
[BOR]
0: Safe
1: Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
2: No NSFW content
3: No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

[EOR]
[BOC]
&gt;But its progress has also had positive results for men. Not the least of which is men having a greater voice to speak about things like their emotions. (The association between emotion=female, female=bad is a little less distinct).

Feel free to show where this progress has been made. I've not seen it. The only place men **are** allowed to discuss their emotions is anonymously through the internet. If I were ever to show any kind of emotion among friends, feminist included, I would be ostracized.

Quoting your other because its annoying responding to two:

&gt;I can't think of any literature written for women that discussed male circumcision in the 20's... or 50's.... and who do you think would be most likely to make this decision, or to change it? The mother... so if mothers weren't talking about it then, (it was just academic men), then it wouldn't have changed.

So your argument is women of the 20's or 50's didn't care as much about their son's well being? You say the mother would be the one making that decision, which is wrong, it would have been the father. You seem to be under the impression women didn't talk before feminism. This is wrong, they did; they just weren't heard. Women have been being heard for a long time now, and have fixed several issues. If MGM were going to be solved by feminism, it would have happened a  while ago.
[EOC]

0: Safe