text:  If on the other hand he intends that they _are_ equally spontaneous in their character equally native to the mind then we repeat what becomes of the elaborate and "indispensable" part ascribed to the _metaphysic_ of effectuating a transition between them? And how can we describe that as a scientific _law_ in which there is confessedly no immediate relation of cause and effect or sequency established? The statement if true manifestly requires to be resolved into the law or laws capable of explaining it