text:  to the _adoption_ of the new rule at the trial and then to the _operation_ of the new rule before the court of error which must then hold that a single bad or a dozen bad counts will _not_ vitiate a general judgment if sustained by one good count! Does not all this suffice to show the desperate shifts to which even two such distinguished judges are driven in order to support the new rule and conceal its impracticability? Then why should the old lamp be exchanged for the new? We entertain we repeat very grave apprehension that the House of Lords has treated far too cavalierly the authority of the great Lord Mansfield than whom a more enlightened learned and cautious a judge probably never administered justice among mankind