text: " We only ask if when looking at the picture in the camera he did not still recognize nature--and then if it was beautiful we might ask him if it was not _true_; and then when he asserts our highest light being white paper and that not white enough for the light of nature--we would ask if in the camera he did not see the picture on white paper--and if the whiteness of paper be not the exact whiteness of nature or white as ordinary nature? But there is a quality in the light of nature that mere whiteness will not give and which in fact is scarcely ever seen in nature merely in what is quite white; we mean brilliancy--that glaze as it were between the object and the eye which makes it not so much light as bright