text:  How can the dogmatic consecration of a like disposition amongst all individuals constitute the definitive perfection of the social order in regard too to ideas whose finity it is so peculiarly important and so difficult to establish? Is it not evident on the contrary that such a disposition is from its nature radically anarchical inasmuch as if it could be indefinitely prolonged it must hinder every true mental organization? "No association whatever though destined for a special and temporary purpose and though limited to a small number of individuals can subsist without a certain degree of reciprocal confidence both intellectual and moral between its members each one of whom finds a continual necessity for a crowd of notions to the formation of which he must remain a stranger and which he cannot admit but on the faith of others