text:  Lord Cottenham appears to rely greatly on this supposed case; but is it not perfectly clear that it is not a case of error _on the record_--and therefore totally inapplicable to the case which he had to consider? The defendant would have certainly sustained an injury in that case; Where is the remedy? There is _no legal_ remedy any more than there is when a man has been wrongfully _acquitted_ of a manifestly well-proved crime or unjustly convicted of a felony