text:  We have no Quack to patronize them; the "_numen aquae_" is not violated in _print_ at least by jobbing apothecaries; but there is Gentile di Foligno and Ugolino di Monte Catino and Savonarola and Bandinelli (1483 ) and Fallopio (1569 ) and Ducini (1711 ) who have written books of which the object as they are in Latin is not assuredly what there is too much reason to believe it _is_ when such books are now presented to the world