
[BOR]
0: Safe
1: Open-ended question
2: Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
3: Not regarding using or support for Lemmy
4: Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
5: [An actual topic of discussion]

[EOR]
[BOC]
If you weren't so utterly braindead, you'd understand that if the cost to bring tourists up to space drops, that drops the cost to bring more scientists and equipment up to space as well which would lead to a massive growth in discoveries.  

Except that you are so caught up in your tiny little world of hate, that you can't possibly expand it enough to understand that things cost money, and thus reducing what things cost, makes it that much better for institutions like NASA.  One of the single biggest concerns of setting up a new space telescope or sending a rocket to a comet or a trip to Mars is money.  It isn't the only concern, but it is a massive one.  Driving down those costs by increasing a launch schedule, trying out reusable rockets and investing a bunch to allow space tourism, helps everything space-related.

You're not smart enough to come back here and admit how wrong you were.
[EOC]

2: Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.