
[BOR]
0: Safe
1: Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive.
2: Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed.
3: Be civil, No violations of [TOS](https://mastodon.world/about).
4: No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments.
5: Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
6: No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban.

[EOR]
[BOC]
I haven't heard that theory before, unfortunately there is no evidence for the claim. 

>I believe that homo and heterosexuality is determined by birth, even if it’s not, I respect everyone’s sexuality/ preference as long as they don’t harm other people.

And with this logic we run into a problem. If everything goes with the restriction of "as long as it doesn't harm anyone", ought non-reproductive incest be tolerated? What about pedophilia in cases where the child is over the age of consent (which is quite low in some countries)? What about bestiality with large enough animals so no damage is done?

Your logic dictates that all of these behaviours should not only be tolerated, but respected.
[EOC]

3: Be civil, No violations of [TOS](https://mastodon.world/about).