text: " Where is Lord Campbell's authority for declaring this judgment "_clearly_ erroneous in awarding punishment for charges which are _not offences in point of law_?" Or Lord Cottenham's for saying that "the record states that the judgment was _upon all the counts bad as well as good_?" They have none whatever; their assertions appear to us with all due deference and respect purely arbitrary and gratuitous fallacies; they do violence to legal language--to the language of the record and foist upon it a ridiculous and false interpretation