loved ones were just a "statistical anomaly".

Car crashes, ODs, drownings, accidents of all kinds....all create heartache and sadness, but that's life. Shit happens to good people.

>At least, they will if they don't have any understanding of statistics and think that a clearly measurable phenomenon is an anomaly.

Considering you keep bringing up mass shootings which are not usually mass shootings the way people think they are and you're proposing a law/laws that will not change shit, based off emotions vs actual reality...yes it's an anomaly, get over it.
[EOC]
